PO377 ETHNIC CONFLICT AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE Week 17 Seminar: Institutional Design as Conflict Management: Executive Structures and Electoral Systems in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Voting Systems Explained
Advertisements

Designing for Equality Best-fit, medium-fit and non-favourable combinations of electoral systems and gender quotas © International IDEA.
Electoral systems used in the UK
Institutions Want stable democracy? Get the institutions right!
Electoral Systems Women and Elections
How to get elected in a Democracy First Past the Post
UK electoral systems Fotolia.
2 systems of voting : Plurality and Proportional representation systems BY: Destiny Cook, Jordan Burke.
Electoral Systems & Party Systems The causes and consequences of multiparty competition.
Alternative Electoral Systems Read and précis notes will be checked before this Lecture is delivered … 1.
AP Comparative Government and Politics Sachem North High School
Linkage Institutions Political Parties, Civil Society, Interest Groups, Electoral Systems & Elections.
Making Legislatures More Representative Bob Richard Californians for Electoral Reform.
Plurality/Majority System vs. Proportional Representation
Topics for Today Civil Society and Institutional Design: Electoral Systems 1.Finish group discussion activity. 2.Characteristics and consequences of three.
Electoral Systems Chapter 5- P
Elections and Electoral Systems
The Electoral College and Alternative Voting Systems
Making your vote count Understanding the different electoral systems Source:
Elections and Public Policy. Electoral systems  Electoral systems are the rules that decide how votes are cast  Some countries use a first-past-the-post.
Electoral Systems.
Linkage Institutions Political Parties, Civil Society, Interest Groups, Electoral Systems & Elections.
The Electoral Amendment Bill, Background: Our current PR system  The current electoral system for the National Assembly is a fixed list Proportional.
Choice Voting- Proportional Representation
Alternative Electoral Systems for BC Deliberative Phase: Weekend 4.
Political Parties October 22, The Constitution’s Unwanted Offspring The Constitution contains no mention of political parties. What is a political.
Single Transferable Vote. Multi Member Constituencies Only Voting is Preferential meaning voters indicate preference by numbers, In order of their favourite.
Proportional Representation
Democracy- Lesson 2 Different types of voting systems.
January 26,  In representative democracies, their purpose is to allow voters to express their political preferences  Elections provide an opportunity.
The role of elections in a democracy Do elections guarantee democracy? Unit 1.
REGIME TYPE Presidentialism & Parliamentarism.
Operační program Vzdělávání pro konkurenceschopnost Název projektu: Inovace magisterského studijního programu Fakulty ekonomiky a managementu Registrační.
Women’s Participation in Elections: The Impact of Electoral Systems Kristin van der Leest OSCE-ODIHR 30 June 2011.
Democratic Systems. There are three Presidential Parliamentary Presidential- parliamentary.
Proportional Representation (PR-List) Systems Weekend 4 : Session 1.
In Canada and Around the World. Before you can understand voting you need to see the results so you know what we are talking about. The following slides.
Democracy. What is Democracy?  Is democracy in the eye of the beholder? Soviets said they had “true democracy” Soviets said they had “true democracy”
Chapter Five Interest Aggregation and Political Parties Copyright © 2012, 2010, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Electoral System Families The Rockridge Citizens’ Assembly April 21, 2004.
Other Voting Systems Although FPTP and AMS are used in British Parliamentary elections, there are other voting systems you should be aware of 1.Alternative.
Mixed Systems Weekend 4 : Session 3. Mixed Systems Mix different formula at different stages of the seat allocation process Austria Mix different formula.
REPRESENTATION.
Institutional Design: Electoral Systems and Executive- Legislative Relations Plan for Today 1. Understand the characteristics and democratic consequences.
Explaining party systems The role of electoral systems.
Electoral System How politicians are elected into office. Electoral Systems 1.First-Past-The-Post 2.Proportional Representation 3.Mixed Member Proportional.
Electoral Systems CHV2O. What is an Electoral System? O How countries elect their government O 7A&feature=BFa&list=PL800A4ECED70779.
SA1: Living in a Democracy Electoral Systems. Proportional Representation Aims: Define Proportional Representation (PR) Examine different types of PR.
Electoral Systems and Reform How democratic is our democracy?
PO377 ETHNIC CONFLICT AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE Week 15: Institutional Design as Conflict Management: Executive Structures and Electoral Systems in Divided.
Plurality Systems Weekend 3 : Session 3. Basic Principles Contestants are individual candidates Contestants are individual candidates Candidates run in.
Institutional Design: Electoral Systems Plan for Today 1. Understand the characteristics and democratic consequences of three basic types of electoral.
PROPORTIONALITY, DISTRICTING AND OPEN LISTS How to reconcile them? Author: Leon Malazogu.
Elections, Parties, and the Party System Malcomlson & Myers, Chapter 9 & 10 Elections & the Electoral System Elections, Parties, & Representation Canada’s.
Chapter Five Interest Aggregation and Political Parties.
Part Three (continued): Electoral Systems & Linkage Institutions “Our political institutions work remarkably well. They are designed to clang against each.
Voting systems in elections First past the post system Supplementary vote system Additional vote system Single transferable vote system.
Presentation on Electoral Reform for Town Hall Meetings Member of Parliament: Riding: Location: DATE:
Voting systems in elections
Global Comparative Politics (3)
POLI 112 POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
Elections OUTLINE General Elections Other Elections
Voting systems in elections
INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE POLITICS UNIT I CH. 1
Electoral Reform in BC …….but, why? (or why not?)
Assessing Electoral Systems
STABILITY OF ELECTION LAW EFFECTIVE PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES
Comparative Analysis of Democratization prof. Fulvio Venturino
Types of Democracies Notes
Elections and Electoral Systems
Presentation transcript:

PO377 ETHNIC CONFLICT AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE Week 17 Seminar: Institutional Design as Conflict Management: Executive Structures and Electoral Systems in Divided Societies

Core Seminar Question  Can institutional design solve violent ethnic conflict and/or prevent the outbreak/recurrence of future violence?

