EPS 2003 Conference Aachen, Germany Eugeni Graugés (U.B) for the BaBar Collaboration Radiative Penguin BaBar B  K *  B  , B   and B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Semileptonic and EW Penguin Decay Results from BaBar John J. Walsh INFN-Pisa BaBar Collaboration XXXXth Rencontres de Moriond QCD and Hadronic Interactions.
Advertisements

23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.
Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Electroweak and Radiative Penguin Transitions from B Factories Paoti Chang National Taiwan University 2 nd KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop on Particle Physics,
Measurement of non BB Decays of Y(4S) to Y(1S)     and Y(2S)     Silvano Tosi Università & INFN Genova.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
Search for 7-prong  Decays Ruben Ter-Antonyan on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Tau04 Workshop, Sep 14, 2004, Nara, Japan Outline:  Introduction 
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
For the BaBar and Belle Collaborations CKM 2008: 5 th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle Rome, Italy, September 9-13, 2008 Bruce A. Schumm.
Radiative B Decays (an Experimental Overview) E.H. Thorndike University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration FPCP May 18, 2002.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
The physics of b s l + l - : 2004 and beyond Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara January 19, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop University.
Direct CP and Rare B A B AR BEAUTY 05 - Assisi Jamie Boyd Bristol University On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
At Belle Katsumi Senyo Nagoya University May 16~18, 2002 Flavor Physics and CP Violation ~ Exclusive and Inclusive Analysis Results.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Sacha Kopp, Univ. Texas -- Austin 1 Search for CP in Rare B Decays Sacha E. Kopp, University of Texas – Austin for the CLEO Collaboration.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota Determination of |V cb | Using Moments of Inclusive B Decay Spectra BEACH04 Conference June 28-July 3, 2004 Chicago,
Radiative and Rare B-Decays at BaBar All results are preliminary unless journal ref. is given limit values are 90% CL unless otherwise specified Carsten.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Exclusive Semileptonic b  u Decays at CLEO Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Summary of Recent Results on Rare Decays of B Mesons from BaBar for the BaBar Collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Chateau Lake Louise February.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Guglielmo De Nardo Napoli University and INFN 7th Meeting on B Physics, Orsay, France, October 4th 2010.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measuring |V ub | from Semileptonic B Decays Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Institute of Physics: Particle.
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
Charmonium Production at BaBar Jamie Boyd University of Bristol Photon 2003, Frascati 7 th -11 th April 2003 On behalf of the Collaboration.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
Evidence for the Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decays ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam, July 27, 2002 Jeffrey D. Richman UC Santa Barbara for the B A B AR Collaboration.
CP-Violating Asymmetries in Charmless B Decays: Towards a measurement of  James D. Olsen Princeton University International Conference on High Energy.
Radiative and Rare B-Decays Fabrizio Salvatore  IoP Meeting  Manchester, 19 th November, 2003  Introduction  Radiative Decays B->K *  X s   Limits.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
B physics at Belle Koji Hara (Nagoya University) Workshop "New Developments of Flavor Physics" 2009 March 9-10, 2009 New results of tauonic B decays B.
B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.
Semileptonic Decays from Belle Youngjoon Kwon Yonsei Univ. / Belle.
A measurement of the B 0 B 0 oscillation frequency and determination of flavor-tagging efficiency using semileptonic and hadronic B 0 decays S. Bolognesi.
A. Drutskoy, University of Cincinnati B physics at  (5S) July 24 – 26, 2006, Moscow, Russia. on the Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP Meeting B physics.
Recent B A B AR Measurements of Hadronic B Branching Fractions David N. Brown University of Louisville For the B A B AR Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
Recent b physics results from OPAL David Waller, Carleton University for the OPAL Collaboration EPS Conference HEP2003 Heavy Flavour Physics Session Aachen,
Measurements of B  X c l Decays Vera Lüth, SLAC BABAR Collaboration Inclusive BR (B  X c l ) and |V cb | Hadronic Mass Moments (Preliminary Measurement)
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Guglielmo De Nardo for the BABAR collaboration Napoli University and INFN ICHEP 2010, Paris, 23 July 2010.
1 Inclusive B → X c l Decays Moments of hadronic mass and lepton energy PR D69,111103, PR D69, Fits to energy dependence of moments based on HQE.
Results from BaBar on the Decays B  Kl + l - and B  K*l + l - FPCP-2002, U.Pennsylvania John J. Walsh INFN-Pisa.
1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006.
ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Marta Calvi - Study of Spectral Moments… 1 Study of Spectral Moments in Semileptonic b Decays with the DELPHI Detector at LEP Marta.
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
Radiative Penguin B Decays at BABAR
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
For the BaBar Collaboration
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
Presentation transcript:

EPS 2003 Conference Aachen, Germany Eugeni Graugés (U.B) for the BaBar Collaboration Radiative Penguin BaBar B  K *  B  , B   and B  X s  1

Flavour Changing Neutral Current decay processes The SM forbids them at tree level Do occur via loop processes involving heavy particles (W,top). Inclusive final states: theoretically cleaner, but with experimentally difficult background suppression Exclusive final states: large theoretical uncertainties from hadronic form factors, but clearer experimental signatures Radiative Penguin Decays 2

Their SM predictions can be changed dramatically if there is new physics! (Huth hep-ph/ ) since new particles (Higgs and SUSY) can enhance their otherwise small SM decay rates: >> Branching Fraction for B  X s  (E  >1.6 GeV in B rest frame): B (B  X s  ) = (3.60 ± 0.30)·10 -4 Gambino & Misiak, Nuc. Phys. B611, 338 (2001) B (B      ) = (0.85 ± 0.34)·10 -6 Ali & Parkhomenko, Eur. Phys. J. C.23, 89 (2002) B (B      ) = (0.49 ± 0.18)·10 -6 hep-ph/ >> B (B   )/ B (B  K*  ) is proportional to |V td | 2 /|V ts | 2 The exclusive process      with a Branching Ratio predicted to be B (B     ) = (7.1 ± 2.5)·10 -5 (Bosch & Buchalla hep-ph/ ) have a small A CP (~ 1%) which is very sensitive to non-SM extra contributions that might cause CP-violating charge asymmetries as high as 20% SM predictions & New Physics Potential 3 CKM Unitariety Triangle

Event Selection 4 Isolated High Energy  (1.5 < E  * < 3.5 GeV ) Shower lateral profile consistent with EM shower Veto if combined with other  in event makes  0 /  (those not vetoed are a significant background) K Identification K Rejection Use DIRC Reverse Kaon ID criteria Useful for B   to reject B  K *  events  →  *(K +  - )  Fish-Eye view Not to scale

Continuum Background Rejection 5 The qq,(q=u,d,s,c) “underneath” the bb Exploit the B-decay isotropy vs the “jet-like” topology of qq events Use B properties and shape variables wrt to  : decay angle,  z, flavour tag, cos  Thrust, energy flow. Cuts on combination of variables (Fisher Discriminant or Neural Network). NN plot on control sample and off-resonance data: CMS

Exclusive processes 6 Reconstruct B meson using the final state products: B  K *  B   (  Advantage: use kinematic signature for B decays Express energy and momentum conservation as m ES  E *2 beam -P *2 B  E=E * B -E * beam (*=CMS frame)   

Finding these events is experimentally very challenging: Low branching ratios ~1 x Large continuum background (ISR +   ). Neural Net fed with multiple variables is use to effectively remove the background  resonance is much wider (149 MeV) than K* B   (  Large B background from    has to be removed.  E resolution limited by  energy measurement Irreducible background from     7

