MURI Neutron-Induced Multiple-Bit Upset Alan D. Tipton 1, Jonathan A. Pellish 1, Patrick R. Fleming 1, Ronald D. Schrimpf.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Barcelona Forum on Ph.D. Research in Communications, Electronics and Signal Processing 21st October 2010 Soft Errors Hardening Techniques in Nanometer.
Advertisements

IHP Im Technologiepark Frankfurt (Oder) Germany IHP Im Technologiepark Frankfurt (Oder) Germany ©
GEant4 Microdosimetry Analysis Tool - GEMAT Fan Lei, Peter Truscott & Petteri Nieminen SPENVIS/Geant4 Workshop, Leuven, Belgium 05 October 2005.
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
M3.1 JYFL fission model Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, FIN-40351, Finland V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, , St. Petersburg, Russia.
NSREC 2013 Summary Radiation 2 Electronics (R2E) LHC Activities NSREC 2013 Summary Rubén García Alía, Giovanni Spiezia, Slawosz Uznanski.
Multi-Bit Upsets in the Virtex Devices Heather Quinn, Paul Graham, Jim Krone, Michael Caffrey Los Alamos National Laboratory Gary Swift, Jeff George, Fayez.
Microprocessor Reliability
2007 MURI Review The Effect of Voltage Fluctuations on the Single Event Transient Response of Deep Submicron Digital Circuits Matthew J. Gadlage 1,2, Ronald.
Future beyond CTF3: ESA/Electron testing January 27 th 2015 CLIC Workshop 2015: Future tests beyond CTF3 January 27 th 2015 Radiation Testing with CALIFES.
Title Nuclear Reaction Models in Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System PHITS Koji Niita: RIST, Japan Tatsuhiko Sato, JAEA, Japan Hiroshi Iwase:
March 16-18, 2008SSST'20081 Soft Error Rate Determination for Nanometer CMOS VLSI Circuits Fan Wang Vishwani D. Agrawal Department of Electrical and Computer.
Summary of activities of the WG on Cosmogenic activation in JRA2/IDEA (during first 18 months) Susana Cebrián Web.
The performance of LHCf calorimeter was tested at CERN SPS in For electron of GeV, the energy resolution is < 5% and the position resolution.
Estimation of SEUs in the FPGAs C. Targett-Adams V. Bartsch, M. Wing M. Warren, M. Postranecky.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
Ron Schrimpf Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Vanderbilt Radiation Effects Research Institute for Space and Defense Electronics.
®. ® Rad Hard Products for Satellites and Space ® QPRO for Avionics  Standard QPRO products immune to upsets in avionics environment.
Workshop on Physics on Nuclei at Extremes, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy.
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
1 MAPLD C192Degalahal SESEE: A Soft Error Simulation & Estimation Engine V Degalahal 1, S M Çetiner 2, F Alim 2, N Vijaykrishnan 1, K Ünlü 2, M.
Preliminarily results of Monte Carlo study of neutron beam production at iThemba LABS University of the western cape and iThemba LABS Energy Postgraduate.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik
Radiation Effects on Emerging Electronic Materials and Devices Ron Schrimpf Vanderbilt University Institute for Space and Defense Electronics.
Measurement and Simulation of the Variation in Proton-Induced Energy Deposition in Large Silicon Diode Arrays Christina L. Howe 1, Robert A. Weller 1,
Single Event Effects in microelectronic circuits Author: Klemen Koselj Advisor: Prof. Dr. Peter Križan.
Soft errors in adder circuits Rajaraman Ramanarayanan, Mary Jane Irwin, Vijaykrishnan Narayanan, Yuan Xie Penn State University Kerry Bernstein IBM.
SEE effects in deep submicron technologies F.Faccio, S.Bonacini CERN-PH/ESE SEE TWEPP2010.
Engineering & Computer Science 1 RADSAFE - An Integrated Radiation Effects Simulation Framework Robert A. Weller,
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
Estimation of Radiation Effects in the Front-End Electronics of an ILC Electromagnetic Calorimeter V. Bartsch, M. Postranecky, M. Warren, M. Wing University.
