An Open-Source Data Hub for Improving the Effectiveness of Integrated Modeling Applications Brandon Nevers (KAI) Xuesong Zhou, Jeff Taylor (Univ. of Utah)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
Advertisements

Breaking the Static Barrier: Building Regional Support for Implementation of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Long-Range Planning Processes TRB Planning Applications.
Byron Becnel LA DOTD June 16, Microscopic simulation models simulate the movement of individual vehicles on roads It is used to assess the traffic.
The TRANSIMS Model: Combining Travel Demand and Microsimulation Operating Paradigms Presented to 2012 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting by John Kerenyi, P.E.,
DynusT (Dynamic Urban Systems in Transportation)
Beyond Peak Hour Volume-to-Capacity: Developing Hours of Congestion Mike Mauch DKS Associates.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
Applying DynusT to the I-10 Corridor Study, Tucson, AZ ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara June 26th, 2012 Jim Schoen, PE, Kittelson & Assoc. Khang.
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. October 11,2007 Application of Dynameq in Montréal: bridging the gap between regional models and microsimulation Application.
GIS-based Road Network Information in Travel Demand Modeling Ahmed Mohideen Abishek Komma Vipul Modi.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
1 Development of Capability-Enhanced PARAMICS Simulation Environment Lianyu Chu, Henry X. Liu, Will Recker California PATH ATMS Center University of California,
15 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey Joyoung Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Byungkyu Brian Park, University.
Evaluation of Potential ITS Strategies under Non-recurrent Congestion Using Microscopic Simulation Lianyu Chu, University of California, Irvine Henry Liu,
Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic Programming Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
Jeffrey Taylor & Xuesong Zhou
An Experimental Procedure for Mid Block-Based Traffic Assignment on Sub-area with Detailed Road Network Tao Ye M.A.Sc Candidate University of Toronto MCRI.
Challenge 2: Spatial Aggregation Level Multi-tier Modeling in Ohio Attempts to Balance Run Time and Forecast Granularity Gregory Giaimo, PE The Ohio Department.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. An Integrated Travel Demand, Mesoscopic and Microscopic.
Can Multi-Resolution Dynamic Traffic Assignment live up to the Expectation of Reliable Analysis of Incident Management Strategies Lili (Leo) Luo, P.E.,
An Empirical Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Paradigms Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Qi Yang Caliper Corporation 14.
A Calibration Procedure for Microscopic Traffic Simulation Lianyu Chu, University of California, Irvine Henry Liu, Utah State University Jun-Seok Oh, Western.
Transportation Operations Group Toward a Consistent and Robust Integrated Multi-Resolution Modeling Approach for Traffic Analysis May 17-21, 2009 Jeff.
©2009 Proprietary and Confidential DTA in practice: Modeling dynamic networks in the real world Michael Mahut, Ph.D. INRO Montreal, Canada.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Assessment of Urban Transportation Networks by integrating Transportation Planning and Operational Methods /Tools Presentation by: Sabbir Saiyed, P.Eng.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
1 BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT TRB Planning Applications Conference Monday, May 7, 2007.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
Big Data “Triage” for Long Range Planning Transportation Engineering and Safety Conference Reuben S MacMartin December 12, 2014.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Bangkok September, Economic Integration 2 Bangkok September, 2012.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
2007 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Daytona Beach, Florida Pseudo Dynamic Traffic Assignment A Duration Based Static Assignment.
GIS-Tranplan Interface Sponsored by: Iowa DOT Project Team Members: Jerry Shadewald Richard Storm.
+ Creating an Operations-Based Travel Forecast Tool for Small Oregon Communities TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 20, 2009.
DKS Associates. 2 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Travel Demand vs. Simulation Models Micro vs. Meso Simulation Models US-101 Corridor Modeling.
Getting to Know Cube.
Dynamic Origin-Destination Trip Table Estimation for Transportation Planning Ramachandran Balakrishna Caliper Corporation 11 th TRB National Transportation.
S. Erdogan 1, K. Patnam 2, X. Zhou 3, F.D. Ducca 4, S. Mahapatra 5, Z. Deng 6, J. Liu 7 1, 4, 6 University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. City of Montreal TRB Technical Conference May 9, 2007 A Multi-resolution Modelling Framework in the Montréal Area A Multi-resolution.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
Enhancement and Validation of a Managed-Lane Subarea Network Tolling Forecast Model May 19, 2005 Stephen Tuttle (RSG), Jeff Frkonja (Portland Metro), Jack.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Tennessee Statewide Model Subarea Model Development and Analysis Tennessee Model Users Group Meeting October 24, 2007 Presented by: Dean Munn Senior Transportation.
1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.
Methodological Considerations for Integrating Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Activity-Based Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Srinivasan Sundaram.
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
Traffic Simulation Model Theory and Application Basics of Traffic Simulation Course Instructors: Mark Hallenbeck, Director, UW TRAC Tony Woody, P.E., CH2M.
September 2008What’s coming in Aimsun: New features and model developments 1 Hybrid Mesoscopic-Microscopic Traffic Simulation Framework Alex Torday, Jordi.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Third International Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge.
Introduction to Vehicle Trajectory Processing Tools.
L04 Source Code Review & Modification Options to Connect to AMS Data Hub (Xuesong Zhou) 1.
L04 Workshop #2 Phoenix, AZ February 27, Desired Outcomes Analysis Framework Plan Working Outline  Leverage Data Collection Plan & Stakeholder.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Mesoscopic Modeling Approach for Performance Based Planning
Network Attributes Calculator
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Signalized Intersections
Presentation transcript:

An Open-Source Data Hub for Improving the Effectiveness of Integrated Modeling Applications Brandon Nevers (KAI) Xuesong Zhou, Jeff Taylor (Univ. of Utah) Prepared for 14th TRB Planning Applications Conference

Outline Overview and Data Hub Concept Development Goals Connections to AMS Data Hub Test Applications and Key Modeling Steps Next Steps 2

Problem Statement and Need Transportation decision making is complex; requires consideration of multiple levels of analysis or domains Improved suite of tools is critical to support USDOT initiatives: – Connected Vehicles – Integrated Corridor Management – Active Transportation Demand Management Many integrated modeling practices are still ad-hoc 3

Data Hub Field DataSafetyEmissions Micro- simulation & HCM Analysis Dynamic Traffic Assignment Travel Demand Forecasting Integrated Modeling Practices Current Practice Ad Hoc 4

5 Data Hub Field Data Land Use, Safety & Emissions Models HCM & Signal Timing Models Micro- simulation Models Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Travel Demand Forecasting Models AMS Data Hub Field Data Land Use, Safety & Emissions Models HCM & Signal Timing Models Micro- simulation Models Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Travel Demand Forecasting Models Our Vision Current Practice Ad Hoc With AMS Data Hub Systematic

FHWA Research Project Project title: Effective Integration of Analysis and Modeling Simulation (AMS) Tools – April 2011 to January 2013 Objectives: – Define a concept of operations – Allow for the effective integration of AMS tools across various domains and scale, – Perform multi-resolution simulation for multiple scenarios 6

Development Goal 1: Unifying Data Scheme 7

Development Goal 2: Support Cross Resolution Modeling Regional planning model Mesoscopic simulation Microscopic simulation Height (Z-axis) represents zone- specific population Color range represents predicted accessibility 8

Development Goal 3: Facilitate Data Exchanges between Modeling/Simulation Software Packages Traffic assignment: 9 Signal Optimization: Synchro Microsimulation: Vissim Google Maps Output

AMS Data Hub Software Prototype: NEXTA Open Source: Available at Google Code: Windows based applications but with connections to on-line storage (Google Fusion Tables) Start with GIS with multiple transportation layers – Network, demand, vehicle trajectory, Link MOE, …. Focus on data processing and visualization 10

