MOBILITY FUND OVERVIEW 18 th Annual Oregon Connections Telecommunications Conference Hood River, Oregon Mark P. Trinchero Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
Advertisements

Section 706 Broadband Progress Reports September 27, 2012.
Federal Communications Commission NSMA Spectrum Management Conference May 20, 2008 Market Based Forces and the Radio Spectrum By Mark Bykowsky, Kenneth.
Dennis Weller Chief Economist Verizon Progress and Freedom Foundation 1 March 2007 Modernizing Universal Service: Meeting America’s Universal Service Goals.
FCC Rural Broadband Experiments Panelists: Carol Mattey, Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Jonathan Chambers, Chief Office of Strategic Planning.
Gene Shawcroft, P.E. Central Utah Water Conservancy District April 29-30, 2013.
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
Feb , ETC DESIGNATION Feb , ETC Designation  What is an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC)?  Carrier designated.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
Tribal Lands Bidding Credits Extending Wireless Services to Tribal Lands Michael Connelly Attorney Advisor Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications.
Bureau of Indian Affairs December 2012 Tribal High Priority Projects Program 21st Alaska BIA Providers Conference.
Tribal Lands Bidding Credit Extending Wireless Services to Tribal Lands Phase II 220 MHz Service (Auction No. 72) Allen Barna Senior Attorney, Mobility.
 Estimates of the influx of newly-covered individuals in California by 2014: ◦ range from 1.5 to 2 million new Medi-Cal beneficiaries ◦ over 3 million.
View from the 8 th Floor August 7, 2012 Angie Kronenberg, Wireline Legal Advisor Office of FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
An analysis of the FCC’s USF and ICC Broadband Reform Proposals.
E-Rate Modernization & Montana’s Libraries Montana Telecommunications Association Annual Meeting Jennie Stapp, State Librarian August 6, 2014.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 Tribal Telecom 2013 Federal Telecommunications Regulatory Updates.
Connect America Fund Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission February 28, 2012.
Tribal Transit Program August 9, 2013 State Programs Meeting Presented By Élan Flippin, FTA.
FCC Rural Broadband Trials: Funding to Connect Rural America Panelist: Jonathan Chambers, Chief Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis Federal.
E-rate Modernization December 2, E-rate Basics Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (E-rate) – Authorized by the 1996 Telecommunications.
Broadband Mapping in Florida Analyzing Coverage, Speed and Demographics Julie Gowen Broadband Mapping Project Manager Department of Management Services.
Michigan Department of Community Health Director Olga Dazzo Status of Health Insurance Exchange Planning Michigan Department of Community Health.
Medicare Part D Overview of Options, Creditable Coverage, Required Notices, COB and Health Care Reform.
U.S. Small Business Administration
School Funding Formula (Agenda item 7). Overview Provide an overview of the formula headlines Final schools funding formula 2015/16 Base Formula.
Support For Rural America William Maher Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau July 2, 2003 Universal Service and The FCC.
Funding Broadband & Net Neutrality Implications for the State Lynn Notarianni PUC Telecom Section Chief
Joint Board Recommendation USF Reform NARUC Winter Meeting February 2008 Ray Baum Commissioner Oregon Public Utility Commission State Chair USJB.
THE FEDERAL LIFELINE PROGRAM. Overview Low-income consumers apply for discounts for local telephone service through the telephone company. Low Income.
Completing the State Aid Payment Request (SAPR). Tips Each spring check on the State Aid Finance web page for the current version of the State Aid Pay.
Tribal Lands Bidding Credits Extending Wireless Services to Tribal Lands Michael E Connelly Attorney Advisor, Mobility Division November 20, MHz.
Central Sierra Connect –Regional Summit Creating Broadband Policy for Your Community Connie Stewart Executive Director California Center for Rural Policy.
1 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Agenda Meeting January 20, 2006.
Tribal Lands Bidding Credits Extending Wireless Services to Tribal Lands Michael Connelly Attorney Advisor Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications.
National Tribal Telecommunications Association Derek E. White President June 19, 2008.
1 REVERSE AUCTION MECHANISM FOR FUNDING UNIVERSAL SERVICES By SHYAMAL GHOSH Washington D.C. 1 st March 2007.
Overview of Due Diligence and Post-Auction Process Michael E Connelly Attorney Advisor Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau December 3,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Wireless Telecommunications Overview January 2009.
Exhibits for the Auction No. 59 Short-Form Application and Related Issues.
Doc.: 18-12/108r0 Submission October 26, 2012 Slide 1 FCC TV Band Incentive Auction: Impact on Unlicensed Operation Notice: This document has been prepared.
Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012.
USF Reform NARUC Panel Presentation Dale Lehman Director, Executive MBA in Information and Communication Technology Alaska Pacific University
Better Thinking. Better Results. Beyond “The Order” – The New Regulatory Horizon for Rural Carriers Bob Schoonmaker, President GVNW Consulting,
Pre - Auction Procedures 700 MHz Band (Auctions 73 and 76) Kathy Hostetter Deputy Division Chief FCC Wireless Telecommunications.
Auction Process & FCC Auction System Auction 79 FM Broadcast Debbie Smith Auctions and Spectrum Access Division June 16, 2009.
IGA State & Local Government Webinar May 2, 2012 Kim Scardino, Deputy Division Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau.
Spectrum Auctions Spectrum Auctions Margaret Wiener Chief, Auctions & Spectrum Access Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau April 30, 2008.
CSO Observer Member of the Evaluation Committee. Civil Society Organization May have representation in the Evaluation Committee As a member of the Evaluation.
Overview of Auction Process & FCC Auction System Auction 78 Overview of Auction Process & FCC Auction System Auction 78 AWS-1 and Broadband PCS Roy Knowles.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 10: Universal Service Copyright © 2007.
Funding Outlook for the Housing Choice Voucher Program Barbara Sard Forum on Impact of Sequestration November 1, 2013.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Overview of Radio Community Service Grants from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting Copyright © 2015 KXNM 88.7 FM.
© 2016 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Audit Compliance September – November 2016.
New Reporting Annual ETC Reporting One-time items
Overview of the FCC’s Rate-of-Return Reforms
Rural Communities Broadband Roundtable October 24, 2013 Tupper Lake NY
Agenda History, 1934 – 1996 What is Universal Service?
Agenda Model Accuracy Sufficiency of support and reasonable comparability of rates Standards for Unsubsidized Competitors Disaggregation Caps in the Presence.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act
Eric boyington Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Administrator
Discussion of Operating Expense Caps and Other Expense Considerations Resulting From the FCC’s Universal Service Fund Reform Order Prepared by Doug Kitch,
2018 Annual Tribal Self-Governance Consultation Conference
AMERIND Critical Infrastructure Tribes Bringing Tribes Broadband
FCC National Broadband Plan (NBP) and Rural Universal Service Reform
Federal Policy Update “Fins to the left, fins to the right...”
Wireline Competition Bureau
The New Mexico Rural Universal Service Fund
Presentation transcript:

MOBILITY FUND OVERVIEW 18 th Annual Oregon Connections Telecommunications Conference Hood River, Oregon Mark P. Trinchero Davis Wright Tremaine LLP October 25, 2013

Universal Service Transformation and the Mobility Fund?  Background of Universal Service Funding – Historically, “implicit” support hidden in Inter-Carrier Compensation rates – Telecom Act of 1996 Created an Explicit fund – Supported multiple carriers: Identical Support Rule  Concerns about size of USF – Supporting multiple carriers in the same area – FCC eliminated Identical Support Rule and Capped Mobile Support at 2008 Levels – Competitive carrier support ≤ ILEC in the area

Universal Service Transformation and the Mobility Fund?  FCC’s “Transformation Order” Set Budget for USF Program For First Time – Wireline carriers: Connect America Fund ($4B) – Wireless carriers: Mobility Fund (two phases) – New funds for Remote Areas and Tribal Lands – Rural Health Care Fund becomes Healthcare Connect Fund – Schools and Libraries Fund remains – Low-Income (Lifeline) Fund remains, with substantial reforms

Mobility Fund Structure Phase I –$300M (plus separate $50M for Tribal lands) –Awarded by reverse auction (first ever) –One-time; no continuing support Phase II –$500M annually –Continuing support each year –Awarded for a period of years (period TBD)

Mobility Fund – Phase I What areas were eligible? –Unserved by either 3G or 4G wireless service 3G = at least 50 kbps uplink, 200 kbps downlink 4G = at least 200 kbps uplink, 768 kbps downlink –Determined at the census block level (is the “centroid” of the census block unserved?) Who could bid in an area? –Designated as an “Eligible Telecommunications Carrier” (ETC) in the area –Access to spectrum in the area –Certify to financial and technical qualifications

Mobility Fund – Phase I (cont.) Winning Bidder Obligations –For at least 75% of the road miles in the bidding area, deploy either 3G service within 2 years, or 4G service within 3 years –Service must include voice, which must be available on a stand-alone basis –Reasonably comparable rates –Offer co-location on new towers in the area, on reasonable terms –Comply with FCC data roaming obligations –Drive testing, reporting, record retention, etc.

Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 Auction 901 Procedures –Identified > 460,000 census blocks that lacked 3G or better mobile service, and also contained road miles (out of ≈ 8,200,000 census blocks in US) –Determined number of road miles in each census block (total of 650,000 road miles) –For bidding purposes (except for Alaska and some tribal lands), aggregated these census blocks by census tracts –6,100 biddable census tracts –Bids were submitted based on dollars/road mile –Reverse auction: lowest bidder wins

Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 Auction 901 Procedures (cont.) –$300 million cap for overall Phase I support Bids ordered from lowest to highest per road mile “Work up the list” until the $300M is gone Tribal bidders received 25% advantage when bidding on their own tribal areas (but no reduction in support) –Process means there are “two ways to lose” your bid: Not the lowest bid in the census tract, or Lowest bid, but bid too high in comparison to other bids nationally (i.e., the $300M was already allocated to lower bids)

Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 Auction 901 Procedures (cont.) –Designed to fund “the least costly of the most costly” areas –Must cover at least 75% of road miles, but support prorated for road coverage between 75% and 100% –Competing with other bidders in the same area, and with all bidders in all other areas

Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 Auction 901 Results (announced 10/3/2012) –52 qualified bidders; 33 submitted at least one winning bid –894 bids submitted; 795 winning bids (about 13% of biddable cnsus tracts) –31 states and 1 territory had winning bids –Winning bids covered c. 83,000 road miles (out of a 650,000 eligible) –Winning bids ranged from $130/road mile to $45,000/road mile –Average winning bid: $3,593/road mile

Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 Auction 901 Results: Top State Winners Total Support Road Miles $/Road Mile ID $32,840,434 2,697 $ 12,177 CO $32,649,205 3,985 $ 8,193 NC $26,108, $ 26,861 TX $24,916,904 14,364 $ 1,735 WY $22,831,980 13,577 $ 1,682 NV $21,060,478 2,776 $ 7,587 NM $17,895,266 17,920 $ 999 VA $12,414, $ 16,487 WV $10,611, $ 30,846 OK $10,376,072 1,339 $ 7,749

Mobility Fund Phase I: Eligible Areas Example

Mobility Fund Phase I: Winning Bids Example

Winning Bids in Oregon and Washington  Oregon had one winning bidder on two census tracts in Baker County – Total Awarded Amount = $123, – Covering road miles mile  Washington had two winning bidders on seven census tracts spread across Cowlitz, Grant, Lewis, Lincoln and Skamania Counties – Total Awarded Amount = $10,139, – Covering mile to $24,753.00/road mile

Tribal Mobility Fund Phase I: Auction 902  Scheduled for December 19, 2013 – Short Form Applications Originally Due By COB October 9 th – Federal Government Shutdown Resulted in Suspension – Awaiting New Deadlines – Will the December 19 th date slip?

Tribal Mobility Fund Phase I: Auction 902 (cont.)  $50M Set Aside for Tribal Lands – Most procedures similar to MF I Auction 901 with some important exceptions – Tribally-owned entities are favored with: 25% Bidding Credit Do Not Need to Have ETC Designation Prior (just pending application) – Remains Difficult for Many Tribal Entities Trouble Obtaining Letters of Credit

Mobility Fund – Phase II Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) in MF Phase II issued as part of Transformation Order Additional Public Notice (PN) refining issues: DA in WT Docket No (12/21/2012) The resolution of many important issues remains uncertain

Mobility Fund – Phase II Overall Structure (as set forth in FNPRM) –$500M annually (up to $100M of this will be reserved for Tribal Areas, including AK) –Distribution by reverse auction –Purpose: “ensure 4G wireless services in areas where such service would not otherwise be available” –Eligibility criteria to be same as MF I –Service must include voice service, and voice service must be offered on a stand-alone basis –Public interest obligations similar to MF I

Mobility Fund – Phase II Refining the Issues: The 12/21/2012 PN –Eligible Areas –Prioritization of Eligible Areas –Term of Support - 10 years? –Support from multiple mechanisms (MF II, CAF)? –Tribal Priorities - Interaction with 25% tribal bidding credit?

Mobility Fund: Final Observations $300M in Phase I covered just under 13% of unserved road miles It will take a lot of money to cover all unserved road miles (CTIA has estimated $7.8B to $21B) Amounts in Phase II ($500M annually) plus Phase I ($300M one-time) are dwarfed by annual wireless industry capital expenditures ($20B+)

Mobility Fund: Were You Moved? Thank You! Questions?