XP 1157 Increasing the CHI start-up current magnitude in NSTX B.A. Nelson et al. 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 31B - Transient Currents and Inductance
Advertisements

Second Peer Review for New MGI Valves for NSTX-U (Update on Valve Testing) R. Raman, et al. October 29,
ASC XP-823 Error Field Correction and Long Pulse J.E. Menard, S.P. Gerhardt Part 1 Determine the source of, and optimal correction for, the observed n=3.
Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI R. Raman 1, M.G. Bell 2, T.R. Jarboe 1, B.A. Nelson 1, D.Mueller 2, R. Maqueda 3, R. Kaita 2,
The current through the inductor can be considered a sum of the current in the circuit and the induced current. The current in the circuit will be constant,
ELECTROMAGNETIC CANNON. Question  A solenoid can be used to fire a small ball. A capacitor is used to energize the solenoid coil. Build a device with.
XP 905: Current Profile Modifications and Fast Ion Loss from BAAEs/EPMs D. Darrow, et al. April 8, 2009.
9/20/04NSTX RESULTS REVIEW NSTX rtEFIT implementation progress results NSTX 2004 RESULTS REVIEW September 20&21, 2004 REAL-TIME EQUILIBRIUM RECONSTRUCTION.
Raman, APS051 Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI R. Raman 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, D.Mueller 2, R. Maqueda.
Plasma start-up in tokamaks Winter School, Marianska, January 21, 2010 Jan Stockel Institute of Plasma Physics, Prague, Tokamak plasma.
1 Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up In NSTX Using Transient Coaxial Helicity Injection Roger Raman, Univ. of Washington For the NSTX Team University of Maryland.
Coupling Solenoid-free Coaxial Helicity Injection Started Discharges to Induction in NSTX Office of Science R. Raman University of Washington For the NSTX.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgements: M. G. Bell 2, R. Kaita 2, H. W. Kugel 2, R. Raman 3, A. L. Roquemore 2 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
Chapter 20 Self-Inductance LR Circuits Motional EMF.
Exam review Inductors, EM oscillations
NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Requirements & Design Point C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.
1 CHI Summary Transient CHI (XP606) –All systems operated reliably without any faults Edge Current drive (XP533)
Mid-Run Assessment - ISD S. Kaye, D. Gates 10 May 2006.
Remote operation of the GOLEM tokamak Gent University, December 14, 2009 Jan Stockel Institute of Plasma Physics, Prague Vojta Svoboda.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
1Physics Operators Course, PCS Navigation, D.J. Battaglia, September 15, 2015 Devon Battaglia, Keith Erickson, Dennis Mueller, Stefan Gerhardt, Roger Raman,
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Demonstration of 200 kA CHI Startup Current Coupling to Transformer Drive on NSTX B.A. Nelson, R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe, University of Washington D. Mueller,
PF1A upgrade physics review Presented by D. A. Gates With input from J.E. Menard and C.E. Kessel 10/27/04.
Solenoid-free Start-up and Ramp-up Progress and Plans for Office of Science R. Raman and D. Mueller For the NSTX Research Team NSTX 5 Year Plan.
NSTX-U cryo/particle control discussion #8 December 19, 2012 What have we done, or plan to do to be responsive to PAC questions, and in prep for 5 year.
Seminar on Plasma Focus Experiments SPFE2010 In-situ measurement of Capacitor Bank Parameters Using Lee model code S H Saw 1,2 & S Lee 1,2,3 1 INTI International.
Absorber arc mitigation during CHI on NSTX D. Mueller, M.G. Bell, A.L. Roquemore, R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, T.R. Jarboe and the NSTX Research Team DPP09 Meeting.
Integration and Plasma Control D.A. Gates, M.G. Bell NSTX 5-Year Plan June 30-July 2, 2003.
CHI Run Summary for March 10-12, 31 & April 9, 2008 Flux savings from inductive drive of a Transient CHI started plasma (XP817) R. Raman, B.A. Nelson,
Summary of the SFPS XPs R. Raman, D. Mueller University of Washington Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and the NSTX Research Team FY09 NSTX Results.
XP817: Transient CHI – Solenoid free Plasma Startup and Coupling to Induction Office of Science R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell.
Progress and Plans for Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up and Ramp-up R. Raman D. Mueller, S.C. Jardin and the NSTX-U Research Team NSTX-U PAC-35 Meeting PPPL.