Connection 1: AMS Data Hub Field Data Land Use, Safety & Emissions Models HCM & Signal Timing Models Micro- simulation Models Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Travel Demand Forecasting Models Regional planning models TransCAD CUBE VISUM GIS shape files Multiple demand formats CSV, Matrix Automatic identification of signal locations Subarea cut utility Export network to Google Maps Regional planning models TransCAD CUBE VISUM GIS shape files Multiple demand formats CSV, Matrix Automatic identification of signal locations Subarea cut utility Export network to Google Maps 11

Network Data Importing – Import GIS node/link/zone shape files – Utilize Open-source Geospatial Data Abstraction Library (GDAL) library – Script for mapping planning data set to NEXTA data hub 12 VISUMOpen-Source Q-GIS

Connection 2: AMS Data Hub Field Data Land Use, Safety & Emissions Models HCM & Signal Timing Models Micro- simulation Models Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Travel Demand Forecasting Models Import DYNASMART/Dynust data set Network Signal Control Vehicle trajectory Trajectory-based statistics generation Select link, path, subarea analysis 95% percentile travel time Planning index Import DYNASMART/Dynust data set Network Signal Control Vehicle trajectory Trajectory-based statistics generation Select link, path, subarea analysis 95% percentile travel time Planning index 13

Connection 3: AMS Data Hub Field Data Land Use, Safety & Emissions Models HCM & Signal Timing Models Micro- simulation Models Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Travel Demand Forecasting Models Import Aimsun vehicle trajectory file Export synchro data format Export VISSIM network data format (*.anm) Extensions: TRANSIMS Open-source CORSIM Import Aimsun vehicle trajectory file Export synchro data format Export VISSIM network data format (*.anm) Extensions: TRANSIMS Open-source CORSIM 14

Connection to Synchro and QEM 1. Import Synchro data directly to NEXTA 2. Match nodes using two layers 3. Fetch signal data from Synchro layer for Dynamic Traffic Assignment 4. Future year study through QEM 15

Connection 4: AMS Data Hub Field Data Land Use, Safety & Emissions Models HCM & Signal Timing Models Micro- simulation Models Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Travel Demand Forecasting Models FREEVAL HCM-based Quick Estimation Method (QEM) Given turning volume, Generate signal phasing and timing data FREEVAL HCM-based Quick Estimation Method (QEM) Given turning volume, Generate signal phasing and timing data 16

Signal Timing and Capacity Data Hub NEXTA network data hub 17 HCM signal data hub HCM highway capacity hub

Connection 5: AMS Data Hub Field Data Land Use, Safety & Emissions Models HCM & Signal Timing Models Micro- simulation Models Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Travel Demand Forecasting Models MOVES LITE Simplified Emission Estimation Method Safe prediction model Given AADT, interchange type, link type Predict crash rates Different crash types MOVES LITE Simplified Emission Estimation Method Safe prediction model Given AADT, interchange type, link type Predict crash rates Different crash types 18

Linking Simulated Vehicle Trajectory with MOVES 19 MOVES Vehicle DynamicsVehicle Fleet I/M programs Fuel properties(others)… constant

Integrated MOVES Lite and DTALite Packages for Emission Analysis MOVES Lite Emission Estimates DTALite Large-scale Dynamic Traffic Assignment & Simulator Simplified Emission Estimation Method Project level Network level Microscopic Vehicle Trajectory Reconstruction Emission Result Aggregation 20

Connection 6: AMS Data Hub Field Data Land Use, Safety & Emissions Models HCM & Signal Timing Models Micro- simulation Models Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models Travel Demand Forecasting Models Inrix Sensor data 15-min speed count GPS data sets Tomtom dataset from New York NGSIM data set Incident data (crash locations) Google Transit Feed Extension: Dynamic OD demand calibration tools Inrix Sensor data 15-min speed count GPS data sets Tomtom dataset from New York NGSIM data set Incident data (crash locations) Google Transit Feed Extension: Dynamic OD demand calibration tools 21

