2014 Election Ballot Mill Levy Override #3A For the Elizabeth School District Explained.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 Election Ballot Mill Levy Override #3A For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
Advertisements

Increasing the Navajo County Expenditure Limit: Key Information for Voters “Proudly Serving, Continuously Improving”
Legislative Committee on Education Capital Funding Needs July 15, 2014.
BRIEF HISTORY OF BENTON HARBOR PROPERTY TAXES 1954 – Present10 mills authorized by City Charter, reduced annually for Headlee Rollback 2001 –
2014 Election Ballot Bond Question #3B For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
1 School Funding Discussion November 15, 2007 Brighton Area Schools.
Financing Public Schools In Colorado (The Intersection With TABOR and Gallagher) Presented To: School Finance Partnership Presented By: Rudy Andras Economist.
DEBT SERVICE EXTENSION BASE REFERENDUM Hartsburg-Emden District #21.
WSSDA Webinar May 14, 2014 Barbara Posthumus, Director of Business Services Lake Washington School District
GUHSD CITIZENS COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Election Information and Budget Overview.
Mattoon Community Unit School District #2 MCUSD# Tax Levy Presentation Presented: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 Board Action: Tuesday, November 13, 2007.
0 RBC contracted with Public Opinion Strategies to conduct a telephone survey in Douglas County School District, Colorado. The survey was completed April.
TABOR Rebates: Just the Facts. What are TABOR Rebates? When state revenues (Fiscal Year Spending) exceed a voter approved cap (rate of change in CPI plus.
THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION Article IX, Section 1: The education of children is a fundamental value of the people of the State of Florida. It is, therefore,
Funding Georgia’s Public Schools: An Overview. What We’ll Cover… An overview of public school funding The difference between federal, state and local.
What is the proposed ballot issue? Referred measure 3B: Increased funding for education in School District 51 only Shall taxes on peoples’ property (house,
Association of Indiana Counties Tax Caps Tax caps are a good policy but is 3, 2, 1 a good policy? Tax caps are a good policy but is 3, 2, 1 a good policy?
On the November 6, 2012 Ballot, Cherokee County voters will be asked to consider a HOST, an additional penny sales tax, which will be used to reduce property.
Supplemental Levy Election Tuesday, March 11, 2014.
TECHNOLOGY AND SAFETY LEVY Olympia School District.
Vote Yes by January 12. Wiest Drive $1.9 million$20,000 Mural.
Levy and Bond Recap Board Report September 10, 2013.
Budget cuts have negatively affected Aurora Public Schools.
Why is Bond Oversight so important? The Law (California Constitution and Education Codes) Huge amount of construction and related activity Potential for.
Horizon Council PresentationHorizon Council Presentation April 22, 2015April 22, 2015.
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in Douglas County, Colorado #12459 May 25-26, 2010.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force March 29,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
What Kind Of Colorado Do You Want?. 3 Proposals on 2010 Ballot Prop 101: Significantly reduces local and state support for public services, in particular.
Lauderdale County Board of Education Florence City Schools Futures Take Flight FRIENDS OF FLORENCE CITY AND LAUDERDALE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Inver Grove Heights Community Schools Public Hearing for Taxes Payable in 2014 December 16, 2013 Jason Mutzenberger Director of Business Services.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
Why Do We Need to Pass a Referendum on November 3, 2015? 1.
Understanding Your School District Budget  Annual Spending Plan  To provide quality instruction and educational programs  Ensures taxpayers’ money.
Sunnyside stands for education $88 million bond M&O override.
Farmington Municipal Schools Two Mill Levy Election.
1 Prop 82: An Historic Opportunity for California’s Children.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance August 20, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Mott Community College Board of Trustees Committee of the Whole Meeting June 27, 2011 BUDGET RESOLUTIONS.
Savoy ISD Tax Ratification Election (TRE) What is it and why it is needed.
1 Convention Center Authority Republican Policy Group Presentation March 23 rd 2015.
November 2 School Levy. Why place a levy on the Nov. 2 ballot?  To help ensure that we provide the services that our students need to be successful.
Weed and Fee’d A TABOR story in two parts By Tim Hoover Communications Director Colorado Fiscal Institute.
City of Veneta Town Hall December /7 coverage with 2 deputies on duty School resource deputy Community resource deputy Full time sergeant 2.
Piqua City Schools Good Schools……Good Value Piqua City School District Permanent Improvement Levy Renewal Presentation May 6, 2014 Superintendent of Schools:
Finance 101. School Boards = Prisoners of Information.
Community Levy Information Meeting Coming Together for Kids! January 13, 2016.
SCHOOL LEVY INFORMATION Quincy School District February 2015.
Presented to the Board of Education April 26, 2016.
For more than 115 years, the AUHSD has developed the future business and civic leaders of Anaheim, Buena Park, Cypress, La Palma and Stanton 90% of our.
SMITHVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT Tradition of Excellence The Power of One … One Community … One Future! November 4, 2014 SMITHVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT.
2016 K-12 Education Package Presented by Tami Darnall SD Department of Education.
BUDGET HEARING II Presented to the Board of Education MAY 10, 2016.
COLORADO ASSOCIATION FOR CAREER & TECHNICAL EDUCATION July 20, Legislative Session Review.
FHSD Proposition Howell Information.
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
Excellence In Education
The Conundrum of School Finance 2017 Action Summit April 21, 2017
What is the most important day of this school year?
Budget Hearing August 23rd, 2017.
How are schools funded since Proposal A
Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City, Kansas
AIKEN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT 4/18/17
G.O. Bond Survey Results Presentation for
Morton District 709 Schools
Tollgate crossing metro district No
OUR PROCESS Board reaches agreement on proposal and
Woodbridge School District
Budget office overview
California Budget & Propositions
Presentation transcript:

2014 Election Ballot Mill Levy Override #3A For the Elizabeth School District Explained

What is a Mill Levy Override? MILL LEVY OVERRIDE: Property taxes collected above the level directed by the Public School Finance Act (PSFA) of This money is locally authorized and used to address local educational priorities. The Colorado Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) requires voter approval to collect tax revenue in excess of that required by the PSFA. In the upcoming election, voters residing in the Elizabeth School District will be asked to authorize a Mill Levy Override in order to provide funding to partially offset state funding shortfalls and address local priorities. State funding shortfalls (which have, over a five year period, reached a cumulative amount of ~$13 million) have impacted the quality of education, forced pay freezes and workforce reductions, severely limited the ability to maintain our infrastructure, and required large expenditures of our finite reserves. Todd Snidow

Impact of Reduced Funding NEGATIVE FACTOR: The amount below the funding level required by Amendment 23 to the Colorado State Constitution. Flat / Declining state-level standardized test scores Pay Freezes and work force reductions Teacher turnover grew to over 30%* Over 100% turnover in 5 years Greatly reduced funding for maintenance and upkeep of facilities Upgrades to classroom and instructional technology minimized Implementation of safety and security measures delayed *Average annual teacher turnover in Colorado is <15%

Can We Reduce These Impacts? The district has determined that a partial offset of the $2.6 million annual shortfall in state-level funding would do much to reduce the negative impacts on education. The board has proposed a $1 million annual mill levy override to be allocated specifically to: Attract and retain quality teachers – Allow the district to better compete with nearby and larger districts for the best teachers. Modernize classroom and instructional technology – Replace aging/obsolete computers and increase network capabilities Improve safety and security for staff and students – Establish district wide School Resource Officer program in coordination with local law enforcement agencies

What Will it Cost Taxpayers? The School Board requests the voters approve an override $1 million annually for the next five years. Based on the total assessed value of property within the district, this equates to an additional levy of approximately 6.6 mills. For home owners this will equate to: – approximately $4.32 per month (or $52 annually) per $100K of assessed home value, or – approximately $180 per year for the average priced home. For business property owners, the cost will be approximately $220 per year for each $100K of assessed property value. This amount will be collected for a period of five years and, if still required, can only be authorized to continue by a vote of the people of the district.

How do Voters Authorize? A vote of “YES on 3A” will authorize the district to collect $1 million per year for a period of five years in order to address specific general funding needs. The ballot question is complex, but includes all language needed to ensure the School Board can meet the urgent operational needs of the district. The ballot language specifies: – the maximum amount to be collected – the operational needs to be funded – the period during which this increase will be in effect, and the maximum interest rate to be paid. – a Citizen Oversight Committee will be established to monitor the use of all taxpayer dollars authorized. Carefully read the ballot question and the additional information provided in the “Blue Book” that the county will provide. Contact a board member if you have any questions or concerns.

Understanding the Ballot Question In order to ensure the School Board can meet the urgent operational needs of the district, the ballot question was carefully written. Though complex, it - Meets the legal requirements of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) Provides the purpose of the measure and outlines the operational needs to be funded Contains a “sunset” provision to ensure that voters have the opportunity to assess both the impact of the additional funding and continuing need after a five year period. NOT A PERPETUAL TAX INCREASE. Explains how funds will be controlled and transparency will be provided to the public The following slides explain all the language in the ballot question in detail.

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES INCLUDING: PROVIDING FUNDING TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN TALENTED TEACHERS; PROVIDING INCREASED INSTRUCTIONAL AND CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED SAFETY AND SECURITY MEASURES FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT SUCH EXPENDITURES SHALL BE MONITORED BY A BOARD APPOINTED CITIZEN’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE; AND SHALL SUCH TAX INCREASE BE AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX MILL LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE LEVY AUTHORIZED FOR THE DISTRICT’S GENERAL FUND; AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, RETAIN AND SPEND ALL REVENUES FROM SUCH TAXES AND THE EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH REVENUES AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE AND AN EXCEPTION TO THE LIMITS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE APPLY UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION? The Mill Levy Override Question BALLOT QUESTION A

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES… The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES… The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A TABOR Required Language TABOR: Taxpayer Bill of Rights

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES… The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A TABOR Required Language Authorization for a tax levy increase.

