GPS Performance in Southern Hardwood Forests Pete Bettinger Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia 2007 Society of American.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
One year's experience with a recreation-grade GPS receiver Pete Bettinger Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Athens,
Advertisements

HA-NDGPS: Opportunities in an Open Landscape Jim Arnold Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations Research and Development.
Recent Evaluations of GPS Technology in the Southeastern United States Pete Bettinger Professor Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University.
Introduction to NAVSTAR GPS Introduction to NAVSTAR GPS.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
CS 128/ES Lecture 11a1 GPS. CS 128/ES Lecture 11a2 Global Positioning System
What is GPS?. The Global Positioning System The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a system of satellites maintained by the US Department of Defense for.
CS 128/ES Lecture 10b1 GPS. CS 128/ES Lecture 10b2 A guide to GPS theory …
CS 128/ES Lecture 11a1 GPS. CS 128/ES Lecture 11a2 Global Positioning System
Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) E. Douglas Aguilar CAPT, USAF.
Background Accessibility Popularity of GPS and INS –Cell phones Apple iPhone, Blackberry, Android platform –Nintendo Wii Wii Remote, MotionPlus.
The Global Positioning System.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
StarFire: A Global High Accuracy Differential GPS System Ron Hatch, Tenny Sharpe, Paul Galyean NavCom Technology Inc. Presented by Jose Romero-Mariona.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
Global Positioning System. The History of GPS Feasibility studies begun in 1960’s. Pentagon appropriates funding in First satellite launched in.
Will you be… MappingMapping or Navigating?Navigating Which GPS Receiver Do I Need?
Introduction to the Global Positioning System Introduction to the Global Positioning System Pre-Work GPS for ICS
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS This material originally from a University of VT course. Borrowed from and modified
Mapping Kentucky History. The MKH Challenge Obtain geographical coordinates to the Kentucky Roadside Markers Use cutting-edge technologies such as Global.
NRCS Global Positioning Systems (GPS) & Geographic Information Systems (GIS) RESOURCE INVENTORY  Soil Survey  National Resources Inventory (NRI)  Wetlands.
Presented By: Scott Rodgers UNC Chapel Hill, Engineering Information Services Types of GPS Receivers.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
1 GPS - The Big Picture Overview Introduction - Show GPS Movie GPS and the Big Picture Accuracy Review of GPS Receiver Types Why the Garmin GPSMap76.
Geographic Information Systems
Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
The Global Positioning System Advanced Tools. Sources of GPS Error Standard Positioning Service (SPS ): Selective Availability:0 to 100 meters Ionosphere:5.0.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
Introduction to the Global Positioning System Introduction to the Global Positioning System Pre-Work GPS for Fire Management
Introduction to Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Prepared for USDA.
Global Navigation Satellite Systems in Forest Management Dr. Pete Bettinger Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia May.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
Global Positioning System
GPS How it Works For a full tutorial on GPS and its applications visit the Trimble WebsiteTrimble Website.
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
Global Positioning Systems Glen T. Huettl Agricultural Education Garrison High School.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
High Accuracy Nationwide Differential Global Positioning System (HA-NDGPS) UPDATE Jim Arnold September, 2009.
Lecturer: Jinglin Wang Student name: Hao Li Student ID:
GPS Performance in Southern Hardwood Forests Pete Bettinger Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia 6 th Southern Forestry.
ESTB in Maritime, Air and Land applications Jarosław Cydejko, Marek Grzegorzewski, Stanisław Oszczak, Adam Ciećko EGNOS WORKSHOP, 24 September 2004, Kraków.
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future GLONASS Russia’s global satellite navigation system 24 satellites in three.
By Andrew Y.T. Kudowor, Ph.D. Lecture Presented at San Jacinto College.
Leaf-off accuracy of mapping-grade GPS receivers Pete Bettinger Michael Ransom James Rhynold University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry and Natural.
GLOBAL POSITINING SYSTEM WORKING,ERRORS AND CORRECTION USING DGPS Department Of Electronics and Communication Engineering.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
Harry Williams, Cartography1 Surveying Techniques II. GPS Despite the fact that Global Positioning Systems use very modern technology, the basic concept.
GPS for H 2 0 ??? Greg W. Keel P.Eng. Parallel Geo-Services Inc. (250)
GPS Accuracy in Northern Forests1 Some notes from: “A Comparison of Autonomous, WAAS, Real- Time, and Post-Processed Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Accuracies.
Precision Agriculture: GPS and Differential Corrections.
Flight Planning and Navigation GPS Navigation © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Aerospace Engineering.
Global Positioning System Overview
The Global Positioning System. Early Satellite Systems Satellite Surveying started more than 30 years ago. Now, High accuracy could be achieved in real.
GPS collection Survey Grade Receivers Mapping Grade Receivers Recreational Grade Receivers Differential correction Real time CORS beacon WAAS Subscription.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
10/05/07 1 Update on DOT Nationwide Differential GPS (NDGPS) Program Presentation to: National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing Advisory.
GPS Fundamentals and Field Mapping University of Rhode Island January 26, 2016 Nigel Shaw National Park Service Boston, MA (617)
GPS Receivers University of Manitoba University of Manitoba Recreation Services GPS Workshop. Recreation Services GPS Workshop.
Image Enhancement Objective: better visualization of remotely sensed images visual interpretation remains to be the most powerful image interpretation.
Mike Quinn – ADSO-Narragansett Bay –
How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.
GPS Modernization & WAAS
Control Methods Workshop 2010 campaign, Ispra April / 37 GNSS: how should we measure parcels in 2010 ? Cozmin LUCAU, Krasimira GANISHEVA,
Introduction to Global Positioning Systems (GPS)
GPS: Global Positioning System
An introduction to GPS technology
Global Positioning System
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance International Committee on GNSS (ICG-4) Working Group A Saint Petersburg,
Presentation transcript:

