Phenomenology of Charmless Hadronic B Decays Denis Suprun University of Chicago Thanks to C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, Z. Luo, J. Rosner for enjoyable collaborations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Search for New Physics in B decays Tadashi Yoshikawa Nagoya U. KEKPH07 3/1 – 3/3.
Direct CP Asymmetries in hadronic D decays Cai-Dian Lü ( 吕才典 ) IHEP, Beijing Based on work collaborated with Hsiang-nan Li, Fu-Sheng Yu, arXiv: ,
1 Charmless Three-body Decays of B Mesons Chun-Khiang Chua Chung Yuan Christian University HEP2007, 20 July 2007, Manchester.
Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Solving the B  K  Puzzle Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
New Physics in B decays 3 rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Oct.3-8, 2005 National Central University, Taiwan Tadashi Yoshikawa (Nagoya U.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
Marina Artuso 1 Beyond the Standard Model: the clue from charm Marina Artuso, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K-
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
Polarization fraction & time-dependent CP analysis of measured at Belle. March 2008 – Geneva Swiss Physical Society – Annual meeting Kim Vervink.
1 B Physics at CDF Junji Naganoma University of Tsukuba “New Developments of Flavor Physics“ Workshop Tennomaru, Aichi, Japan.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
1. Outline 2 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015.
Constraints on  from Charmless Two- Body B Decays: Status and Perspectives James D. Olsen Princeton University Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle.
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
Large electroweak penguin contribution in B decays T. Yoshikawa ( Nagoya ) 基研研究会「CPの破れと物質生成」 2005年 1月1 2日~14日 This talk is based on S. Mishima and T.Y.
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
A window for New Physics in B s →KK decays Joaquim Matias Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona David London & JM, PRD (2004) David London &JM & Javier Virto,
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University for the CLEO Collaboration Recent Results in B and D Decays from CLEO BEACH 2002, Vancouver June 26, 2002.
Test Z’ Model in Annihilation Type Radiative B Decays Ying Li Yonsei University, Korea Yantai University, China Based on J. Hua, C.S Kim, Y. Li, arxiv:
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
11 th July 2003Daniel Bowerman1 2-Body Charmless B-Decays at B A B AR and BELLE Physics at LHC Prague Daniel Bowerman Imperial College 11 th July 2003.
Charmless B  VP Decays using Flavor SU(3) Symmetry hep-ph/ C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, Z. Luo, J. Rosner, DS Denis Suprun University of Chicago.
Electroweak B Decays T. Yoshikawa ( Nagoya ) Possibility of Large EW Penguin contribution FPCP2004 Oct. 4 – 9, EXCO, Daegu, Korea This talk is based on.
1 A New Physics Study in B  K  & B  K*  Decays National Tsing Hua University, October 23, 2008 Sechul OH ( 吳世哲 ) ( 오세철 ) C.S. Kim, S.O., Y.W. Yoon,
Flavor Diagram Approach to Hadronic B Decays
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Theories of exclusive B meson decays Hsiang-nan Li Academia Sinica (Taiwan) Presented at Beijing Aug , 2005.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Interpreting CP asymmetries in. B   CP asymmetries Tree diagram: Penguin diagram: need |P/T| and  =arg(P/T) R t /R c R u /R c   
1# CKM Unitarity angles    and     Recent results from the B factories. ) Hassan Jawahery Univ. of Maryland Lepton-Photon Symposium Fermi.
Nouvelle physique dans le mixing des B d,s et approche frequentiste versus Bayesienne.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
1 G. Sciolla – M.I.T. Beauty in the Standard Model and Beyond Palm tree and CKM Beauty in the Standard Model and Beyond Gabriella Sciolla (MIT) CIPANP.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
Final state interactions in heavy mesons decays. A.B.Kaidalov and M.I. Vysotsky ITEP, Moscow.
B s Mixing Parameters and the Search for CP Violation at CDF/D0 H. Eugene Fisk Fermilab 14th Lomonosov Conference Moscow State University August ,
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma1 B Decays to Measure  Stephen Bailey Harvard University for the BaBar Collaboration PASCOS 2003.
CKM06 A. Soni Φ 3 (γ) from charmless modes using U-spin Amarjit Soni HET, BNL
C.D. LuCKM1  /  3 from Charmless B s Decays Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Thanks A.Ali, G.Kramer and Li, Wang... Testing Uncertainty of.
C.D. LuMoriond1 Charmless hadronic B s Decays Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Thanks Ali, Kramer and Li, Shen,Wang The study of hep-ph/
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
Reaching for  (present and future)
Hadronic B Decays at BELLE and BABAR
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Polarization in charmless B VV decays
CP VIOLATION (B-factories)
Measurements of a and future projections
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
Searching for SUSY in B Decays
New Physics from B decays
Charmless Quasi-two-Body Modes at BaBar
Nonleptonic Two Body Decays of Charmed Mesons
Presentation transcript:

Phenomenology of Charmless Hadronic B Decays Denis Suprun University of Chicago Thanks to C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, Z. Luo, J. Rosner for enjoyable collaborations

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/  B factories have produced a lot of excitement, particularly in measuring indirect CPV in the B system  sin2  =0.736  from  K S based upon BaBar’s 81 fb -1 and Belle’s 140 fb -1 data (LP03) era of precision measurement  sin2  can also determined using other modes:  K S,  ’K S, K S K + K -  We also want to observe direct CPV in B system and to check whether it is consistent with SM expectation  Most branching ratios of charmless B  PP and PV are currently measured with errors about 10%~20% 5%~10% errors in amplitude  One hopes to have <5% errors on the amplitudes of most modes more precise information on  and  (<10 o ) Motivation

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ CKM Matrix and Unitarity Triangle = γ β α (0,0) (, ) (1,0) small in magnitude but contain largest CPV phases

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/  Many B decays involve the two CKM elements of interest to us and may reveal CP violating effects  The ultimate goal of studies in B physics is not only to achieve precision measurements of the above parameters, but to discover New Physics  One way to detect New Physics is to perform consistency checks for the sizes and phases of the CKM elements CKM Matrix and B Physics = ~ e -iβ ~ e -iγ

5 CKM Fitter results Upper limit on γ will become more strict when Run II of the Tevatron will become sensitive to B s oscillations at the level of Δm s =15 ps -1

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Charmless B decays Relatively rare decays with branching ratios of the order Wealth of new increasingly precise measurements Many of them involve interference of a tree and a penguin amplitude with a weak phase γ between them Nonzero (mod π) strong phases are required for CP Violation Are well suited to  constrain γ  determine the magnitude of penguin contributions  get some information on strong phases

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ B  VP decays

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Dominant types of amplitudes Tree (T) Color-suppressed (C)EW penguin (P EW )Penguin (P) Color-suppressed EW penguin ( ) Neglect Exchange (E)Annihilation (A) Penguin annihilation (PA) Singlet penguin (S)

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Assumptions The only deviation from SU(3) is through decay constants in tree diagrams SU(3) is implied when we assume  the same phases for t and t   that QCD and EW penguins P and P and color- suppressed amplitudes C and C are related to each other as the ratio of the involved CKM parameters  that a penguin in which a gluon couples to has the same amplitude as those that couple to and

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Approach  Take all available information on charmless B decays to a VP final state and fit it with a simple model of interference between appropriate tree and penguin diagrams  Extract magnitudes and relative phases of tree and penguin amplitudes  Predict branching ratios and CP asymmetries for observed and as-yet-unseen modes  Considerable sensitivity to γ.

