Internationalizing Higher Education: Rhetoric and Reality Madeleine F. Green York University March 3, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slides have references to related pages in the Guide
Advertisements

Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
Globalizing Learning: Implications for Curriculum Design and University Governance Ka Ho Mok Associate Vice President & Dean The Hong Kong Institute of.
TIS International Conference - Internationalisation of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education: Exploring New Frontiers - 16/17 June 2011 Assessing.
Comprehensive Internationalization: A U.S. Perspective
What is the Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP)? 2012 Institute on Integrative Learning and the Departments July 12, 2012 Carol Geary Schneider.
David J. Sammons, Dean UF International Center. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools: SACS is our regional accrediting authority. The last SACS.
Internationalization of the Undergraduate Curriculum.
SERVICE-LEARNING: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES BY FRANCIS YEE AND FRANCIS ADU-FEBIRI.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Education For Social Work
Measuring Comprehensive Internationalization in U.S.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Learning without Borders: Internationalizing the Gator Nation M. David Miller Director, Quality Enhancement Plan Timothy S. Brophy Director, Institutional.
Enhancing Academic Practice Nigeria Role of Newcastle University.
Internationalizing the University: Exploring Academic Development Needs and Means in a Context of Shifting Cultural Identities Dr Yvonne Turner June 2011.
CANADA’S ENGAGED UNIVERSITY: STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS FOR YORK UNIVERSITY PATRICK MONAHAN, VICE-PRESIDENT ACADEMIC & PROVOST ACADEMIC PLANNING FORUMS.
Quality Enhancement Plan: Year Four Implementation.
Exploring the 21st Century Imperative I of Intercultural Competence
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
SEM Planning Model.
In Pursuit of Global Competence: Effective Practices for Student Learning Outcomes in Community College Study Abroad Programs.
Assessment Plans Discussion CLAS Unit Heads Maria Cimitile, Associate Dean, CLAS Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer January 11, 2006.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Advancing Campus Internationalization Through an Integrated Approach: The Role of Languages and Cultures Across the Curriculum Regional Meeting of the.
MAPPING INTERNATIONALIZATION at U.S. Colleges and Universities Dr. Madeleine Green Vice President for International Initiatives, ACE.
Sustainability Education and Student Learning at the University of British Columbia Kshamta Hunter Teaching and Learning Office UBC Sustainability Initiative.
Jennifer Robertson, SAGE Director Suzette Dohany, Professor of Communication.
Revised Requirement Course Proposal.  Change the Requirements for the Bachelor’s Degree from A to B. Successfully complete the General Education Requirements.
WAGGGS Policy & Guidelines: Adult Training, Learning and Development
CULTURERESOURCECENTRE Internationalisation of Sydney Institute cultureresourcecentre.com.au – 14 May 2010 LEADERSHIP FORUM INTERNATIONALISATION OF SYDNEY.
Exchange A7: Linking activity in Europe – UNEP mapping and building sustainability across universities and colleges in Europe Wayne Talbot, WTA Education.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
INTERNATIONALIZING NORTH ISLAND COLLEGE. INTERNATIONALIZATION What is it? Why internationalize? What is NIC doing?
WELCOME!. Foreign Language as a tool of internalization of Higher Education.
CUPA-HR’s Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Strategy: A Call to Action SNECUPA-HR Fall 2011 Professional Development Program December 9, 2011.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
Building Collaborative Initiatives that Enhance Student Learning Nancy Mitchell and Linda Major.
Fostering Global Citizenship in Higher Education Assessment and Evaluation.
Evidence of Success: Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in International Education Dr. Darla K. Deardorff Association of International Education.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
Figure 8.1 Opportunities and Outcomes of International Strategy
Curriculum Design. A Learner Centered Approach May, 2007 By. Rhys Andrews.
CBR 101 An Introduction to Community Based Research.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
1 Enterprise and Global Management of Information Technology.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Transnational Consortia: Responding to the Challenge of Global Higher Education.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
1 PENN STATE HARRISBURG CAPITAL COLLEGE Curricular Cooperation at Penn State: Major Themes and Goals
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
International Leadership Team Susan Mackey-Kallis, Chair Town Hall Meeting April 26, 2013.
Appalachian State University Strategic Planning November 2, 2012 A look at the Higher Education landscape.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Amaretpitak Rm., CL, Suvarnabhumi Campus Topic:Topic: Boosting “Internationalization” in Student Affairs June 8, 2015.
INTERNATIONALIZING TEACHING & LEARNING. Intercultural, international, and global flows of technology, economy, knowledge, people, values and ideas Individual.
Inclusive Excellence: Embracing and Assessing a Diverse Student Body 130 th NEASC Annual Meeting Boston December 9, 2015.
What does Internationalization mean for Western? Faculty workshop 1 (27 and 28 October 2014)
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Cultivating Integrative Teaching and Learning at Fairfield University Dr. Kathryn Nantz Acting Director, Center for Academic Excellence Director of Core.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
HR Strategies & its impact on Business Strategy.
1 GOAL: Provide students with a quality educational experience that enables them to complete their educational goals in a timely fashion. Review and restructure.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Types of Community Engagement Forms among Participating Institutions
Globally Engaged Institutions: Lists of Initiatives or Institutional DNA? Patti McGill Peterson Senior Fellow, Center for Internationalization and Global.
ACE INTERNATIONALIZATION LAB
BCCIE Summer Conference
Presentation transcript:

Internationalizing Higher Education: Rhetoric and Reality Madeleine F. Green York University March 3, 2006

