Independent Technical Review Support Activity: Risk Assessment for the Evaluation of Direct and Multi-Pathway Impacts of Emissions from the Maine Energy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Holcims draft EIS - Missing Data, Missing Analysis Missing the Point Anne Hedges Montana Environmental Information Center.
Advertisements

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
PUBLIC DOSES ESTIMATION BASED ON EFFLUENTS DATA AND DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF TRITIUM IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES AT CERNAVODA E. Bobric, I. Popescu, V. Simionov.
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
Evaluating Shadow Flicker in the Current Regulatory Environment Massachusetts Wind Working Group Meeting: October 30, 2013 Richard Lampeter, INCE Senior.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office 100 Area and 300 Area Component of RCBRA Steve.
Wildlife Hazard Management ACI-NA CONFERENCE, MARCH 16, 2004.
Risk Assessment.
Assessing Dose and Potency of Chemicals Robert Blaisdell, Ph.D, Chief Exposure Modeling Section Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
IAC Student Meeting February 19, 2004 Using DOE BestPractices Steam Tools And Resources Dr. Anthony L. Wright Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Inventory Management Systems Developing a National System for GHG Inventories Lisa Hanle U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 29, 2004 Panama City,
Biomass Electricity Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009.
1 Omowumi Alabi Department of Geosciences University of Missouri-Kansas City Kansas City, MO.
INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD)
Presentation to Board of Forestry November 29, 2011 Alice Edwards Division of Air Quality Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
Energy & Electricity. History of Electricity/Grid Electricity “system” created in US 1881  Purpose was electricity for lights  1881 cost: $0.24/kWh!
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
Dairies and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Environmental Concerns and Research Needs USEPA, Region 9 March 2004.
ENERGY INDUSTRY FUNDAMENTALS: MODULE 2, UNIT C — HAZARDS AND RESPONSES.
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant Public Workshop Cal/EPA Headquarters Building Sierra Hearing Room Sacramento,
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits Joel Leon, Bureau of Technical Services April 9, Presented by – ACE academy New Jersey Department.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
Overview of Land Use Compatibility between Sensitive Land Uses and Nuisance Sources Peter Piersol A&WMA/OPPI Land Use Compatibility.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.
SIP Steering Committee Meeting March 29,  In October 2011, EPA issued draft SIP and modeling guidance related to the 1-hour SO2 standard issued.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Climate, Air Quality and Noise Graham Latonas Gartner Lee Limited RWDI Air Inc.
1 Neptune and Company, Inc. Technical Guidance for Asbestos Risk in Soils Neptune and Company, Inc. Denver, CO
Environmental Technology Council EPA /State / DOD Region IV Environmental Conference June 2005 Joydeb “Joy” Majumder, EPA Region 4.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Conversion Technologies April 15, 2004.
ERT 319 Industrial Waste Treatment Semester /2013 Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
For 2014 Golden Empire AWMA Conference September 16, 2014 Leland Villalvazo, Supervising AQS San Joaquin Valley APCD.
WP4. Assessment of environmental impacts and resulting externalities from multi-media (air/water/soil) impact pathways A. Rabl, T. Bachmann, R. Torfs -
Lead NAAQS Review: 2 nd Draft Risk Assessment NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call August 8, 2007 Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar OAQPS.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Health Outcomes in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties Issue:  Higher health risks found in: Infants Infants Elderly (age >65) Elderly (age >65) Blacks Blacks.
I RIS E NVIRONMENTAL Independent Review of Documents Pertaining to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Permanente Facility Rob Balas & John McLaughlin February.
The office is independent of, but funded by the ACT Government State of ACT Water Presentation for AUSSI water workshop Becky Smith Senior Manager Office.
MICHAEL E. SCOTT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT Available Information on the Beneficial Reuse of Coal Combustion Products 1.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
ANLEC R&D COMMUNICATION PACK ( ). Trace emissions from Oxy Combustions do not pose significantly higher health, environmental or operational.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
The Challenge of PCBs in the Spokane River
Arsenic Acceptable Ambient Level Revision
Rookery Pit Energy-From-Waste Plant
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
Environmental sampling and monitoring
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Brownfield Corrective Action with Revised RRS
INPUT DATA REQUIREMENTS
Regional Environmental Health Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Independent Technical Review Support Activity: Risk Assessment for the Evaluation of Direct and Multi-Pathway Impacts of Emissions from the Maine Energy Recovery Company Facility Biddeford, ME Prepared by Cambridge Environmental, Inc. Presented by: Travis R. Kline, MEM TechLaw, Inc.

Background Maine Energy Recovery Company Environmental Code Office, City of Biddeford TechLaw –Toxicology and Risk Assessment Group (TARA) –USEPA and State Programs: Senior technical oversight Human health and ecological risk assessment –Risk assessment guidance development T. Kline, Chair, Expert External Peer Review Panel: –Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities (USEPA 1998, 1999, 2005) –Risk assessment training: USEPA’s Air Toxics Risk Assessment USEPA’s Combustion Risk Assessment USEPA’s Developing Permit Conditions for Open Burn/Open Detonation Units No Conflict of Interest

