Improving NGO Internal Governance and Public Accountability: Sharing Experience and cases on NGO self Regulation A paper presented at the CIVICUS Webinar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Rights Toolkit Comprehensive Toolkit To Address Children's Rights In Development & Humanitarian Cooperation And Government Programming.
Advertisements

International Aid Transparency Initiative Some Code of Conducts TAG meeting Brussels, 3 June 2009.
CSO/NGO Consultations Report to IATI Signatories, Partner Countries and Steering Committee Paris, 4 July 2011.
Ministry of Labor and Social Policy SOCIAL POLICY COUNCILS Dragica Vlaović-VasiljevićSophia, 2-6th July 2007 Dragica Vlaović-VasiljevićSophia, 2-6th July.
What are key underlying principles and accepted strategic approaches for addressing monitoring discrimination? Partnership Participation Child rights approach.
Financing of OAS Activities Sources of cooperation Cooperation modalities Cooperation actors Specific Funds management models and resources mobilization.
Introduction to the Global Programme Concept Susan Wingfield Consultant to SBC 13 th January, Dhaka.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of Developed by the evaluation unit of
What is CSR? Why CSR? What are Companies and Governments Roles?
Monitoring and Evaluation in the CSO Sector in Ghana
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN THE SIERRA LEONE CIVIL SERVICE PRESENTER: DAVID WS BANYA DIRECTOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – HRMO.
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodia’s development challenges Host of the 2nd Global Assembly for CSO Development.
Commonwealth Local Government Forum Freeport, Bahamas, May 13, 2009 Tim Kehoe Local Government and Aid Effectiveness.
By: Janet Mawiyoo – Chief Executive Officer Promoting Transparency in CSOs in Kenya.
CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.
Harriet Namisi Programme Coordinator: Policy Analysis - Governance The Development Network of Indigenous Voluntary Associations, (DENIVA) Introduction.
GACC, UNCAC PROJECT & UNCAC REVIEW PROCESS IN GHANA Engagement of civil society in the fight against corruption 28 TH AUGUST 2013.
© CSR Asia 2010 ISO Richard Welford CSR Asia
Participatory Governance Assessment for REDD+: The pilot process in Nigeria Oslo Governance Forum 3-5 October, 2011 By Salisu Dahiru National Coordinator.
Summary Report of CSO Meeting GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop (ECW), Southern Africa 15 th July 2013 Livingstone, Zambia (
PRESENTATION TO THE MOLE CONFERENCE, CHANCES HOTEL, 15 JULY 2009 YIGA BAKER M ANEW REGIONAL COORDINATOR EASTERN AFRICA.
Bond.org.uk The Bond Effectiveness Programme: developing a sector wide framework for assessing and demonstrating effectiveness July 2011.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
Developing Capacity on Water Integrity WATER INTEGRITY NETWORK Delft 31st May 2013 Francoise Nicole Ndoume Regional Coordinator Water Integrity Network,
An Accord Between the Government of Canada and the Voluntary Sector Training Deck provided by: The Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Affairs Division Social.
LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND ETHICS (THE UGANDA EXPERIENCE) PAPER PRESENTED AT TRAINING WORKSHOP HELD AT DOCKLANDS HOTEL.
ISO Richard Welford CSR Asia © CSR Asia 2011.
Corporate Social Responsibility- do we need a Statutory Instrument? Presented to the Zambia Alternative Mining Indaba conference- July 17, 2013 Sombo Chunda,
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
MeTA Jordan Executive Summary Baseline data is an important source for policy makers to diagnose the pharmaceutical and health sector situation in order.
Introduction A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE WCD FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS & APPLICATION Alex Muhweezi & Chihenyo Mvoyi IUCN Uganda Country Office.
What do they do and how do they do it?. Presentation  History, structure and governance  Main areas of work  Achievements  Challenges  Lessons learnt.
The WIPO Development Agenda: An Overview Geneva May, 2009 Esteban Burrone World Intellectual Property Organization.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
Ensuring the credibility and effectiveness of CSO self- regulation: the Cameroon CSOs Code of Ethics. By :Eric Ngang North West Association of Development.
UN GLOBAL COMPACT for NGOs
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Time to act on the Future of Europe …
Contact Monitoring Regional Network (CMKN). Why procurement It is estimated that an effective public procurement system could save as much as 25% of government.
Group 02. Group Members Chair: Manu Gupta Time keeper: Ryo Hamaguchi Reporters: Chamindha Sunita Reddy; Ananda Mallawatantri; Patra Rina Dewi; Suman Nag,
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW Meeting, April – May 2013.
“Financial reporting plays a critical role in establishing and maintaining the confidence of the investing public. The objective of financial reporting.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 September Human Resource Development Council for South Africa (HRDCSA)
Page 1 Committee presentation An overview of the external audit process and types of audits 12 May 2010.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
INTEGRATING INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE (IK) INTO UGANDA’S POVERTY ERADICATION ACTION PLAN (PEAP) By Joyce N. Muwanga Assistant Executive Secretary Uganda National.
 Introduction  Local AIDS Governance Barometer (LAGB) Model  LAGB Purpose  LAGB Application – Kabwe district, Zambia  LAGB’s Contribution to the.
Aid Transparency: Better Data, Better Aid Simon Parrish, Development Initiatives & IATI Yerevan, 4 October 2009.
Background Nature and function Rationale Opportunities for TB control Partnering process.
CCC’s Bi-Monthly Member Meeting GHP Operational Plan 2016 By: Soeung Saroeun, ED EL Sotheary, HOP 08 December 2015, KSSA, Phnom Penh Vision: Sustainable.
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodia’s development challenges Host of the 2nd Global Assembly for CSO Development.
CSR and the ASEAN Community Jerry Bernas Program Director ASEAN CSR Network.
Observatories for the Health Workforce in Africa VIII REGIONAL MEETING OF THE OBSERVATORIES OF HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH IN THE AMERICAS LIMA, PERU
Managing the National Communications Process UNFCCC Workshop on Exchange of Experiences and Good Practices among NAI Countries in Preparing NCs September.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
1 CIVIL SOCIETY AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN VIETNAM: BRIDGING THE GAP Hanoi, March 2013.
1 Introducing the ARC: The New Performance Appraisal Tool for RCs and UNCTs March 2016.
FORMULATING EXTENSION POLICY, KENYA’S EXPERIENCE BY MARY KAMAU DIRECTOR, EXTENSION & TRAINING MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE KENYA DURING THE EXTENSION WORKSHOP,
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
The New Performance Appraisal Tool for RCs and UNCTs
Second SDG Partnerships Webinar:
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
VIWANGO CERTIFICATION MECHANISM
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
THE independent evaluation office of Undp Independence, credibility and use IPDET, 30 June 2014 Indran A. Naidoo Director.
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Presentation transcript:

