Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Advertisements

Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
National Survey of Student Engagement Department of Institutional Research and Planning December 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
The College of Education We develop educational leaders who create tomorrow’s opportunities.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2002.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Topic #4 - EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Evidence: PowerPoint of Key Evidence Produced by AC Office of Outcomes Assessments 1.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement)
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University

What is NSSE? We have often heard the term NSSE, but not everyone really knows what it is. See if you can answer this question: What is NSSE?

A. a creature from Loch?

B. a really big spill

C. a diagnosis YOU Have NSSE!

D. The National Survey for Student Engagement

Today’s Presentation Briefly introduce the NSSE Focus on two question categories Point out some potential uses of the NSSE for Student Affairs Share a few examplesShare a few examples of how NSSE is currently used at ISU Transition to discussions of how to use this (and other) information in Student Affairs

Question Categories on the NSSE Academic and intellectual experiences Mental activities Examinations Reading and writing Problem sets Homework problems Enriching educational experiences Quality of relationships Time usage Institutional environment Educational and personal growth Academic advising Satisfaction

NSSE Category Nine: Time Usage Question: “About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? 1=0 hrs/wk; 2=1-5; 3=6-10; 4=11-15; 5=16-20; 6=21-25; 7=26-30; 8=>30 Question Themes : –Preparing for class –Working for pay on campus –Working for pay off campus –Participation in co-curricular activities –Relaxing and socializing –Providing care for dependents living with you –Commuting to class

Preparing for Class Freshman Students 3.54* (6-10 hrs. per week) Senior Students 3.98 (6-10 hrs. per week) When compared with other freshman at doctoral-intensive and all other NSSE-participating schools, ISU freshman spend significantly less time preparing for class.

Working Working for pay on campus Working for pay off campus Freshman Students 1.61 (0 hours per week) 2.89* (1-5 hours per week) Senior Students 1.96 (1-5 hours per week) 3.77* (6-10 hours per week) When compared to students at other doctoral-intensive and NSSE-participating institutions, ISU freshman work for pay off campus significantly more (p<.001). ISU seniors work for pay off campus significantly more (p<.01) when compared to other seniors at NSSE participating institutions.

Participating in Co-Curricular Activities Freshmen2.37* (1-5 hours per week) Seniors2.08 (1-5 hours per week) ISU freshmen participate in co-curricular activities significantly more than freshmen at other doctoral-intensive universities (p<.001).

Observations: What do the NSSE Questions Have to Say About ISU Students’ Use of Time? Results for preparing for class might be a concern Freshman participation in co- curricular activities is encouraging. How might these results be “sliced and diced?” Might the athletic department, or Greek life like to see their own data (which would differ) in respect to their own students? Key point—what might be useful in helping us understand our students and how to better serve them?

NSSE Category Eleven: Education and Personal Growth Acquiring a broad general education Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills Writing clearly and effectively Speaking clearly and effectively Thinking critically and analytically Analyzing quantitative problems Using computing and information technology Working effectively with others Learning effectively on your own Understanding yourself Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds Solving complex real-world problems Developing a personal code of values and ethics Contributing to the welfare of your community All questions rated on 4 point scale; 1=very little; 2=some; 3=quite a bit; 4=very much

Working Effectively With Others Freshmen2.88 (some/quite a bit) Seniors3.10 (quite a bit) ISU freshman and senior scores lower than those at NSSE-participating and doctoral intensive institutions (sig. p<.05)

Voting Freshmen2.54 (some) Seniors2.24 (some) ISU freshmen reported voting higher than freshmen at other doctoral-intensive universities (p<.05).

Understanding People of Other Racial/Ethnic Backgrounds Freshmen2.56 (some) Seniors2.61 (some)

Contributing to the Welfare of the Community Freshmen2.22* (some) Seniors2.37* (some) ISU freshmen and seniors rate ISU significantly lower than those at other NSSE institutions (p<.01); however, ISU seniors rate ISU higher than in 2003.

Observations Given some improvements, why did this occur? What did ISU do to improve institutional performance? What can be done to improve performance in some areas? Can these data be “sliced and diced?”

How Are NSSE Data Currently Being Used at ISU to Affect Institutional Effectiveness?

General Education Assessment NSSE questions are matched with a number of performance indicators Results on the NSSE indicate that ISU students perform well in respect to participating in community projects as part of a course, for example Used with other indicators, such as GRE scores, to assess the quality of student learning

College of Nursing The use of NSSE questions is currently being discussed by faculty 2003 NSSE results indicate that Nursing students tend to commute and take care of dependents living with them than other students Implications for student services

College of Education Teacher education program was in need of assessments for diversity and technology 2003 NSSE questions indicate that senior teacher candidates rate the institution significantly higher on technology than freshman teacher candidates Implications for upcoming (November 2005) NCATE and IPSB visit

Concluding Comments NSSE is useful in assessing institutional capacity on several student affairs questions NSSE questions can be “sliced and diced” so they can be used by different departments and programs Central question about assessment—not only placing data on a table, but actually using and discussing data to enhance students’ experience at ISU.

Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice The benchmarks are based on 42 key questions from the NSSE survey that capture many of the most important aspects of the student experience. These student behaviors and institutional features are some of the more powerful contributors to learning and personal development.

Level of Academic Challenge Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Colleges and universities promote high levels of student achievement by emphasizing expectations for student performance. Activities and conditions: Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, and other activities related to your academic program) Number of assigned textbooks of course readings Number of written papers or report of 20 pages or more Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages Coursework emphasizing analysis of the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Coursework emphasizing synthesis and organizing ideas, information into new, more complex interpretations Coursework emphasizing the making of judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods Coursework emphasizing application of theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations Campus environment emphasizing time studying and on academic work

Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when they are intensively involved in their education and are asked to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Collaborating with others in solving problems or mastering difficult material prepares students to deal with the messy, unscripted problems they will encounter daily during and after college. Activities: Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussion Make a class presentation Worked with other students on projects during class Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Tutored or taught other students Participated in a community-based project as part of a regular course Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

Student-Faculty Interactions Students see first-hand how experts think about and solve practical problems by interacting with faculty members inside and outside the classroom. As a result, their teachers become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, life-long learning. Activities: Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student-life activities, etc.) Received prompt feedback from faculty on your academic performance (written or oral) Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements

Enriching Educational Experiences (many items here were asked freshmen in the form of "do you plan to do item") Complementary learning opportunities inside and outside the classroom augment the academic program. Experiencing diversity teaches students valuable things about themselves and other cultures. Used appropriately, technology facilitates learning and promotes collaboration between peers and provides students with opportunities to synthesize, integrate, and apply their knowledge. Such experiences make learning more meaningful and, ultimately, more useful because what student know becomes a part of who they are. Activities and conditions: Participating in co-curricular activities (student government, social fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate sports, etc.) Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment Community service or volunteer work Foreign language coursework Study abroad Independent study or self-designed major Culminating senior experience (comprehensive exam, capstone course, thesis, project, etc.) Learning communities Talking with students with religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values Talking with students of a different race or ethnicity Using electronic technology to discuss or complete assignments Campus environment encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

Supportive Campus Environment Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relations among different groups on campus. Conditions: Campus environment provides the support you need to help you succeed academically Campus environment helps you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Campus environment provides the support you need to thrive socially Quality of relationships with other students Quality of relationships with faculty members Quality of relationships with administrative personnel and offices

Question #1 What are we doing to support this particular Benchmark?

Question #2 What else can we do to support this particular Benchmark?

Question #3 What question(s) might your unit have that the NSSE could address?