U.S. is some- where in this zone Frequency of Care Life Expectancy Shape of the Benefit-Utilization Curve: Supply-Sensitive Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Government P4P Programs: Pay for Performance - Is Medicare a Good Candidate? Albert W. Morris, Jr., M.D. President National Medical Association The Second.
Advertisements

Making Payment Reforms Work for Patients and Families Lee Partridge Senior Health Policy Advisor National Partnership for Women and Families January 28,
Unwarranted Variations in Health Care Presentation by John Wennberg Presentation by John Wennberg Citizens Health Care Working Group Citizens Health Care.
Copyright 2014 Center to Advance Palliative Care. Reproduction by permission only. Palliative care is specialized care for people with serious illness.
The High Value Healthcare Collaborative (HVHC) Model for Driving Innovation/Spread in Care & Payment Reform Lucy Savitz, Ph.D., MBA Director of Research.
New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment and Care Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission December 2014.
The Role of Shared Decision Making in Reducing Unwarranted Variation in Health Care A Talk by Jack Wennberg A Talk by Jack Wennberg Implementing shared.
Middle Atlantic Actuarial Club September 17, 2009 Baltimore, MD Shannon Brownlee, MS Senior Research Fellow, New America Foundation Overtreated: Why Too.
A. Sultan, December 2001 Utilization of Physician Services at the End of Life: Differences between U.S. and Canada Issue: Increased health care expenditure?
Understanding Practice Variations: A Focus on Academic Medical Centers The Eisenberg Legacy Lecture The Eisenberg Legacy Lecture Stanford, California Presentation.
Setting a Context for Medicare Spending
Congressional Budget Office Presentation to the National Health Policy Conference The Outlook for Health Care Spending February 4, 2008.
Congressional Budget Office Presentation to The Tax Policy Center and the American Tax Policy Institute Taxes and Health Insurance February 29, 2008.
Health Economics and Health Policy Victor R. Fuchs Henry J. Kaiser Jr. Professor Emeritus Stanford University Department of Health London 9 May 2003.
1 A Crystal Ball: How to Improve the Health Care System Tom Closson President and CEO Ontario Hospital Association NAPAN 8th Annual Conference Sunday,
Working Session 4: Quality and Efficiency Expanding the Use of Healthcare IT: The United States Initiative and the Development of Healthcare IT in Japan.
What’s Next for Health Care
Congressional Budget Office Presentation to the Center for Health Policy, Stanford University A Federal Perspective on Health Care Policy and Costs Peter.
Congressional Budget Office Presentation for the Bipartisan Policy Center Health Care: Capturing the Opportunity in the Nation's Core Fiscal Challenge.
Variation in the Delivery of Medical Care: Is More Better? Todd Gilmer, PhD Professor of Health Policy and Economics Department of Family and Preventive.
The Business Case for Bidirectional Integrated Care: Mental Health and Substance Use Services in Primary Care Settings and Primary Care Services in Specialty.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Health Policy Seminar on Sunday, April 19 th, 2009 Washington, D.C. Shannon Brownlee Visiting Scholar, NIH Clinical Center Dept. of Bioethics Schwartz.
Getting Better Value in Health Care Public Employers Health Purchasing Committee 5-23 DRAFT.
Excess cost growth in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other health care spending Source: CBO, A Federal Perspective on Health Care Policy and Costs, 2008.
Congressional Budget Office Presentation for The Hastings Center Rising Health Care Costs and the Federal Budget May 20, 2008.
Unwarranted Variation: Expanding the Agenda for Rebuilding the Health Care system in Louisiana January 16, 2007 REDESIGNING 10 th Annual Health Care Forum.
Geriatrics Patient Centered Medical Home Audrey Chun, MD Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
Slide 1 Bending the cost curve Addressing the problem of “supply-sensitive” care Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Center for the Evaluative.
National Center for Policy Analysis Making Ideas Change the World Myths About National Health Insurance.
Congressional Budget Office Presentation to The Alliance for Health Reform Health Costs and Health Information Technology Peter Orszag Director June 20,
The U.S. Physician Workforce: Beyond the Numbers The U.S. Physician Workforce: Beyond the Numbers Richard A. Cooper, M.D. Leonard Davis Institute of Health.
Performance Measurement Sets Dolores Yanagihara Program Development Manager IHA.
Foundation for American Healthcare Leadership Summit John E. Wennberg, MD, MPH Chicago, IL June 17-18, 2004.
Quality of care Patient-centred primary and specialist care Medication reviews Chronic condition management and disease prevention 1.
Health System Improvement Opportunities In Louisiana: Analysis Through the Lens of Unwarranted Variation June 9, 2008.
What percentage of hospitalizations for people with chronic disease is avoidable? A.10% to 20% B.20% to 30% C.40% to 55% D.60% to 90%
In Healthcare, Is More Always Better? Thérèse Stukel Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto Dartmouth Medical School, US Graham Woodward Cancer.
Reducing Regional Disparities in Health Spending: Framing the Debate David Wennberg and Friends Maine Medical Center Center for the Evaluative Clinical.
Differences in the Quality of the Patient- Physician Relationship Among Terminally Ill African American and White Patients: Impact on Advance Care Planning.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Examining Long-Term Care Episodes and Care History for Medicare Beneficiaries: A Longitudinal Analysis of Elderly Individuals with.
Steven Lieberman Assistant Director Health and Human Resources Division Congressional Budget Office Lowering Medicare Costs: Regions or Beneficiaries?
Health Information through the Internet Comparisons leading to Quality.
UNDERSTANDING AND DEFINING QUALITY Quality Academy – Cohort 6 April 8, 2013.
The Tahoe/Carson Valley Transitions in Care Collaborative “A Solution for Improved Care Management in Rural Environments”
Accountable Care: The Challenge of the Decade Michigan’s Premier Public Health Conference October 13, 2011 Kim Horn President and CEO Priority Health.
Geography of Medicare By David M. Cutler and Louise Sheiner American Economic Review Vol. 89 No Cliff Gagnier.
1 Medicare Demonstrations Support for Health IT Linda Magno Medicare Demonstrations Program Group Office of Research, Development, and Information.
Colorado Health Care 2014 Legislative Agenda Senator Irene Aguilar, MD.
Spending, Quality and Efficiency of Care Addressing the paradox of plenty Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Center for the Evaluative Clinical.
The Challenge of Practice Variations And the Future of Primary Care 2009 Blanchard Memorial Lecture John E. Wennberg May 1, 2009.
The Role of the Disease Management/Chronic Care Industry in Health Reform.
MEDICARE PART B DRUG PAYMENT PROPOSAL Proposed CMS Rule Cuts Reimbursement For Physician- Administered Drugs Costing More Than $480/Day Projected Effect.
Geographic Variation in Healthcare and Promotion of High-Value Care Margaret E. O’Kane November 10, 2010.
Improving Program Budgeting in Ukraine’s Fiscal Process
4 of 5 Californians who died in 2014 were covered by Medicare
Managing Type 2 Diabetes
Ratio of percentile groups
From: The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending
Cindy Hatton President & CEO Susan Levitt V.P. Clinical Services/COO
Primary health care.
Total Medicare Beneficiary Deaths, 2014: 2.1 million
Percent of Total Health Care Spending
Advancing Primary Care Delivery: Practical, Proven, and Scalable Approaches Chartpack UnitedHealth Center for Health Reform & Modernization September.
Congressional Budget Office
Managing Type 2 Diabetes
Adults in California and New York Reported Lower Rates of Cost-Related Access Problems Than Those in Florida and Texas Percent of adults ages 19–64 U.S.
Current national average Impact on number of people
Payment Reform to Transform Advanced Illness Care
Policy Options and Distribution of 10-Year Impact
Presentation transcript:

U.S. is some- where in this zone Frequency of Care Life Expectancy Shape of the Benefit-Utilization Curve: Supply-Sensitive Services

i.e. The problem of unwarranted variation in treatment of chronic illness is a problem in overuse and waste, not underuse and health care rationing

What Does Greater Medicare Spending Buy? Medicare Per capita spending (306 regions: ) More than 15% Above Average 0-15% Above Average 0-15% Below Average More than 15% Below Average

What does Greater Per Capita Spending BUY? not more effective or preference-sensitive care Medicare Reimbursements Effective Care Preference-Sensitive Care (Discretionary Surgery) Ratio to Lowest Spending Region More than 15% Below Average 0-15% Below Average 0-15% Above Average More than 15% Above Average

What does Greater Per Capita Spending BUY? More Supply-Sensitive Care!! More than 15% Below Average 0-15% Below Average 0-15% Above Average More than 15% Above Average Days in Hospital Medical Specialist Visits % Seeing 10 or More Doctors End of life care Ratio to Lowest Spending regions

Reducing Overuse: supply sensitive care Major focus: At patient level, active chronic disease managementMajor focus: At patient level, active chronic disease management

Reducing Overuse: supply sensitive care Major focus: At patient level, active chronic disease managementMajor focus: At patient level, active chronic disease management Major focus: At system level, control of capacity relative to size of population servedMajor focus: At system level, control of capacity relative to size of population served

