NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
10/14/08SJSD Assessment2 End of Course Exams Information for SJSD Teachers October 14, 2008.
Advertisements

ACE-Achieving Classroom Excellence.  2005: Achieving Classroom Excellence Act (SB 982) ◦ Established the ACE Task Force and guiding principles  2006:
Lynda Lupp Richard Maraschiello Amy Morton Adam Schott John Weiss.
Testing for STAAR/EOC, TAKS Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.
END OF COURSE STAAR TESTING What every 9 th grade student and parent need to know Sept
1 Transition to FCAT 2.0, End-of-Course Assessments, and School Accountability and Beyond Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum.
STAAR EOC Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support
TEKS Revisions and the End of Course Exams Tom Wurst March 25, 2010.
ALTERNATE PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT The Rubric for End of Course Assessments
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Mary Jane Tappen Executive Vice Chancellor Division of Public Schools.
HB5 Summary Tom Jaggard Social Studies Specialist Region Testing Coordinator Education Service Center, Region 2.
New State Graduation Requirements C/O 2018 AND BEYOND.
Legislative Update #1 Changes in Assessment and Graduation 83 rd Texas Legislature.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 6/21/10.
STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC READINESS. What is STAAR? State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness STAAR assessments will be available for:
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Spring 2009 Training End-of-Course Field Test. Schedule of Important Dates for 2009 Field Test Event Spring Field Test Window -- April 27 – May 15 EventSchedule.
Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction January 14, 2015 School Performance Grades.
Division of Florida Colleges Update
Changes and Impacts A & S May  Accountability History  Accountability Changes and Impact  Discussion 2.
Hosted by Secondary Curriculum EOC/ STAAR 4 x 4 More EOC/ STAAR You guessed it.. more EOC
Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children David Holdzkom Assistant Superintendent - Evaluation & Research Ken Branch Senior Director.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Initiatives Updates May 24, 2012.
Information provided by LISD Assessment Office.  STAAR stands for: › State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness  Implemented in for school year.
School Performance Score Elementary School - October 2013 i LEAP Grade 3 LEAP Grade 4 Assessment Points * 150Advanced 125Mastery 100Basic 0Approaching.
New Graduation Requirements November 10, Outline 1.Update on Graduation Requirements Work 2.Job Skills Assessment Recommendations 3. Substitute.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Curriculum Directors April 10, Key provisions under the Chapter 4 proposal as adopted by the State Board of Education.
 ACE Curriculum  ACE Testing  ACE Remediation and Intervention  ACE Resources.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
2015 MAP Scores Fulton 58 School District MAP Facts  Grades 3-8 and English II, Biology, Government and Algebra I and II  First year for online.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements and Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 3/15/2011.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
Pennsylvania’s Keystone Exams: A Change to Graduation Requirements.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Our district’s goal for all students Move to college or a skilled job upon graduation.
UMASD CURRICULUM/TECHNOLOGY/STUDENT SERVICES COMMITTEE December 17, 2012.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
What You Need to Know about Special Education Graduation Mary Milham, Region 7 Specialist / / November 2010.
Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010.
Winston Salem/Forsyth County Schools Testing Information Atkins Academic and Technology High School Parent Meeting February 16, 2012 Monta’ Ervin, Curriculum.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Kansas City Public Schools BOE Meeting Wednesday, August 8th.
Federal Accountability Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) and Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) Meeting | March 5, 2012 Texas.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
What this means for you!.  In 2007, Senate Bill 1031 called for the development of End-of-Course exams in 12 courses. ◦ Algebra I, Algebra II, and Geometry.
Pennsylvania’s Keystone Exams Overview Pennsylvania Department of Education English Language Education Advisor Edward.
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
Student Data Review Title VII Indian Education Parent Meeting March 4, 2013.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
State Testing Program Update Sharon Nobis CHHS Assistant Principal Grapevine-Colleyville ISD November 7, 2011.
HCS Spring 2013 Assessment Cycle % of Time Dedicated to Standardized Assessments.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Testing Students with Disabilities. Resources Appendix C of Test Administration Manuals – SCPASS Science and Social Studies – End-of-Course English 1.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
End of Course Exams  In February, 2007 the Missouri State Board of Education approved End of Course (EOC) exams.  WHY?
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
PARCC Results Summary Report.
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
EOCT BACKGROUND SPRING 2012
Discussion on Virginia’s State Assessment Program
Presentation transcript:

NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal Chief Accountability Officer

