1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office 312.353-9286.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market Structure.
Advertisements

Why competition law? Economic performance Social welfare Well being of consumers.
How To Spot Price Fixing Merril Hirsh Partner Troutman Sanders LLP Washington, DC.
REDUCING A COMPANY’S RISK OF BEING A CARTEL VICTIM Brian R. Henry Senior Counsel Venturing and Emerging Brands and North America Competition Counsel The.
2012 ICN Cartel Workshop Panama City, Panama, Thursday, October 4 th, 2012 Lisa M. Phelan Chief of the National Criminal Enforcement Section (NCES) United.
Bid Rigging and Collusion in Government Contracts.
Public Procurement Seminar 16 th & 17 th June 2010 Savannah Hotel Fair Trading Commission Detecting Bid Rigging.
Darren A. Craig COOPERATION, COLLABORATION, OR COLLUSION? ENHANCED ANTI-TRUST SCRUTINY January 9, 2014.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations John Terzaken, Assistant Chief U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Lara M. Kroop & Chris Wheeler U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division San Francisco Field.
Powerpoint Templates The fight against bid rigging- NACC experience Bridget Dundee Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2013.
John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief, New York Field Office Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice Judicial Training Program Moscow, Russia July.
Antitrust Does Google have monopoly power? Microsoft? On what? Why? Why Not? Is that bad? Why? Can you name monopolies in other industries? Is Monopoly.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
Chapter 10 White-Collar and Organized Crime. Introduction ► White-collar crimes – criminal offenses committed by people in upper socioeconomic strata.
Government Regulation of Industry ESD 11 November 13, 2000 Richard Tabors.
Business And Its Legal Environment (Mgmt 246) Professor Charles H. Smith Antitrust and Securities Law (“the second” Chapter 21 and Chapter 28) Spring 2010.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Collusion in Department of Transportation Contracts.
Virginia Association of Governmental Purchasing March 12, 2008 Richmond, Virginia.
Criminal Antitrust Practice Donald C. Klawiter J. Clayton Everett, Jr. Jennifer M. Driscoll.
Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Patricia L. Jannaco, Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
3. Criminal Price-Fixing Prosecutions Antitrust Law Fall 2014 Yale Law School Dale Collins SLIDES FOR CLASS.
Understanding, Detecting, & Reporting Antitrust Violations Howard J. Parker & Lidia Maher U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division San Francisco Field.
Fines: A Contextual Approach The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do no necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission.
Practical application of industrial economics: Antitrust Law November 24, 2008 By Kinga Guzdek.
1 Antitrust Division Criminal Enforcement Program Presentation on Antitrust Violations & Prosecutions Michelle Pionkowski Trial Attorney U.S. Department.
Public Policy in Private Markets Collusion. Announcements HW:  HW 1, graded – can pick up at the end of class  HW 2, due 3/1; HW 3 due 3/6 3/6: first.
1 THE RECOVERY ACT: Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Debra C. Brookes, Esq. Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Antitrust OBE 118, Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey In the course of doing business, companies, businesses and individuals can easily run afoul of the Antitrust.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts relate to each other? What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts.
Bell Ringer What is legality? What makes something legal/illegal? What could make a contract illegal?
Auctions serve the dual purpose of eliciting preferences and allocating resources between competing uses. A less fundamental but more practical reason.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations John Terzaken, Assistant Chief U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Nat’l Criminal.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Monopoly and Antitrust Policy. Imperfect Competition and Market Power An imperfectly competitive industry is an industry in which single firms have some.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 26 Antitrust and Monopoly.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Government Regulation of Competition and Prices Twomey Jennings.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Alaska Antitrust Fundamentals Clyde “Ed” Sniffen Jr. Senior Assistant Attorney General Alaska Department of Law.
Market Structures Chapter 7. Get a Sheet of paper out ► List the following on a half sheet of paper:  Three favorite cereals  Three favorite brands.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Measures to prevent collusive tendering: an important adjunct to a liberalized government procurement regime Robert Anderson Counsellor, WTO Secretariat.
New York State Attorney General’s Office Antitrust Bureau
Red flags OLAF.D.2 – Fraud Prevention, Reporting and Analysis Unit
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
2017 SOA Annual Meeting & Exhibit
What is the Sherman Anti-Trust Act?
2018 SOA Life & Annuity Symposium
SA Michael S. Douglas AFOSI 3 FIS OL-C
Integrity Filters in eProcurement Systems
Public Policy to Promote Competition
Chapter 7 Section 4.
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
Corruption Measures for Identifying and Reducing Fraud and Corruption Risks in Public Procurement.
THE RULES OF THE GAME: Intro to Antitrust Law Robbyn Wysocki
Presentation by the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
The Antitrust Laws: Detecting Bid Rigging, Price Fixing, and Other Types of Collusion The views expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily represent.
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division
Abigail Smith Assistant Attorney General
Presentation transcript:

1 Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office

2 What is Antitrust?

3 The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §1) “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.” Prohibits agreements among competitors in restraint of trade or commerce Price fixing, market allocation and bid rigging are all criminal violations

4 Elements of an Offense Concerted action in the restraint of trade – i.e., an agreement among competitors Between two or more independent entities Affecting interstate or foreign commerce

5 Bid Rigging Agreement in advance to manipulate outcome of bidding process Types: –Bid Suppression –Complementary Bidding –Bid Rotation

6 What do you think the penalties are for Sherman Act violations?

7 It's risky, of course---if we're caught, it could mean many hours of community service.

8 Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement Act of 2004 Increased maximum criminal penalties: –Individuals- 10 years and/or $1,000,000; –Corporations- $100 Million Alternative fine provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3571 – Twice the gross financial loss or gain resulting from the violation where this number would exceed $100 Million.

9 Companion Violations Bribery/Gratuities (18 U.S.C § 201) False & Fictitious Claims (18 U.S.C. § 287) Conspiracy to Defraud U.S. (18 U.S.C. § 371) False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) Mail/Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343) Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1519)

10 Why am I here? $819,000,000,000

11 NO PRESSURE Risk Management “Agencies must immediately review the risk framework... and initiate risk mitigation strategies.”

12 Evolution of Collusion Motive 12 Means 3 Opportunity 4 Agreement

13 BATTLING BID RIGGING See the Signs M arket A pplication P atterns S uspicious Behavior

14 Market: Are Conditions Conducive to Collusion?

15 Market: Are Conditions Conducive to Collusion? No readily available substitutes The product is standardized Vendors repeatedly sell to the same buyers Competitors in an industry frequently interact Bidders personally submit bids at the same physical location

16 APPLICATION: The Dumb Crook Similar applications – handwriting; typeface; stationery Last-minute changes – white-outs or physical alterations to prices Vendor picks up an extra bid package for another vendor OR submits a competing vendor’s bid

17

18

19

20 Paper v. Electronic Same basic fraudulent conduct Other M.A.P.S. factors to look for: –Metadata (hidden data) –Cover header info. incorrect –Same math errors, typos, etc.

21 Metadata Can be Revealing:

22 Patterns in Bids or Prices The vendors take turns as the winning bidder (bid rotation) The winner subcontracts work to losers It all evens out The same guys always win (or lose) Bids are unusually high Fewer than normal number of bidders

23 PATTERNS: Bid Rotation Bid 1: Company A wins Bid 2: Company B wins Bid 3: Company C wins Bid 4: Company A wins Bid 5: Company B wins Bid 6: Company C wins

24 PATTERNS: Bid Suppression Bid 1: Companies A, B, C, and D bid Bid 2: Companies B, C, and D bid Bid 3: Companies A, C, and D bid Bid 4: Companies A, B, and D bid Bid 5: Companies A, B, and C bid Also watch for subcontracts to the company that sits out!

25 PATTERNS: Who Is Getting What Bid 1: A wins a $3 million contract Bid 2: B wins a $5 million contract Bid 3: C wins a $1 million contract Bid 4: C wins a $4 million contract Bid 5: A wins a $2 million contract Everyone = $5 million

26 SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR: Itching to Get Caught No Chance Bidder – Bids submitted by vendor known to lack the ability to perform Betting Bidder – Vendor brings multiple bids to an opening or submits bid once other bidders are determined Loud Mouth Bidder – Suspicious statements

27 Detecting Bidding Fraud – Best Practices Examine the bid files for: –Incomplete files –Irregularities Same phrasing Same return address Same price calculations or errors

28 PARTING WORDS Remember M.A.P.S. Err on the side of reporting suspicions We are here to assist you Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office