 APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP Wendy Whitmer REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR NEWESD 101.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Science Leadership Network Winter 2015 Facilitators: Brian MacNevin, NWESD Regional Science Coordinator Joanne Johnson, NW LASER Alliance Director.
Advertisements

Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards.
Science & Engineering Practices. Welcome! Things to do… Sign-in Find a table Silence your electronic devices.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP Wendy Whitmer REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR Kathy Johnson SELKIRK S.D.
Implications for Learning Sequences
FALs and MDC. Before the Collaborative Activity: Meet as a grade level to collaboratively plan in advance the administration of the pre- assessment As.
Science Leadership Network Spring Welcome! Sign in Sign in Collect a TPEP Reflection sheet Collect a TPEP Reflection sheet Silence your cell phone.
Aligning Assessments to Ohio Social Studies Standards Teaching American History Grant Presentation.
Science Content Leadership Network July 17, 2014.
Your Guide… Brian MacNevin Regional Science Coordinator Northwest Educational Service District E: T:
Tools for Teachers Linking Assessment and Learning “Assessment should be an integral part of teaching. It is the mechanism whereby teachers can learn how.
NGSS Performance Expectations Please sit in mixed grade level groups K-12 Alliance.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 Wendy Whitmer, Regional Science Coordinator.
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
Math Content Workshop Focus: Progression of Fractions in Grades 3-5
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Write to Learn K-3 Partner Share With your partner discuss your current understanding and use of writing to learn.
NGSS EQuIP Rubric SMD EPO PD
3 Dimensions of the Next Generation Science Standards Spokane County Water Resource Center Wendy Whitmer- Regional Science Coordinator 1.
Next Generation Science Standards Taking Time to Get It Right “Have the courage to be patient!” Presentation Font: Ar Cena.
CSTA 2013: CFGs for Course Planning “ Knowing how to think empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.” ---Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Elementary Science Leadership Network June 17, 2014 While you are getting settled, think about the NGSS probe and record your answers..
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.
Engaging in Next Generation Science Standards. Amber Farthing Professional Learning and Program Assistance Coordinator, LASER Ellen Ebert Science Director,
Lesson 5.12 EbD Application of Core Curriculum 1 ® ®
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Michael Brown Regional Science Coordinator ESD 105.
Using Picture Books for Professional Development on NGSS Kirk Robbins October 26, 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
November 1, 2012 Professional Development Pathways for the Future of Science TnSELA Annual Conference.
APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
21 st Century Science Osborne (2007): 21st Century Scientific Literacy To become scientifically literate, science education requires a focus on: The scientific.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
Writing in Science in Action – MEETING 4. Learning Objectives  To understand the purpose of the Teacher’s Scientist Notebook.  assess student work using.
 APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
+ Operations and Algebraic Thinking Success Implementing CCSS for K-2 Math Day 2.
 Please share your thoughts!  Rest rooms  Snacks/coffee  Morning and afternoon break  Cell phones on silent, but please take all necessary calls!
NGSS 103 Deepening Understanding of the Next Generation Science Standards K-12 Alliance We are all in the same room, but not in the same place 1.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Science Leadership Network September 11, Welcome! Things to do… Sign-in Find a table Silence your electronic devices.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
January 23, Outcomes Participants will collaborate on plans for implementation of the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Science. Participants.
Science Leadership Network Winter Building Expertise with NGSS Innovations.
LaTAAP E-folio: A Reflection of Professional Development July 2006 Mary Ann Harmon Shelia Chavis.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Science Leadership Network Winter Building Expertise with NGSS Innovations.
APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
Preparing for NGSS: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Add your information here:
Implementing Formative Assessment Processes: What's Working in Schools and Why it is Working Sophie Snell & Mary Jenatscheck.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Tool 5: Using Evidence of Learning Specifications to Develop a Performance Task and Rubric Five Tools & Processes for NGSS.
Tiered Lessons – Content by Readiness Project Aspire Broadcast 9 – Focus on Assessing Concepts Sara Delano Moore, Ph.D.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Elementary Science Leadership Team Meeting February 5, 2016 Jeff Ryan- Regional Science Coordinator Welcome, please sign in, help yourself to snacks and.
Craig T. Gabler KDSL Global Science Specialist
From Conclusion writing to arguing from evidence
Science Matters September-October 2012.
Science Leadership Network
NGSS Tool and Process 1 . Advancing Tools and Processes for Next Generation Science Planning for Classroom Assessment Tool 5: Using Evidence of Learning.
Michael Heinz, Science Coordinator NJDOE Science Homepage
Our Leadership Journey
Presentation transcript:

 APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP Wendy Whitmer REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR NEWESD 101

Workshop One: Application and Engineering Design Supporting student success on the MSP and beyond

Why are we here?

