Programme Review at the NMMU – Outcomes, Lessons Learnt and Remaining Challenges Programme Review at the NMMU – Outcomes, Lessons Learnt and Remaining.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.

Advertisements

Development of HEAR at Ulster Background to HEAR Content of HEAR Challenges in development Academic performance (4.3) Additional information (6.1) Roll.

The Finnish-HEQCs Quality Systems Restructuring Project: Outcomes Impact & UNIVEN University of Zululand Workshop Dr. M. Makhafola Director:

The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.

Outcomes and impact of the Project at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, and remaining challenges.

University of the Western Cape HEQC /Finnish Project October 2008 Vincent Morta Quality Manager.

Alexandria, 2005 NQAAC Quality Assurance and Accreditation for Higher Education Dr. Salwa EL Magoli National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee.

Keynote on the CPA Review Process Evolution of the CPA Consolidates science and technology programmes of the AU Guiding policy document for STI in Africa.

Irish Universities Quality Board Internal Quality Assurance at Universities: The Irish perspective Dr Padraig Walsh Chief Executive Irish Universities.

The situation with regard to SA public nursing colleges FUNDISA May 2012.

ACADEMIC QUALITY & STANDARDS TEAM 2008 QAA Institutional Audit Features of good practice: the development, consistent use and presentation of the Strategy.

Management of the quality assurance system at the University of East London Ruth Carter Head of Quality Assurance and Enhancement EUROPOS SĄJUNGA Europos.

THE IMPACT OF MERGERS ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM 7 – 8 October 2008 CSIR ICC.

Professional Bodies Quality Assurance Forum 26 February 2013.

1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.

FINNISH-HEQC-HDI’s PROJECT OUTCOMES, IMPACT AND CHALLENGES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ZULULAND OCTOBER 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, UNIVERSITY OF ZULULAND PROF.

Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.

Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.

Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process

Food Security and Sustainable Development Report on the Implementation of the Sub-programme 20 October 2011.

Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.

Re-accreditation Workshop Private Higher Education Institutions 6 August 2008.

Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.

Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —

Report on present status of the quality assurance system at University of Split Željko Dujić, MD, PhD Vice rector for science and international affaires.

1 AUQA Performance Portfolio Chapter 3 International Activities.

Audit of predetermined objectives Presentation: Portfolio Committee on Economic Development March 2013.

Council on Higher Education: Annual Report Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 10 October 2013.

SUPPORT TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ACADEMY OF POLICE SCIENCES IN SYRIA Project Overview UNDP Syria April 2009.

Further, Higher, Better? International perspectives on dual sector education A symposium Neil Garrod Gareth Parry Rolf Stumpf Skip Triplett.

Peer reviewer Basic Workshop Prof. Dr. Gamalat M. Ali Director of Tanta Quality Assurance Center, Tanta University.

Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.

Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.

1 BRIEFING ON THE STAFFING SOUTH AFRICA’S UNIVERSITIES’ FRAMEWORK (SSAUF) Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 25 August.

TVET Colleges Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process Free State and North West TVET Colleges 23 & 24 June 2015.

Diane Grayson Overview of the South African Quality Enhancement Project.

FACULTY REPORTS JANUARY 16, 2009 GEOFFREY DYER Taft College’s Progress in SLOs.

Briefing on the CHE’s Annual Report 2008/09 Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Higher Education & Training 28 October 2009.

HEQC NATIONAL REVIEW OF ACADEMIC & PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMMES IN EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL PREPAREDNESS WORKSHOP 24 & 26 April 2006.

Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.

Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.

Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar

Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.

Enhancing capacity in the Child & Youth sector through situated supported distance learning Building Capacity through a Participatory Institutional Assessment.

Afdeling Institusionele Navorsisng en Beplanninig Division for Institutional Research and Planning FROM EVALUATION REPORTS TO ACTION – CLOSING THE LOOP.

External Audit as a Catalyst for Institutional Development – A South African Perspective EAIR Conference: August 2009 Presenter: Martin Oosthuizen.

Report on present status of the quality assurance system at University of Split Željko Dujić, MD, PhD Vice rector for science and international affaires.

Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.

Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.

HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.

1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.

Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines

Higher Education Quality Committee

Audit of predetermined objectives

Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.

Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University

Program Quality Assurance Process Validation

Faculty of Science Review Staff Orientation Workshop

Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion

Study Programmes: Modelling & Operation Project

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING

MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System

Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting

“NATIONAL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT” Leader in Skills Development

Implementation of the UN DA 10 project “The African context”

Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance

Christophe Duhamel Global Office Coordinator, FAO Statistics Division

Review of CSTL MER Framework

Fort Valley State University

Quality Enhancement Cell

Presentation transcript:

Programme Review at the NMMU – Outcomes, Lessons Learnt and Remaining Challenges Programme Review at the NMMU – Outcomes, Lessons Learnt and Remaining Challenges Final Workshop of HEQC Quality Systems Restructuring Project October 2008 Presenters: Martin Oosthuizen and Piet Roodt Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University Port Elizabeth South Africa

2  NMMU: Background  Components of Quality Systems Restructuring Project  Objective of Programme Review  Outcomes of Programme Review  Lessons learnt  Challenges OUTLINE

NMMU: Background NMMU – Merger in of: UPE, PE Technikon, Vista Campus in Port Elizabeth One of 6 comprehensive universities in SA HE sector 5 Campuses in PE, 2 in George 3

NMMU Background One of 9 medium sized universities in SA HE sector:  Total enrolments in 2007:  Total undergrad in 2007: (89%)  Total pg – 11% (Below M - 4% ; M – 5.6%, D – 1.4%)  UG Diploma: (47.9%); UG Degree: 9252 (39.1%)  Contact: (83%); Distance: 3934 (17%)  SET: 31%; Business and Management: 24.9%; Education: 22.2%; Other Humanities: 21.9%

Components of Quality Systems Restructuring Project 5 Consolidation of institutional quality management systems (Project 1) Development of a policy for the approval of new academic programmes (Project 2) Quality review of all existing programmes against defined quality criteria (Project 3A) (Focus of Presentation) Development of a framework for the new academic programme structure of the NMMU (Project 3B)

OBJECTIVE of PROGRAMME REVIEW  Ensure quality of educational provision  Systematic review of existing undergraduate & postgraduate coursework programmes  Provide basis for development and implementation of a programme review system

OUTCOMES  Programme review framework Slide 8 Slide 8  Review criteria Slide 12 Slide 12  Capacity development  Conduct of programme reviews Slide 14 Slide 14  Programme review structures  Duplicate programmes  Programme review database

Programme Review and Planning Process 1. Review Design - Programme definition - Criteria Development - Programme clusters 2. Review Guidelines - Criteria - Templates - Timeline - Module Report 3. Workshops (with HEQC) - Training - Clarification of process Preparatory Phase

CPID Input - Module Information - Student data - Staff data 4. - SE Portfolio Development - Departmental Review 6. Quality Report 5. Validation of SE Report by Review Panel 7. Quality Improvement Plan Quality Review Phase Programme Review and Planning Process

CPID Input - Strategic Planning - Sustainability and Viability 8. FMC considers academic planning and resource aspects in conjunction with quality reports 9. Consolidated Faculty Planning and Quality Report Academic Planning Phase Programme Review and Planning Process

10. Faculty Board 11. APQC 12. EMCOM 13. SENATE CPID records results of programme review on: - Programme Database - PQM Institutional Review and Planning Phase Programme Review and Planning Process

Review Criteria 12 Mission, Goals Programme Planning & Design Student Recruitment, Admission & Selection Staffing Teaching & Learning Academic Development Assessment Programme Coordination & Administration Resources & Infrastructure Programme Monitoring & Review 29 Statements Input: 17 criteria Process: 9 criteria Output: 2 criteria Review: 1 criterion

Summary of panel reviews CyclePanelsNumber of programmes reviewed Departmental staff present at reviews Number of Academics involved in panels 1 Faculties of Law, Education & Health Sciences Faculties of Business and Economic Sciences & George Campus Faculties of Arts, EBEIT & Science (in process) 3584

Progress through the Programme Review Process CYCLE 1CYCLE 2CYCLE 3 SE Portfolio Development Departmental Review Validation of SE Report by Review Panel Quality Report Quality Improvement Plan 890 FMC considers academic planning aspects in conjunction with quality reports 010 Consolidated Faculty Planning and Quality Report 000

 Improvement processes and quality enhancement. Examples:  Staff appointed on short-term contracts  Recognition of prior learning  Module guides  AssessmentOUTCOMES

LESSONS LEARNT  Academic ownership  Understanding of quality criteria  Capacity for self-evaluation reflective practice  Cooperation between CPID and CTLM  Realistic timeframes

CHALLENGES  Institutional cultures  Disciplinary benchmarking  Use and availability of information and evidence  Programme coordination and Definition of a “programme”  Programme review and academic planning  Leadership of engagement

18 Thank You To the HEQC and the Finnish Funders Piet Roodt & Martin Oosthuizen Planning and Institutional Development Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University Port Elizabeth, South Africa + 27 (0) (piet) (martin);