Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the 2009-2010 school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes in Student Assessment and School Accountability A-1.
Advertisements

School Grades Model and Historical Background
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Cohort Graduation Exit Code Review December 18, 2014.
CTE and the A-F Report Card ODCTE Summer Conference 2012.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Mary Jane Tappen Executive Vice Chancellor Division of Public Schools.
School Grades, Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Reporting, and Alternative School Improvement Ratings Florida Charter School Conference 2010 Presenter: Edward.
Test Chairpersons Meeting September A ccountability R esearch and M easurement  On February 28, 2012, the State Board of Education considered.
Testing and Accountability Update: Legislation, School Grades July, 2013 Dr. Karen Schafer Director, Office of Accountability and Testing.
College and Career Ready Pre K – 12 Public Schools Florida College System State University System 1.
Rule Development Workshop: School Grades Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August 13, 2013 Florida Department of Education Division of Accountability,
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
 Gisela Feild Administrative Director Assessment, Research and Data Analysis July 2014.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
How Does Oregon Report Graduation Rates? Cohort Graduation Rate This year’s release reports on graduation rates for students who first entered high school.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Changes and Impacts A & S May  Accountability History  Accountability Changes and Impact  Discussion 2.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting April 8 and.
Implementing the 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate. Projected Four-Year Dropout Rate – A measure of the cumulative proportion of the 9 th grade class that.
GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS Senate Bill COLLEGE & CAREER READINESS Department of School Counseling Cynthia Park, Director Ralph Aiello, Coordinator.
Graduation Conversation Doug Kosty Assistant Superintendent, Office of Learning Derek Brown Manager, Assessment of Essential Skills Cristen McLean Operations.
A Survival Guide 13/23/2010.  Today’s Presentation  Presenters & Support Personnel  Handouts  Questions  Follow-Up School Visits 3/23/
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Testing and Accountability Update: Legislation, School Grades July, 2013 Dr. Karen Schafer Director, Office of Accountability and Testing.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update Florida Charter School Conference November 20, 2014.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Student Services Meeting September 2012 Gisela Feild 1.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C. Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum Contact Meeting Adapted.
1.  Non-FCAT Components  Review FCAT Components 2.
School Accountability Update July 2005-March 2006.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Measuring Michigan’s Graduation & Dropout Rates The Impact of the Four-Year Cohort Margaret Merlyn Ropp Ph.D., Director Center for Educational Performance.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
The Florida College System Fall What do students need to know? 28 colleges in Florida, one near you Lower tuition than a state university and most.
CTE and the A-F Report Card Tommi Leach and Kelly Arrington, ODCTE.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. School Accountability Rules.
Florida Raising the Ceiling, Raising the Floor February 15, 2011.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Florida’s School Grading System Updates Florida Organization of Instructional Leaders (FOIL) Fall Conference 2013 Lake Mary, Florida November 14, 2013.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Understanding our 2012 High School Grade 1Spruce Creek High.
1 Proposed Changes to School Grades for and Beyond.
Testing and Accountability Update July, 2010 Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Testing and Accountability.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Accountability Update
How the Graduation Rate Is Calculated
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
FY12 Accountability Updates
Overview of School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress,
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Gisela Feild Administrative Director
External Data Usage in Florida
Revising High School Grading Requirements
Accountability Presentation
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Secondary Data Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining 50% will be based on factors that include: –A school’s graduation rate; –As valid data become available, the performance and participation of students in AP, IB, Dual Enrollment, AICE, and industry-certification; –The postsecondary readiness of the students as measured by the SAT, ACT, or CPT; –The high school graduation rate of at-risk students; –The performance of a school’s students on statewide standardized end-of-course assessments, when available; and –Growth or decline in the data components from year to year. 1

2 Timeline

New Component #1: Graduation Rate Proposal: Use Florida High School Graduation Rate calculation that excludes GEDs (NGA rate) Use “current year” rate; not lagged measure. –For example, 2010 School Grade would use the graduation rate for the Class of

Insert Note: Florida’s High School Graduation Rate Calculation: Implications for the Standardized National Calculation 4

