VVPAT BY KRISTEN DUARTE & JESSICA HAWKINS. WHAT IS VVPAT? An add-on to electronic voting machines that allows voters to get a printed version of their.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Secret Ballot Receipts: True Voter Verifiable Elections Author: David Chaum Published: IEEE Security & Privacy Presenter: Adam Anthony.
Advertisements

Electronic Voting Systems
Voting System in the November 4, 2008 General Election Produced by the Iowa State Association of County Auditors.
Hard Facts about Soft Voting David E. ‘Dave’ University of Virginia Department of Computer Science.
ELECTRONIC VOTING (HK) FEBRUARY 2004 COPYRIGHT © 2004 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Electronic Voting: The Technology of Democracy Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Ballot On Demand David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology
Will Your Vote Count? Will your vote count? Voting machine choices N.C. Coalition for Verified Voting Joyce McCloy Pros and Cons of voting.
A technical analysis of the VVSG 2007 Stefan Popoveniuc George Washington University The PunchScan Project.
Internet Voting Technology and policy issues. Selective History of Voting (US) early 1800’s: public oral voting at County Hall 1800’s: free-form, non-secret.
Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. Human Centered Computing Lab Prime III Universal Accessibility Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D. IDEaS Professor Chair Human-Centered Computing.
Electronic Voting: Danger and Opportunity J. Alex Halderman Department of Computer Science Center for Information Technology Policy Princeton University.
1 Receipt-freedom in voting Pieter van Ede. 2 Important properties of voting  Authority: only authorized persons can vote  One vote  Secrecy: nobody.
1 J. Alex Halderman Security Failures in Electronic Voting Machines Ariel Feldman Alex Halderman Edward Felten Center for Information Technology Policy.
Observation of e-enabled elections Jonathan Stonestreet Council of Europe Workshop Oslo, March 2010.
Presentation by Christine McElroy
17-803/ ELECTRONIC VOTING FALL 2004 COPYRIGHT © 2004 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS / Electronic Voting Session 2: Paper Trails Michael I. Shamos,
Electronic Voting: The 2004 Election and Beyond Flashback: Florida 2000.
Electronic Voting Linh Nguyen. Electronic Voting  Voting Technologies  The Florida 2000 Election  Direct Recording Electronic Devices (DREs)‏ - Diebold.
Reliability in Embedded Software Joseph Lucas. Requirements Real time/reactive operation Real time/reactive operation Small size, low weight Small size,
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
High Tech Voting Yecheal Tarshish CS-100. Why upgrade the voting process? Remember Florida 2000?
Data and Applications Security Secure Electronic Voting Machines Lecture #30 Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas April 23, 2008.
Election Administration. Ensuring legitimacy of the government Legitimacy: acceptance of the right of public officials to hold office and to promulgate.
Demystifying the Independent Test Authority (ITA)
IEEE vTools Voting. Electronic Election for sections, chapters, and affinity groups – Piloted in 2007 & 2008 using a vendor software – In parallel, started.
Audit Purpose of Audit Quality assurance procedure Check accuracy of machine tally of ballots Ballots for a contest are sampled, manually verified, and.
25 October Elections and Voting. Punch Card Machine Punch cards stacked here Punched here.
TOWARDS OPEN VOTE VERIFICATION METHOD IN E-VOTING Ali Fawzi Najm Al-Shammari17’th July2012 Sec Vote 2012.
Chapter 16 Designing Effective Output. E – 2 Before H000 Produce Hardware Investment Report HI000 Produce Hardware Investment Lines H100 Read Hardware.
AutoMARK Overview Preparation & Testing. AutoMARK: An Overview Q: What is it? A: A great big printer Q: When is it used? A: Onestop and Election Day Q:
E-Voting Dissent Sara Wilson, Katie Noto, John Massie, Will Sutherland, Molly Cooper.
Digital Democracy: A look at Voting Machines Presented by Justin Dugger April 2003.
Secretary of State Voting System Security Standards Juanita Woods Secretary of State Elections Division HAVA Information Security.
California Secretary of State Voting Systems Testing Summit November 28 & 29, 2005, Sacramento, California Remarks by Kim Alexander, President, California.
GENERAL ELECTION COMMISSION OF MONGOLIA LEGAL FRAMEWORK 1992The Сonstitution of Mongolia 2006Law on the central electoral body 2011Law on the automated.
Audit Trail
Idaho Procedures AUTOMARK BALLOT MARKING DEVICE. Document Firmware Upgrade  AutoMark Voter Assist Terminal, (VAT) version or  AutoMark.
Electronic Voting: The 2004 Election and Beyond Prof. David L. Dill Department of Computer Science Stanford University
Online voting: a legal perspective
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Auditing concepts David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology
Idaho Procedures M100 OPTICAL SCAN PRECINCT TABULATOR.
How and what to observe in e-enabled elections Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
Reporting Abstract Requirements and Procedures. New Reporting Requirement Official Abstract of Votes New form to be completed and submitted to the Secretary.
WHY THE vvpat has failed
Electronic Voting: Danger and Opportunity
WHAT CONSTITUTES A VOTE? Annual Training for County Election Officials
VVPAT Building Confidence in U.S. Elections. WHAT IS VVPAT ? Voter-verifiable paper audit trail Requires the voting system to print a paper ballot containing.
7 th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs  Must be 18 years old by a set date before the next election  Voter registration protects your vote  No.
Voting Equipment, Technology and Supplies NC State Board of Elections Wellness Check CHECKLIST.
Election Reform The Open Voting Consortium. Elections are important Voting is how we ultimately control.our government Many elections are decided by just.
PREPARATIONS FOR VOTING: IN QUEST OF INTEGRITY AND PUBLIC CONFIDENCE by Roy G. Saltman Consultant on Election Policy and Technology
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Idaho Procedures M650 GREEN LIGHT OPTICAL SCAN TABULATOR.
Warm Up In the Voting Rights Act of 1965, when certain state required preclearance, what needed to happen before a state could change its voting laws?
7 th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs  Must be ___ years old by a set ____ before the next ________  Voter _________ protects your vote  No one.
E-Government, E-Voting, and the Future Jordan Weiler.
The Voters Role in Government Class Lecture. Requirements for Voters Requirements for voters in Georgia: years old 2. Citizen of the United States.
1 Election Day Operations for TSX Counties Prepared and Presented by: Matt Grubbs, Director of Elections/HAVA.
The VVSG 2005 Revision Overview EAC Standards Board Meeting February 26-27, 2009 John P. Wack NIST Voting Program National Institute.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT NASEM Future of Voting Meeting June 12, 2017
EVoting 23 October 2006.
E-voting …and why it’s good..
Electronic voting – safe or not?
The Voters Choice Act (SB 450) Modernizing The Voting Experience
Election Security Best Practices
Accessible Voting Initiatives in Maryland
The Voters Choice Act (SB 450) Modernizing The Voting Experience
Election Security Best Practices
7th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs
Lesson 3: Medical Records
Presentation transcript:

VVPAT BY KRISTEN DUARTE & JESSICA HAWKINS

WHAT IS VVPAT? An add-on to electronic voting machines that allows voters to get a printed version of their ballot. Like a printed receipt

COMMON PROBLEMS Increases the cost of electronic voting systems Not an effective check on malfunction or fraud because most voters aren’t required to look at it Difficult to use because of the external hardware  Hiring technicians  Educating voters and poll-workers

SECURITY PROBLEMS Malicious software code can be put into the VVPAT to misrecord the voters’ selections The printer could invalidate a new ballot once the voter leaves and print a new fraudulent ballot VVPAT can print when the voter isn’t observing the paper trail  “Ballot stuffing”  Hard to differentiate between fraudulent and real ballots

PRIVACY CONCERNS Ohio case in 2007 Disabled and blind voters are at a disadvantage because they are unable to identify their ballot on their own

COSTS In Orange County, the cost of the VVPAT is $12,121,875 and the cost of the whole system including the voting machines and installation is $40,333, In King County, New York the cost of the VVPAT is $660,000. This caused the county to spend $11.3 million on the election. This cost included the machine maintenance, manual recounts, and general election costs.

STATISTICS In Georgia, the installation and use of the VVPAT only increased the voter confidence from 86.9% to 89.4%. As of 2008, only 19 states required at least some ballots to be recounted 10% of the VVPAT spools are unreadable or missing 19% of the spools reported discrepancies