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES… The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A TABOR Required Language Authorization for a tax levy increase. Amount to be collected in the first year.

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES… The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A TABOR Required Language Authorization for a tax levy increase. Amount to be collected in the first year. Amount to be collected in subsequent years.

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES… The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A “Sunset” Provision Specifies that the measure is authorized for only 5 years.

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES… The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A “Sunset” Provision Specifies that the measure is authorized for only 5 years. Specifies that only a vote of the people can extend the measure.

SHALL ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT C-1 TAXES BE INCREASED $1 MILLION IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2015, AND THEN REMAIN AT $1 MILLION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH AND INCLUDING TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2019 (SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVED REAUTHORIZATION AFTER 2019), TO BE USED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES… The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Purpose of Funding

…INCLUDING: PROVIDING FUNDING TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN TALENTED TEACHERS; PROVIDING INCREASED INSTRUCTIONAL AND CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED SAFETY AND SECURITY MEASURES FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF; The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A

…INCLUDING: PROVIDING FUNDING TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN TALENTED TEACHERS; PROVIDING INCREASED INSTRUCTIONAL AND CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED SAFETY AND SECURITY MEASURES FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF; Voter Authorized Spending The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A

…INCLUDING: PROVIDING FUNDING TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN TALENTED TEACHERS; PROVIDING INCREASED INSTRUCTIONAL AND CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED SAFETY AND SECURITY MEASURES FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF; Voter Authorized Spending The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Allows the district to better compete with nearby and larger districts for the best teachers.

…INCLUDING: PROVIDING FUNDING TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN TALENTED TEACHERS; PROVIDING INCREASED INSTRUCTIONAL AND CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED SAFETY AND SECURITY MEASURES FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF; Voter Authorized Spending The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Allows the district to better compete with nearby and larger districts for the best teachers. Supports replacing aging/obsolete computers and increase network capabilities.

…INCLUDING: PROVIDING FUNDING TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN TALENTED TEACHERS; PROVIDING INCREASED INSTRUCTIONAL AND CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED SAFETY AND SECURITY MEASURES FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF; Voter Authorized Spending The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Allows the district to better compete with nearby and larger districts for the best teachers. Supports replacing aging/obsolete computers and increase network capabilities. Provides for district-wide School Resource Officer (RSO) program in coordination with local law enforcement agencies

PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT SUCH EXPENDITURES SHALL BE MONITORED BY A BOARD APPOINTED CITIZEN’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE; AND SHALL SUCH TAX INCREASE BE AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX MILL LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE LEVY AUTHORIZED FOR THE DISTRICT’S GENERAL FUND; The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A

PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT SUCH EXPENDITURES SHALL BE MONITORED BY A BOARD APPOINTED CITIZEN’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE; AND SHALL SUCH TAX INCREASE BE AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX MILL LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE LEVY AUTHORIZED FOR THE DISTRICT’S GENERAL FUND; The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Control and Transparency

PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT SUCH EXPENDITURES SHALL BE MONITORED BY A BOARD APPOINTED CITIZEN’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE; AND SHALL SUCH TAX INCREASE BE AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX MILL LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE LEVY AUTHORIZED FOR THE DISTRICT’S GENERAL FUND; The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Control and Transparency Directs the establishment of a Citizen’s Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures of tax dollars authorized for collection by this measure

PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT SUCH EXPENDITURES SHALL BE MONITORED BY A BOARD APPOINTED CITIZEN’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE; AND SHALL SUCH TAX INCREASE BE AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX MILL LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE LEVY AUTHORIZED FOR THE DISTRICT’S GENERAL FUND; The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Control and Transparency Directs the establishment of a Citizen’s Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures of tax dollars authorized for collection by this measure Specifies that this tax is in addition to that required by the PSFA

PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT SUCH EXPENDITURES SHALL BE MONITORED BY A BOARD APPOINTED CITIZEN’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE; AND SHALL SUCH TAX INCREASE BE AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX MILL LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE LEVY AUTHORIZED FOR THE DISTRICT’S GENERAL FUND; The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Control and Transparency Directs the establishment of a Citizen’s Oversight Committee to monitor expenditures of tax dollars authorized for collection by this measure Specifies that this tax is in addition to that required by the PSFA Specifies these taxes augment the district’s general fund

AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, RETAIN AND SPEND ALL REVENUES FROM SUCH TAXES AND THE EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH REVENUES AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE AND AN EXCEPTION TO THE LIMITS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE APPLY UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION? The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A

AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, RETAIN AND SPEND ALL REVENUES FROM SUCH TAXES AND THE EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH REVENUES AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE AND AN EXCEPTION TO THE LIMITS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE APPLY UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION? The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Funds above the TABOR limit

AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, RETAIN AND SPEND ALL REVENUES FROM SUCH TAXES AND THE EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH REVENUES AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE AND AN EXCEPTION TO THE LIMITS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE APPLY UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION? The Bond Question Explained BALLOT QUESTION 3A Funds above the TABOR limit Specifies that any money collected is authorized over and above any limit specified by the Taxpayer Bill of Rights.