Secretary Spellings: Uniform Graduation Rate Proposal Defines HS graduate rate as the number of students who exit in the standard number of years with a regular high school diploma divided by the number of students who entered 9 th grade four years earlier – adjusted for transfers in and out. Calculation must include disagreggations by race, gender, and low income status. States must implement by ; interim formula may be used for states lacking the capability to account for all elements of the formula. GED recipients would be considered “non-graduates”. Proposal to permit states to propose an alternate definition of “standard number of years” for limited categories of students under certain conditions. 5

Graduation Rate Calculations Florida’s regular rate includes all diploma recipients. This includes standard and special diplomas as well as regular and adult GEDs. The NCLB graduation rate includes standard diplomas and regular GEDs but excludes the special diplomas and the adult GEDs. The USDOE proposed rate (NGA Compact) includes standard and special diplomas but excludes all GEDs, regular and adult. 6

Florida Rates: Regular High School Graduation Rate and the NGA Compact Graduation Rate Source: Education Information and Accountability Services 7

Florida’s Adjusted Cohort High School Four Year Graduation Rate Illustrated for ’s Graduates th graders th graders th graders th graders = Adjusted Cohort The Denominator Transfers into Each Grade Level Transfers from Each Grade Level Adjusted Cohort -- = The Numerator Students not graduating Dropouts during the 4 years Total Graduates 8

Adjusted Cohort Total Graduates = Four Year Graduation Rate 70.3% Florida’s Adjusted Cohort High School Four Year Graduation Rate Illustrated for ’s Graduates NGA Compact Rate- Education Information and Accountability Services, Florida DOE 9

Calculation Issues Documenting Transfers Out: –Charter School, Home School & Private School –Transfers out of state –Adult Education Transfers In: –New Enrollees What is the definition of a “graduate”? 10

New Component #2: Performance & Participation in Accelerated Coursework Initial Proposal 1.Separate Measures for Participation and Performance 2.Base measures (i.e., percent participating/performing) on all 9-12 th graders at the school in a given year – capturing student participation/performance throughout their high school careers. –Goal: Increase the number of students graduating from high school earning at least some postsecondary credit. –This method holds schools accountable for all their graduating students; not just those who enroll in accelerated courses. 3.Weight the different types of accelerated coursework based on credits earned… 11

New Component #2: Performance & Participation in Accelerated Coursework Proposal Industry certification will be included in the formula in ; not phased-in a year later as previously proposed. For the participation measure, there will be no weights applied for different types of accelerated coursework. For the performance measure, a weighting method is proposed based on the logic used to award postsecondary credit by exam (as approved in rule). 12

New Component #2: Performance in Accelerated Coursework Successful Completions defined as: AP Score of 31 Successful Completion Score of 4 or 52 Successful Completions IB Score of 41 Successful Completion Score of 5, 6, or 72 Successful Completions AICE Passing Score on an AS Level AICE Exam 1 Successful Completion Passing Score on an A Level AICE Exam 2 Successful Completions Dual Enrollment Passing grade of “C” or higher in the course 1 Successful Completion Industry Certification 10/30/200810/30/20081 Successful Completion 13

New Component #3: Postsecondary Readiness Proposal: Number of students scoring “ready” (as defined by state approved cut scores) on the ACT, SAT, or CPT divided by the total number of students who scored at achievement level 3 or higher on required FCAT graduation tests. –Separate measures for Reading, Writing, and Math –If student takes multiple tests (ACT, SAT, or CPT), the students highest score by subtest is used. This is consistent with the Bright Futures considerations and the current calculation of readiness. 14

New Component #4: Graduation Rate for At-Risk Students Proposal Use Florida High School Graduation Rate calculation that excludes GEDs (NGA rate) Subset of overall cohort – including only those students that earned a Level 2 or lower on both FCAT Reading and Math in 8 th Grade. If a school does not have at least 30 students in that subgroup, the school’s overall graduation rate will be substituted for this measure. –This is consistent with what is done currently in school grades in regard to the learning gains of the lowest performing students (bottom quartile). 15

New Component #5: Growth or Decline in components Proposal: Schools earn an escalating number of bonus points based on the magnitude of their improvement. Bonus Points would be awarded based on the following improvements (growth from prior year): 5 to 9 percentage point improvement 5 bonus points 10 to 19 percentage point improvement 10 bonus points 20+ percentage point improvement 20 bonus points 16

17