GPS Performance in Southern Hardwood Forests Pete Bettinger Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction In forests, vegetation plays a significant role in obstructing signals and introducing error into the system through the multipath effect of signals being redirected from obstructive surfaces. More multipath can be found, and lower SNR values realized, in areas under a forest canopy. These effects may be reduced by antenna design, processing techniques related to the data collected, and other methods, however the improvement to data quality of an individual receiver in high multipath environments is often unknown Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction Manufacturer's stated accuracy of GPS receivers are usually ambitious. We have embarked on a set of studies to determine the accuracy of various receivers and antenna configurations in a forested environment. Our goal is to better understand the behavior of data positioning as well as to better understand the capabilities of GPS receivers Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Two recent developments in GPS technology - WAAS and DGPS - may help improve the accuracy of GPS-determined positions. These are on-the-fly differential correction processes, as opposed to traditional differential correction, which can be performed after data has been collected.

Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention The Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) was begun in 1994 as a joint project between the United States Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). WAAS was meant to provide service for all classes of aircraft in all phases of flight in the United States. It is now available for use in a variety of hand-held GPS receivers. As of September 28, 2007, WAAS service is now available to users throughout Canada and Mexico. The cost to provide the WAAS signal is about $50 million per year.

WAAS consists of: A monitoring network Processing facilities Geostationary satellites Reference stations (~34) Central data processing sites The reference stations collect measurements from the GPS and WAAS satellites so that near real-time differential correction can be made given ionospheric delay information that is determined. Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention WAAS is said to improve basic GPS accuracy to approximately 7.6 meters vertically and horizontally, at least 95% of the time. Actual performance measurements of system at specific locations have shown it typically provides better than 1.0 meters laterally and 1.5 meters vertically throughout most of the U.S. In forested conditions, however, this may not hold.

Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) is an enhancement GPS that uses a network of fixed ground-based reference stations to broadcast the difference between their positions as indicated by the GPS satellites and their known fixed positions. DGPS can refer to any type of ground-based augmentation system. Static mode DGPS is where the rover and the base station remain in fixed places (are stationary). Kinematic mode DGPS is where the base station remains in a fixed position, yet the rover moves from unknown location to unknown location. According to the US Coast Guard, 47 countries operate systems similar to the US NDGPS. Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

The U.S. Coast Guard DGPS system consists of two control centers and 86 remote broadcast sites in many more are planned. The Coast Guard DGPS became fully operational in The accuracy is said to be about 10 m. Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Lower-population areas, and areas away from waterways, most notably the Rocky Mountains, Texas, West Virginia, and Alaska, have poor coverage by the Coast Guard's ground-based DGPS. Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Both WAAS and DGPS require dual frequency capability in GPS receivers (one frequency is a signal from the GPS satellites, the other frequency is the signal from the WAAS or DGPS satellites or beacons). Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction GPS technology changes rapidly. Advances in all aspects of GPS technology require continual review of this technology and its effect on positional accuracy. The potential cost savings made available from an evaluation of a range of receivers might encourage forest managers to more readily apply this technology to their day-to-day operations Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction Three general categories of GPS receivers: Survey-grade GPS receivers are reported to be capable of providing sub-centimeter positional accuracy, at a cost of $10,000 dollars or more per unit. Mapping-grade receivers, which in some cases can provide sub-meter accuracy, range from about $1,500 to $5,000 or $10,000. These are frequently used in forestry applications. Recreation-grade receivers generally provide the least accurate positional information - between 3m and 10m accuracy under optimal conditions - and range in price from $100 to about $1,000. Recreation-grade receivers have become popular among many outdoors enthusiasts, and this popularity has likely influenced the wide variety of inexpensive GPS receivers available on the market today Society of American Foresters National Convention

Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Extrex ~$100 GPS 60 ~$200 GPS 72 ~$130 GPS Rino ~$650 Magellan Triton 300 ~$150 Magellan eXplorist 100 ~$120 Magellan eXplorist XL ~$400 Magellan eXplorist 600 ~$350

Brunton Atlas ~$400 Delorme Mapping GPS ~$400 Lowrence iFinder ~$100 to 300 Bushnell Onix 200 ~$200 Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Mio P550 PDA ~$300

Introduction 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Trimble GeoXH ~$5,300 Trimble GeoXM ~$2,600 Trimble Recon ~$1,000 Trimble Juno ST ~$650 CMT MC-GPS ~$2,500 CMT March-II-E ~$2,500 CMT PDA GPS ~$1,300 Leica GS20 Professional data mapper ~$4,800 Magellan Promark 3 ~$3,000

Research was conducted at the GPS test course facility in Whitehall Forest, Athens, Georgia. Three OPUS benchmarks were established within two kilometers of the field course. Position determination of twenty-seven permanent monuments was then made using standard surveying techniques. Each survey point consists of a brass survey cap mounted on a 0.6 m rebar post, which is encased in concrete. Survey points were established under a range of topographical and forested conditions, and positional accuracy is known to < 2 cm Society of American Foresters National Convention Introduction

Twenty-four of the points were classified as under full canopy (not influenced by forest edge). Aspect ranges from North to Southeast, while slopes vary from %. Forest conditions changed nominally over these positions, a general pattern of species gradation occurs, changing from bottomland hardwood forest with a larger component of beech (Fagus grandifolia) and related species to an upland dominated by oak and hickory (Quercus spp., Carya spp.) with some remnant shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) still present Society of American Foresters National Convention Introduction

A laser-level tripod stand was designed and used to allowed all receivers to be placed directly over each monument, at a height ranging from 1.3 m to 1.5 m, which varied based on ground conditions Society of American Foresters National Convention Introduction

Study #1 Study #1: A Comparison of GPS Performance in a Southern Hardwood Forest: Exploring Low-Cost Solutions for Forestry Applications 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Methods GPS receivers studied: Mapping-grade:Trimble ProXR Recreation-grade:Garmin Etrex Garmin Map 60C Thales Mobile Mapper Conditions: Upper slope, mid-slope, lower slope positions Leaf-on time of year (summer) Leaf-off time of year (winter) 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Results Receiver Etrex Etrex with WAAS Map 60C Map 60C with WAAS Thales Mobile Mapper Trimble ProXR Trimble ProXR diff. corrected 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Lower Slope Mid- Slope Upper Slope Leaf-on RMSE 95

