Puzzles in B physics Recent development in PQCD, QCDF, SCET Hsiang-nan Li Academia Sinica, Taiwan presented at Whepp9 Bhubaneswar Jan. 07, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

X IN L IU ( 劉新 ) Collaborated with Wei Wang and Yuehong Xie Department of Physics, Jiangsu Normal University 17 th Sep.,
C.D. LuSino-German1 Hadronic B Decays in Perturbative QCD Approach Formalism of perturbative QCD (PQCD) based on k T factorization Direct CP asymmetry.
Search for New Physics in B decays Tadashi Yoshikawa Nagoya U. KEKPH07 3/1 – 3/3.
Direct CP Asymmetries in hadronic D decays Cai-Dian Lü ( 吕才典 ) IHEP, Beijing Based on work collaborated with Hsiang-nan Li, Fu-Sheng Yu, arXiv: ,
Phenomenology of Charmless Hadronic B Decays Denis Suprun University of Chicago Thanks to C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, Z. Luo, J. Rosner for enjoyable collaborations.
1 QCD Factorization with Final-State Interactions Chun-Khiang Chua Academia Sinica, Taipei 3rd ICFP, Cung-Li, Taiwan.
Hadronic B decays involving tensor mesons Hai-Yang Cheng ( 鄭海揚 ) Academia Sinica Properties of tensor mesons QCD factorization Comparison with experiment.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
1 SM expectations on sin2    from b → s penguins Chun-Khiang Chua Academia Sinica FPCP April 2006, Vancouver.
Rumin Wang G. R.. Lu& Y. D. Yang Work done in collaboration with G. R.. Lu & Y. D. Yang Huazhong Normal University Henan Normal University November 15,
1.  Motivation  Theoretical framework  Perturbative QCD Approach  Numerical Results  Summary 2.
Solving the B  K  Puzzle Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica.
C.D. LuICFP31 Some progress in PQCD approach Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Formalism of Perturbative QCD (PQCD) Direct CP asymmetry Polarization in B 
1 Resolving B-CP puzzles in QCD factorization - An overview of charmless hadronic B decays - Hai-Yang Cheng Academia Sinica Based on 3 papers with Chun-Khiang.
Rare Hadronic Semi-Inclusive Decays Xiao-Gang He NTU 1.Why rare hadronic semi-inclusive decays? 2.The Branching ratio for B to K X 3.The CP Asymmetry for.
Iain Stewart MIT Iain Stewart MIT Nonleptonic Decays and the Soft Collinear Effective Theory Super B Factory Workshop, Hawaii, 2004.
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Belle results relevant to LHC Pheno-07 May 8, 2007 Madison Wisc. S.L. Olsen U of Hawai’i.
Large electroweak penguin contribution in B decays T. Yoshikawa ( Nagoya ) 基研研究会「CPの破れと物質生成」 2005年 1月1 2日~14日 This talk is based on S. Mishima and T.Y.
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
A window for New Physics in B s →KK decays Joaquim Matias Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona David London & JM, PRD (2004) David London &JM & Javier Virto,
ICFP05, NCU1 B → Kπ decays and new physics in the EW-penguin sector Yu, Chaehyun ( Yonsei University) October 6, 2005 In Collaboration with C.S. Kim, S.
9/19/20151 Semi-inclusive DIS: factorization Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Run-Hui Li Yonsei University Mainly based on R.H. Li, C.D. Lu, and W. Wang, PRD83:
4th / B George W.S. Hou (NTU) ITEP, 7/24/06 1 Fourth Generation Manifestations in B Decays July 24, 2006, ITEP, Moscow.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
1 Final state interactions in hadronic B decays Hai-Yang Cheng Academia Sinica FSIs BRs & CPV in B decays Polarization anomaly in B  K* QCD & Hadronic.
1 CP Violation and Final State Interactions in Hadronic Charmless B Decays Hai-Yang Cheng Academia Sinica FSIs DCPV in B  K , ,  Polarization anomaly.
Test Z’ Model in Annihilation Type Radiative B Decays Ying Li Yonsei University, Korea Yantai University, China Based on J. Hua, C.S Kim, Y. Li, arxiv:
Large Electroweak Penguin Effects in B and K physics Makiko Nagashima Dept. of Physics, NTU Dept. of Physics, NTU Collider and New physics Mini-Workshop.
A Short Introduction to the Soft-Collinear Effective Theory Sean Fleming Carnegie Mellon University |V xb | and |V tx | A workshop on semileptonic and.
Lecture II Factorization Approaches QCDF and PQCD.
H. Kawamura, “QCD for B physics” QCD for B Physics KEK Theory meeting “Toward the New Era of Particle Physics ” Dec Hiroyuki Kawamura (RIKEN)
Lecture 4 Hadronic heavy-quark decays Hsiang-nan Li Oct. 22,
Electroweak B Decays T. Yoshikawa ( Nagoya ) Possibility of Large EW Penguin contribution FPCP2004 Oct. 4 – 9, EXCO, Daegu, Korea This talk is based on.
1 A New Physics Study in B  K  & B  K*  Decays National Tsing Hua University, October 23, 2008 Sechul OH ( 吳世哲 ) ( 오세철 ) C.S. Kim, S.O., Y.W. Yoon,
Theories of exclusive B meson decays Hsiang-nan Li Academia Sinica (Taiwan) Presented at Beijing Aug , 2005.
Theoretical tools for non-leptonic B decays
Interpreting CP asymmetries in. B   CP asymmetries Tree diagram: Penguin diagram: need |P/T| and  =arg(P/T) R t /R c R u /R c   
1 Factorization Approach for Hadronic B Decays Hai-Yang Cheng Factorization ( and history) General features of QCDF Phenomenology CPV, strong phases &
CKM, Dec Aneesh Manohar & I.S. hep-ph/ Arnesen, Ligeti, Rothstein, & I.S. hep-ph/ ; Lange, Manohar, & I.S. hep-ph/0? ? ?001 Iain Stewart.
Max BaakCKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya 1 1.Introduction 2.SU(3) breaking effects  Soft rescattering effects  W-exchange contributions  Non-factorizable contributions.
Learning  ( 0 ) from B decays Chuan-Hung Chen Department of Physics, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan  Introduction & Our question  
THEORETICAL STATUS OF B MESON PHYSICS Blaženka Melić, IRB, Zagreb LHC days in Split 2006, Oct
1 Sudakov and heavy-to-light form factors in SCET Zheng-Tao Wei Nankai University , KITPC, Beijing.
End User's View of Lattice QCD Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Lattice QCD Journal Club March 9, NTU.
Charmless Two-Body B Decays Involving a Tensor Meson Kwei-Chou Yang Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan The 36th International Conference on High Energy.
1. What data show 2. Polarization analysis & Puzzle ? 3.Results by PQCD & speculation 4. Summary Chuan-Hung Chen Physics Department, National Cheng-Kung.
Some Topics in B Physics Y ing L i Y onsei U niversity, K orea Y antai U nviersity, C hina.
Paolo Gambino CKM 2006 Nagoya 1 The B  X s γ BF at NNLO Paolo Gambino Università di Torino.
B Decays Beyond the Standard Model Xiao-Gang He NTU 1.Introduction 2.B to K pi and pi pi 3.B to phi Ks and B to K* gamma decays 4.Same sign diplepton decays.
C.D. LuCKM1  /  3 from Charmless B s Decays Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Thanks A.Ali, G.Kramer and Li, Wang... Testing Uncertainty of.
C.D. LuMoriond1 Charmless hadronic B s Decays Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Thanks Ali, Kramer and Li, Shen,Wang The study of hep-ph/
seminar at Academia Sinica
Polarization in charmless B VV decays
Selected topics in B physics
Resolving B-CP puzzles in QCD factorization
: pQCD analysis in pursuit of determing ϒ
B physics at hadron collider
Nonleptonic Two Body Decays of Charmed Mesons
Bs → PV decays and effects of next-to-leading order contributions in the perturbative QCD factorization approach Da-cheng Yan Ping Yang, Xin Liu, Zhen-Jun.
Heavy-to-light transitions on the light cone
B. El-Bennich, A. Furman, R. Kamiński, L. Leśniak, B. Loiseau
Productions and Decays of Charmonium Application of perturbative QCD
Factorization in some exclusive B meson decays
Calculation of Pure Annihilation Type B Decay in PQCD Approach
Run-Hui Li Yonsei University
Semi-inclusive hadronic B decays at the endpoint
Presentation transcript:

