Recent USAF Total In-Flight Simulator (TIFS) Projects SAE Guidance & Control Committee March 2005 Eric Ohmit Flight Research Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM (AFCS)
Advertisements

Company Presentation.
Air Traffic Management
Issues specific to general aviation and business jets Session 6 Presentation 3.
Georgia Tech Aerial Robotics Dr. Daniel P Schrage Jeong Hur Fidencio Tapia Suresh K Kannan SUCCEED Poster Session 6 March 1997.
Types of Aircraft Flight Instruments Parts of an Aircraft Principles of Flight At the Airport
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
Aircraft Control Surfaces and Components. Aircraft Components and Control Aircraft range from simple home-built machines to complex fighter jets All aircraft.
AIRCRAFT HANDLING Part 6 General Flying.
AE 1350 LECTURE #3 TOPICS PREVIOUSLY COVERED Roadmap of Disciplines “English” to “S.I.” units Common Aerospace Terminology Airplane Axes and Motion This.
INSIDE THE COCKPIT OF AN AIRPLANE
Calspan In-Flight Simulation Projects SAE Presentation Oct 2008 Learjet – Automated Aerial Refueling Learjet – Sense & Avoid Flight Test Flight Research.
Range (nm) Payload (kg) Payload (lb) Endurance (hr) As a total system, Vigilante.
INNOCON Innovative solutions to the modern real time Arial surveillance challenges.
Matt McKeever Jonathan Baker UAV Design Team 11/16/2006
1 Ames Research Center Karl Bilimoria 5 March 2008 Lunar Lander Handling Qualities – Terminal Descent to Touchdown Dr. Karl Bilimoria NASA Ames Research.
Aircraft Motion and Control
Aircraft Response to Control Input Data Collection System Presenter: Curtis Cutright Advisor: Dr. Michael Braasch Project Sponsor: JUP.
Data Processing Equipment
Aviation Requirement 1 A) Define “aircraft”- an airplane, helicopter, or other machine capable of flight What are the operation of the following:  Jet.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida Flight Standards District Office FAA Safety Team Safety Presentation Technically.
Leading Cadet Training
1 How does an aircraft fly?. 2 First of all – An aircraft needs one or more engines to move forward.
Aviation Merit Badge.
W w w. a r c a a. a e r o AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR AEROSPACE AUTOMATION Overview of Activities at the Australian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation.
Chapter 22 Air Vehicular Systems.
Pinch Hitters The Right Stuff for the Right Seat Flight Controls and Flight Instruments William J. Doyle, Jr., CFII, AGI, IGI, ASC
Calspan Flight Research Recent Activities Lou Knotts SAE ACGSC Meeting Salt Lake City March 2-4, 2005.
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
Mobile Distributed 3D Sensing Sandia National Laboratories Intelligent Sensors and Robotics POC: Chris Lewis
October 2006 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Williamsburg, VA October 2006 John Bosworth (661)
Results of NASA/DARPA Automatic Probe and Drogue Refueling Flight Test Keith Schweikhard NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
The Robert A. Reisman Precision Armaments Laboratory
Flight Readiness Review July 31 – August 5, 2006 Joseph “Ben” Hovelman, Sky Research Bruce Coffland, NASA ARC FIELD TESTING OF REMOTE SENSOR GAS LEAK DETECTION.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
BQM-167A Advanced UAV System Architecture
A Piloted Simulator Evaluation of Transport Aircraft Rudder Pedal Force/Feel Systems Eric C. Stewart NASA Langley Research Center 98 th Aerospace Control.
Distribution A: Cleared for Public Release, SAF/PA
Doris Hamill UAV Business Development Lead NASA Langley Research Center and Hampton Roads First Responders.
Powered Flight Syllabus #1 CAP O-Rides Squadron 85.
1410 Sachem Place ◊ Suite 202 ◊ Charlottesville, VA Integrated Adaptive Guidance & Control for the X-37 during TAEM & A/L.
Calspan Status Update AG&C Committee, October 11-13, 2006 Williamsburg, VA Lou Knotts/Eric Ohmit.
Vehicle Systems Leading supplier of Flight Control Electronics  Military … F-15, F-18, F-22, C-17, Typhoon, Tornado  Commercial … A320, B-767, B-777.
Introduction to Control / Performance Flight.
What Is Multilateration Triangulation System Uses Aircraft Transponder Multiple Ground Receivers Central Computer Calculates & Displays Aircraft Position.
All information contained in this document is proprietary to SDT and may not be reproduced or disclosed to any third parties without the written consent.
Calspan Status Update AG&C Committee, March 1-3, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV E. Ohmit.
February 2007 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Boulder, CO February 2007 John Bosworth (661)
Lecture 7: INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM (ILS)
Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter
1 Panel on New Air Traffic Control and Management Technology February 23, 2007 Regional Airport Planning Committee Panel on New Air Traffic Control and.
Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter June, 2009 NASA LaRC | NC State University | APTIMA.
Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B
Federal Aviation Administration Halon 1211 Stratification/ Localization in Aircraft Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center.
Theory of Flight All are demonstrated by the flight of the bird!
Cognitive Issues Related to Moving-map Displays in Military Aircraft Maura C. Lohrenz Joint University Program in Air Transportation Systems, Ohio University.
Flight Deck Weather Information :
Lecture 8: INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM (ILS)
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
1 Use or disclosure of this information is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. Flight Symbology to Aid in Approach and Landing.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
Final approach Instrument landing system
International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment The NASA IKHANA UAS Platform Introduction to UAV Content provided by: V. Ambrosia, G. Buoni,
Helicopter Flight Dynamics
Cloud Cap Technologies
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
FBW – Introduction The FBW architecture was developed in 1970’s
Design Refining a design.
Progress in Weather Observations
Presentation transcript:

Recent USAF Total In-Flight Simulator (TIFS) Projects SAE Guidance & Control Committee March 2005 Eric Ohmit Flight Research Group

Background The USAF NC-141H TIFS and its twin (CTIFS) were developed during the 70’s to provide an in- flight simulator test beds for civil and military applications The TIFS has been in operation for over 30 years The TIFS is operated under a CRADA with the USAF by Calspan in Buffalo NY.

Background New nose was developed to support NASA HSCT XVS and SVS evaluations during –Develop & demonstrate a Synthetic External Visibility System to allow pilots to navigate & make precision approaches & landings without reference to real-world external windows –Significant reduction in nose weight allowing for additional equipment installation HDTV, displays, radar, etc

Background CRADA with USAF –USAF AFRL/VA discontinued operation of TIFS & VISTA Aircraft 1998 –CRADA signed by all parties 11/99 –N793VS assigned to aircraft on 1/01 by FAA

Recent programs X-40A IAG&C In-Flight Evaluations (Sep-Dec 2003) –USAF AFRL Sponsored –Participants AFRL, Calspan (nee Veridian), Barron Associates, Boeing –IAG&C – Integrated Adaptive Guidance & Control

Program Objectives Risk Reduction Flight Testing of an autoland control system with algorithms which –Accommodate Single and Multiple Control surface failures (locked surface) –Reconfigure the trajectory as necessary to provide acceptable touchdown locations and sink rates –Reference: “An Approach to Integrated Adaptive Guidance and Control with Flight Test Results” Schierman, Ward, Hull, Gandhi, Oppenheimer & Doman, AIAA JGC&D

Approach profile

Results Successful demonstration of –Single control surface failures –Multiple control surface failures –Trajectory reconfiguration –Autonomous steep approaches to touchdown under the control of the IAG&C Autoland controller (no pilot or safety pilot interaction after engagement) –Expansion of the TIFS flight path and Side force surface envelopes Utilized SFS in toed out configuration to produce drag Original goal had been to evaluate  ~ -27 deg, nominal attained was -8 to -12 deg Airframe buffet at full SFS deflection prevented higher descent rates –Modified TIFS Model Following algorithm for scaled vertical axis MF

Movie

ITT Viking Program ITT (nee Kodak) Viking Sensor program –Sponsor ITT –Department of Energy (partial funding for flight testing)

Objectives Quick-turn Demonstration of Airborne Natural Gas Leak Detection System. Commercial development, but flight test partially funded by the Department of Energy. DOE schedule required fast response workaround from original plan –TIFS selected due to ease of installation and available flight status –Used avionics nose configuration of TIFS –Side-force-surfaces removed

Installation

Results Installed over 1200# of equipment in nose and 1000# in cabin. Based on a laser system. Checkout in Buffalo, NY – Aug 2004 Flight evaluations in Casper, WY – Sep 2004 –Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center, Cheyenne WY Very successful results System presently being installed in a Cessna Caravan

Movie

Future Programs & Other Potential uses of TIFS Scheduled use –Handling Qualities Program (Summer ’05) Potential uses –Airborne sensor test-bed –UAV Control law or multi-UAV test risk reduction/demonstration –UAV sensor/payload flight testing

Contact Information Norm Weingarten TIFS Program Manager (716)

TIFS Typical Systems Equipment (Backup chart) Avionics Nose with APG-66 Radar Aft Crew Station

