BENEFITS OF THE RMP AND CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Regulated Community Perspective David W. Tucker City of San Jose.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Advertisements

Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.
USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
The Clean Estuary Partnership and the RMP Comparing two stakeholder programs producing science in support of policy James M. Kelly, Chair Bay Area Clean.
Regional Monitoring Program Benefits and Challenges For The Future Scientific Community Perspective Andrew J. Gunther Vice President, Applied Marine Sciences,
Contaminants at the Estuary Interface Jon Leatherbarrow 1 Rainer Hoenicke 2 Lester McKee 1 1 San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 California Resources Agency.
Regional Board Monitoring and Special Studies Related to 303d Listing and TMDLs Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
The RMP Mercury Strategy Jay A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute Presented at: The RMP Mercury Coordination Meeting Feb 2008.
Impairment Assessment and Conceptual Model of Legacy Pesticides: DDT, Chlordane, and Dieldrin RMP Annual Meeting May 4, 2004 Jon Leatherbarrow, Chris Werme,
Water-Quality Measurements in San Francisco Bay – a component of ~ 40,000 measurements per year.
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
Executive Order Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds.
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council.
East San Gabriel valley watershed Group Watershed Management Program (WMP) Development Cities of claremont, La Verne, pomona, and san dimas.
Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips (USGS) and Greg Allen (EPA)
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Puget Sound Monitoring Consortium March-April 2008 updates to interested parties.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Cooperative Efforts with Gulf of Mexico Alliance New Web Site – me.html First Annual Monitoring Forum Priority.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
Richard J.T. Klein Stockholm Environment Institute and Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Oregon Toxics Reduction & Green Chemistry PPRC Roundtable – October 24, 2012 Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
There are a number of different ways of managing transboundary river systems, and different institutional responses to these challenges.
Item #17: Board Workshop Alamitos Bay and Los Cerritos Channel Watershed Management Area Watershed Management Program Approach October 9, 2014.
SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
Moving toward more collaborative and adaptive management of wildlife: Changing perspectives of state wildlife agency personnel Carrie Ott-Holland, Stanton.
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
BACWA – Leading the way to protect our Bay Bay Area Clean Water Agencies Annual Member’s Meeting January 24, 2008 Michele Pla Executive Director.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Agency Coordination: Fraser River Estuary Management Program [FREMP] Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference 3 April 2003 Vancouver,
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Sustainable Dairying: Water Accord The Sustainable Dairying: Water Accord (the Accord) has been developed under the oversight of the Dairy Environment.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council SUMBER:
Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips U.S. Geological Survey.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
Analyzing Community-Based Services & Social Capital General Approaches.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Sustaining a Long-Term Water Quality Monitoring Program: The Lessons from San Francisco Bay Mike Connor 1, Jay Davis 1, Andrew Gunther 2, David Tucker.
Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.
ADAPTIVE IMPLEMENTATION FOR SEDIMENT-BASED TMDL’S BACWA’S COMMENTS James M. Kelly Chair, Bay Area Clean Water Agencies Director of Operations Central Contra.
Environment Environnement Canada Rob Kent, Chris Lochner, Janine Murray, Connie Gaudet Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance Water Science and Technology.
Statewide Compilation of Common Themes from Regional Group Reports A Conversation: Virginia’s Social Services System Roles · Responsibilities · Funding.
1 Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT (CSBG) Technical Assistance Coordination Strategy Office of.
Evaluation of State and Regional Water Quality Monitoring Councils September 9 th, 2003 Advisory Committee on Water Information U.S. Environmental Protection.
San Francisco Estuary Partnership PCBs in Caulk Project Overview PCBs in Caulk Project Overview October 26, 2010.
Economic, Social and Environmental Benefits Better Planning and Operational Decisions in Water Management Decision Making Capacity and Institutions; Stakeholder.
Public Choices for a Healthy Harbor US EPA Collaborative Science & Technology Network for Innovation Rosslyn, VA - October 18 th, 2005 Marta A. Panero.
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation Sound Management of Chemicals (SMOC) and Environmental Monitoring & Assessment (EM&A) Presented.
Health Outcomes in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties Issue:  Higher health risks found in: Infants Infants Elderly (age >65) Elderly (age >65) Blacks Blacks.
Water Quality in San Francisco Bay J.A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute.
2013 Priorities January 25, Overview of 2013 Board Actions State implementation plans Climate change: plan update, regulatory actions, sustainable.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PILOT PROGRAM: Update May 4,
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2007.
Water Conservation and Recycling Roundtable Interim Federal Action Plan for the California Bay-Delta April 8, 2010.
Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program Implemented Jointly by Department of Water Resources and State Water Resources Control Board.
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
Comprehensive Conservation & Management Plan (CCMP)
Regional Collaboration on Water Supply Issues
Presentation transcript:

BENEFITS OF THE RMP AND CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Regulated Community Perspective David W. Tucker City of San Jose

A Historical Perspective? The Beginning

Implementation of the Regional Monitoring Program Resolution …….April 15, 1992 Resolution …….April 15, 1992 EO to implement the RMP A coordinated multi-media regional monitoring program

Implementation of the Regional Monitoring Program Section Request…….June 12, 1992 Section Request…….June 12, 1992 Program to be phased-in to limit cost increases Reduction of routine effluent and receiving water monitoring

Implementation of the Regional Monitoring Program RB Correspondence……..August 5, 1992 RB Correspondence……..August 5, 1992 Payment to the Aquatic Habitat Institute constitutes compliance MOU includes development of San Francisco Estuary Institute

Sombrero Nebula

BENEFITS OF THE RMP

Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making. RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making.

BENEFITS OF THE RMP Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making.

COLLABORATIVE MONITORING PROGRAM

BENEFITS OF THE RMP Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making. RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making.

BENEFITS OF THE RMP Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making.

QUALITY INFORMATION Developed Quality Assurance Program Plan for trace level measurements. Collected 10 years of unparalleled monitoring information for the Estuary. Collected 10 years of unparalleled monitoring information for the Estuary. Measured more than 61,000 water quality parameters for the Estuary.

QUALITY INFORMATION Water and sediment in the Estuary meet cleanliness guidelines for most contaminants. A few contaminants are found widespread. PCBs, PAHs & mercury account for most of the guideline exceedances.

QUALITY INFORMATION Water and sediment in the Estuary meet cleanliness guidelines for most contaminants. Contaminants that commonly exceed their guideline include DDT, chlordane, arsenic, chromium, copper, mercury and nickel.

BENEFITS OF THE RMP Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making. RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making.

BENEFITS OF THE RMP Evolved into a collaborative, stakeholder- based approach. Collects high-quality data on chemical contaminants and toxicity RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making. RMP Information facilitates data-driven decision-making.

DECISION MAKING What is the degree of contamination in the Estuary? Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Are contaminants in the Estuary having a harmful effect on wildlife?

DECISION MAKING What is the degree of contamination in the Estuary? Most water quality guidelines met but a few problem contaminants widespread Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Are contaminants in the Estuary having a harmful effect on wildlife?

DECISION MAKING What is the degree of contamination in the Estuary? Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Clearly better than decades earlier however no clear indication of continued improvement Are contaminants in the Estuary having a harmful effect on wildlife?

DECISION MAKING What is the degree of contamination in the Estuary? Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Are contaminants in the Estuary having a harmful effect on wildlife? Unanswered at this time – more work needed

DECISION MAKING What is the degree of contamination in the Estuary? Most water quality guidelines met but a few problem contaminants widespread Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Is the contamination getting better or is it getting worse? Clearly better than decades earlier however no clear indication of continued improvement Are contaminants in the Estuary having a harmful effect on wildlife? Unanswered at this time – more work needed

Butterfly Nebula

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Economic uncertainty, good business Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. One-place scientific shopping Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership Focus mission and activities

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Improve coordination / collaboration with outside researchers, agencies, etc. Economic uncertainty, good business Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. Become the Estuary’s environmental clearinghouse for scientific information. One-place scientific shopping Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership Programmatic integration with the Clean Estuary Partnership Focus mission and activities Focus mission and activities

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Enhance communication and outreach efforts Enhance communication and outreach efforts Re-evaluate program funding structure Re-evaluate program funding structure

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Enhance communication and outreach efforts Enhance communication and outreach efforts Tell folks what we have learned! Re-evaluate program funding structure Re-evaluate program funding structure

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Enhance communication and outreach efforts Enhance communication and outreach efforts Re-evaluate program funding structure Re-evaluate program funding structure Equity and fairness

CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Enhance communication and outreach efforts Enhance communication and outreach efforts Tell folks what we have learned! Re-evaluate program funding structure Re-evaluate program funding structure Equity and fairness

Supernova

BENEFITS OF THE RMP AND CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE Regulated Community Perspective David W. Tucker City of San Jose