Improving NGO Internal Governance and Public Accountability: Sharing Experience and cases on NGO self Regulation A paper presented at the CIVICUS Webinar interaction on; Legitimacy, Transparency and Accountability issues for civil society organizations By Bonnie Kiconco K. Mutungi National QuAM Coordinator 15 th July, 2010

Outline of the presentation Introduction The Rational for the QuAM initiative Over view of the QuAM process Governance structure and Features Certification levels and process QuAM Strategic Focus Achievements Anticipated Benefits Implementation challenges Conclusion

INTRODUCTION: What is QuAM The NGO Quality Assurance Certification Mechanism (QuAM) is a voluntary internal self assessment and regulation mechanism initiated to strengthen the internal governance of NGOs by supporting them to enhance their capacity to uphold accepted standards and ethical conduct. The QuAM development process was done under the patronage of the Uganda National NGO Forum (UNNGOF) and the Development Network of Indigenous Voluntary Associations (DENIVA). The two organizations and the promoters of the initiative.

Rationale for the QuAM Initiative The rationale behind the initiative was that the NGO sub-sector itself should be actively engaged in promoting particular set of values and norms as part of maintaining a public reputation for professionalism and high ethical standard. To set out principles and definite standards of behaviour for responsible practices with an aim of protecting the credibility and integrity of civil society organisations in Uganda

Rational … CSOs to subject themselves to the same level of scrutiny as they demand of others (CSOs in Uganda have enjoyed special status and influence within development processes by highlighting the failures of Government and other institutions). To regulate the conduct of NGOs. There is consensus among CSOs themselves and other stakeholders including development partners, that there is need for a Civil Society Voluntary Certification Mechanism that would apply to a broader constituency within civil society. To enhance CSO’s legitimacy by demonstrating their accountability, their openness to public scrutiny and their adherence to acceptable ethical standards of behaviour

Overview of the QuAM Process The QuAM initiative was developed through a highly participatory process that took over 18 months. The initiative came at an opportune time to salvage individual organizations’ codes of conduct most of which are just kept on shelves and not performing their intended purpose. The process also entailed public input through the media.

Process The QuAM development process was done under the patronage of the Uganda National NGO Forum (UNNGOF) and the Development Network of Indigenous Voluntary Associations (DENIVA) and the initial phase was concluded in After over 3 formative years of the QuAM as a collective process, important gains have been made and lessons learnt. Key among lesions learnt is the nature and status of NGOs in Uganda.

