Preliminary Analysis of the 2013 Canadian Graduate and Professional Student Survey (CGPSS) - York University Results Richard Smith Acting Director Office.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.

Advertisements

1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.

SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.

Subjective well-being in the human services: A pathway to sustainable social development John Graham Murray Fraser Professor Faculty of Social work Fuschia.

QEP -- What & Why? The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) is part of the Reaffirmation Process for the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association.

College of Engineering. Table of Contents Introduction about the National Survey of Student engagement. NSSE response rate Benchmarking areas Areas of.

Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.

Campus Climate for UNC Charlotte Faculty Findings from the 1998, 2001, & 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of.

The Pathway to Success Create a Unified Undergraduate Student Success Program Goal 1 – Initiative 3.

Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.

Benchmarks from the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey University Faculty Meeting October.

November 29, 2006Management Form Principal’s Task Force: Student Life & Learning Morton J. Mendelson Deputy Provost (Student Life & Learning)

CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.

National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.

UK higher education: quality assurance at home and abroad Carolyn Campbell The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

U of Alberta Enhancing doctoral education: A collaborative endeavour? Lynn McAlpine, Oxford University Cheryl Amundsen, Simon Fraser University (As you.

Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.

Title III Strengthening the Institution Don Staub, Director.

University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.

Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.

Arizona State University College of Education Curriculum and Instruction Science Education Mathematics Education Language and Literacy.

Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.

Being a Successful Graduate Student  As a new graduate student, you are likely wondering:  What is graduate school like?  What should I expect?  Can.

Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.

LeBaron Woodyard Dean, Academic Affairs October 30, 2013 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL OFFICERS FALL 2013 CONFERENCE.

Community College Survey of Student Engagement JIM Meeting Presentation January 20, 2009 Jerome Ward Director, Institutional Research Cochise College.

What We've Learned: How Service Prepares Individuals for Employment and Post-Secondary Education Sheila Fesko Dana Carpenter.

Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.

HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.

Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.

ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.

National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.

NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/

“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.

Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA Higher Education Research Institute University of California at Los Angeles HERI Faculty Survey 48.

Academic support Curriculum Review Presentation 12 th June 2008 Mark Garner.

SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.

Graduating Senior Survey Summary of Results through

Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.

The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.

Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.

Council of Ontario Universities Ontario’s Graduate Programs Outcomes Survey Presented to The Canadian Association for Graduate Studies Julia Colyar October.

UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.

ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.

1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.

Institutional Effectiveness: Sophomores’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Sophomore Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.

MnSCU Audit Committee May 20, Update on System-level Accountability Framework May 20, 2003.

UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.

Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement 11/13/15.

Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA Higher Education Research Institute University of California at Los Angeles HERI Faculty Survey 57.

RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.

The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.

Institutional Effectiveness: Seniors’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Senior Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office.

Introductions Emily Carpenter Coordinator, Academic Advising College of Arts and Sciences Suzanne Dantuono Director of Advising College of Engineering.

Training for staff members responsible for writing self-evaluation reports of study programmes, May 2011 University of Tuzla Prof. Dr Emina Nakaš-Ićindić.

Experiences with Faculty

Major Conceptual Frameworks

Realize. A better world through research.

The positive impact of personal advising training

UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

TRENT UNIVERSITY 2007 CGPSS REPORT

Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services

Special Collections as a Community for Interdisciplinary Collaboration Caroline G. Hogan , School of Library & Information Science, The University of.

College of Graduate & Postdoctoral Studies

FSSE-G RESULTS Faculty Survey of Student Engagement for Graduate Student Instructors.

UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

The Heart of Student Success

UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Analysis of the 2013 Canadian Graduate and Professional Student Survey (CGPSS) - York University Results Richard Smith Acting Director Office of Institutional Research and Analysis September 2013

2 Introduction York participated in the Canadian Graduate and Professional Student Survey (CGPSS) since CGPSS is used by Ontario universities as part of the Multi-Year Accountability Agreement (MYAA) accountability framework. Data for this report are sourced from York’s 2013 survey results. Indicators are benchmarked against the results from York’s 2010 survey, as well as the 2013 results for Ontario and Canada.

3 Response rates

4 Distribution of respondents by discipline

5 Overall indicators of satisfaction The following questions are selected to reveal areas of focus for enhancing graduate student satisfaction. Part I: 1.If you were to start your graduate/professional career again, would you select this same university? 2.If you were to start your graduate/professional career again, would you select the same field of study? 3.Would you recommend this university to someone considering your program? 4.Would you recommend this university to someone in another field? 5.If you were to start your graduate career again, would you select the same faculty supervisor? Part II: 1.Overall, how would you rate the quality of your academic experience at this university? 2.Overall, how would you rate the quality of your student life experience at this university? 3.Overall, how would you rate the quality of your graduate/professional program at this university? 4.Overall, how would you rate the quality of your overall experience at this university?

6 Satisfaction with program, quality of interactions, coursework and obstacles to academic progress Part III: Rate the following dimensions of your program 1.The intellectual quality of the faculty 2.The intellectual quality of my fellow students 3.The relationship between faculty and graduate students 4.Overall quality of graduate level teaching by faculty 5.Advice on the availability of financial support 6.Quality of academic advising and guidance 7.Helpfulness of staff members in my program 8.Availability of area courses I needed to complete my program 9.Quality of instruction in my courses 10.Relationship of program content to my research/professional goals 11.Opportunities for student collaboration or teamwork 12.Opportunities to take coursework outside my own department 13.Opportunities to engage in interdisciplinary work 14.Amount of coursework Part IV: Rate the extent to which the following factors are an obstacle to your academic progress 1.Work/financial commitments 2.Family obligations 3.Availability of faculty 4.Program structure or requirements 5.Course scheduling 6.Immigration laws or regulations

7 General assessment * Difference in means significant at 5% level.

8 General satisfaction * Difference in means significant at 5% level.

9 Satisfaction with program, quality of interactions and coursework – part 1 * Difference in means significant at 5% level.

10 Satisfaction with program, quality of interactions and coursework – part 2 * Difference in means significant at 5% level.

11 Satisfaction with program, quality of interactions and coursework – part 3 * Difference in means significant at 5% level.

12 Obstacles to academic progress * Difference in means significant at 5% level.