Puzzles in B physics Recent development in PQCD, QCDF, SCET Hsiang-nan Li Academia Sinica, Taiwan presented at Whepp9 Bhubaneswar Jan. 07, 2006

Outlines Introduction QCDF, PQCD, and SCET B! VV polarizations B! K  direct CP asymmetries B!  branching ratios Mixing-induced CP asymmetries in b! s penguin Conclusion

Introduction Missions of B factories: Constrain standard-model parameters Explore heavy quark dynamics Search for new physics Entering the era of precision measurement, puzzles have appeared. Critical examination of QCD effects is necessary for confirming new physics.

Naïve power counting Estimate order of magnitude of B decay amplitudes in power of the Wolfenstein parameter » 0.22 It is not a power counting from any rigorous theory Amplitude» (CKM) (Wilson coefficient) Induced by O 2 =(su)(ub) / C 2,s

CKM matrix elements Wilson coefficients |  -i  |¼ 0.4 a 1 =C 2 +C 1 /N c a 2 =C 1 +C 2 /N c

Quark amplitudes b u s u Color-allowed tree TColor-suppressed tree C QCD penguin PElectroweak penguin P ew s u u s u u s u u g  Z W

 parameterization (C 4 /C 2 )(V td V tb /V ud V ub )/1» ( 2 /1)( 3 / 4 )» Tree-dominant

B(B 0 !  0  0 ) P, C, and P ew in  0  0 are all subleading. We should have Br(  0  0 )¼ O( 2 )Br(  +  - ) Data show Br(  0  0 )¼ O( )Br(  +  - ) The B!  puzzle! Large P and/or C?

K  parameterization (C 2 /C 4 )(V us V ub /V ts V tb )» (1/ 2 )( 5 / 2 )»

Direct CP in B! K  K +  - and K +  0 differ by subleading amplitudes, P ew /P » C/T». Their CP are expected to be similar. Their data differ by more than 3  !

sin 2  1 /sin 2  1 decay amplitude, f CP =exp(-2i  1 ) Measure S f CP / Im f CP ) measure sin(2  1 ) Either pure-tree or pure-penguin modes serve the purpose Tree-dominant B! J/  K S, penguin pollution: P/T» (C 4 /C 2 )(V ts V tb /V cs V cb )» 2 » 5% Penguin-dominant b! s, tree pollution: C’/P’ » 2 » 5%

4S  0 by about 1  A puzzle? Penguin-dominated Tree-dominated

QCD-improved Factorization (Beneke, Buchalla, Neubert, Sachrajda) Perturbative QCD (Keum, Li, Sanda) Soft-collinear Effective Theory (Bauer, Pirjol, Rothstein, Stewart)

QCDF Based on collinear factorization (Brodsky and Lepage 80). Compute correction to naïve factorization (NF), ie., the heavy-quark limit. Divergent like s 0 1 dx/x (end-point singularity) in collinear factorization nonperturbative perturbative

Hard kernels T I comes from vertex corrections T II comes from spectator diagrams Magnetic penguin O 8g q 1 x

End-point singularity Singularity appears at O(1/m b ), twist-3 spectator and annihilation amplitudes, parameterized as X=(1+  e i  )ln(m b /  ) For QCDF to be predictive, O(1/m b ) corrections are better to be small ¼ FA. Data show important O(1/m b ). Different free ( ,  ) must be chosen for B! PP, PV, VP.

PQCD End-point singularity means breakdown of collinear factorization Use more “conservative” k T factorization (Li and Sterman 92) Parton k T smear the singularity Same singularity in form factor is also smeared No free parameters

Factorization picture Sudakov factors S, summation of  s ln 2 (m b /k T ) to all orders, describe parton distribution in k T k T accumulates after infinitely many gluon exchanges, similar to DGLAP evolution up to k T ~Q Large k T Small b Always collinear gluons g g

SCET I Two scales in B decays: m b  and m b 2 Full theory! SCET I : integrate out the lines off-shell by m b 2 C(  )J (0) (  )! C(  )  (  ) J (0) Hard-collinear gluon, mass O(m b  ) T(  0 )J (1) (  0 ) b W mb2mb2 Wilson coeff of SCET I 22 1/m b suppressed current g