Topics for Today Watch your language: terms and definitions The gap between dreams, aspirations, attitudes, and institutional practice Making internationalization a reality

Terms and Definitions

Globalization Flow of goods, ideas Diminishing importance of boundaries of time and space Diminishing importance of nation-state Connections, interdependence Often not a neutral term

Definitions: Flows “…the closer integration of the countries and people of the world, which has been brought about by the enormous reduction in the costs of transportation and communication, and the breakdown of artificial barriers to the flows of goods, services, capital, knowledge, and (to a lesser extent) people across borders.” (Steiglitz, 2003)

Definitions: Interdependence “...bringing all of humanity into a single ecosystem of embedded, overlapping networks. Borders, boundaries, delineations, and walls of any kind are slowly giving way to the compelling force of integration and interdependence.” (Garrison, 2004)

Definitions: Neo-liberalism “We use the term globalization to represent neo-liberal economic ideology and its material strategies that aim to increase profits and power for transnational corporations, and similar strategies enabling government agencies to gain economic advantages and be competitive.” (Currie et al, 2003)

Internationalization “The process of integrating an international, intercultural, or global dimension into the purpose, function, or delivery of postsecondary education.” (Knight 2003)

Internationalization “...the complex of processes whose combined effect, whether planned or not, is to enhance the international dimension of the experience of higher education in universities and similar educational institutions.” (OECD)

Internationalization Is an ongoing process Is intentional (if it is to have a lasting effect) Affects the way we construct knowledge Is systemic

International Education Usually an aggregation of programs, activities: › International students › Study abroad › Courses › Co-curriculum › International cooperation

Multicultural/Intercultural In the U.S. context, multicultural is generally used to refer to domestic ethnic and racial diversity Intercultural generally refers to the encounter between people of different nation-states or diaspora cultures Overlap between two terms

Issues Is learning about/encountering another culture “at home” the same as doing so in a different linguistic and cultural context? Points of synergy and tension between internationalization and multiculturalism

Aspirations and Ambitions

ACE Research Public opinion surveys, studentPOLL data on high school students, 2000 Status Report, 2000 Mapping Internationalization, 2003 Student attitudes and experiences in “high activity” institutions

Student Interest in International Education

International Experience of High School Seniors

Students Planning to Participate in International Courses and Programs

Faculty Attitudes 67% agreed that it is the responsibility of ALL faculty to provide undergraduates with an awareness of other countries and cultures 64% agreed that most undergraduate students graduate with this awareness

Public Support for International Education

ACE 2001 Survey: Dimensions of Internationalization Articulated commitment Academic requirements Organizational structure Funding Communication structure Faculty opportunities Student opportunities

Institutional Commitment to International Education

International Course Requirements 41% of institutions have an international course requirement Of those with a requirement, over 60% require one course, 21% require two courses, and 19% require three or more courses Of those with a requirement, 62% require students to take a course that primarily features perspectives, issues, or events from non- western countries or areas

Supporting Structures 23% have no office 49% have no full-time non-student support staff where there is one office 55% have no full-time non-student support staff where there are multiple offices

External Funding for International Education

Developing an Internationalization Strategy

Multiple Rationales for Internationalization Academic excellence Job preparation Global citizenship Competition and positioning Institutional revenue

Two Complementary Strategies Institutional goals and strategies (inputs) Student learning goals and outcomes (outputs/outcomes)

Elements of Internationalization (inputs) Campus culture Academic opportunities Co-curriculum International partnerships Funding Supporting structures and policies International Students Synergy among the elements

Internationalization is marginal International programs, activities are fragmented Emphasis on inputs not outcomes Faculty interest and capacity Reward system Study abroad is a major strategy, but not the only one Lack of institutional strategy Challenges

Using a Student Learning Outcomes Approach

Why Articulate Student Learning Goals? Presents an opportunity for a shift away from an ad hoc approach to internationalization Offers a “guiding star” approach to align curriculum with desired outcomes Can help others to understand impact Good educational practice -- outcomes/assessment offers a road map for improvement Quality control -- accrediting agencies mandate

The Fundamental Questions about Student Learning What do we want our students to know? To be able to do? What attitudes are we trying to foster? Where would students at our institutions actually acquire these knowledge, skills, attitudes? (mapping exercise)

Fundamental Questions (cont’d) What is our evidence that students are achieving these outcomes? (assessment)

Challenges of Developing and Assessing Outcomes Difficulty of agreeing on outcomes Coordinating levels: institution, college, department We still don’t have a culture of assessment in higher education Assessment is too infrequently looped back into improvement

Challenges (continued) Faculty workload issues How to integrate—use “regular” student work as artifacts for assessment

But There are Rewards… Closing the gap between rhetoric and reality Quality improvement Students can articulate their learning for themselves and others

Reviewing Internationalization Strategies and Activities

Getting There Catalog the state of campus internationalization Clarify goals (institutional and student learning goals) Identify challenges/obstacles Develop or revise internationalization plan Assign responsibility and monitor progress

The Process Develop a leadership team › Size › Legitimacy › Leadership Set a schedule Plan communications and involvement

Elements of the Review Articulated commitment Academic offerings and requirements Student opportunities Faculty opportunities Funding Communication structure Supporting structures and policies Campus culture

Framing a New Conversation on Internationalization Create multiple campus conversations Create conversations in the disciplines Benefit from outsiders and their ideas Use cross-departmental work-groups Create supporting structures

What is the Outcome? Map what is going on Identify gaps Identify possibilities for synergy Develop a plan based on solid information The process is also the product—create a campus conversation

Conclusion Comprehensiveness Integration Intentionality Leadership