Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. IDEaS Professor Chair Human-Centered Computing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I Think I Voted. E-voting vs. Democracy Prof. David L. Dill Department of Computer Science Stanford University
Advertisements

Testing the AutoMARK Ballot Marking Device on Election Day.
1 Dr. Brenda C. Snipes Broward County Supervisor of Elections.
Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Auburn University Computer Science and Software Engineering The Prime Voting System: Multimodality.
1 Dr. Brenda C. Snipes Broward County Supervisor of Elections.
Will Your Vote Count? Will your vote count? Voting machine choices N.C. Coalition for Verified Voting Joyce McCloy Pros and Cons of voting.
Election Night Results and Reporting Webinar 1. Application Overview Election Results Reporting provides an easy and just-in-time reporting of Statewide.
Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the ease of use and accuracy of Prime III, technology designed specifically to enable those with a disability.
VVPAT BY KRISTEN DUARTE & JESSICA HAWKINS. WHAT IS VVPAT? An add-on to electronic voting machines that allows voters to get a printed version of their.
By Varun Jain. Introduction  Florida 2000 election fiasco, drew conclusion that paper ballots couldn’t be counted  Computerized voting system, DRE (Direct.
POWER OF THE DISABILITY VOTE. VOTERS WITH DISABILITIES More than 35 million Americans with disabilities are eligible to vote. But only 15 million do vote.
1 J. Alex Halderman Security Failures in Electronic Voting Machines Ariel Feldman Alex Halderman Edward Felten Center for Information Technology Policy.
Election Observer Training 2008 Elections Certification & Training Program
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Review of VVSG 1.1 Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
Prime III Curtis Cain – czc0016 Kevin Simmons - kzs0014 Sriharsha Sathyanarayana - sbs0006 Rajendra Kokate - rdk0003.
Voting Machines Failing the World *Voting machines around the world are failing in Colorado as well as 34 other states. *This could be crucial in the upcoming.
Electronic Voting: The 2004 Election and Beyond Flashback: Florida 2000.
Electronic Voting Linh Nguyen. Electronic Voting  Voting Technologies  The Florida 2000 Election  Direct Recording Electronic Devices (DREs)‏ - Diebold.
Voting Machines Failing the World The true issue for these electronic voting machines is that the government has not been a full out supporter of this.
Guide to the Voting Action Planner Voting is the way we elect government officials, pass laws and decide on issues…
Optical Scan Ballot. January Prior to Primary Election Establish Election Precincts Establish Election Precincts Absentee precincts Absentee precincts.
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting TGDC Recommendations Research as requested by the EAC John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Accessibility and Usability Considerations for Remote Electronic UOCAVA Voting Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Overview of July TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards, ITL
C Arlene Ash Can Statistics Help Improve US Elections? Arlene Ash, PhD Boston University School of Medicine AAAS February 15, 2009.
Election Administration. Ensuring legitimacy of the government Legitimacy: acceptance of the right of public officials to hold office and to promulgate.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Vote-by-Phone David Flater / Sharon Laskowski National Institute of Standards and Technology
TOWARDS OPEN VOTE VERIFICATION METHOD IN E-VOTING Ali Fawzi Najm Al-Shammari17’th July2012 Sec Vote 2012.
ELECTIONS Upcoming Trends. ELECTIONS ADMINSTRATORS Duties o Protect the security and integrity of the elections o Redistricting o Secure polling locations.
Making every vote count. United States Election Assistance Commission HAVA 101 TGDC Meeting December 9-10, 2009.
California Secretary of State Voting Systems Testing Summit November 28 & 29, 2005, Sacramento, California Remarks by Kim Alexander, President, California.
Audit Trail
Usability and Accessibility Working Group Report Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology TGDC Meeting,
1 The Promise of Equality in Voting Still Not a Reality for Americans with Disabilities Granite State Independent Living “Tools for Living Life on Your.
Georgia Electronic Voting System Testing and Security Voting Systems Testing Summit November 29, 2005.
Electronic Voting: The 2004 Election and Beyond Prof. David L. Dill Department of Computer Science Stanford University
Briefing for NIST Acting Director James Turner regarding visit from EAC Commissioners March 26, 2008 For internal use only 1.
VVSG: Usability, Accessibility, Privacy 1 VVSG, Part 1, Chapter 3 Usability, Accessibility, and Privacy December 6, 2007 Dr. Sharon Laskowski
Panel One Why Audit? Mary Batcher Ernst & Young and Chair of ASA Working Group on Elections.
Idaho Procedures M100 OPTICAL SCAN PRECINCT TABULATOR.
How and what to observe in e-enabled elections Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
1 The Evolution of Voting Systems Paul DeGregorio Vice Chairman Donetta Davidson Commissioner The U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
Political Process 3.6 Politics and Government. E- voting Electronic voting systems for electorates have been in use since the 1960s when punched card.
WHY THE vvpat has failed
NIST Voting Program Activities Update January 4, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.
VVPAT Building Confidence in U.S. Elections. WHAT IS VVPAT ? Voter-verifiable paper audit trail Requires the voting system to print a paper ballot containing.
Election Reform The Open Voting Consortium. Elections are important Voting is how we ultimately control.our government Many elections are decided by just.
Creating Accessibility, Usability and Privacy Requirements for the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) Whitney Quesenbery TGDC Member Chair, Subcommittee.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Election Assistance Commission 1 Technical Guidelines Development Committee Meeting Post-HAVA Voting System Requirements – Federal Perspective February.
Association of World Election Bodies Contents ICT–based Election Management Voter Registration and Identification Voting and Counting Examples.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Accessibility and Usability Considerations for UOCAVA Remote Electronic Voting Systems Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute.
The VVSG 2005 Revision Overview EAC Standards Board Meeting February 26-27, 2009 John P. Wack NIST Voting Program National Institute.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT NASEM Future of Voting Meeting June 12, 2017
National Institute of Standards and Technology
EVoting 23 October 2006.
How do Elections Work? Section 2 (pages ).
E-voting …and why it’s good..
A Modular Voting Architecture (“Frogs”)
CDF for Voting Systems: Human Factors Issues
Con Electronic Voting Preston Pope, Zach White, Ankit Shrivastava, Max Alexander.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Ronald L. Rivest MIT NASEM Future of Voting December 7, 2017
Election Security Best Practices
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Accessible Voting Initiatives in Maryland
Election Security Best Practices
Bharat Electronics
Presentation transcript:

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. IDEaS Professor Chair Human-Centered Computing Division School of Computing Clemson University

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Outline Prime III Voting System Model Demo What’s Next? Discussion

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Prime III Paper Ballot This process begins with a blank ballot  Ballot paper is a specific stock  The ballot may contain a watermark After the voter is authorized to vote using the voter registration database/roll

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Prime III Paper Ballot Voter’s ballot identification number Ballot language Voter Ready Ballot is placed in Prime III Machine and the voter’s ballot is loaded with the appropriate language.

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Prime III Universal Accessibility

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Multimodal Multimodal Interactions  Voters can speak and touch interchangeably

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Voter - Touch Large touch screens  Large fonts  Images or No Images  Touchable Names centered on button Voter touches the screen to make selection  Confirmation is visual Ballot layout  One race per screen  Voter confirms ballot before it is recorded

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Voter - Verbal Headset  The system speaks to the voter through the headset  Conversation is confidential – no one can hear the machine’s speech, but the voter  System’s speech can be pre-recorded or computer generated or both. Embedded microphone in the headset  Voter speaks words like “vote”, “continue”, etc. or blows into the microphone  Confirmation is verbal

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Voter – Universal Accessibility Sighted Blind Deaf Illiteracy  Sighted and Blind Physical Disabilities  Limited or no use of hands  For example, wounded military, elderly, etc. All of these voters can privately and independently vote on the same machine!

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Software Prime III DVD  Bootable DVD contains Prime III  Created, approved and sealed

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Voter-Verified and Generated Ballot (VVGB)  Printed ballots will contain only the selections for each race Barcode on printed ballots for scanning  More accurate and easier to scan  Ballot contents may be read back to the voter VVGB is scanned by a separate, independent machine VVGB

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Security

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Demo

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility What did you see and hear?

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Visual Voter ready ballot One race per screen Delay after each touch Names are centered on each button  W. Virginia vote flipping VVGB

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility VVGB Prevents - Minnesota Image taken from Minnesota Public Radio Website

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Statistical Power of 10% Audits Percentage-Based versus Statistical-Power-Based Vote Tabulation Audits John McCarthy, Howard Stanislevic, Mark Lindeman, Arlene S. Ash, Vittorio Addona, Mary Batcher The American Statistician Feb 2008, Vol. 62, No. 1: 11–16.

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility VVGB Preliminary studies against VVPAT and Optical Scan  Osher Lifelong Learning Institute  More efficient on speed and accuracy Barcode scanning is magnitudes more accurate than optical scans

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Verbal Verbal response to touch Privacy in voice interactions I blew into the microphone to make a selection Voters can hear the ballot results after they are printed

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Conclusions

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Conclusions Universal Design  1 machine for everyone (California Incident)  Poll workers are trained on 1 platform  Multimodal Interface accommodates nearly everyone Software Independent  No undetectable change or error in the software or system can cause an undetectable change or error in the election outcome  Software Independence (Rivest & Wack, 2006; EAC, 2007)  Voter verified paper trail  Statistical audit  More accurate than optical scan  No more Minnesota

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Conclusions Recount ability  Thus far, better than optical scan and VVPAT Component based design adaptable for  Military and overseas voting  Fax, Internet, Mail, Phone, etc.  Mail-In voting (Oregon)

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Conclusions – What’s Next? Usability studies with different populations Ergonomic design of the actual machine(s) Voter registration and administration Election management and poll worker training Maybe a real election  Any volunteers?

Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Thank You Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. IDEaS Professor & Chair Human Centered Computing Division School of Computing Clemson University