B(B 0   0  ) < 1.2·10 90%CL B(B ±     ) < 2.1·10 90% CL B(B 0   ) < 1.0·10 90% CL A total of 78 fb -1 data are used B   /  Results (hep-ex/ submitted to PRL) A multi-dimensional maximum likelihood fit is used to extract signal yields. No Evidence of signal, upper limits are set: 8 B 0   0 ,  0   +  - B ±   ± ,  ±   +   B 0  ,    +  -   Preliminary

|V td |/|V ts | limit from B   /  Assuming (isospin symmetry) B(B   ) = B(B ±   ±  ) = 2 x B(B 0   0  ) Then the upper limit obtained B(B   ) < Using (Ali & Parkhomenko Eur. Phys. J. C.23, 89 (2002)) B(B   )/B(B  K *  ) = |V td /V ts | 2  2 |1+  R| (1-m  2 /M B 2 ) 3 /(1-m K* 2 /M B 2 ) 3 And assuming  =0.76±0.10,  R=0.0±0.2; |V td |/|V ts 90% CL B   limit Preliminary

Inclusive Processes 10 HQET: Quark-Hadron Duality B(b -> s  ) = B(B -> X s  ) s b  b Xs B  Identify  from B  X s , but With the signal  selected there is still ~10 3 more background than Signal. Challenge is to reduce bkg while minimizing stat.+sys.+model errors Two approaches: Fully Inclusive Semi Inclusive B -> X s  BB qq

BXsBXs 11 Semi-InclusiveFully Inclusive Background Rejection  (Exclusive States)Lepton tags Efficiency3%1% Fraction of Xs states: 50% 100% qq bkg estimationSideband subtractionOff-resonance data BB bkg estimation Monte Carlo (peaking) Sideband sub. (non-pk) M. Carlo – data validated X-feed bkg estimation Monte Carlo (peaking) Sideband sub. (non-pk) No X-feed Spectral Resolution  Mxs ~ 5 MeV  E~100 MeV Model DependenceXs, K*/Xs, M xs cutEE

B(B  X s  ) = (3.88 ± 0.36 (stat) ± 0.37 (syst) (model))·10 -4 Fully Inclusive B  X s  Data BB expected events Integrated to obtain Branching Fraction Preliminary Data sample 54 fb -1 Signal events integrated between 2.1 and 2.7 GeV to extract branching fraction   [2.1; 2.7] GeV Dominant Stat error due to ~6fb -1 off- resonance used for continuum subtraction Dominant Syst error from BB subtraction (   and  from B decays can fake  )   X d  events subtracted using theory prediction: (4.0±1.6)% ( Continuum Back. subtracted) hep-ex/

Semi-Inclusive B  X s   exclusive states) = K + /K 0 s +up to 3  (1  0 ), 12 states Observe discrepancy in JETSET simulation of Xs fragmentation. Efficiency from Monte Carlo weighted to correct discrepancy Correct for undetected modes M ES (GeV) 1.4 < M Xs < 1.6 GeV =2.35  0.04 (stat.)  0.04(sys.)  =0.37  0.09 (stat.)  0.07(sys.)  0.10(th.) GeV (Using Ligeti et.al PRD 60, (1999)) & m b =4.79  0.08 (stat.)  0.10(sys.)  0.10(th.) GeV (Ligeti et al. Phys. Review D 60, , 1999) E  in B reference system Preliminary

B(B  X s  ) = (4.3 ± 0.5 (stat) ± 0.8 (syst) ± 1.3 (model) )·10 -4 Semi-Inclusive B  X s  Branching fraction extracted from fit to the spectrum 14 - Fix m b =4.79 and fit using spectrum Kagan & Neubert Euro.Phys. J. C 7,5(1999) Preliminary Data sample 20 fb-1

