Using the National Student Clearinghouse for Outcomes Data Mary Ann Coughlin Jean Wyld Joseph R Bjerklie Rachel Albert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobility, Time to Degree, and Institutional Practices: Towards a New Conceptual Model of Undergraduate Retention for Underrepresented Students Lucy Arellano,
Advertisements

Making Opportunity Affordable Grant
Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance Presentation about the ATD Cross-State Data Workgroup NC Community College.
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Use of Student Transcript Data to Inform Financial Aid Analysis at the National Level.
Postsecondary Education Sample Studies and Data Tools Susan Aud, Ph.D. National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education Sciences U.S. Department.
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
System Overview Digital Student Data Depositories Worldwide Founding Seminar Groningen, Netherlands April 16,
©2011 National Student Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. Doug Shapiro Executive Research Director.
Career and Technical Education in Minnesota Presentation to the Governor’s Workforce Development Council March 13, 2008 Minnesota Perkins State Career.
IPEDS Presented by Mark Lafer Senior Policy Analyst Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency.
1 New York State Trends in Student Financial Aid and Cost of Attendance Presented to the Higher Education Committee of the New York State Board of Regents.
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
SEM Planning Model.
IPEDS C ollege O pportunities O n- L ine COOL.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
Hiring a Diverse Faculty – are we there yet…? A presentation to Highline Community College on some results from a study of changes in full-time faculty.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Reverse Transfer: Where We Are, Where We’re Going Tennessee ACT Summit January 29, 2013 Gloria Gammell, Ed.D. University of Tennessee.
Dreamkeepers: Emergency Grants to Increase Student Persistence Presented by Scholarship America Max Espinoza, Senior Vice President, Education Policy &
Weathering the Enrollment Storm Part 1 Averett University Danville, VA Averett University Danville, VA Presenter: Stacy Gato, Vice President for Enrollment.
Transfer Shock: Is It Alive and Well? Dr. Eric Gumm Abilene Christian University NISTS 2010.
Working Toward a Statewide Information System to Track the Effectiveness of Student Aid Financial Programs in Maryland Michael J. Keller Director of Policy.
From Recruitment to Retention: Focusing Campus Efforts to Promote Transfer Student Success National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students January.
Completion Incentive Grant Fund Financial Aid Pilot Program 2012 SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference Massachusetts Department of Higher Education.
3R’s: Research, Retention and Repayment Predicting the Future by Understanding Current and Past Students.
Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.
Graduation Attainment Efficiency
November 2014 MINNESOTA’S Statewide Longitudinal Education Data System (SLEDS) Minnesota Department of Education Minnesota Department of Employment and.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Vice President for Student Affairs Georgia Regents University Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation of Success Transfer.
Comparing the bachelor’s completion rates of native and transfer students using multiple informational sources Eric Lichtenberger National Institute for.
Achieving the Dream Dr. Jan Lyddon October What is Achieving the Dream?
Marshall W. Garland Deborah L. Jonas. Ph.D. Chrys Dougherty, Ph.D. Anne Ware, Ph.D. Presentation at the 24th Annual Management Information Systems (MIS)
ILASFAA: 2014 MAP ADVISING RECOMMENDATIONS Background MAP Task Force – Illinois General Assembly – 2013 Concluded that students would benefit from.
National Accountability Initiatives and Their Impact on NCCCS J. Keith Brown CCPRO Fall Conference October 18, 2010.
The Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA SM ).
Heterogeneity Among Pell Recipients Evidence and Implications Robert Kelchen and Sara Goldrick-Rab University of Wisconsin-Madison Affordability and College.
PAWS 4 Page 5.  No! Career/Technical Pathway programs offer a broad range of training for a wide variety of career pathways and many aspects of a broad.
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers October 20, 2009.
A project of the President’s Emerging Leaders Program in collaboration with the Administrative Services Task Force.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Total Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans Used to Finance Postsecondary Education Expenses in 2011 Dollars (in Millions), to SOURCE: The.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Refocusing Student Success: Toward a Comprehensive Model A Ten-Year Model Designed by Dr. Gary Rice Implemented at the University of Alaska Anchorage Student.
9/26/  U.S. Department of Education  Michael Itzkowitz, Special Advisor Postsecondary Education 9/26/20132.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
Low-income Adults in Profile: Low-income Adults in Profile: Improving Lives Through Higher Education Bryan Cook ACE Center for Policy Analysis.
Draft Draft Recommendations for Measuring Completion: Success is earning the credential sought by the student Completion should be measured both when students.
Saundra Yancy McGuire, Ph.D., Chair Kurt Keppler, Ph.D., Vice-Chair The LSU Retention Committee: Procedures, Findings and Recommendations LSU Faculty Senate.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Utilizing the Data Produced By StudentTracker 1 How to turn a Long File into a Wide File.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
P-20 in Action – Michigan’s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Success through Cross- Agency Collaboration 2012 MIS Conference February 16, 2012.
Advancing Student Success and Development Presentation to the F&A Advisory Committee June 27, 2012.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Updates on AASCU & APLU Data Projects Christine M. Keller, PhD Executive Director, Voluntary System of Accountability APLU Associate Vice President, Academic.
Community Colleges & Certificate Programs… other options that work! Senior Class Advisory February 1, 2016.
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH, PLANNING, AND PERFORMANCE BETH BEAN Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force and Advisory Board.
Defining and Measuring Student Success Dr
AACRAO Transfer Conference July, 2013 Afet Dundar, PhD
Enhancing Accountability Alabama’s Colleges and Universities
Equity Strategic Framework
Presentation transcript:

Using the National Student Clearinghouse for Outcomes Data Mary Ann Coughlin Jean Wyld Joseph R Bjerklie Rachel Albert

Agenda O National Student Clearinghouse O What is the Clearinghouse? O What Data is Available Through the Clearinghouse? O National Discussion -- Measuring Student Outcomes O Traditional Retention / Grad Rates O Non-first Full-time Degree Certificate Seeking Students O Campus Level O Common Research Questions O Admitted/Did not Enroll O Students who leave -- Where did they go O Other Questions that NSC can shed some light on… O Enrollment in Graduate Programs O Student Swirl & Concurrent Enrollment O Implications for Academic Leaders O National Student Clearinghouse Research Center

Quick Facts O National Student Clearinghouse founded in 1993 O Non-profit organization O Board of Directors comprised of leaders in postsecondary education, K-12 education, research and education finance O National Student Clearinghouse Research Center created in 2010 O Non-profit organization O Board of Directors comprised of research experts from postsecondary education, K-12 education, and multistate organizations O National Reports – Hot off the Presses – Signature Report on “Completing College: A National View of Student Attainment Rates” O Advisory Committees O Data Access Advisory Committee O Provides guidance on use of data and research O Clearinghouse Advisory Committee O Provides guidance on institutional burdens and how NSC can help

What Services? O NSC offers a wide range of services to both K-12 and postsecondary institutions. O Services range from enrollment verification to degree verification to transcript ordering, to student tracking to gainful employment reporting. O Three main services: O EnrollmentVerify O DegreeVerify O Student Tracker O Services are most well known to Registrars and Financial Aid Officers. O Also many Institutional Researchers familiar with Student Tracker.

Scope of Services More than 3,300 colleges and universities use NSC services; enrolling over 96% of all students in public and private U.S. institutions DegreeVerify, represents over 80% of U.S. four-year degrees. Over two million degrees are confirmed through DegreeVerify each year. More than 2,600 institutions use enrollment verification service. More than 1.7 million enrollment verifications are performed through EnrollmentVerify each year. Transcripts are requested for more than one million recipients each year via Transcript Ordering service. Student Self-Service program is used by more than 2.5 million students each year.