More Specific Questions  What are the perils and virtues of presidentialism in ethnically divided societies?  Which, if any, type of electoral system for the legislature has the greatest potential to reduce inter-ethnic tensions?  Are vote-pooling (preferential) electoral systems or electoral systems of proportional representation based on party lists (list PR) more likely to help achieve sustainable peace in deeply divided societies?

Linz (1990): The perils of presidentialism  Personalisation of power  Dual democratic legitimacy  Temporal rigidity  Politics perceived as zero-sum game  Polarisation (in the populace as well as among politicians)  Weakening of party system

Horowitz (1990): Critique of Linz  Linz’s selection of case studies is regionally skewed, as he mainly focuses on experience from Latin America; there have been many instable parliamentary systems in postcolonial Asia and Africa.  Linz assumes certain form of electoral rule for presidency (plurality/majority system) from which most of his criticism follows ( → he criticises the electoral rule rather than form of government).  Government and opposition frequently cooperate in the legislative process in presidential systems (contradicts argument of polarisation).  Fixed term of elected president is not more likely to create a crisis than the flexible term of a parliamentary government ( → the possibility to remove a parliamentary government in the middle of its term can foster political instability particularly in fragmented societies).  Also the power of prime ministers can become personalised.

A brief overview of First Past the Post  A plurality/majority (i.e. not proportional) voting system;  candidates are presented in single-member districts;  voters vote for one candidate;  the candidate with the most votes (not necessarily an absolute majority of the votes) wins. The First Past the Post electoral system is the simplest form of a plurality/majority system. Other plurality/majority systems include the Block Vote, Party Block Vote, the Two-Round System and the Alternative Vote. [There are also mixed electoral systems besides “pure” plurality/majority or proportional representation systems.]

A brief overview of the Alternative Vote  A preferential but plurality/majority (i.e. not proportional) voting system;  candidates are typically presented in single-member districts;  electors rank candidates in the order of their choice, by marking “1” for their favourite candidate, “2” for their second choice and so on;  a candidate who has won an absolute majority of votes (50% plus one) is immediately elected;  if no candidate has an absolute majority, the candidate with the lowest number of first preferences is eliminated from the count;  second preferences of the “eliminated” candidate are assigned to the remaining candidates in the order as marked on the ballot;  process is repeated until one candidate has an absolute majority.

A brief overview of List PR  A proportional representation system using party-lists;  each party presents a list of candidates to the electorate in multi- member electoral districts;  voters vote for a party;  parties receive seats in proportion to their overall share of the national vote;  winning candidates are taken from the lists in order of their position on the lists. Important variations among List PR systems include the introduction of formal thresholds for party representation; the adoption of open, closed or free lists; and the system used to calculate the allocation of seats. [For sources on different electoral systems see the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network or the handbooks by the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA).]

A brief overview of the Single Transferable Vote  A preferential proportional representation system (i.e. not party-lists);  candidates are presented in multi-member districts;  voters rank candidates in order of preference on the ballot paper (like AV);  the total number of votes is counted, then divided by the number of seats in the constituency plus one; this produces the quota of votes required for the elections of a single candidate;  any candidate who has more first preferences than the quota is immediately elected;  if no-one has achieved the quota, the candidate with the lowest number of first preferences is eliminated, with her second preferences being redistributed to the remaining candidates;  at the same time, the surplus votes of elected candidates (i.e. those above the quota) are redistributed according to the second preferences on the ballot papers; all the candidate’s ballot papers are redistributed, but each at a fractional percentage of one vote, so that the total redistributed vote equals the candidate’s surplus;  this process continues until all seats for the constituency are filled.

Group work  Split into small groups and have a look at the excerpt from Freedom House’s (2009) country report on Bosnia and Herzegovina. Based on the description by Freedom House, which type of executive structure and electoral system for the legislature would you recommend for BiH post-Dayton? Use the following check list by the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network ( to guide your choice:  Is the system clear and comprehensible?  Has context been taken into account?  Is the system as inclusive as possible?  Will the voters feel motivated to participate?  Is a competitive party system encouraged?  Will the system help to alleviate conflict rather than exacerbate it?

Source: Office of the High Representative and EU Special Representative,.

Some further questions to consider 1. Under which conditions is a presidential form of government preferable to parliamentarianism in ethnically divided societies? 2. Should ethnically divided societies dismiss the adoption of majoritarian electoral systems? Why/why not? 3. Is the combination of a presidential form of government and a majoritarian electoral system for the legislature a recipe for violent ethnic conflict?