Results Receiver Etrex Etrex with WAAS Map 60C Map 60C with WAAS Thales Mobile Mapper Trimble ProXR Trimble ProXR diff. corrected 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Lower Slope Mid- Slope Upper Slope Leaf-off RMSE 95

Results General trends: Positional accuracy increased as slope position increased. However, improvements with WAAS correction were found across the slope positions studied. Change in RMSE with increasing number of position fixes was not as predictable as one would have hoped. Mapping-grade receiver outperformed the other receivers on all slope conditions. Differentially corrected (post-processed) data was better than WAAS corrected data (on the fly) Society of American Foresters National Convention

Study #2 Multipath mitigation under a forested canopy: Using a choke-ring antenna 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Methods GPS receivers studied: Mapping-grade:Trimble ProXR Topcon Choke ring antenna Conditions: Upper slope, mid-slope, lower slope positions Leaf-on time of year (summer) Leaf-off time of year (winter) 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Results Receiver Trimble ProXR Trimble ProXR diff. corrected Choke ring Choke ring diff. corrected 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Lower Slope Mid- Slope Upper Slope Leaf-on RMSE 95

Results Receiver Trimble ProXR Trimble ProXR diff. corrected Choke ring Choke ring diff. corrected 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Lower Slope Mid- Slope Upper Slope Leaf-off RMSE 95

Results General trends: Positional accuracy increased as slope position increased. Differentially corrected (post-processed) data was better than raw data collected on the fly. Change in RMSE with increasing number of position fixes was not as predictable as one would have hoped Society of American Foresters National Convention

Results General trends: The choke ring antenna more effectively mitigated signal degradation. Real-time RMSE with the choke-ring configuration was about as good as the RMSE associated with differentially-corrected ProXR data. a) One might assume that 3.5 m of inaccuracy is associated with other factors than multipath (uncorrected choke-ring data - differentially corrected choke-ring data) b) Similarly, multi-path results in 5-12 m of inaccuracy depending on slope and canopy position and time of year. (uncorrected ProXR data - uncorrected choke-ring data) 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Study #3 A Comparison of GPS Performance in a Southern Hardwood Forest: Exploring Real-time Data Accuracy of Forestry Receivers 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Methods GPS receivers studied: Mapping-grade:Trimble ProXH Trimble GeoXH Garmin 17 HVS TDS Nomad Recreation-grade:Garmin Etrex Trimble Juno Conditions: Random positions Leaf-on time of year (summer) 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Results Receiver Trimble ProXH Trimble GeoXH Garmin 17 HVS TDS Nomad Trimble Juno Garmin Etrex 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention Lower Slope Mid- Slope Leaf-on RMSE 95

Results General trends: - Positional accuracy increased as slope position increased (for most situations). Change in RMSE with increasing number of position fixes was not as predictable as one would have hoped. While the order of units tested at each site was randomly determined, the RMSE results are curious, and require further examination. These were one-time measurements, typical of operational work. Repeated measurements, as what were collected in the other studies, may temper some of the results, but then the study will not be reflective of typical operational work Society of American Foresters National Convention

Overall Observations: 1. With a mapping-grade GPS receiver, real-time positional accuracy may be 4-15 meters under tree canopies. 2. WAAS does slightly improve real-time position estimates. 3. Post-process differential correction significantly improves position estimates. With a mapping-grade GPS receiver, 3-5 m accuracy may be obtained. 4. Positional accuracy changes with slope position. 5. Error levels do not necessarily change (get smaller) with more position fixes. 6. Multi-path accounts for about 5-12 m of error, depending on slope and canopy position and time of year. 7. Time of year matters. Results 2007 Society of American Foresters National Convention

Society of American Foresters National Convention

Society of American Foresters National Convention