Missouri State Board of Education The Missouri State Board of Education identified the following purposes for replacing the high school MAP with End of Course (EOC) assessments: Measuring and reflecting student mastery toward post- secondary readiness Identifying students’ strengths and weaknesses Communicating expectations for all students Serving as the basis of state and national accountability plans Evaluating programs

End-of-Course Assessments  Spring Field test administration began: Algebra I, English II, and Biology  Operational testing to begin: Algebra I, English II, and Biology; Field test administration for  – Operational testing additions to include: Algebra II, Integrated Mathematics II and III, Geometry, English I, Government, and American History

Student Requirements for EOCs  Students will be required to take:  Algebra I  English II  Biology  Government  One additional EOC in each content area (total of 8 EOCS prior to graduation)  *Students taking Algebra I in the 8th grade will take BOTH the MAP and Algebra I end-of- course exams.

Right Test ~ Right Time The responsibility for testing students belongs to the school district. (Districts will be held accountable for students who are not assessed on the 8 required EOCs prior to graduation.) The district has the responsibility to match its course content with the CLE’s that are being tested in the EOC Assessment. When the content of the assessed information is covered, the test can be administered regardless of student grade level.

EOC Accountability  AYP  Method must be approved by USED Algebra I scores of middle school students  APR  MSIP uses district-level data The grade in which Algebra I is taken is not an issue

District-Level MSIP Standards 9.1.1MAP Communication Arts -Grades MAP Math – Grades MAP Communication Arts – Grades MAP Math – Grades MAP Communication Arts – Grades MAP Math – Grades MAP Communication Arts -Grades MAP Math – Grades MAP Communication Arts – Grades MAP Math – Grades EOC English II (Grades 6-12) 9.1.8EOC Algebra I (Grades 6-12)

APR/MSIP Accountability  APR/MSIP uses district-level data  Algebra I, English II, Biology, and *Government  Biology will be a bonus until 5 th cycle  Additional EOCs used in bonus provision  Building-level APRs are not used for state decision- making purposes -Standards with no data are not evaluated

District APR - Math 2009 MAP Math – Grades 3-5 MAP Math – Grades 6-8 EOC Algebra I – Grades MAP Math – Grades 3-5 MAP Math – Grades 6-8 EOC Algebra I – Grades 6-12 Additional Math EOCs – Bonus Provision

DRAFT - March 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 10 To Bank or Not to Bank?  Student scores are not reported in the building in which instruction occurred – how does instruction change?  Schools are held accountable for students to whom they did not provide instruction  Schools are held accountable for data up to four years old – not “REAL TIME”  Difficult to identify or measure growth/improvement

DRAFT - March 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 11 APR Year Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed Banking Scenario EXAMPLE: 6-8 Middle School 9-12 High School

DRAFT - March 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 12 Banking Scenario N / % Proficient N / % Proficient 2012 APR Year 3/3% 20/20% Assessed 2/2% 13/13% Assessed 3/3% 7/7% Assessed 35/35% 3/3% Assessed 43/100 43% 43/100 43% % Prof

Proposed AYP Options  AYP - Method must be approved by USED Students are required to take Algebra I + one additional Math EOC (regardless which assessments are used for accountability). **IEP exceptions may exist for second EOC. Initial Proposal - If a student takes Algebra I prior to high school, the student’s grade level MAP Math score will count for AYP accountability in that year. For high school AYP accountability, the score from the student’s first Math EOC taken at the high school will be used.

Current AYP Option  AYP – Request a waiver for the following: For high school AYP accountability: The Algebra I score of students who take Algebra I in high school will be used. If a student takes Algebra I prior to high school, the score from the student’s first Math EOC taken at the high school will be combined with the students’ Algebra I score to create a composite AYP Math score for high school accountability.

District AYP - Math District AYP Math (MAP) 6-8 Math (MAP) 9-12 Math EOCs (Algebra I or Composite Score for Algebra I + Algebra II, Geometry, Integrated Math II/III)

Building AYP  6-8 Middle School Building 6-8 Math  9-12 High School Building Algebra I or Composite Score for: Algebra I + Algebra II Algebra I + Integrated Math II Algebra I + Integrated Math III Algebra I + Geometry For example: If a student takes Algebra I in 9 th grade and Algebra II in 10 th grade, only the Algebra I score will be included for accountability purposes. If a student takes Algebra I in 8 th grade and Integrated Math II in 10 th grade, a composite score will be created from the Algebra I and Integrated Math II scores for high school AYP purposes.

 Questions on EOCS?