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Data and Fit Parameters 34 data points:  branching ratios and CP asymmetries in strangeness-preserving ρπ, ρη, ρη, ωπ decays (ΔS=0) strangeness-changing K * π, K * η, K * η, ρK, ωK,  K decays (ΔS=1)  direct and mixing-induced asymmetries in ρ ± π and  K S decays 12 fit parameters :  weak phase γ  amplitudes: |t P |, |t V |, |C P |, |C V |, |P P |, |P V |, |P EW,P |, |P EW,V |  strong phases: δ V, δ P, φ

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ χ 2 -γ plot Three minima of about equal depth: γ=26 o, 63 o, 162 o Ambiguity can not be resolved from the B  VP data alone. Appeal to experiment: CKM Fitter: 39 o <γ<80 o Appeal to theory: Minima at 26 o and 162 o feature large strong phases leading to Arg(t P /t V )=-(87±10) o and (38±12) o, respectively. Arg(t P /t V )=-(20±10) o at γ=63 o γ=(63±6) o : Fit quality 55%

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Predictions Largest predicted CP asymmetries: A CP (ρ 0 π + )=-0.16±0.04A CP (ρ 0 K + )=0.21±0.10 A CP (ρ - π + )=-0.13±0.06A CP (ρ - K + )=0.16±0.07 A CP (ωK + )=0.19±0.08 As yet unseen modes to be observed soon (in ): Predicted br. ratios: Current UL B(K *+ π 0 )=15.0±3.1 <31 B(ρ 0 K 0 )=7.2±2.0 <12.4 B(ρ + K 0 )=12.6±1.6 <48 ρ + K 0 is a pure p V penguin and its measurement is particularly important

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Comments on SU(3) In the last few months I saw new and more precise measurements shifting closer to our predictions. Despite smaller errors the quality of the fit improved: χ 2 dropped by 1.8 units to 18.7/22. Fit parameters remained stable. Probably, we can not yet see significant SU(3) breaking effects in the current B  VP data. I expect that the predictions of this method will remain reliable for at least another year. Recent BaBar measurement of B(B 0  ωη)=4.0±1.6 is a challenge.

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ B  PP decays

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Dominant types of amplitudes Neglect Exchange (E)Annihilation (A) Penguin annihilation (PA) Tree (T) Color-suppressed (C)Penguin (P) Singlet penguin (S) EW penguin (P EW ) Color-suppressed EW penguin ( )

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ Data and Fit Parameters 26 data points:  branching ratios and CP asymmetries in strangeness-preserving ππ, πη, πη decays (ΔS=0) strangeness-changing Kπ, Kη, Kη decays (ΔS=1)  direct and mixing-induced asymmetries in π + π -, π 0 K S and ηK S decays 13 fit parameters :  weak phase γ  amplitudes: |T|, |C|, |P|, |P tu |, |S|, |S tu |  strong phases: δ T, δ C, δP tu, δ S, δS tu  δ EW factor that relates EW penguins to tree-level diagrams

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/ χ 2 -γ plot Three minima of about equal depth. Ambiguity can not be resolved from the B  PP data alone. Appeal to experiment: CKM Fitter: 39 o <γ<80 o Fit without S tu : χ 2 =18.1/15; γ=(66±14) o Fit with S tu : χ 2 =16.0/13; γ=(54±21) o

Denis Suprunhep-ph/ and hep-ph/  Flavor nonet symmetry is employed to analyze B decays into VP and PP final states; symmetry breaking effect is partially taken into account for tree amplitudes.  Flavor SU(3) generally fits data well, with some exceptions. Predictions are made based upon current measurements.  Our preferred  63 o fit in VP modes favors a weak phase  within the range 57 o - 69 o at 1  level and 51 o - 73 o at 95%CL. It is compatible with other determinations of .  Our preferred  54 o fit in PP modes favors a weak phase  within the range 30 o ~72 o at 1  level. It is also compatible with the CKM Fitter favored  range:  Our preferred  54 o fit in PP modes favors a weak phase  within the range 30 o ~72 o at 1  level. It is also compatible with the CKM Fitter favored  range: 39 o <γ<80 o  Expect B s decays to be measured at Tevatron Run II. Predictions on the branching ratios and CP asymmetries can be made on the basis of SU(3) flavor symmetry and the magnitudes and phases of the topological diagrams extracted from B d decays to PP and VP final states. Summary and Outlook