Framing a Quality Enhancement Plan for Lamar University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Internationalization of the Undergraduate Curriculum.
Advertisements

APSU QEP. Explore practical learning experiences and opportunities to excel in life. APSU QEP.
Engaging the First Year Student WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Higher Education Conference. Engaging Faculty in Retention Issues Part II Presidential Summit on Retention The Need and Scope February 20, 2007 Dr. Richard.
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
1 Accreditation and the First-Year Experience Kay H. Smith, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for the Academic Experience College of Charleston.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
University Surveys and Assessments Department Chair and Dean Retreat.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Global Awareness and Student Engagement Allison BrckaLorenz Jim Gieser Program presented at the 2011 ASHE Annual Conference in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Education to Careers. Education-to-Careers in Illinois Also known as school to work Commitment to improve quality and relevance of education for every.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
Report on CCHE Performance Contract Negotiations Jack O. Burns, Ph.D. Vice President for Academic Affairs & Research January 25, 2005.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
CSU Summit on the Preparation of Teachers Irvine, California February 14, 2011 Connecting Teacher and Administrator Preparation with After-School Learning.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
THE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING AT RYERSON PREDICTORS OF STUDENT SATISFACTION CHRISTOPHER EVANS VICE PROVOST ACADEMIC.
An Equal Opportunity University Third Annual Meeting of the Provost’s Committee on Undergraduate Student Success October 22, 2009.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Lamar University’s QEP: FRESHMAN SUCCESS Making it happen...
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
First Year Programs is dedicated to providing comprehensive transitional programming from the moment that the prospective student selects the UW. Efforts.
Not Just for Students: An Archives Workshop for Faculty Rachel Grove Rohrbaugh Chatham University Archives | Pittsburgh, Pa. | (412)
Focusing on QEP Goals. “The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1) includes a broad- based institutional process.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Vice President for Student Affairs Georgia Regents University Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation of Success Transfer.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Climate for Minorities at UK A Summary of Various Survey Findings (1997 – 2001)
COM 101 Training 2013 Roberta Rea. Teaching and learning practices have been widely tested and have been shown to be beneficial for college students from.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Our Readiness to Enhance Our Academic Programs Pareena G. Lawrence.
Knowing Our Students, and Helping Them Succeed. 54.8% Latino Students (38.8% college-wide) 67.6% Female v. 32.4% Male (61.4% v. 38.6% college-wide) Average.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
Lamar University’s QEP: Active and Collaborative Engagement for Students (ACES): Growing Active and Collaborative Learning.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Why Are HIP Practices so Important to Students?... Where and how are we accomplishing these at CWU? HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES: Create an environment that helps.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
GGC and Student Engagement
Presentation transcript:

Framing a Quality Enhancement Plan for Lamar University

Defining our perceived strengths… At Lamar, students enjoy small classes taught by well qualified faculty who maintain good rapport with students, who make themselves available to students, and who are committed to student success. At Lamar, students have opportunities for hands-on learning experiences, including research, internships, and study abroad.

More perceived strengths … Lamar has a lively and livable campus environment. Lamar makes information technology available. Lamar has diverse academic programs meeting the needs of a diverse student body.

And our perceived weaknesses … Lamar’s academic standards are too low and our academic culture is not as conducive to learning as it could be. Lamar lags in educational technology. Lamar’s academic programs, faculty, and staff do not reflect the diversity of our student body.

What NSSE data tell us … Lamar freshmen scored markedly below LU seniors and below students at comparable institutions on: Active and collaborative learning. Student-faculty interaction. Enriching educational experiences.

Why the freshman/senior gap? Maybe we are only retaining the more engaged students. Maybe we do a better job of engaging upper level students. Maybe our incoming freshmen are changing.

How our freshmen have changed…

How our FRESHMEN compare to those at our peer NSSE institutions… Age distribution is about the same. We have a higher proportion of African-Americans Part-time students First generation in college Off campus workers Providers of care for dependents

These freshmen define the future of Lamar University. We must enhance the learning experience of the students that we have and that we are likely to continue to enroll.

National 2006 NSSE Report " Students who participate in collaborative learning and educational activities outside the classroom and who interact more with faculty members get better grades, are more satisfied with their education, and are more likely to remain in college. But the gains from those practices are even greater for students from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds, or who come to college less prepared than their peers." -- Chronicle of Higher Education, our emphasis

Additional observations … We already have as perceived strengths Strong faculty-student relations Opportunities for hands-on learning experiences A high level of diversity This offers a strong foundation for a QEP focused on student engagement and experiential learning.

Our QEP could address … Student to student engagement Student to faculty engagement Student engagement with academic content Student engagement with the learning process Long-term engagement with one’s community and profession

Student to student engagement Collaborative learning projects Service learning Peer mentoring Learning communities ??

Student to faculty engagement Undergraduate research Summer bridge programs Enhanced use of technology for distance learners Service learning involving faculty ??

Student engagement with academic content Course redesign Inquiry based learning (problem based) Undergraduate research Authentic assessment/ multiple assessment Experiential/ applied learning ??

Student engagement with the learning process Course redesign Experiential learning Undergraduate research ??

Long-term engagement with one’s community and profession Service learning Internships Study abroad ??

The “Learning Nexus” - The "nexus" concept takes "engagement" to another level, emphasizing multi- dimensionality, the linkage of diverse groups of students, faculty, disciplines, and the process of learning itself in dynamic communication. The object is to construct a project that will be the basis of ongoing constructive engagement – i.e., self-sustaining and generative of more and stronger linkages within the nexus.

Things we CANNOT do… Additional course requirements Mandates to faculty One size fits all approach Just attack perceived weaknesses