Aviation Safety ProgramSingle Aircraft Accident Prevention April 1. 2003 1 NCC-1-377, Honeywell Tucson Design, Implementation, and Verification of Fault-Tolerant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connected Health Framework
Advertisements

1 Multi-Function Multi-mode Digital Avionics (MMDA) NASA Glenn Research Center – End of FY05 Status Presented to ICAO ACP WGC-11 GRC/James Budinger September.
Update on Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications (WAIC) ICAO, ACP-WG-W, Montreal Marcella Ost January 22, 2010 ACP WG-W/3 IP-3.
Introducing Campus Networks
Chapter 19: Network Management Business Data Communications, 5e.
Steve Jordan Director. Industry Solutions 05/05/14 Managing Chaos: Data Movement in 2014.
Chapter 15: Packaged Software and Enterprise Resource Planning
Panel 5: The Latest in OA Innovation and C4ISR 4 November, 2014 Mike Rice President / Senior Systems Engineer R2E Inc.
11. Practical fault-tolerant system design Reliable System Design 2005 by: Amir M. Rahmani.
OBP Research Oy for simpler creation of embedded systems.
Engineering Design Roundtables Innovation in Aeronautics Roundtables José Neves 24 / 02 /2015.
REDUNDANT ARRAY OF INEXPENSIVE DISCS RAID. What is RAID ? RAID is an acronym for Redundant Array of Independent Drives (or Disks), also known as Redundant.
Distributed Systems 1 Topics  What is a Distributed System?  Why Distributed Systems?  Examples of Distributed Systems  Distributed System Requirements.
ATN 2002 London September 2002 Presented by Aloke Roy Authors: Christophe Hamel Tom Judd Ketan Nguyen Bryan Rowe Kevin Wohlers ATN AIRBORNE IMPLEMENTATION.
Reliability on Web Services Presented by Pat Chan 17/10/2005.
7-1 INTRODUCTION: SoA Introduced SoA in Chapter 6 Service-oriented architecture (SoA) - perspective that focuses on the development, use, and reuse of.
Advanced Processing Systems Honeywell Proprietary1 12/04/2003 Honeywell UF HCS & Honeywell DSES Opportunities Presented by Advanced Processing Systems.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Software Systems for the Second Century of Flight Research and Roadmap Thoughts High Confidence.
CS599 Software Engineering for Embedded Systems1 Software Engineering for Real-Time: A Roadmap Presentation by: Mandar Samant Raghbir Singh Banwait.
1 ITC242 – Introduction to Data Communications Week 12 Topic 18 Chapter 19 Network Management.
Systems & Cross-Cutting Issues Moderator: John Baras Scribe: Eric Cooper Attendees: Claire Tomlin (UC Berkeley), Mingyan Li (Boeing), Lyle Long (Penn State),
SE 464: Industrial Information systems Systems Engineering Department Industrial Information System LAB 02: Introduction to SAP.
REAL-TIME SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Industrial Avionics Working Group 19/04/07 Architecture Integration.
Unified Nuclear Industry Catalogue of Equipment and Materials Used for Designing, Construction and Operation of NPPs NIZHNY NOVGOROD ENGINEERING COMPANY.
The Systems Assurance Group Dr Jaspal Sagoo Systems Assurance Group QinetiQ Trusted Information Management Malvern Technology Centre.
Industrial Avionics Working Group 18/04/07 Defining the Safety Case Architecture IAWG Modular Certification.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing and NextGen Implementation 1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing.
Product Life Cycle Management Innovation to Execution
NeSSI Update An Implementation of the Generation 2 Bus Siemens Activities November 2006.
Welcome to the Aerospace Instrumentation and Controls Collaboration Forum Ohio Aerospace Institute, Cedar Point Road, Cleveland, OH For The.
1 ECE 453 – CS 447 – SE 465 Software Testing & Quality Assurance Case Studies Instructor Paulo Alencar.
Page - 1 Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power Role of EASY5 in Integrated Product Development Frank Gombos Boeing Canoga Park, CA.
A Commercial Airplane Manufacturers View
SIMATIC New Generation Controllers S7-1200
Technical Integrity Assurance For Product Development W. Henson Graves Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Russ Campbell.
September 20, 2002G2E 2002 GSA Technology Forum1 Gaming Device Standards Workgroup.
Industry Session – Mixed Criticality and Multi-Core David Corman Program Director, Cyber Physical Systems National Science Foundation 1.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
Analyze Opportunity Part 1
Enterprise Storage A New Approach to Information Access Darren Thomas Vice President Compaq Computer Corporation.
IMPROUVEMENT OF COMPUTER NETWORKS SECURITY BY USING FAULT TOLERANT CLUSTERS Prof. S ERB AUREL Ph. D. Prof. PATRICIU VICTOR-VALERIU Ph. D. Military Technical.
Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE)
Author George Peck EVLA System PDR December 4-5, EVLA Monitor and Control Hardware.
Panel Three - Small Businesses: Sustaining and Growing a Market Presence Open Interfaces and Market Penetration Protecting Intellectual Innovation and.
DCOM (Overview) by- Jeevan Varma Anga.
© 2012 xtUML.org Bill Chown – Mentor Graphics Model Driven Engineering.
Tools and Technology Development Hardware-in-the-Loop Dennis Culley NASA Glenn Research Center Collaboration Forum Ohio Aerospace Institute August 25,
Time Triggered Networks: use in space 2015 CCSDS spring SOIS Plenary 23 March 2015 Glenn Rakow/NASA-GSFC.
Drive by Wire – “What Will Be Its Impact On Tomorrow’s Vehicles?” Craig Stephens Ford Motor Company.
Safety-Critical Systems 7 Summary T V - Lifecycle model System Acceptance System Integration & Test Module Integration & Test Requirements Analysis.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
Langley Research Center Why is SPIDER Design Assurance based on Formal Methods? Paul S. Miner NASA Langley Internal Formal Methods.
Advantages of Time-Triggered Ethernet
1 5/18/2007ã 2007, Spencer Rugaber Architectural Styles and Non- Functional Requirements Jan Bosch. Design and Use of Software Architectures. Addison-Wesley,
Why Do Airplanes Crash? Investigating Air Data Inertial Reference Units Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering INTRODUCTION Modern aircraft.
Tackling I/O Issues 1 David Race 16 March 2010.
NASA Orion Avionics Architecture Joseph Moholt All Points Logistics © 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
Skills and products portfolio an overview Lorenzo Martinelli – Business Development Contact:
Simplifying Customer Software Integration Tim Myers April 9 th, 2011 Colorado Undergraduate Space Research Symposium Payload Configuration GUI.
ARTEMIS SRA 2016 Trust, Security, Robustness, and Dependability Dr. Daniel Watzenig ARTEMIS Spring Event, Vienna April 13, 2016.
COMMITTEE CHARTER SAE S-18 Aircraft & Systems Development and Safety Assessment Committee 29 January 2008.
SRA 2016 – Strategic Research Challenges Design Methods, Tools, Virtual Engineering Jürgen Niehaus, SafeTRANS.
Update on WAIC Issues ITU-R Working Party 5B and Future Regulatory Considerations Joe Cramer December 16, 2009.
Update on Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications (WAIC) ICAO, ACP-WG-W, Montreal Marcella Ost January 22, 2010 ACP WG-W/3 IP-3.
Storage Virtualization
Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE™) Support
Presentation transcript:

Aviation Safety ProgramSingle Aircraft Accident Prevention April NCC-1-377, Honeywell Tucson Design, Implementation, and Verification of Fault-Tolerant Modular Aerospace Controls Honeywell NCC Honeywell MAC (FADEC) –Modular approach –High product assurance, reliability, and safety –Reduced NRE and RE costs Modular certification Reuse - multiple applications TTTech TTA –Architecture hardware and software tools supplier –Architecture-enforced partitioning and transparent fault-tolerance capability SRI Formal Methods (FM) –Formal specification and verification of TTA properties –Formal verification of modular certification concept Objectives –NASA: A case study for the application of Formal Methods in the certification of the fault tolerant modular architecture –Honeywell: A highly reliable and safe system assured by formal verification and certification

Aviation Safety ProgramSingle Aircraft Accident Prevention April NCC-1-377, Honeywell Tucson What is MAC? Modular Aerospace Controls (MAC) MAC is a common Honeywell development platform that deploys modular electronics, common development environment and tools, and an open communication protocol The MAC platform was created to enable low-cost development and support of FADEC applications The Next Generation of Aerospace Electronic Systems

Aviation Safety ProgramSingle Aircraft Accident Prevention April NCC-1-377, Honeywell Tucson PSM 1 CPM 1 SFM 1 pS PSM 1 CPM 1 IOM 1 SFM 1 IOM 3 IOM 2 pS Today’s MAC Fits a Variety of Applications Uniquely capable –Low cost, harsh environment, fault tolerant Pre-qualification and semi-independent certification Industrial / automotive components & technology Partitioned operating system & application software Dramatic development cost and cycle time reduction Longevity through proactive obsolescence management Increased reliability through volume manufacturing and 6  Facilitates simplified overspeed and uncommanded thrust protection Medium Engine Control PSM 1 CPM 1 IOM 1 IOM 6 IOM 4SFM 3IOM 2 pS IOM 3 IOM 6 IOM 5 pS Large Engine Control RE-USEABLE MODULES Small Engine Control

Aviation Safety ProgramSingle Aircraft Accident Prevention April NCC-1-377, Honeywell Tucson MAC Benefits for Redundant Flight Critical Systems Provides Improved Data Flow and Redundancy Management TTP/C Bus Eliminates Bottleneck –Easily re-configurable via TTTech COTS tools Configurable I/O modules plug into bus Redundancy is efficiently managed –Redundant I/O is available on bus without latency –Failures are localized; remainder of system is available Replica Computations between GPMs Serial link bottleneck between channels Custom bus controllers, complex addressing Not easy to accommodate changes Inefficient utilization of redundancy –Data latency issues to be dealt with –Many single failures warrant channel swap or degraded operation

Aviation Safety ProgramSingle Aircraft Accident Prevention April NCC-1-377, Honeywell Tucson NCC Accomplishments Design Correctness and Certification Developed approach for Modular Certification supported by formal analysis Presented to Industry and FAA Active participation in RTCA SC- 200/EUROCAE WG-60 “Modular Avionics” by all team members –Honeywell Tucson –Honeywell Labs –SRI International –TTTech –NASA Langley Fault-Tolerant Integrated Modular Avionics Developed modular architecture based on TTP/C Formal Analysis of key fault-tolerance protocols Several Products in Development –Aermacchi M346 Dual-FADEC First delivery 11/02 –F110 MDEC for GE (F16 mid-life upgrade) Kickoff 8/02 –Planned response to Boeing 77 initiative for modular architectures –Expect starts for civil products in 2004