1 3D Simulation and Analysis of the Radiation Tolerance of Voltage Scaled Digital Circuits Rajesh Garg Sunil P. Khatri Department of ECE Texas A&M University.
INTERPRETATION OF THE SINGLE EVENT UPSET IN STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY CHIPS INDUCED BY LOW ENERGY NEUTRONS B. Mukherjee 1, D. Makowski 2 M. Grecki 2,
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
1 The NSEU Sensitivity of Static Latch Based FPGAs and Flash Storage CPLDs Joseph Fabula Jason Moore Austin Lesea Saar Drimer MAPLD2004 This work has benefited.
8 June 2006V. Niess- CALOR Chicago1 The Simulation of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimetry V. Niess CPPM - IN2P3/CNRS - U. Méditerranée – France On.
Effects of Surrounding Materials on Proton-Induced Energy Deposition in Large Silicon Diode Arrays Christina L. Howe 1, Robert A. Weller 1, Robert A. Reed.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Residual Does Rate Analyses for the SNS Accelerator Facility I. Popova, J. Galambos HB2008 August 25-29,
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Charge Collection and Trapping in Epitaxial Silicon Detectors after Neutron-Irradiation Thomas Pöhlsen, Julian Becker, Eckhart Fretwurst, Robert Klanner,
Radiation Effects on Emerging Electronic Materials and Devices Ron Schrimpf Vanderbilt University Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Department.
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
NASA 2001 Mars Odyssey page 1 Workshop HEND Russian Aviation and Space Agency Institute for Space Research Present knowledge of HEND efficiency.
UNCLASSIFIED Impact of Complex Material Systems on the Radiation Response of Advanced Semiconductors Robert A. Reed Institute for Space and Defense Electronics.
Workshop On Nuclear Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies, ICTP , A. Borella1 Monte Carlo methods.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
SEU Hardening Incorporating Extreme Low Power Bitcell Design (SHIELD)
Doping-type Dependence of Damage in Si Diodes Exposed to X-ray, Proton, and He + Irradiation MURI Meeting - June 2007 M. Caussanel 1, A. Canals 2, S. K.
Pion-Induced Fission- A Review Zafar Yasin Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan.
Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to MRaD Doses Bruce Schum UC Santa Cruz July
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
SEE Scaling Effects Lloyd Massengill 10 May 2005.
Gill 1 MAPLD 2005/234 Analysis and Reduction Soft Delay Errors in CMOS Circuits Balkaran Gill, Chris Papachristou, and Francis Wolff Department of Electrical.
UNCLASSIFIED Fundamental Aspects of Radiation Event Generation for Electronics and Engineering Research Robert A. Weller Institute for Space and Defense.
Itacil C. Gomes I.C.Gomes Consulting & Investment inc. Project X Forum on Spallation Sources for Particle Physics March 19-20, 2012 Fermi National Accelerator.
A Novel, Highly SEU Tolerant Digital Circuit Design Approach By: Rajesh Garg Sunil P. Khatri Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M.
Applications of Monte Carlo Radiation Transport Simulations Techniques for Predicting Single Event Effects in Microelectronics Robert A. Reed Vanderbilt.
Pedro Brogueira 1, Patrícia Gonçalves 2, Ana Keating 2, Dalmiro Maia 3, Mário Pimenta 2, Bernardo Tomé 2 1 IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, 2 LIP, Laboratório.
CODES: component degradation simulation tool ESA Project 22381/09/NL/PA.
CALIFES 2015 run preliminary results
12th Geant4 Space Users Workshop
Geant4 and Microelectronics – Recent Successes, Looming Concerns
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
TCAD Simulations of Silicon Detectors operating at High Fluences D
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
R.W. Mann and N. George ECE632 Dec. 2, 2008
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Quantum Mechanical Description of Displacement Damage
Presentation transcript:

MURI Neutron-Induced Multiple-Bit Upset Alan D. Tipton 1, Jonathan A. Pellish 1, Patrick R. Fleming 1, Ronald D. Schrimpf 1,2, Robert A. Reed 2, Robert A. Weller 1,2, Marcus H. Mendenhall 3 1.Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Nashville,TN 2.Vanderbilt University, Institute for Space and Defense Electronics, Nashville, TN 3.Vanderbilt University, W. M. Keck Free Electron Laser Center, Nashville, TN

MURI Update Objective –Model multiple-bit upset for 90 nm CMOS technology –Calibrate to experimental neutron data Status –Device description created –Simulation is good agreement with experimental data Results overview –MBU for neutron irradiation exhibits an angle dependence –MBU for neutron irradiation exhibits frontside/backside dependence Future work –Begin modeling of 65 nm technology –Characterize impact of angular dependence on error rate

MURI Outline Background –Multiple-bit upset (MBU) –Neutron-induced MBU Modeling –Monte-Carlo Radiative Energy Deposition (MRED) Results –Single-bit –Multiple-bit Conclusion Future work

MURI Outline Background –Multiple-bit upset (MBU) –Neutron-induced MBU Modeling –Monte-Carlo Radiative Energy Deposition (MRED) Results –Single-bit –Multiple-bit Conclusion Future work

MURI Multiple-bit upset increases with scaling Reliability –Memory design –Testing Multiple-bit upset (MBU) has been shown to increase for smaller technologies Feature size small relative to radiation events from Seifert, et al., Intel. IRPS, Nucleon-Induced MBU Maiz et al. Tosaka et al. Kawakami et al. Hubert et al.

MURI Neutrons induce nuclear reactions Neutron- induced nuclear reactions Secondary products are ionizing particles that induce soft errors Incident Neutron Nuclear Reaction Heavy-Ion Sensitive Nodes

MURI Outline Background –Multiple-bit upset (MBU) –Neutron-induced MBU Modeling –Monte-Carlo Radiative Energy Deposition (MRED) Results –Single-bit –Multiple-bit Conclusion Future work

MURI 90 nm SRAM model Sensitive node –Charge collection volume Technology Computer Aided Design (TCAD) Model Simulation - MRED (Monte- Carlo Radiative Energy Deposition) Code Energy deposition cross section -  ED (E) Multiple node cross section -  M (E) Modeling methodology MRED Sensitive Node  ED (E) Metallization  M (E) TCAD Neutron Spectrum

MURI MRED irradiated the TCAD device TCAD structure created from layout and process information for a 90 nm SRAM Device imported into MRED and simulated using Los Alamos Neutron Lab (LANL) WNR beam line neutron spectrum Silicon bulk Copper lines Tungsten vias Single Cell

MURI LANL neutron beam WNR beam spectrum imported into MRED Fluence comparable to cosmic- ray neutron fluence B. E. Takala, “The ICE House: Neutron Testing Leads to More Reliable Electronics,” Los Alamos Science, 30 November 2006.

MURI n+Si  C+3n+2p + +3  MRED simulates ionization and nuclear processes MRED tracks energy deposition through all layers Energy deposition at each sensitive node is calculated Sensitive Nodes  Cell Array

MURI Outline Background –Multiple-bit upset (MBU) –Neutron-induced MBU Modeling –Monte-Carlo Radiative Energy Deposition (MRED) Results –Single-bit –Multiple-bit Conclusion Future work

MURI Energy deposition cross section  ED (E)  Cross section to deposit at least E in the sensitive volume Relationship to SEU cross section  SEU =  ED (Q crit ) Energy Deposited (MeV) Charge Generated (fC)

MURI Single volume energy deposition  ED (E) is the corresponding cross section to deposit energy E or greater in a single sensitive volume Exhibits a slight angle dependence –Shape of sensitive volume Energy Deposited (MeV) Charge Generated (fC) 0° 45° 90°

MURI Frontside vs backside Backside shows increased cross section

MURI Multiple volume energy deposition MBU  2 or more physically adjacent bits  M (E) is the corresponding cross section to deposit energy E or greater in multiple volumes Exhibits a slight angle dependence –Cell spacing –Kinematics of reaction products Energy Deposited (MeV) Charge Generated (fC) 0° 45° 90°

MURI Multiple bit multiplicity MBU characterized for bit multiplicity Probability of an event decreases with increasing multiplicity #Events(multiplicity) fluence

MURI The fraction of MBU exhibits an angle dependence Fraction of MBU  (# of MBU events) (# of upset bits) Fraction of MBU increases for neutrons at grazing angles Testing and error calculations must account for angular dependencies

MURI Conclusion Multiple-bit upset is increasing for highly-scaled devices Neutron irradiation has been modeled using MRED for a 90 nm CMOS technology Cross section differs between frontside and backside irradiation Fraction of MBU exhibits an angle dependence for neutron irradiation –Fraction increases at grazing angles –Neutron testing must account for these dependencies

MURI Future work Finish 90 nm work and publish findings –Model 90 nm experimental neutron data Begin work on 65 nm technology –Create process and design based model –Proton and heavy-ion testing Fall/Winter 2007 –Examine impact of angular dependence on error rate