Road Safety Audits: An Overview 2015 Team Conference Henry Brown, P.E. Research Engineer University of Missouri March 11, 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
December 5, 2011 Presented by: Sue DAgnese Region 1 Traffic Manager Overview of: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT (RSA) PROCESS & APPLICATIONS TV Highway at 185th Ave.
Advertisements

Presented by Nazir Lalani P.E TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATIONS (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC MEETING FOR LA 86 & LA 320: ROUNDABOUT IBERIA PARISH State Project No. H Federal Aid Project No. H
Type Name Here Technical Program Services Eduardo C. Serafin, PE, AICP.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
ROADWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT (RSI) ROAD SAFETY AUDITS & AUDIT REVIEWS CLIFF REUER TRAFFIC & SAFETY ENGINEER SDDOT OFFICE OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
6-1 Lesson 6 | Practice RSA. Perform a practice-RSA of a design-stage or an in-service road. Analyze data acquired from site visit or design plans and.
1 Diagnosis of road accident problems Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time Spent: 6 hrs.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.
T RIBAL S AFETY C HAMPIONS W ORKSHOP December 2 – 3, 2014 Embassy Suites Hotel & Conference Center Norman, Oklahoma Proven Safety Countermeasures Huy A.
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Road Safety Audits Ghazwan al-Haji PhD student ”On whats goes wrong in road design and how to put it right safely”
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Module 13: Highway-Rail Grade Crossings (HRGC)
Signs, signals, and pavements markings
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
Road Safety Audit CEDR SG „Road Safety“ Eva M. Eichinger Copenhagen, April, 2004 Road Safety Audit General Introduction Eva M. Eichinger, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Diagnosis of Sites with Potential for Safety Improvement 1 Module 4 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise,
INTERSECTION SAFETY PERFORMANCE AND AUDIT Andy Loonan Basak Aldemir-Bektas Intersection: Welch Avenue & Lincoln Way.
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
1 ADOT Road Safety Assessment Program Presented to NACOG Technical Subcommittee December 4, 2013.
1 Road Design Standards for Older Drivers Publication No. FHWA-RD Randy Hulsey Director Douglas County Department of Transportation.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
May 1, 2014 East Gude Drive Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Stakeholder Pedestrian Safety Meeting.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
Lesson 2 | Road Safety Issues 2-1. Learning Outcomes Define RSA. Explain the need for tools to improve road safety. Explain the role of GORE. Identify.
Enhancing Highway Safety: Applications of the Human Factors Guidelines (HFG) for Road Systems Presentation to the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Western Association.
Risk Management for Highway Design Jeffrey Shaw, P.E. Safety & Design TST.
1 At-Grade Intersection Design. 2 Objectives Define general intersection design objectives Describe factors that influence curb return design For a nice.
Access Management: South Carolina’s Experience Rick Werts Director of Traffic Engineering South Carolina Department of Transportation.
Road safety audits on mining operations Damir Vagaja Manager Mining and Resources ARRB Group.
Desktop RSA Activity Desktop RSA Activity 4-53 Step 1: Identify project or existing road to be reviewed. Step 2: Select an independent, multi-disciplinary.
ROUNDABOUTS Improving Safety and Efficiency The Ohio Department of Transportation District Clark Ave. Ashland, OH Julie Cichello, P.E. District.
Patrick Hasson Federal Highway Administration Midwestern Resource Center Engineering Safer Intersections.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
Roundabouts: A Safer Choice. What is a roundabout? A roundabout is a type of circular intersection with yield control of entering traffic, islands on.
March 20, 2011 Presented by: Sue D’Agnese, Region 1 Traffic Manager Overview of: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT (RSA) PROCESS & APPLICATIONS OR210 Scholls Ferry Rd:
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
3-1 Lesson 3 | Basic RSA Principles. Define RSAs and explain how they contribute to road safety. Describe the composition and purpose of an RSA team.
Complete Streets Michigan’s Approach Mark A. Van Port Fleet AASHTO SCOD Annual Meeting July 15, 2008.
156 th Street Design in Bennington Public Open House Meeting October 28, 2009 City of Bennington, NE.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Chapter 6: Intersections
Edward L. Fischer P.E..  Ed, it was hard to read slides from back of room with this background.  Can I change it? Nancy Brickman.
Road Safety Audits Road School, 2011 Rick Drumm, P.E. Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration.
Steps 6 to 8 Lesson 4 | The Eight-Step RSA Process 4-86.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
City of Snoqualmie Tokul Roundabout Project April 10, 2012.
Adjusting Speed Limits
Road Safety Audits Copyright © 2016 STC, UK 1
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Road Safety Audit Findings
Towards the Ideal Roundabout Design
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
Safety Audit Components
School of Civil Engineering
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
Presentation transcript:

Road Safety Audits: An Overview 2015 Team Conference Henry Brown, P.E. Research Engineer University of Missouri March 11,

Acknowledgements Craig Allred (FHWA) John Miller (MoDOT) Dana Ternus (NW Missouri Regional Council of Governments) Charlie Nemmers, Carlos Sun, and Praveen Edara (University of Missouri) 2

Presentation Outline Overview of RSAs Procedures for RSAs RSA Case Studies 3

Basic Concepts What is a road safety audit? Why do we need RSAs? When do we conduct RSAs? 4

What is an RSA? Formal safety performance examination Existing or Future Road Segment or Intersection Independent, multidisciplinary team 5

A road safety audit also… considers the safety of all road users considers interactions at the borders or limits of the project examines the interaction of project elements may proactively consider mitigation measures 6

… a simple standards check for adherence to design guidelines. … an opportunity to redesign the project. A road safety audit is NOT… 7

Why do we need RSA? Road Environment Factors (28%) Vehicle Factors (8%) Human Factors (95%) 4% 24% 67% 4% TYPICAL REPORTED CRASH CAUSES 8

Why do we need RSAs? Relatively few road-related safety issues are identified in collision reports. Road designs need to anticipate and accommodate common driver errors. Easier to design and build safer roads than to modify some entrenched driver behaviors. 9

Reduce the number and severity of crashes Promote awareness of safe practices Process to identify and address problems Considers human factors and multimodal issues Low cost RSA Benefits 10

When do we conduct RSAs? pre-construction: – planning / feasibility – preliminary (draft) design – detailed design construction: – work zones – pre-opening post-construction/operational: – existing roads 11

When do we conduct RSAs? 12

The Eight Step RSA Process Procedures 13

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Field reviews 5 Analysis & Report 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 14

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Perform field reviews under various conditions 5 Conduct audit analysis and prepare report of findings 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 1 Identify project 1 Identify project 15

Step 1 Step 1 In-service projectDesign stage project Step 1: Identify the Project 16

High-crash sites High-profile sites Changed traffic characteristics Step 1 Step 1 Candidates for In-service RSAs 17

Make structural changes on paper instead of in concrete. Optimize crash and conflict prevention. RSAs: Design Stage Step 1 Step 1 18

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Perform field reviews under various conditions 5 Conduct audit analysis and prepare report of findings 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 2 Select RSA team 2 Select RSA team 19

Independent Experienced Multi-disciplinary Step 2 Step 2 Select RSA Team 20

Operations Step 2 Step 2 Geometric Road users/human factors Select the RSA Team: Core Skills 21

Interdisciplinary RSA Team: Composition and Size local agency staff exchange staff from another local agency consultants combination of above Step 2 Step 2 22

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Perform field reviews under various conditions 5 Conduct audit analysis and prepare report of findings 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 3 Start-up meeting 3 Start-up meeting 23

Crash history Traffic volumes Aerial photographs Design drawings Background reports Design criteria Step 3 Step 3 The Start-up Meeting: Provide Project Information 24