 measurements 15 - Preliminary

BaBar is measuring with high statistics and precision: B  K *  (20 fb -1 ) B(B 0  K *0  ) = (4.23 ± 0.40 (stat) ± 0.22 (syst))·10 -5 B(B ±  K ±  ) = (3.83 ± 0.62 (stat) ± 0.22 (syst))· < A CP < 90% CL Upper limits on B   /   (78 fb -1 ) B(B 0   0  ) < 1.2·10 90%CL B(B ±   ±  ) < 2.1·10 90% CL B(B 0   ) < 1.0·10 90% CL Branching Fraction and  spectrum for B  X s  inclusive B(B  X s  ) = (3.88 ± 0.36 (stat) ± 0.47 (syst) (model))·10 -4 (54 fb -1 ) semiexcl. = 2.35 ± 0.04 (stat) ± 0.04 (syst) GeV (20 fb -1 ) semiexcl. B(B  X s  ) = (4.3 ± 0.5 (stat) ± 0.8 (syst) ± 1.3 (model) )·10 -4 (20 fb -1 ) Conclusions

17 Backup Slides

B  K *(892)  (PRL 88:101805, 2002) 18 B(B 0  K *0  ) = (4.23 ± 0.40 (stat) ± 0.22 (syst))·10 -5 B(B ±  K *±  ) = (3.83 ± 0.62 (stat) ± 0.22 (syst))·10 -5 B(B  K*  )-B(B  K*  ) B(B  K*  )+B(B  K*  ) < A CP < 90% CL Data analyzed = 20 fb -1 B 0  K 0*  K 0*  K +  - B ±  K ±*  K ±*  K ±   B 0  K 0*  K 0*  K s 0   B ±  K ±*  K ±*  K s 0  ± A CP = Only the modes     s   ,         and        Are used to compute the CP-violating Charge asymmetry.

B   /  Upper 90% CL BaBar BELLE CLEO Theory (Ali&Parkomenko) B(B 0   0  ) < 1.2·10 -6 < 2.6·10 -6 < 17·10 -6 = (0.49±0.18)·10 -6 B(B ±   ±  ) < 2.1·10 -6 < 2.7·10 -6 < 13·10 -6 = (0.90±0.34)·10 -6 B(B 0   ) < 1.0·10 -6 < 4.4·10 -6 < 9.2·10 -6 = (0.49±0.18)· Preliminary

 PEPII is a B factory running at energies around the  (4s) resonance.(E CM =10.6GeV)  Its asymmetry in beam energies 9.0 GeV and 3.1 GeV) allows the measurement of time-dependent CP violating asymmetries in the decay of neutral B mesons  with a boost  = 0.56 in the LAB frame)  " B meson decay channels interesting to study CP violation have small branching ratios (10 -4 ) Several tens of million of neutral B meson pairs needed to measure CP asymmetries with 10% error Luminosities of to cm -2 s -1 B Factory

The detector SVT: 5 double side layers, 97% efficiency, 15 mm z hit resolution DCH : 40 axial and stereo layers Tracking:  (p T )/p T = 0.13 %  p T %, s(z 0 ) = 1 GeV/c DIRC: 144 quartz bars EMC: 6580 CsI(Tl) crystals  E /E = 2.3 %  E -1/4  1.9 % IFR: 19 RPC layers, muon and K L id

Data Sample Data taken at the Y(4S): RUN1 ~ 20fb -1 RUN2 ~ 61 fb -1 RUN3 ~ 35 fb -1 so far 22

No monocromatic  spectrum because of b motion within B meson Photon Energy Spectrum 23 Experimentally hard to suppress background at low  energy  Lower energy cut on the  energy in all the experimental measurements We use Kagan and Neubert's (Euro. Phys, Jour. C7,5, 1999) HQET next-to-leading order  spectrum Eg. E  >2.2GeV corresponds to ~ 80% of all the spectrum From moments analysis of  spectrum  extraction of HQET parameters. From first moment of  spectrum   (Ligeti et al. Phys. Review D 60, , 1999) measures the energy of the light degrees of freedom Hurth hep-ph/

B  X s  Branching Ratios 24 S. Playfer, CKM workshop II Preliminary

B  K *  Branching Ratios 25 Theoretical speculation of 10% isospin breaking (Kagan & Neubert hep- ph/ ) can be tested soon Preliminary B 0  K 0*  B ±  K ±*  S. Playfer, CKM workshop II