QuAM Governance Structure The QuAM organization structure is as follows; –The National QuAM Assembly, –National QuAM Council, –District Quality Assurance Certification Committee, –Public or Beneficiary

QuAM Features The QuAM goes beyond any single existent code of conduct; it is based on clearly defined standards and sets out implementation modalities, including sanctions in the case of breach. Obtaining a QuAM certificates is not a legal requirement, but once issued, the provisions of a certificate are binding on the certified NGO. QuAM has three certification levels and an NGO qualifies for one basing on its compliance with the 59 standards as indicated below:

QuAM Certificate Levels There are three different levels of a quality assurance certificate issued: –Provisional –applies to NGOs that are of recent creation, meet selected minimum quality standards (18 in total). They apply for full certification after one year. –Full Certificate –issued when all minimum quality standards have been met (they are 32 in total, including the 18 above) –Advanced Certificate –issued to an NGO that meets all minimum standards above as well as standards for improvement (27 in total).

Levels of Development Attaining any of the above certificates depends on the level of development the organization has achieved. There are 59 standards that are used to assess an organization that applies to be certified and these are classified as below: development as classified below: –(A): The NGO as an Organization; –(B): NGO Programs and Activities; –(C): Further improving our performance

Certification Process The certification process and overall implementation of the QuAM is vetted and verified by two important external organs, and at times the third organ may be involved. The organs are: –National QuAM Council: independent of any single NGO comprising of 7 persons from representatives of NGO networks (apex, thematic and district) and two independent persons with extensive knowledge of civil society. The Council issues Quality Assurance Certificates and also acts as the keeper of the QuAM: monitors its implementation, keeps records, sensitizes and trains district committees. –District Quality Assurance Certification Committee: Is composed of 5 voluntary members, at least one third of whom are female. –Public or Beneficiary: vetting may be done with the help of the prescribed beneficiaries which the NGO in operates. At times the vetting mechanisms may require every NGO to subject itself to public scrutiny to get feedback on its work from the community or stakeholders that have a stake in the organization

Strategic Focus Outreach and Publicity of QuAM to all NGOs and their constituencies in the country Encouraging and supporting NGOs to under take the Certification NGO Capacity Development (this will evolve as generic QuAM Gaps are identified through Monitoring and Evaluation– it should be conceptualized as a mentoring process where more advanced NGOs can help the others) Networking, Learning and Synergy Building (national QuAM platform for learning and experience sharing

Foreseen QuAM Benefits The QuAM is a progressive, non–threatening instrument to internal self-governance, designed to enable NGOs at different levels of development to grow overtime QuAM ensures genuine appreciation of principles and practices, as opposed to enforced conditioning which leads to organizations ‘artificially’ claiming governance standards without believing in them Having NGOs that are publicly accountable and are able to show the impact of their work to the community/ constituency they represent.

Benefits Benefits for NGOs include: –Enhanced credibility, legitimacy, accountability, protection/autonomy –Contributes to better cohesion amongst NGOs –Helps to constantly improve performance and NGOs learn from examples; and –Raises profile

Achievements so far made Launch by Minister of State for Internal Affairs at the 2nd Uganda Social Forum in September 2006 Recognition of the QuAM by NGOs, development partners and government – the QuAM is recognized in the NGO Regulations of 2009 and the draft NGO Policy QuAM infrastructure in place; –A fully established and functioning National Council –Fully functioning secretariat, –QuAM Committees in 19 districts, Recognition of the QuAM by NGOs, development partners and government – the QuAM is recognized in the NGO Regulations of 2009 and the draft NGO Policy

Achievements Sensitizing and marketing to NGOs – both during the process of formulation and after its launch, Some NGOs have already gone through the process and testified to the importance of Self Regulation, and they can give testimony on how going through the process has helped streamline their operations and these include; –UNNGOF, –Plan Uganda, –Kalanga District NGO Forum, –DENIVA, and –Anti-Corruption Coalition Uganda (ACCU

Outstanding Challenges Limited outreach especially at sub national level, Different interpretation by other stakeholders who look at QuAM as a compulsory instrument, rather than voluntary which would undermine a cardinal principle of the initiative, Lack of clarity on ownership; some NGOs think that QuAM belongs to particular organizations and they have no business with it.

Conclusion In a country facing a moral crisis in the public and private sector, the QuAM aims to make a contribution to inculcating moral impulses that will percolate through the entire society. The QuAM is one of the most important developments in the NGO sector that has got support from a cross section of NGOs; local, national, International, and other partner sectors We therefore call upon all actors to respect the values and principles that QuAM espouses and support its implementation. We would encourage all NGOs in the country to adopt/assimilate to the QuAM Agenda as an instrument composed of standards aimed at enhancing Accountability as well as credibility in the sector.