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Perform field reviews under various conditions 5 Conduct audit analysis and prepare report of findings 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 4 Field reviews 4 Field reviews 25

Review available crash data Arrange transportation Designate a secretary and photographer Step 4 Step 4 Perform Field Review: Preparation for the Field Review 26

Step 4 Step 4 Perform Field Review: Common Items to Look For Sight distance obstructions Pedestrian and cyclist conflicts Visual clutter 27

Step 4 Step 4 Perform Field Review: Common Items to Look For Roadside Hazards Driveway Issues 28

 Peak and off-peak traffic periods  Dry and wet weather conditions  Day and night conditions Step 4 Step 4 Perform Field Review: Variable Conditions to Observe 29

Perform Field Review: Identify Safety Issues Safety analysis considers three elements concurrently: geometry operations user characteristics and interactions Step 4 Step 4 30

Identify Safety Issues: Geometry Use of design standards and guidelines: a sound starting point cumulative effect of minimum/ maximum values supplement with human factors analysis and project-specific concerns (such as maintenance concerns) Step 4 Step 4 31

curve radius sight distance + curve + gradient hazard in clear zone Identify Safety Issues: Geometry Step 4 Step 4 32

Identify Safety Issues: Operations congestion and delay signal operation operating speeds turning movements queueing driveways Step 4 Step 4 33

34 Identify Safety Issues: User Characteristics and Interactions school buses farm vehicles trucks cyclists school children driver age Step 4 Step 4

Step 4 Step 4 Perform Field Review: Checklists and prompt lists: may provide structure to the site visit remind the team what to look for, and help ensure that nothing is missed 35

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Perform field reviews under various conditions 5 Conduct audit analysis and prepare report of findings 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 5 Analysis & Report 5 Analysis & Report 36

Prioritize Safety Issues may be based on crash frequency and severity: crash history (audits of existing roads) expected crashes (design stage audits) – qualitative estimate of risk – quantitative estimate of risk Step 5 Step 5 37

Short term solutions include: maintenance, vegetation, changing signage or pavement markings, Enforcement & Education Long term solutions include: flattening a curve or modifying a roadway’s vertical alignment, Enforcement & Education Step 5 Step 5 Mitigate Safety Concerns: Suggestions Appropriate to Project Stage 38

Early design stage: alignment changes Later design stage: signing improvements Step 5 Step 5 Mitigate Safety Concerns: Design-Stage 39

40

Roundabouts 41

Roundabouts “If the politicians really go ahead with this, they’ll pay at the ballot box,” driver Turner Lane warned. “What goes around comes around.” (Winnipeg Sun: April 1, 2013) 42

Short Range Paint, Signage Mid-Range Contour Bank Long-Range Realign Skewed Intersection Step 5 Step 5 Suggested Countermeasures 43

 Summarizes the project  Identifies team  Documents site visits  Documents results  Identifies and prioritizes safety concerns  May include suggestions for improvements Step 5 Step 5 The RSA Findings: Formal Report 44

Step 5 Step 5 The RSA Findings: Formal Report 45

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Perform field reviews under various conditions 5 Conduct audit analysis and prepare report of findings 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 6 Present findings 6 Present findings 46

Discussion of safety concerns Clarify findings and suggestions Assist project owner in making best choices Step 6 Step 6 The RSA Findings Presentation 47

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Perform field reviews under various conditions 5 Conduct audit analysis and prepare report of findings 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 7 Prepare response 7 Prepare response 48

Inadequate Response “We will not realign the intersection at Jefferson Road. We do not feel that it is needed.” Step 7 Step 7 Responses 49

1 Identify project 2 Select RSA team 3 Start-up meeting 4 Perform field reviews under various conditions 5 Conduct audit analysis and prepare report of findings 6 Present findings 7 Prepare response 8 Implement findings Responsibilities RSA Team Design Team / Project Owner 8 Implement findings 8 Implement findings 50