Clearinghouse -- IPEDS O It is important to note the differences between NSC data and IPEDS data. NSC DataIPEDS Data Unit of Analysis Individual Student RecordsInstitutional Level -- Aggregated Data Available Participating InstitutionsAll Title IV Institutions Analyses Supported LongitudinalBenchmarking

Measuring Student Success Outcomes: A National Discussion Traditional Metrics IPEDS Data Graduation Rates Retention Rates Cohort Based First-time Full- time (FTFT) Degree & Certificate Seeking (D&SC) Main Factors Defining student success outcomes Retention Persistence Graduation For which students? FTFT D&SC? Non-First Time All Students? Recent Initiatives Access to Success Complete College America Transparency by Design Student Learning Progress Model – University of Alaska Anchorage Voluntary Framework of Accountability Voluntary System of Accountability

Recent Initiatives

Accessing NSC Data – Student Tracker

Campus Analyses to Support Program Review Admitted Students Did not Enroll – Where are they now? Students who graduate – Do they enroll in Graduate School?

Enrollment in Graduate Programs

Matriculated students who left your institution – Where are they now Did they transfer? Did they graduate

Benefits of StudentTracker System O Institutional-level data are readily available O Opens up options for studies on the topic of access O External data sources, both local and national O Inform the discussion of postsecondary access for students O Inform decisions regarding college access and student success

Importance of NSC StudentTracker Data Today O Fast-paced change in education O Changing demographics O Value of higher education O College administrators under greater pressure O Transitioning from “data-poor” to “data- rich” O Need to remain competitive O Data driven decisions

Implications for Academic Leaders O Enables enhanced information for decision making O Provides easy access to information O Promotes cost-effective analyses O Improves understanding of patterns that helps to better serve students O Assists in answering key questions

Potential Value-Added for Academic Leaders O Provides a more complete picture of student success outcomes O Only source of data that can be used to track students longitudinally across state lines and across sectors O Data can also be analyzed at the program level O Raise student achievement and success

Recommended Actions to Effectively Use Data O Establish a clear vision for institutional data use O Provide support that promotes a data- driven culture within your institution O Make data an ongoing part of instructional improvement - ask the questions O Use data to promote student achievement and success O Focus on efforts that support students’ paths to graduation

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center O Purpose: O The National Student Clearinghouse Research Center collaborates with higher education institutions, states, school districts, individual high schools, educational organizations and the U.S. Department of Education as part of a national effort to better inform education leaders and policymakers. O Goal: O Through accurate longitudinal data outcomes reporting, the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center enables better educational policy decisions leading to improved student outcomes. O Products: O Signature Reports O Snapshots

O Signature Reports provide comparison data that reveal patterns and valuable insight on students' postsecondary access, persistence, and other success outcomes. O Four Reports have been released 1. Understanding the Recession's Impact on U.S. College Enrollment and Persistence Patterns 2. Transfer & Mobility: A National View of Pre-Degree Student Movement in Postsecondary Institutions 3. Reverse Transfer: A National View of Student Mobility from Four-Year to Two-Year Institutions 4. Completing College: A National View of Student Attainment Rates O Available at: O

Completing College O Report explores the six-year outcomes of a cohort of first-time-in- college degree-seeking students who started in fall 2006 (N=1,878,484). O It enhances the traditional graduation rate by reporting in four key ways: 1. Student completion anywhere, beyond institutional boundaries, across state lines, and over time; 2. Persistence anywhere, not just at the starting institution, for those who have not yet completed but are still pursuing a degree; 3. College outcomes broken out by student age at first entry and enrollment intensity, thus addressing questions about the role of students’ varied postsecondary pathways in progress toward national completion goals; 4. Enrollment intensity based on the enrollment status in all terms of enrollment, and not just the first term.

Completing College: Interesting Finding Within six years, 12 percent of first-time students completed a degree or certificate at an institution other than the one where they started, raising the overall completion rate from 42 to 54 percent.

Transfer & Mobility: Interesting Findings O One third of all students transferred at least once within five years. O Part- and full-time students had similar transfer rates over five years. O Over one quarter of all transfers crossed state lines.

. O Snapshot Reports exam national enrollment trends O The report data come from student-level college enrollment data and present unique snapshots in time that reveal college enrollment patterns and student pathways to student outcomes O Reports are organized into five categories: persistence, mobility, concurrent enrollment, adult learners, degree attainment. O Available at: O

Discussion Questions