OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007.
Office of Management & Budget
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
OMB Circular A-133 (Single Audit) Heather Perry, CPA Amy Ring,
Audit Requirements. Objectives Purpose & applicability Responsibilities of auditee & DOL Components of a single audit WIA considerations Testing for compliance.
A-133 Audit Lynette Arias Director, Sponsored Projects Administration (SPA)
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Audit Requirements for Nonprofits.
1 Guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 By David G. Bullock, Partner Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
A--133 Audit Compliance Requirements February 22, 2013 Helen R. Jordan, Management Analyst Office of Grants Management and Compliance.
Preparing the SEFA AMSSA Regional Meeting Presentation by Lisa Young, CPA Office of the State Auditor.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Presented by Edward A. Hofma, CPA, CGMA Principal in the CPA firm of Averett Warmus Durkee, PA 1417 East Concord Street Orlando, Florida (407) 849.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
CReATE Presented by: Marcy Friedle, Grants Compliance Analyst.
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
Audits A-133 Compliance and Audit Readiness By: Tracy Jackson Senior Grants Management Specialist (Audits)
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Single Audit Compliance Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Jackie Reese, Audit Unit.
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
Not Your Father’s Single Audit Tammie Brown John Fisher U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
Uniform Grant Guidance Laura Hirst Office of the Auditor General.
Audit and Fiscal Oversight Responsibilities VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP December 15,2010.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the Office of Management and Budget’s Circular A-133 Presented to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Session #57 All About Compliance Audits Katrina Turner.
New Charter School Training April 24, 2012 Presented by Iona Martin, Financial Specialist Financial Accounting / OCAS & Auditing.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
DHS Financial Reporting Requirements March SUBRECIPIENTS n Contractors classified as subrecipient and expending $300,000 or more in Federal Funds.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Chapter 21 Internal, Operational, and Compliance Auditing McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series FS 204 Jean Cody Assistant Director, Post-Award Office of Sponsored Programs.
The New Super Circular Inaugural Tribal Accounting Conference November 16, 2015 Morgan Aronson National Single Audit Coordinator
Section 68 – What are your Sub- Recipients up to? (Sub-Recipient Monitoring – State Perspective) Wednesday, May 23, :30-2:45 Cindy Jarvis, Assistant.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Audit Requirements June 2009.
Federal Schedule Webinar Presented in Conjunction with ODJFS January 11, 2012 Rhonda Kline, CPA Accounting & Auditing Division.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Billy Swindell Shelley Fleming, CPA State of Oklahoma Single Audit 1.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Grant Management and Compliance
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
NCJA’s National Forum Financial Management Training
Uniform Guidance Discussion
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
Assistant Director – Sponsored Research Administration
Fiscal Monitoring in eGrants Management System (eGMS) July 26, 2018
Subrecipient Monitoring
Subrecipient Agreements
Uniform Guidance Audit: Overview, Timeline and Contacts
Presentation transcript:

OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research Accounting Services

General Purpose Provides standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies for audits of States, local governments, and non- profit organizations expending Federal funds A-133 2

Entities that A-133 applies to:  Non-Federal entities that expend $500,000 or more in a year in Federal awards. Applies to both recipients and sub- recipients.  Non-Federal entities that expend less than $500,000 are exempt from audit requirements, but records must be available for review/audit by Federal agency, pass-through entity or General Accounting Office (GAO) Entities that A-133 does not apply to:  Non-US based entities expending Federal funds received directly or indirectly  Any private, for-profit company A-133 Applicability 3

What is an A-133 (Single) Audit ? A single comprehensive audit of a recipient’s financial statements and Federal funding One annual audit, as opposed to each agency conducting their own individual audits If a Federal agency conducts an additional audit, the agency must arrange for full funding A-133 4

Audit Coverage Encompasses all State of Florida agencies Performed annually and covers preceding fiscal year University required to prepare a Schedule of Expenditures on Federal Awards by Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number A CFDA is a number assigned to a Federal program in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance A-133 5

Audit Methodology A risk based approach is used to determine what programs to focus on: Current and prior audit findings New programs or those with regulatory changes Inherent risk associated with the Federal program Significant personnel changes Audit procedures performed Test internal control systems Test financial statement accuracy and reliability Identify and test compliance requirements of specific Federal programs Oversight is provided by Federal agencies and pass- through entities A-133 6

A-133 Non-compliance Sanctions Withhold a percentage of Federal awards Withhold or disallow overhead costs Suspend Federal awards until an audit is conducted Terminate Federal awards A-133 7

Cognizant Agency Recipients expending more than $50 million per year in Federal awards will have a cognizant audit agency Generally, the agency is determined by who provides the predominant amount of direct funding The cognizant agency serves as the point of contact for any audit activity related to a recipient of federal funds U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is the cognizant audit agency for FSU/State of Florida A-133 8

Funding Federal Agency FSU Prime Recipient Other Entity Prime Recipient Other Entity Sub-recipient FSU Sub-recipient Other Entity Sub-recipient 9

Monitor sub-recipient compliance with A-133, if applicable Sub-recipients that meet the criteria are required to obtain an A-133 audit and report to the prime recipient the results of that audit Impose sanctions (discussed previously), if sub- recipient is unable or unwilling to have required audits or does not take appropriate corrective actions to findings Scope of prime’s responsibility is limited to the sub- award only and does not extend to sub-recipient’s organizational and systems audits (handled by cognizant audit agency) Prime Recipient’s Responsibilities A

FSU’s A-133 Audit Performed by Auditor General’s Office, State of Florida Coordinated by FSU’s Office of Audit Services Prepares written response and corrective actions, with anticipated completion date, to audit findings Copy of the audit report submitted to a Federal Audit Clearinghouse and is accessible at The clearinghouse sends a copy of the audit report to Federal agencies with grants on which there were findings A

FSU’s A-133 Audit Audit report package must be kept on file for three years from date of receipt Audit package includes: 1. Financial Statements and Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 2. Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings 3. Auditor’s report 4. Corrective Action Plan For awards for which FSU is a sub-recipient, FSU is required to: Notify the prime agencies that an A-133 audit was conducted and whether there were any applicable findings related to the prime agency’s award A

Current Hot Button Topics  Cost Transfers  Cost Sharing  Effort Reporting  DS-2 Compliance  Final Reports  Sub-recipient Monitoring  Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Exemptions A

Departmental A-133 Tips  Adhere to all terms of and conditions of awards  Adhere to all regulations, policies and procedures  Federal (OMB Circulars, various agency sites)  FSU (Controller, Purchasing, HR, etc.)  Research (  Departments must notify the Assistant Director for Compliance in SRAS when auditors are inquiring with PI/department staff  Refer agencies to SRAS  Keep track of questions and responses  Forward any A-133 letters/requests to SRAS A

QUESTIONS 15