Implementation - may depend on policy, manpower, and/or funding. Step 8 Step 8 Step 8: Implementation of Improvements 51

Pre-construction RSAs: Changes to design drawings Post-construction RSAs : Incorporate improvements in operating budgets or maintenance programs Step 8 Step 8 Implementation of Improvements 52

Examples: What to Look For 53

Sight Distance SR42 Before 54

Sight Distance SR42 Before 55

Sight Distance SR42 After 56

Sight Distance SR56 Before 57

Sight Distance SR56 After 58

Sight Distance 59

Sight Distance 60

Roadside Safety 61

62

63

64

65

66

67

Photos: Craig Allred (FHWA) 68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75 Pavement Considerations

76

77 Drainage

78

Pavement Markings and Signs 79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

BEFORE AFTER 87

88

89

Signalization 90

91

Operations 92

Pedestrians 93

94

RSA Case Studies 95

Case Study 1: US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue, Chillicothe, Missouri Chillicothe 96

US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue: Overview 97

US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue: RSA Team Mo-Kan Regional Council MoDOT City of Chillicothe Green Hills RPC Delaware Valley RPC Chillicothe Police Department Missouri Highway Patrol Northwest Missouri Regional Council of Governments 98

US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue: Statistics 21 Reported Crashes Fatalities AADT – US 36: 4,300 vpd – Mitchell Ave.: 1,000 vpd Speed Limit – US 36: 65 mph – Mitchell Ave.: 35 mph 99

US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue: Sight Distance 100

US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue: Signs 101

US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue: Operations 102

US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue: Suggested Improvements Increase Size of Essential Signs Relocate Industrial Park Sign Paint Yield Line, Stop Bar, Turn Arrows Increase Lighting Add Intersection Ahead Signs Reconfigure Intersection Extend Turn Lanes Re-route Truck Traffic to US 65 Interchange 103

US 36 at S. Mitchell Avenue: Suggested Pavement Markings 104

Case Study 2: Bullhead Parkway, Bullhead City, Arizona miles 4-lane divided highway AADT 10,000 to 15,000 vpd 50 mph speed limit 17 intersections (4 signalized) (FHWA 2012)

Bullhead Parkway RSA: Examples of Implemented Countermeasures 106 Update Pavement Markings Install RPMs on Inside Edge Lines and Lane Lines Extend Right Turn Lanes Install Two-Direction Arrow Signs at T-Intersections Install Guardrail for Embankments Improve Grading at Median Drainage Structures (FHWA 2012)

Bullhead Parkway RSA: Crash Reductions 107 (FHWA 2012) 54% Total Crashes 50% Injury Crashes 30% Intersection- Related Crashes

Case Study 3: Work Zone RSA I-275 Tampa, Florida 108 Two Interchanges Positive Elements – Good delineation – Signal Backplates – Repeat Exit Notification Suggestions – Adding Signing – Crosswalks – Align Signal Heads – Signal Timing (FHWA 2013)

Case Study 4: Design Visualization Burma Road, Rhode Island 109 New Corridor Used 3D Model Recommended Roundabout Over Signalized Intersection Other Suggestions – Lighting – Large turn radius for trucks – Extend left turn lanes (FHWA 2011)

Case Study 5: Safe Routes to School Albany, Georgia 110 Suggestions – Sidewalks around school grounds – Upgrade signs and markings – H.A.W.K. Signal (FHWA 2010 & 2011, National Center for Safe Routes to School, 2008)

Additional Resources NCHRP Synthesis 336: Road Safety Audits (TRB) Road Safety Audit Guidelines (FHWA) FHWA Website: Bicycle Road Safety Audit Guidelines and Prompt Lists (FHWA) RSA Newsletter (FHWA) 111

Questions? E2509 Lafferre Hall Columbia, MO