Network Coding/Debugging/Calibration Reduce editing and debugging efforts Visualization and validation 22 Purple band: observed volume vs. Dark blue band: simulated volume

Test Applications Two test networks selected: – NW 185 th Avenue in Portland, Oregon – I-10 in Tucson, Arizona Primary objective: demonstrate linkages among AMS tools and field data Model and field data already available to team Familiar networks Interested modeling agencies – Portland Metro – Pima Association of Governments 23

185 th Avenue NW Portland, OR Over 20 signalized intersections Interchange ramp terminals at US Counts / Volume »Historical count database Signal Timing »Synchro Travel Time/Speed »Bluetooth TM Data Sources VISUM DTALite & DynusT Synchro VISSIM AMS Tools

I-10 Freeway Network Tucson, AZ Hour Segment Counts Intersection Turning Movement Counts I-10 Mainline Speed Data Sources TRANSCAD DTALite & DynusT Synchro VISSIM AMS Tools 5 miles of I-10 being reconstructed 4 interchanges; 3 to be closed during reconstruction

Key AMS Data Hub Modeling Steps Network Import 2. Subarea Cut 3. Signal Timing Estimation4. O-D Calibration5. Data Visualization

1. Network Import/Conversion Highlighted Features – Supports flexible GIS network coding – Internal error checking (network coding) – Intersection control inference Benefits – Time savings in quality control and network preparation efforts 27

2. Subarea Cut Highlighted Features – Generate subarea OD demand matrix – Convert zone centroids and connectors to side streets Benefits – Reduced physical effort in preparing subarea networks 28

3. Signal Timing Estimation Highlighted Features – HCM-based Quick Estimation Method (QEM) – Evaluate Phasing, Timing, Movement Capacity, Left-turn treatment strategies, etc. – Data Exchange with Synchro and DTA packages Benefits – Reduced effort in preparing intersection analysis 29

4. Calibrate O-D Demand Matrices Highlighted Features – Calibrate subarea OD demand – Utilize time-dependent link counts – Integrated OD adjustment and simulation process Benefits – Highly efficient assignment engine – Better path flow estimates for microsimulation 30

Calibrate O-D Demand Matrices 31

5. Data Management and Visualization Highlighted Features – Google Fusion Tables (Cloud-based Data Storage) – Google Earth, 2D, 3D, 4D illustration – Flexibility/Interoperability through data format Benefits – Enhanced visualization capabilities – Simplified data sharing between agencies, public 32

Estimated Time Saving from AMS Data Hub 33 ComponentWithout AMS Data Hub With AMS Data Hub Network Import Export, edit, and import network 8-10 hours1-2 hours Intersection Control Inference Editing control type for all nodes 6-8 hours4-6 hours Subarea OD Tables Aggregate path flows at boundary 8-16 hours< 0.5 hours Convert Connectors to Side Streets Add new nodes, delete links, etc. 1-2 hours< 0.5 hours Signal Timing with QEM Initial timings for intersections 6-8 hours< 0.5 hours ODME Preparing field data, running ODME 6-8 hours2-3 hours TOTAL35-52 hours7-11 hours 80% Savings

Challenges 1.Network coding Different applications require different levels of details 2.Signal data representation 1. capacity; 2. turning movement and effective green time 3. dual ring signal timing 4. software/hardware in the loop 3.Software vendor buy-in 1. existing multi-resolution integration using their own proprietary format 4.community support (TRB/IEEE) 34

Next Steps 1.Receive comments and host webinar with invited user group 2.Continue model development and testing – Refine and expand connections with signal timing data – Linkage with Activity-Based Model – Expand number of AMS tool interfaces – Provide connection with real-time detector data 3.Identify and conduct pilot tests 35