Lorilee Sandmann & Amy Driscoll Oct. 1, 2012. “Community Engagement describes the collaboration between higher education institutions and their larger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
Advertisements

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate The scholarship of discovery The scholarship.
Strategic Planning Summary of Events Open Space Technology (OST) Retreat– Oct Review of Inputs from OST by Strategic Planning Operations Committee.
1 Role of Provosts in promoting Civic & Community Engagement Academic Council 30 November 2006 Season Eckardt Administrative Director, CSU Office of Community.
August 2013 School of Medicine Strategic Planning Community Engagement Committee.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
The Carnegie Classification for Institutions Engaged with Community: Challenges, Benefits, and Understandings from the Documentation Process Amy Driscoll,
AMERICAN DEMOCRACY PROJECT / THE DEMOCRACY COMMITMENT NATIONAL MEETING JUNE 8, 2012 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS A Crucible Moment: Higher Education and Democratic.
Meet the Carnegie Classification for Community Engagement June 13, 2008.
Community Engagement at WCU Carnegie Foundation Classification Monday, June 23, 2008.
Science Foundation Arizona Arizona STEM Network October, 2011.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
Office of Academic Affairs June 1, 2007 Academic Priorities: Next Steps Spring Symposium 2007.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
1 Engaged Campus – Institutional Level and Department Level presented to Engaged Department Summit CSU Chico – May 5, 2006 Season Eckardt, Administrative.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Community Engagement: A Continuum from Outreach to Engagement
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Stewards of Place II REPORT ADP June Institutional Stewards of Place “From their earliest days, state colleges and universities have diligently.
Stages of Commitment to Change: Leading Institutional Engagement Lorilee R. Sandmann, University of Georgia Jeri Childers, Virginia Tech National Outreach.
MOVING TOWARDS COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Dr. Jean Cate, Quyen Arana & Dewey Hulsey.
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
“PLANNING” CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Elizabeth Noel, PhD Associate Vice President, Research Office of Research and Development.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
FLIBS June 2015 Biology Category 1
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
Office of Academic Affairs January 12, 2007 Confirming Portland State’s Leadership Position and Defining Academic Priorities Campus Symposium 2007.
 Traditional View of Excellence Research funding- whatever the topic Number of Doctoral Degree Programs Selectivity Invention/discoveries Size International.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Friday: Lunch Topics… Exploring your campus climate Creating a supportive environment for your plan Building momentum for your plan.
Strengthening Communities Awarded to support the development and implementation of collaborate and innovative community projects that address economic.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
Framework for Enhancing Student Learning School District 63 (Saanich)
Documentation and Assessment of Scholarship in Extension and Engagement: A National Perspective Amy Driscoll Associate Senior Scholar Carnegie Foundation.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Service-Learning: A pedagogy and scholarship of civic engagement Marie Watkins, Ph. D. Faculty Assembly August 24, 2011.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Designing and Assessing Civic Engagement Activities for 300 Level Learning Communities Maggie Commins November 28th, 2016.
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Joseph B. Berger University of Massachusetts Boston
UW’s Engagement Task Force Board of Trustees Meeting November 2018
Building a Great Campus Civic Action Plan
Carnegie Community Engagement Classification
Carnegie Engaged Campus Initiative
Building a Great Campus Civic Action Plan
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Enhancing the University Engagement Ecosystem
Presentation transcript:

Lorilee Sandmann & Amy Driscoll Oct. 1, 2012

“Community Engagement describes the collaboration between higher education institutions and their larger communities (local, regional/state, national, global) for the mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge and resources in a context of partnership and reciprocity.”

 Acknowledge and celebrate the good work of many campuses  Respect the diversity of approaches  Utilize existing assessments and data  Encourage an inquiry process  Provide useful data for other purposes  Promote improvement and best practices in engagement

 Mainly descriptive  Self-reported data/information  Institutions evaluate various aspects of their processes in relationship to standards of best practice and provide supportive evidence  Not a ranking tool – no hierarchy or levels of classification

 Institutional Self-assessment & Self-study ◦ Brings disparate parts of the campus together to advance a unified agenda ◦ Allows for identification of promising practices that can be shared across the institution  Legitimacy --Enhances legitimacy, public recognition, visibility for CE  Accountability --Demonstrates institution is fulfilling its mission to serve the public good  Catalyst for Change--Fosters institutional alignment for community-based teaching, learning & scholarship  Institutional Identity --Clarifies institutional identity & mission distinguishing it from peers

 311 /389 applicants classified  173 public/138 private institutions ◦ 111 research universities ◦ 103 master’s colleges/universities ◦ 59 baccalaureate colleges ◦ 20 community colleges ◦ 8 specialized (arts, medicine, technology)

 305 campuses expressed an intent to apply/ received the application  154 campuses submitted an application ◦ 151 campuses withdrew without applying  115 received the classification

 Foundational Indicators ◦ Institutional Commitment ◦ Institutional Identity and Culture  Curricular Engagement  Outreach and Partnerships

 Assessment and Documentation  Reciprocity  Faculty Support and Rewards  Integration and Alignment with Other Institutional Initiatives

 Application processes for 2015  Application guide available 2014  Potential for international applications

1. For the 2015 classification, campuses that have not received the classification will need to submit a complete application. 2. Additional questions added to the application 3. Campuses preparing to apply for the classification should use the 2010 documentation framework to guide their efforts 4. Check the website January 2013 for application

 The questions on faculty rewards and changes in promotion guidelines will be moved out of the “supplemental questions” into the standard questions in the framework  (It will be considered as more significant!)

5. All campuses that received the classification in 2006 and 2008 will have the opportunity to re-apply through an abbreviated application process  The abbreviated application will not be available until January will not answer questions until then

Reapplication IntentApplication  The application will ask for evidence of changes that have taken place on campus (practices, structures, policies) to deepen community engagement and make it more pervasive across the institution  The reclassification application will include narrative sections allowing for explanation of changes that have occurred since the previous classification  Narratives address ◦ what currently exists (based on the most recent AY data) ◦ what has changed since the last classification ◦ relevant links to supporting evidence.  Example: “Briefly discuss any significant changes in mission, planning, etc., since the last classification, particularly focusing on evidence of encouraging deeper, more authentic collaboration and reciprocity in community partnerships.”

6. Campuses classified in 2010 will not need to make any applications until 2020

 Identify appropriate key people  Form a committee  Set timelines and schedules  Set an inquiry agenda  Scan available data  Seek executive support  If you can’t get past the initial sections, don’t apply now, use the application to expand your engagement campus agenda

Clarify community engagement agenda on campus (town hall meetings, convocations, symposia) Inform others about community engagement Connect discussions/work to executive leadership, deans, and chairs (and what they care about) Build connections across campus (other units, strategic initiatives) Building connections with community partners, new and old Find ways to develop new leaders, new advocates, new allies & augmented understanding of CE activities Do NOT do it for Carnegie; Do it for your own self-interests

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching descriptions/community_engagement.php NERCHE

The Engaged Campus: Preparing for the 2015 Carnegie Community Engagement Classification (PRE-RECORDED) This is part of the Campus Compact Engaged Campus Webinar Series. Available for $50. Please visit website for more information on the series and to register. compact-engaged-campus-webinar- series/ Available Friday, October 12, December 21, 2012