Dam Removal in Rhode Island: Present and Future David Chopy, DEM July 16, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CRMC Aquaculture Policy
Advertisements

NEW JERSEY DAM SAFETY RULES AND REGULATIONS. What is a dam? "Dam" means any artificial dike, levee or other barrier, together with appurtenant works,
Capacity Building for RCDs The Santa Cruz Countywide Partners in Restoration (PIR) Permit Coordination Program Prepared for the California Association.
General Permit for Low Hazard Potential Impounding Structures By Robert J. VanLier, P.E. Regional Dam Safety Engineer 900 Natural Resources Drive, Charlottesville,
Flood Hazard Areas & the NJPDES Rule s © 2009 Fox Rothschild Land Use and Environmental Regulation in New Jersey October 14, 2009 Flood Hazard Areas &
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Plum Creek Reservoir Water for a Better Tomorrow Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas January 13, 2003.
Mordecai Lincoln Dam & Hunters Pond, Scituate, MA
Coal Ash Ponds The Romeo and Juliet Story of Coal Fired Power Plants Society sees them as toxic together, but currently, one cannot exist without the other.
Overview the local, state, and federal regulatory authorities which affect the interim housing mission Identify vital stakeholders with regulatory authority.
The North Carolina Dam Safety Program. Our Responsibilities Administration and enforcement of the Dam Safety Law of 1967 and the supplementary Administrative.
1 Massachusetts Wetlands Regulations and the MCP Rachel Freed Mass. Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands and Waterways Program Northeast Regional.
Breaching the Mahar Regional School Dam Presentation to Ralph C. Mahar Regional School Committee GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. February 9, 2011.
Putting Dams in Order A Program for Comprehensive Identification and Prioritization of Dam Management Actions Cathy Marcinkevage AECOM Environment EBC.
Challenges and opportunities for dam removal projects in Texas Lessons that can be learned from other states Ryan McGillicuddy – Texas Parks and Wildlife.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Certification Requirements
Crafting Stormwater Programs Oregon Coastal Planners Fall Network Meeting October 9, 2008 Florence Event Center Alissa Maxwell, PE.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation Virginia Dam Safety & Floodplain Programs William G. Browning, Director Dam Safety & Floodplain Management.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 105 Dam Safety and Waterway Management February 21, 2007.
Grays Harbor County Shoreline Master Program Update Our Heritage, Our Future Grays Harbor Master Builders January 9, 2012.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.
Impact of Low Volume Roads Downstream of Dams on Hazard Classification By Robert J. VanLier, P.E. Regional Dam Safety Engineer 900 Natural Resources Drive,
Restoring the Lower Pawtuxet River Public Meeting January 29, 2008.
Amendments to Orange County Code Chapter 9 (Building & Construction Regulations) Orange County BCC June 16, 2015.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
River and Canal Maintenance Activities Allowed Under RIDEM Wetlands and Water Quality Regulations Russ Chateauneuf Chief Groundwater & Wetlands Protection.
Water Legislation Impacts on First Nations March 10, 2010 Hilton Hotel & Suites, Niagara Falls, Ontario Ontario First Nations Technical Services Corporation.
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Karl Morgan JUNE 2013 Karl Morgan JUNE 2013.
Coastal and Estuarine Habitat Restoration Program and Trust Fund RIGL § Caitlin Chaffee Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council.
Managing Western Water as Climate Changes Denver, CO February 20-21, 2008.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Roseau River Flood Damage Reduction Project Roseau, Minnesota.
WFD National Stakeholder Forum 29 th /30 th October 2003 Building and Engineering Works Dr. Scot Mathieson Conservation Advisor SEPA.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005.
NOAA RESTORATION CENTER The NOAA RC seeks to make the process of regulatory review and permitting of environmentally beneficial habitat restoration projects.
Millbrook Dam Environmental Assessment Study Dan Marinigh CAO/Secretary-Treasurer Otonabee Region Conservation Authority October 20, 2015 Otonabee Conservation.
City of Austin Environmental Health Services Division Proposed City Code Changes Presented by: David Lopez, Chief Environmental Health Officer Vince.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
Public Workshop: RIPDES Draft Phase II Storm Water Regulations RI Department of Environmental Management RIPDES Storm Water Program July 25, 2001 Contacts:
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Christopher Knotts, P.E. Public Works & Water Resources Association of Levee Boards of Louisiana Annual Meeting December 3, 2015.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lisa Mangione Regulatory Division Los Angeles District January 14, 2016 USACE Regulatory Program Emergency.
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
MS Dam Safety Program Dusty Myers, P.E. Chief, Dam Safety Division.
NID Data Model based on HUC CE394K.3 Term Project by Seungwon Won December 7, 2000.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
Guidelines for Land Clearing Presented By: SLC Environmental Resources Department.
NCACC Environmental Steering Committee Legislative Update October 2013.
Chapter 15, Amended Article X Wetland Conservation Areas Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection Division February 5, 2008 Presented by.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Creation of a Dam Management District
Environmental Quality Board
HB 328 SITING OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMNT FACILITIES
Texas Master Naturalist Lindheimer Chapter
Tennessee Safe Dams Program
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
Oklahoma Floodplain Managers Association
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
INDOT Storm Water Management
Dam Management District Overview
WATER POLLUTION OF RIVERS AND DAMS
Presentation transcript:

Dam Removal in Rhode Island: Present and Future David Chopy, DEM July 16, 2009

State’s Role Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Dam Safety responsible for regulatory oversight of inspections, construction, maintenance and repair of all dams in RI (including issuance of permits) DEM Dam Safety also provides assistance and guidance to dam owners, which includes inspections of dams and completion of engineering reports and studies DEM and Coastal Resource Management Council (CRMC) responsible for issuance of permits involving substantial alteration or removal of dams

Dam Safety Regulations Rules and Regulations for Dam Safety –Promulgated on December 20, 2007 –Include definitions and revised hazard classifications for dams throughout the State –Emphasis placed on high and significant hazard dams, including inspection and permitting requirements

Dam Safety Regulations Key Definitions Dam-any barrier made by humans that impounds or diverts water Regulated dam –a low hazard dam that is 6 feet or more in height –a low hazard dam that has 15 acre feet or more of storage capacity –a high hazard dam –a significant hazard dam

Dam Safety Regulations Key Definitions Substantial alteration - any physical modification that results in a permanent change in the water elevation or in water flow downstream Removal - destruction or breaching of a dam to the extent that the dam no longer impounds or diverts water

Dam Safety Regulations Hazard Classifications The hazard classification is based on the potential for harm caused by failure – each dam is classified as high, significant, or low No relationship between the hazard classification and current condition of the dam

Dam Safety Regulations High Hazard – means a dam where failure or misoperation will result in a probable loss of human life.

Dam Safety Regulations Significant Hazard – means a dam where failure or misoperation results in no probable loss of human life but can cause major economic loss, disruption of lifeline facilities or impact other concerns detrimental to the public’s health, safety or welfare. Examples of major economic loss include washout of a state or federal highway, washout of two or more municipal roads, loss of vehicular access to residences, (e.g. a dead end road whereby emergency personnel could no longer access residences beyond the washout area) or damage to a few structures

Dam Safety Regulations Low Hazard – means a dam where failure or misoperation results probable loss of human life and low economic losses.

State Inventory 671 dams in active State inventory 97 dams classified high hazard 83 dams classified significant hazard 491 dams classified low hazard

Freshwater Wetland Permitting Substantial alteration or removal of dams regulated by DEM Freshwater Wetlands Program or CRMC Submission of Formal Application to Alter a Freshwater Wetland Application fee required Issues of Concern –Potential impacts to downstream flooding –Sediment contamination –Value of current versus proposed wetland habitat –Potential impact from invasive species –Potential impact to recreational users

Freshwater Wetland Permitting Fees for Formal Application to Alter –Wetland restoration: $300 –Dam removal: $750 –Substantial alteration: $ $200/acre impoundment

Recent Regulatory Change DEM Freshwater Wetland Regulation amended June 2009 Purpose is to streamline the permitting process by exempting applicants from the requirement of obtaining written notarized authorization from the other owners of property within which freshwater wetlands will be directly altered as a result of the project. The amendment pertains to only partial or full dam removal projects that are proposed for the purpose of habitat improvement, restoration or dam safety on dams where the surface water upstream of the dam is considered a flowing body of water. Amendment authorizes the DEM to require that the applicant place a public notice of the proposed project in a daily or weekly newspaper with the circulation in area of the project.

Status of Dam Removals So far, DEM has approved the removal of 1 dam Approval issued May 28, 2009 for Dyerville Dam (State ID # 136) on the Woonosquatucket River in Providence Dyerville Dam classified as Low Hazard and is currently in partially breached condition Purpose of removal is to improve fish passage

Status of Dam Removals Application submitted to DEM to remove 2 other dams Shannock Mill Pond Dam (State ID # 250) in Charlestown on the Pawcatuck River and Paragon Pond Dam (State ID # 139) in Providence on the Woonosquatucket River Both dams classified as Low Hazard Purpose of removal is to improve fish passage Shannock Mill Pond Dam funded using $$ from Federal American Reinvestment and Recovery Act Shannock Mill Pond Dam on the Pawcatuck River in Charlestown, RI

Status of Dam Removals Application expected for partial removal of Pawtuxet River Lower Dam (State ID # 143) in Warwick on the Pawtuxet River Pawtuxet River Lower Dam classified as Low Hazard Purpose of removal is to improve fish passage

Other Questions Posed Do we have a master plan? No. DEM is exploring removal at a number of locations for fish passage. Also, with a large number of dams in need of repair, expect this may be most cost effective approach for many of them What resources, financial and technical, are available to dam owners and/or consultants? Only financial resources are Federal funding such as Federal American Reinvestment and Recovery Act. DEM offers technical advice and assists applicants in permitting process. Any issues unique to RI? Geographic size and density make it difficult in many cases to remove dams-many stakeholder interests to address

RI Department of Environmental Management For additional information, please contact: David Chopy DEM, Office of Compliance and Inspection Or Russ Chateauneuf DEM, Office of Water Resources