TechLaw Experience ETTP Oak Ridge (OB/OD Disposal Facility), Oak Ridge, TN. Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge Superfund Site, PCB Thermal Treatment Unit (TTU) Operable Unit, Carterville, IL. Knowles Atomic Power Laboratory, Windsor, CT. Kodak, Rochester, NY. Albemarle, Orangeburg, SC. Calgon Carbon, Catlettsburg, KY. Mallinckrodt, Raleigh, NC. Southeast Kansas Cumulative Effects Study Lone Star Industries, Cape Girardeau, MO Holnam, Clarksville, MO Lafarge/Systech, Fredonia, KS Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, Parsons, KS Aplus/Laidlaw, Coffeyville, KS Maine Yankee, Wiscasset, ME

TechLaw Review Process MERC: Municipal solid waste  Refuse derived fuel  Steam generated electricity Air emissions: Long- or short-term public health risks? Normal operating and process upset emissions Adult and child residents, recreational fishers, subsistence farm family (adult and child) Maximum off-site points of impact based on dispersion/deposition modeling Inhalation of volatiles and particulates, ingestion of soil, Saco River-derived drinking water, and locally- produced foods (vegetables, milk, beef and fish). Not a hazardous waste combustion facility  HHRAP

TechLaw Review Timeline/Scope Risk Assessment Protocol, Nov –Consistency with USEPA guidance –Appropriate levels of conservatism Draft Risk Assessment Report, Dec –Verify air modeling –Adherence to the approved protocol –Confirm sensitivity analysis Revised Risk Assessment Report, April, 2006 –Methods approved, commence quantitative QC –Media-specific calculations, risk estimates, data consistency Response to Comments, June, 2006 –Clarification: Data inputs, data cross-referencing Final Risk Assessment Report, June 2006 –Verify corrections, additions

Process Upset Emissions Startups, shutdowns, air pollution control system or combustion control system malfunctions Short-lived – waste feed stopped (opacity, CO, SO 2, others) Based on maximum 1-hour COPC exposures Significantly overpredicts actual maximum short-term impacts: –Composite, worst-case conditions. Simultaneously assumes: Plant operating at maximum COPC emission rates Process or control system upset Atmospheric dispersion conditions  maximum short-term impacts Effects on long-term average: –July 1, 2001  March 31, 2005, MERC = 90% operating time – outage hrs –If max system upset factor (3.9 combustion control upset) applied to each occurrence  = 310 hrs operation. –Baseline assumes 100% operation, equivalent emissions during outage ( hrs) >> max upset conditions (310 hrs) –Max 1hr HQ = 0.011

Conservatism vs. Uncertainty Inherent conservatism – Follows USEPA HHRAP Site-specific values similar to HHRAP defaults Use of high-end emissions: –[ maximum detected]s or [X+2s d ]s vs. [avg. measured]s (% incrs.) –Res. adult: 2.2E-06 vs. 1.4E-06 (cancer risk) (62%) –Res. child: vs (nc hazard) (105%) –Farmer adult:5.4E-06vs. 3.3E-06 (cancer risk) (62%) –Farmer child:0.048vs (nc hazard) (96%) –Fisher adult:3.3E-06 vs. 2.0E-06 (cancer risk) (68%) –Fisher child: 0.22 vs (nc hazard) (71%) Treatment of COPCs < detection limits: –Nondetect results: Use of proxy values: ½ MDL, MDL –Greatest impact: Residential adult 30% increase in use of full MDL vs. ½ MDL -4% decrease when all ½ MDL Greatest impact still less than 1/6 th of target risk

Conservatism vs. Uncertainty Chromium speciation: Hexavalent chromium (inh. carcinogen) –1% = mean measured fraction in MERC ash samples –2% = value used in baseline estimates –10% = extreme upper-bound estimate (example) –Greatest potential impact on Adult farmer: 1%  3.49E-06 2%  3.55E-06 10%  4.03E-06 Deviation from HHRAP: Mercury speciation and distribution: –Baseline speciation and distribution based on MERC boiler (combustion) stack gases –Recreational fisher (adult) Avg. of measured values (baseline): HI = 0.15 HHRAP default distribution: HI = 0.13 Maximum measured HgCl2 vapor fraction: HI = 0.16

Superposition of maximum and concentrations and deposition values –Superposing the separate max impact locations for each source dispersion/deposition –Increase of less than 10% Bounding estimates for COPCs in the Saco River –Assume all COPCs emitted enter river –Overestimates associated risks by a factor of at least 9, still below 1.0E-05 (risk) and 1.0 (hazard). Fisher exposures: All fish consumed from highest impact waterbody (e.g., 20.3 oz/wk for 40 years) Farmer exposures: All veggies, meat, dairy assumed home- grown at maximum impact (deposition) location (e.g., 19.7 ozs beef/wk, 3.9 qrt milk/wk for 30 years) Less conservative: Use of a non-zero kse (COPC loss in soil by erosion) –HHRAP: kse = 0 –Reduces overall HI for Rec. Fisher from 0.21 (kse=0) to Conservatism vs. Uncertainty

HHRA Assessment/Results Well-written, logical, thoroughly complete Adheres to established USEPA risk assessment guidance and protocols Conservative sensitivity analysis confirms limited deviations Chronic ELCR and Hazard < 1.0E-05 and 1, respectively: –Resident, adult: 1.6E –Resident, child: 6.5E Basis –Farmer, adult: 3.5E –Farmer, child: 8E Basis –Fisher, adult:2E –Fisher, child:7.2E Basis

Questions Contact information: –Travis Kline Direct phone: 518/ Mailing address: c/o TechLaw, Inc. 90 Canal St., Suite 303 Boston, MA 02114