1 R Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller 1, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell 1, J. Menard 1, R. Maqueda 2 et al. University of Washington, Seattle 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
Work with TSC Yong Guo. Introduction Non-inductive current for NSTX TSC model for EAST Simulation for EAST experiment Voltage second consumption for different.
RFX-mod programme workshop, January 2009 Scenario and operational issues for high current L. Zanotto, R. Cavazzana, S. Dal Bello, F. Milani.
NCSX NCSX CDR May 21-23, 2002 H.W. Kugel Slide 1 Conceptual Design for NCSX Auxiliary Systems Heating, Fueling,Wall Conditioning and Vacuum Systems.
Low-density Start-up D. Mueller, M. Bell, S. Gerhardt, J. Menard, R. Raman, S. Sabbagh NSTX FY12 low density discussion: May 12, 2011.
Solenoid Free Plasma Startup Progress and Plans R. Raman, D. Mueller S.C. Jardin (Theory) for the NSTX Research Team NSTX PAC-29 PPPL B318 January 26-28,
1 Plasma Start-up In NSTX Using Transient CHI R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, M. Ono 2, T. Bigelow 3, R. Kaita 2, B.
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
Dependence of Pedestal Structure on Ip and Bt A. Diallo, R. Maingi, S. Zweben, B.P. LeBlanc, B. Stratton, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, J. Canick, A. McClean,
NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils – SAS, JKP, RM, SG XP818: Exploratory approach to finding ELM mitigation solution with midplane non-axisymmetric.
1 Plasma Start-up In NSTX Using Transient CHI R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, M. Ono 2, T. Bigelow 3, R. Kaita 2, B.
Solenoid Free Plasma Start-up Mid-Run Summary (FY 2008) R. Raman and D. Mueller Univ. of Wash. / PPPL 16 April 2008, PPPL 1 Supported by Office of Science.
Summary of RF Work To Date G. Taylor NSTX Monday Physics Meeting June 21, 2010 NSTX Supported by 1.
NSTX-U Run Planning Guidance for 2015 NSTX-U Research Forum 1 FY2015 (and 2016) research milestones will guide prioritization of eXperimental Proposal.
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
Engineering Operations Outage Status: Tile cleaning is complete Tentatively planning on 2 LITER operation. Design Review upcoming Shielding of HHFW/in-vessel.
FY WEP TSG Goals & WEP-Relevant Diagnostic Upgrades NSTX Supported by WEP TSG Meeting September 14,
SMK – XP 1 XP 811: Effect of Rotation on Energy/Impurity Confinement S. Kaye, L. Delgado-Aparicio Joule Milestone Description –XP directly addresses Joule.
1 NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-712 Title: HHFW Power Balance Optimization at High B Field J. Hosea, R. Bell, S. Bernabei, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
Simulation of Non-Solenoidal Current Rampup in NSTX C. E. Kessel and NSTX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory APS-DPP Annual Meeting, Savannah, Georgia,
Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI Office of Science 22 nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference October 13-18, 2008, Geneva College W&M.
Raman, Dec051 Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI R. Raman 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, D.Mueller 2, R. Maqueda.
Fast 2-D Tangential Imaging of Edge Turbulence: Neon Mantle (draft XP) R. J. Maqueda, S. J. Zweben, J. Strachan C. Bush, D. Stutman, V. Soukhanovskii Goal:
Comparison of Private Flux Region and High Field Side MGI (massive gas injection) with the conventional LFS MGI in NSTX DRAFT RUN PLAN ITER TSG & MS TSG.
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
New prototype modulator for the European XFEL Project (DESY) Pulse Step Modulator (PSM) Technology for long pulse applications.
1 Edge Characterization Experiment in High Performance (highly shaped) Plasmas R. J. Maqueda (Nova Photonics) R. Maingi (ORNL) V. Soukhanovskii (LLNL)
Demonstration of Coupling CHI Started Discharges to Induction in NSTX R. Raman 1, B.A. Nelson 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, M.G. Bell 2, J. Menard 2,
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy The Use of a 28 GHz Gyrotron for EBW Startup Experiments on MAST John Caughman,Tim Bigelow, Steffi.
2010 Spring Korean Physical Society
Lower Ip Long Pulse H+ITB Advanced Scenarios
Lower Ip Long Pulse L-mode and H-mode Advanced Scenarios
Chapter 31B - Transient Currents and Inductance
Presentation transcript:

XP 1157 Increasing the CHI start-up current magnitude in NSTX B.A. Nelson et al. 1

Background Higher levels of CHI-started currents reduce central solenoid flux requirements to ramp to a given current level. In recent years we have focused on coupling CHI-started currents to induction for a demonstration of central solenoid flux savings. This was adequately demonstrated during FY2010. CHI-only discharges on NSTX were actively studied during 2005 and In 2010 less than 2 hours were devoted to these experiments, yet the potential for generating 400 kA of startup current was seen. The higher startup currents were achieved by increasing the injector flux, which require higher levels of injector current. Eventually at sufficiently high levels of injector current the low-Z impurity influx may limit the useful amount of injected poloidal flux. These limits have not yet been established for NSTX. For 2011/12, improvements to the CHI capacitor bank circuit are expected to enable improved programming of the capacitor bank voltages to reduce absorber arcs, which is what limited the performance of the near-400 kA CHI-only discharge during All discharges will use the full TF capability of 0.55 T so as to minimize the injector current, maximize current multiplication, and reduce the influx of low-Z impurities. 2

Experimental Run Plan Start with 12 mg/min Li evaporation rate for 8.5 min. Ensure that there is no NBI gas injection pulse just before the CHI discharge. Restore a reference CHI-only discharge from XP1034 (142163). Reproduce using a total of 4 capacitors. – Parameters: V_CHI = 1700 V. Thomson time = 9 and 13 ms. CHI start time = 6 ms. Cap bank dwell time = 3 ms. Branch-5 plenum pressure = 1700 Torr. – Use the same coil programming as in , including those for the PFAB1 and 2 coils. – After successfully running this shot with no absorber arc, reduce the Branch-5 plenum pressure to 1600 and then to 1500 Torr. – Other small adjustments to the voltage and to the PF1AL, PF3L and PF2L coils may be needed. The fast camera images and spectroscopic data will be used to assist with these changes, as we have routinely made during the past CHI runs. – Repeat with NBI gas pulse 3

Increase Injector Flux in 10% Increments Increase the flat-top current magnitude in PF1B by 10% – Switch to banks 1 and 2 charged to 1700 V, triggered at 6 and 6.5 ms, with 3ms dwell time. The magnitude and length of the current pulse in PFAB1 needs to be adjusted to reduce absorber arcs. – Adjust the PF2L to allow the plasma to be pushed into the vessel and to allow it to detach. Small changes to PF3L and PF1AL may also be needed. – After successful current generation, continue to increase the PF1B current in 10% steps until the full coil current limit is reached or until the cap bank is no longer able to inject the poloidal flux or until the injector current becomes too high so that a large increase in lower divertor low-Z impurities places a limit on the useful injected flux. The original reference shot used 7.2 kA in PF1B. The maximum limit is 10 kA. – All three capacitor banks may be needed. Under this scenario, bank No. 1 should be charged to the maximum voltage of about 1.7 kV. Banks 2 and 3 could be charged to a lower voltage. Variations to these voltage changes will be experimentally determined based on fast camera images, extent of plasma growth and the detachment of the plasma from the injector. – Note that small changes to the Branch-5 gas pressure may be needed. The goal is to operate at as low as pressure that allows reliable breakdown. – Eventually Li evaporation rates may need to be increased. 4

Establish Control Parameters After a current limit is reached on the PF1B coil, further increases to the injector flux will be possible by delaying the start of the ramp-down of the PF1B coil current. – Start with 1 ms delays in the start of current ramp down and optimize at these condition. For discharges that have now attained 350 kA (FY11) and 400 kA (FY12), with longer current decay times – Repeat the final discharges without the NBI gas injection to assess the benefits of not injecting the NBI gas pulse. – Determine, gas programming, capacitor bank voltage programming, capacitor bank dwell time, Li deposition level, PFAB1 and 2 programming. PF2L, 3L, 1AL programming and those in PF5, 3U and 2U. 5