TIFS Display & Systems Programs (Backup chart) PREVIOUS PROGRAMS: REMOTELY PILOTED VEHICLE COMPASS COPE - Autoland & Remote Operator EXTERNAL VISIBILITY & SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS NASA HSCT & Aviation Safety Programs MARTIN MARIETTA SMART WEAPONS SUITE AFTPS ASTTA Avionics Systems Test & Training Aircraft C-141 DISPLAY UPGRADE WINDSHIELD DISTORTION B-1 COMMAND FLIGHT PATH DISPLAY CONTROL SYSTEM RECONFIGURATION

TIFS Sensors (Backup chart) AIR DATA: , , V, Turbulence, h, h-dot,  (Raw data & Complementary filtered) ANGULAR MOTION: , , , p, q, r LINEAR MOTION: Airspeed, Rate of Climb Nx, Ny, Nz (cg & Pilot) ALTITUDE: Pressure, Radar NAVIGATION: LTN-72R(INS), D-GPS, LORAN, TACAN, VOR DIGITAL DATA BUSES: MIL 1553B and ARINC 429 & 561 IRIG TIME CODE: Available in computer, data recording and video recording

TIFS Power, Weight, Cooling (Backup chart) Power available: 28V DC: 115 Amps 400 Hz AC, 3 Phase: 40 KVA 60 Hz AC: 7 KVA Weight available for customer equipment: ~ 1,000 pounds in aft cabin ~ 1,500 pounds in avionics nose 6’ deep with two Radomes (12 gHz & 36 gHz) ~ 500 pounds in simulation cockpit Rugidization: Accommodate “office” environment & prototype equipment: sensors, computers, displays Cooling: Auxiliary air conditioner ~ 36,000 BTUs. Exhaust fans: 270 cfm in simulation cockpit 800 cfm in aft cabin Cooling air & exhaust can be directly plumbed to/from equipment for positive cooling

TIFS Performance Capabilities (Backup chart) V-max: 270 Kt V-touchdown: 115 Kt Kt V-stall deg Faps): 95 Kt Max Sink Touchdown: 10 Ft/Sec Steep Approach: -15 deg Flight Path(  ), 270 Kt Max Rate of Climb: 2000 Ft/Min Nz range: 0 to 2.0 g Ny range: +/ g h-max for simulation: 10,000 Ft h-min: 0 Ft (for runway touchdown) h-min: 500 Ft (over terrain) Max Flight Duration: 2.0 Hr Crew Size:2 Safety Pilots 2 Test Engineers 4 Customer Engineers/Pilots/Observers

TIFS Piloted Simulation Nose (Backup chart)

TIFS Avionics Nose (Backup chart)

TIFS Piloted Simulation Nose Configuration (Backup chart) COMPUTERS: SILICON GRAPHICS ONYX RAPID SYSTEMS (5 DSPs) RECORDERS: 260 CHANNELS VIDEO & VOICE FULL SENSOR SUITE GPS SYSTEM LITTON 72R INS VARIABLE FEEL CONTROLLERS WHEEL CENTERSTICK SIDESTICK RUDDER PEDALS SERVO THROTTLE SEPARATE RECONFIGURABLE SIMULATION COCKPIT INSTRUMENT PANEL & FLOOR PROGRAMMABLE 19" CRT & F-18 TYPE HEAD-UP AND HEAD-DOWN DISPLAYS ELEVATOR AILERON RUDDER DIRECT LIFT FLAPS SIDE FORCE SURFACES DIRECT THRUST CONTROL 6 DOF MODEL FOLLOWING SIMULATION BERNOULLI DRIVE ZIP DISK

TIFS Avionics Nose Configuration (Backup chart) F-16 APG-66 RADAR FULL SENSOR SUITE LTN-72R INS GPS SYSTEM AN/AAS-36 IRDS E/O TV CAMERA MAVERICK SEEKER HEAD AVIONICS AFT CREW STATION STANDARD INSTRUMENTS PROGRAMMABLE DISPLAYs FBW CONTROL OF AIRCRAFT CONTROL OF ALL EQUIPMENT RADAR DIGIBUS INTERFACE SILICON GRAPHICS ONYX RAPID SYSTEM DSP COMPUTER DIGITAL DATA & VIDEO RECORDERS SIDEFORCE SURFACES CAN BE REMOVED ACCOMODATE CUSTOMER EQUIP.

TIFS Typical Simulation Cockpit Configurations (Backup chart) Room for Large Displays & Radar Wide Unobstructed Field-of-View Large Center Console with Throttle Feel System Side Consoles for Controllers & Instruments Two Floor Configurations: Level & Sloped 7 Deg Nose-up