Reducing Overuse: supply sensitive care Major focus: At patient level, active chronic disease managementMajor focus: At patient level, active chronic disease management Major focus: At system level, control of capacity relative to size of population servedMajor focus: At system level, control of capacity relative to size of population served Major Impediment: adverse economic impact on providersMajor Impediment: adverse economic impact on providers

Days in Hospitals During Last Six Months of Life Among Patients with severe chronic illness who received most of their care in one of 77 “best” U.S. hospitals

Supply-Sensitive Care Days in Hospitals During Last Six Months of Life Among Patients assigned to Selected Academic Medical Centers NYU Medical Center27.1 Mount Sinai Hospital22.8 NY Presbyterian Hospital21.6 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center21.3 Mass. General Hospital16.5 UCLA Medical Center16.1 Boston Medical Center15.6 Brigham & Women's Hospital13.9 Beth Israel Deaconess12.2 UCSF Medical Center11.5 Stanford University Hospital10.1

Association Between Hospital Days for Cancer and for CHF patients during last six months of life: 77 Selected Academic Medical Centers

L6M hospital day rate: Non-Black L6M hospital day rate: Black R 2 = 0.75 Association between hospital days for black and non-black patients during last six months of life among 50 “best” hospitals

Supply-Sensitive Care Physician Visits During the Last Six Months of Life Among Patients assigned to Selected Academic Medical Centers NYU Medical Center76.2 UCLA Medical Center43.9 NY Presbyterian Hospital40.3 Mass. General Hospital38.8 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center66.2 Mount Sinai Hospital53.9 Brigham & Women's Hospital31.9 Boston Medical Center31.5 Beth Israel Deaconess29.2 UCSF Medical Center27.2 Stanford University Hospital22.6

R2R2 = Hospital Day Rate Physician Visit Rate Association Between Hospital Days and Physician Visits During the Last Six Months of Life among patients receiving most of their care in one of 77 “best” U.S. hospitals

Percent seeing 10 or more physicians during last six months of life among patients receiving most of their care in one of 77 “best” U.S. hospitals

Association Between Medicare inpatient + Part B Payments Months and 0-6 Months Before Death: 77 hospital cohorts ( ). R2R2 = ,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,00040,0001,5003,5005,5007,500 Payments Mos. Before Death Payments Mos. Before Death Payment in Last 6 Months Payment in Last 6 Months

NYU Medical Center24.6 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center20.7 Mount Sinai Hospital16.4 UCLA Medical Center14.6 New York Presbyterian13.8 UCSF Medical Center 9.2 Stanford University Hospital 8.7 Primary care + medical specialist S-FTE inputs per 1,000 Medicare decedents: last six months of life among selected hospitals

NYU Medical Center1.70 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center2.19 Mount Sinai Hospital1.10 UCLA Medical Center2.86 New York Presbyterian1.05 UCSF Medical Center0.67 Stanford University Hospital1.31 Ratio: medical specialist/primary care Ratio: medical specialist/primary care

Medicare reimbursements per decedent during the last six months of life among California hospitals (weighted average in parentheses) ( ) 5,000 15,000 25,000 35,000 45,000 55,00065,000 All other ($18,165) Sutter ($17,035) CHW ($16,824) Tenet ($29,003) Adven- tist ($18,422) St. Joseph ($14,691) Kaiser ($13,445) Univ. of CA ($27,218) Daughters of Charity ($23,727) HCA ($18,942) Scripps ($16,795)

Hospital days per decedent during the last six months of life among California hospitals (weighted average in parentheses) ( ) All other (13.6) Sutter (11.4) CHW (12.6) Tenet (16.9) Adven- tist (13.3) St. Joseph (12.0) Kaiser (10.1) Univ. of CA (14.2) Daughters of Charity (15.9) HCA (15.0) Scripps (13.1)

Association Between Total Medicare Payments Months and 0-6 Months Before Death: 77 hospital cohorts ( ). R2R2 = ,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 1,5003,5005,5007,500 Total Payments Mos. Before Death Total Payment in Last 6 Months

What Preferred Providers should be asked to do: Eliminate Underservice of Effective CareEliminate Underservice of Effective Care Reduce Medical MistakesReduce Medical Mistakes Learn What Works (Outcomes Research)Learn What Works (Outcomes Research) Assure Informed Patient Choice (Shared Decision Making)Assure Informed Patient Choice (Shared Decision Making) Achieve Efficient and Effective Management of Supply-Sensitive Care (Target: Chronic Disease)Achieve Efficient and Effective Management of Supply-Sensitive Care (Target: Chronic Disease) Achieve Efficient Allocation of Resources geared to Size of the Population ServedAchieve Efficient Allocation of Resources geared to Size of the Population Served

Dartmouthatlas.org Thank You!!!!! Thank You!!!!!