SCET II SCET I ! SCET II : integrate out the lines off- shell by m b  Compared to QCDF, T II ! T(  0 )J(  0,  ) J(  0,  )O(  ) 22 Jet=Wilson coeff of SCET II ! T(  0 )J(  0,  )  M (  )  B (  )

B! K  direct CP

Large strong phase A CP (K +  - )¼ implies sizable   » 15 o between T and P (PQCD, 00) T exp(i  3 ) P T exp(-i  3 ) T exp(i  3 ) P T exp(-i  3 ) If  T =0 Br Br = Br If  T =0 Br = Br Direct CP

Explanation 1 How to understand the small A CP (K +  0 )? Large P EW to rotate P (Buras et al.; Yoshikawa; Gronau and Rosner; Ciuchini et al., Kundu and Nandi) ) new physics? (Hou’s talk) T exp(i  3 ) P T exp(-i  3 ) P EW Br¼ Br

Explanation 2 Large C to rotate T (Charng and Li; He and McKellar) ) mechanism missed in naïve power counting? C is subleading by itself. Try NLO PQCD. (T+C) exp(i  3 ) (T+C) exp(-i  3 ) T exp(i  3) P Br¼ Br

NLO PQCD (Li, Mishima, Sanda 05) LO: all pieces at LO LO NLOWC : NLO Wilson coefficients VC: vertex correction QL: quark loops MP: Magnetic penguin Corrections to form factors are not very relevant here. decrease P by 10%

Vertex correction Vertex correction enhances C/ a 2, and makes it almost imaginary. Without vertex correction Re, with vertex correction Im, with vertex correction Is negative. It rotates T!

Quark amplitudes at LO and NLO C’ is enhanced by a factor of 3, Arg(C’/T’)=-80 o C’ is still subleading. T, P’ ew are almost unchanged.

PQCD results Hadronic uncertainty

QCDF  T has a wrong sign in QCDF. C makes the situation worse. (T+C) exp(i  3 ) (T+C) exp(-i  3 ) T exp(i  3) P Br = Br

SCET C/T is real in leading SCET, and large from the  data. C can not reduce A CP (K +  0 ) (hep-ph/ ). (T+C) exp(i  3 ) (T+C) exp(-i  3 ) T exp(i  3) P Br = Br

SCET inputs

SCET predictions

B!  branching ratios

Remarks It is natural to explain the  K data in PQCD. The B!  puzzle, large B(  0  0 ), remains. B(  0  0 ) is an input of SCET, not a resolution Resolution was claimed in QCDF/SCET (Beneke and Yang 05). Any proposal for the  puzzle must survive the constraint from other data.

SCET inputs Not a resolution

B!  in PQCD Data BABAR Belle Average  +  - 30± 4± 5 30± 6  +  ± ±  0  0 <1.1 <1.1 B!  L  L in NLO PQCD (Li, Mishima) LO NLOWC +VC +QL +MP +NLO  +   +   0  NLO has saturated the  0  0 bound  the  puzzle is confirmed.

QCDF The mechanism to enhance C/  2 comes from the NLO jet function in SCET. The QCDF formulas are modified: The enhancement from the jet function is about 30» 60% Jet function  » m b  h »(m b  ) 1/2

B!  in QCDF/SCET Branching ratios Beneke and Jager 05 Parameter sets With NLO jet

Check B!  K,  Large real C/T=0.72 ! Data S4+LO jet S4+NLO jet A CP (  + K - ) A CP (  0 K + ) Tendency is not favored ! Also overshoot the  data Data (£ ) S4+LO jet S4+NLO jet B(  0  0 ) < Expected, because  and  factorization formulas are almost identical

Mixing-induced CP in b! s

All approaches gave consistent results, and small uncertainty. C (tree pollution) remains small even with NLO Promising new physics signal, if data stand.

Conclusion Many puzzles in B-factory data A CP (K +  0 ) much differs from A CP (K +  - ). new physics in P EW ? New mechanism in C? A CP (B + ) are sensitive to NLO QCD B(  0  0 ) remains as a puzzle. Wait until Babar and Belle settle down. S penguin much different from S ccs is a promising new physics signal. If we are lucky, new physics may be right at the corner, but….