Your Presenters Lisa Dal Gallo Dave Kirn Regional Executive/Justice Market Leader Partner, LEED AP
Selecting the Right Project Delivery Available Delivery Models –Design-Bid-Build –Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) –Design-Build –P3
DESIGN-BID-BUILD No early involvement of key team members Construction Documents complete before advertisement for bids Separate contracts for design & construction Must award to lowest bidder
Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Allows for early involvement of CM CM selected based on lowest bid or best value Separate contracts for design & construction CM must be a licensed contractor Subcontractors awarded based on “process set forth by County”
Design-Build Allows for early involvement of key project team members DB team selected based on lump sum or best value Single contract for design & construction DB must be a licensed contractor Can include key consultants and subcontractors as part of design-build team
Project Delivery Method – Market Share
Design Build – Market Size
Design-Bid-Build Program Re-Program Design Re-Design Test Contractor Trade Contractors Architect Consultants Phase Long Delay Effect of Delayed Feedback Design Effort Wasted Design/Project Schedule Extended Options Constrained Upward Drift in Project Cost Feedback Cycle
Design-Bid-Build
Test Design/Builder GC + Architect Consultants & Key Subs Design/Builder Key Subcontractors Test Continuous Cost Data Rapid Estimation (BIM) From Engaged Contractors Feedback in Design-Build Projects
Project Delivery Comparison Integration CM Architect Contractor CM CM or PM CMAR No Possible BIM LEAN CMAR Cost/Schedule Risk Architect (E & O) Lump Sum or GMP CM
Advantages of Design-Build One stop shop for owner Increase collaboration & innovation Increased efficiency Decreased change orders Increased sustainability Eliminates finger pointing between contractor and A/E
Disadvantages Designers of record and contractor on same team Prequalification process can extend contract award process Owner does not pick A/E directly Criteria/Bridging A/E cannot propose on design-build team
Goals / Reasons For Using Design Build Value based selection Selecting a partner –Collaboration –Innovation Reduced owner risk –Single point of responsibility –Reduction of claims, delays and change orders Flexibility in process Performance guarantees
Achieving Your Project Goals Finding The Right Advisors –Legal Counsel –Project/Construction Manager –Criteria/Bridging Architect
Determining The Right DB Strategy Strategies available –Best Value –Lump Sum Design competitions Stipends –Why pay a stipend –How to determine the amount of the stipend How far to take the criteria/bridging documents
Develop DB Agreement To Achieve Project Objectives Deal Point Summary –Project objectives and goals –Compensation –Project management –Communication flow –Change orders –Dispute resolution process –Project charter/teaming agreement
Team Composition Skills –Technical expertise –Problem solving/decision skills –Interpersonal skills Diversity –Experience & knowledge –Creative tension Size (5-9) –Small = efficient = 4 or 5 –Large = creative <=12 –Smallest team necessary Personality –Collaboration (1/3 not collaborative) –Command and control –Firm culture
Team Organization Cross-functional teams Interdisciplinary –Systems or areas Discrete whole –Cost, scope and responsibility Design, construction, cost, schedule, commissioning Duration Dependent on function Package work to teams, not teams to work Teams within teams External or internal coordination
Team Agreement Mission Statement Value Statement –What is most important to team Behaviors –Process & strategy Measurable Goals –Value –Goals –Target –Metric Communications Teams –Leadership –Cross-functional
DBE Selection– A Two-Step Process Step 1 - RFQ/Pre-Qualifications –Process –Establishing requirements –Scoring SOQ’s –Shortlisting (5-6 teams) –Interview proposed teams –Notice to qualified proposers At least 3 and no more than 5
DBE Selection (Continued) Step 2 – RFP –RFP must be clear and concise –Define the process –Confidential meetings –Evaluation/scoring of proposals Evaluation criteria Weighting of evaluation criteria Criteria compliance –Interviews –Selection –Award
Criteria Compliance Log - Sample
Facilitating Design Process Basis of Design –Proposal presented to all stakeholders Program Verification –Owner/stakeholder involvement Systems Confirmation –Conformance with criteria Target Value Design Process “Construction Documents”
Quality Control Design Quality –Design issues log –Requests for clarification –Requests for information –Design reviews Construction Quality –Submittal reviews Action Information
Design Issues Log - Sample
Quality Control Inspection & Testing –Inspector of Record –Testing & Inspection Start-up & Testing Punch-list
Commissioning & Acceptance Commissioning –Compliance with criteria Beneficial Occupancy Full Occupancy Transition Plan Warranties & Guarantees