Overview of the Series  Application and Engineering Design  Adjusting Instruction Based on Student Data  Implications for Instruction

Learning Intentions:  Understand the technological design process as described in the WA Standards and the NGSS  Understand the student expectations for the technological design process in Washington State Standards  Understand application item types as assessed on the Measurement of Student Progress

Learning Intentions:  Use student data to adjust instruction  Apply understanding of the applications/engineering in the classroom in individual own context  Identify Academic Vocabulary unique to the Science MSP and the strategies to support ELL students

Day 1: Learning Intentions  Understand the technological design process as described in the WA Standards and the NGSS  Understand the student expectations for the technological design process in Washington State Standards  Understand application item types as assessed on the Measurement of Student Progress

What does Engineering Design look like for students?

Engineering in the NGSS

Anatomy of a Next Generation Science Standard

Building an Understanding of the Architecture of the NGSS: Foundation Boxes

Building an Understanding of the Architecture of the NGSS: Performance Expectations

Architecture of the System Assessable Component Foundation Boxes Connections Code for Topic Name Grade Level Coded Performance Expectations Code in parentheses designate which of the performance expectations incorporate this Disciplinary Core Idea Code in parentheses designate which of the performance expectations incorporate this Crosscutting Concept Code in parentheses designate which of the performance expectations use this Practice

What NGSS Says About What Students Should Know and Be Able to Do… Examine the description of Engineering Design at your grade level in the following documents:  Appendix I from the NGSS  Engineering, Technology and Application of Science (ETS) standards from the NGSS

What NGSS Says About What Students Should Know and Be Able to Do… Share ideas from your readings and add student expectations onto the Engineering Design poster

How do the Washington expectations compare? Examine the application (APP) test and item specifications from the 2009 standards. Match these expectations with the NGSS Engineering Design Process steps.

Debrief What similarities do you recognize between the current assessed expectations and the NGSS engineering design process?

BREAKBREAK

Pre-Assessment  Give it a try…

Engineering Design Challenge!

Zip Line Carrier Design and build a ping pong ball carrier that will travel down a zip line Criteria Constraints  ping pong ball must stay in carrier  carrier must move continuously  carrier must take 4-8 seconds to reach the bottom zip line angle materials carrier must be removable from zip line

Criteria versus Constraints???? Zip Line Carrier Design and build a ping pong ball carrier that will travel down a zip line Criteria Constraints  ping pong ball must stay in carrier  carrier must move continuously  carrier must take 4-8 seconds to reach the bottom zip line angle materials carrier must be removable from zip line

Engineering Design Challenge! Zip Line Carrier Design and build a ping pong ball carrier that will travel down a zip line Criteria Constraints  ping pong ball must stay in carrier  carrier must move continuously  carrier must take 4-8 seconds to reach the bottom zip line angle materials carrier must be removable from zip line

Lunch

Post-Assessment  Give it a try…  Improve on your answer  Did you answer both parts?  Were your responses clear?

Debrief Where in this challenge did you have the opportunity to practice the different elements of the engineering design process?

Tying back  Where did the redesign item fit into our Engineering Design placemat?

Implementation How will this look in MY classroom?  The Zipline Challenge  Where do you see places for Engineering Design in your context?

Science and Engineering Practices: Another Layer

How do the Washington expectations compare? Examine the application (APP) test and item specifications from the 2009 standards. Match these expectations Science and Engineering Practices

How will students be expected to show their understanding on the MSP? How do these example assessment items provide evidence of student understanding?

Reflect  What is your initial reaction to the information about assessment?  What potential areas of growth do you see for you and your students?

First Step Narrow focus to Redesign in order to examine student work and to plan for instructional shifts.

Your Tasks  Administer the MSP style assessment item to your students PRIOR to any additional instruction on engineering design.  Collect and sort those student responses into High, Medium, Low categories based on your own thinking.  Bring those assessments to the next session for scoring  Bring a student roster for recording student scores  Engage students through the “Zip-Line” design challenge activity.  Note successes and challenges and be prepared to debrief the experience at Session 2.

Wrap-Up 1.Question from today 2.Things you would like to see at our next session on March 17 th 3.Key ideas you got out of today

Materials: Copy List:  Appendix I from NGSS  NGSS 5 th and 8 th grade ETS standards  Design Process “placemat”  Example 5 th and 8 th grade MSP items Additional Materials:  Test and Item Spec cards  Copies of standards documents/frameworks/NGSS for reference Design Challenge Materials:  Zip Line student handouts  Lab materials (list) Take home packet:  Directions for giving the student assessment  MSP Item copy master (5 th and 8 th )  Zip-Line challenge student handout masters and teacher directions  Zip Line Challenge reflection sheet