Revealed-preference methods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Valuation 9: Travel cost model
Advertisements

Valuation of Non-Market Goods Normally, in CBA, use CS or WTP to measure benefits.
INWEPF 4th Steering Meeting and Symposium (5-7 July 2007)
Valuation 10: Hedonic Pricing
Mikael hildén Methods to Estimate Values of Environment (examples from coastal zone) Erkki Ikäheimo  
Applied Welfare Econ & Cost Benefit Analysis
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making Chapter 8 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
Economics 101: How to Measure Indirect Values Benjamin S. Rashford Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wyoming.
Valuing the Environment What exactly do economists mean when they talk about “valuing the environment” in monetary terms?
1 האם נוכל לתת ערך כלכלי למגרש משחקים בעיר ? יכולים לעזור ? CVM, TCM האם מירה ברון, אנסטסיה טקץ ', אירינה ליבשיץ שטח כלכלה, הפקולטה להנדסת תעשייה וניהול.
317_L24, Mar 11/08, J. Schaafsma 1 Review of the Last Lecture are discussing shadow pricing in the context of cost-benefit analysis noted that shadow pricing.
 Homework #2 due Thursday  Exam #1 on Thursday  Writing Assignment due Oct. 27th.
Highlights of Chapter 14. Measuring the value of outcomes (or social surplus) Two basic methods – Revealed preference (observing what people actually.
1 Travel Costs Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /25/2004.
Evaluating the environment Gauri-Shankar Guha. Dr. Gauri-Shankar Guha ASU - Econ Evaluating the Environment For the individual, economic values.
Measuring Environmental Benefits: Revealed Preference Approaches Travel Cost, Hedonic Price, and Household Production Methods.
Agenda Benefits Overview Travel Cost Method Random Utility Models
1 Social Discount Rate Travel Costs Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /15/2003.
Travel Costs Lecture 12 October 9, /
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 14 Pesticide Runoff Potential from Field Crops.
AGEC 608 Lecture 13, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 13 Objective: Discuss various ways to estimate value of impacts using revealed preference approaches, highlighting.
AGEC 608 Lecture 14, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 14 Objective: Provide overview of contingent valuation method (CVM) and review strengths and weaknesses of.
Measuring Environmental Benefits: Revealed Preference Approaches Travel Cost and Hedonic Methods.
 Group Quiz Thursday  Homework #2 Due Next Thursday  Exam #1 Next Thursday  Writing Assignment Due Oct. 27th.
Travel cost example Value change in beach water quality [e.g. near Coal Oil Point (with oil, without oil)] Assume: travel cost is $0.20/mile No other opportunity.
1 Topic 4.c: Non-market Valuation Many policies and projects involve inputs and outputs for which there are no formal markets. Important examples include.
Assessing Costs and Benefits of Environmental Policies & Regulations.
Travel Cost Method (TCM)
Valuation Methods focus on conventional market approaches Session Objectives: Identify key steps in valuing the environment Use selected methods to analyze.
 Homework #8 due Next Thursday  Group Outline due Nov. 11 (next Thurs.)
Econ 231: Natural Resources and Environmental Economics SCHOOL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS.
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
Valuation of Intangibles. Measuring the value of outcomes (or social surplus) Two basic methods – Revealed preference (observing what people actually.
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AIR POLLUTION ON HUMAN HEALTH
Welfare economics Outline Expressing changes in human well-being (utility) in monetary terms Deciding between monetary measures that are equally theoretically.
Chapter 10 CBA and valuation1 CHAPTER 10 Cost-Benefit Analysis and Valuation.
Lecture 11: Valuation of Environmental Amenities
What I was doing on Thursday during class.... Measuring Environmental Benefits: Revealed Preference Approaches Travel Cost and Hedonic Methods.
NICK HANLEY UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING Valuing cultural heritage using methods from environmental economics.
Travel Cost Model: an example Sittidaj Pongkivorasin Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University.
Environmental Valuation using Revealed Preference Methods Lectures include: –A little welfare economic theory that forms basis of environmental valuation.
Choe, Whittington, Lauria (1996) Valuation study in Davao, Philippines Objectives? Valuation techniques applied?
Modeling Market Failure Chapter 3 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Ecosystem Valuation Social and Environmental Aspects Kathryn Benson CE 397 November 25, 2003.
Outline of presentation Travel cost method – concept, example, assumptions Consumer surplus related to TCM Visitor’s table Demand curve Concerns regarding.
Valuing the environment Required reading: Perman et al (2 nd edition) Chapter 14 Markandya, A. “The value of the environment: a state of the art survey”
Contingent Valuation Methods See Boardman et al., Chapter 14 Interview individuals to elicit their preferences for different states of the world. Based.
Environmental Economics Class 4. Valuing the Environment: Methods Methodologies available for quantifying benefits and costs. Valuation techniques available.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Valuing the Environment: Methods.
Measuring Environmental Benefits. In principle, benefits can be represented by consumer surplus, or the area under the demand curve: Market good sold.
CORRELATION. Correlation key concepts: Types of correlation Methods of studying correlation a) Scatter diagram b) Karl pearson’s coefficient of correlation.
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making Chapter 7.
Evaluating Recreational Benefits of Water Resources on Small Geographical Areas An Application to Rivers in Puerto Rico Prepared by: Juan Marcos González.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
GEF Session 15 Valuing Recreation/Amenity Benefits – travel costs, CVM, hedonics John A. Dixon The World Bank Institute Ashgabad, November.
Nonmarket Values Property, ideas and experiences can have “value” even if not exchanged in a market.
Economic valuation OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Economic Valuation of Environmental attributes Larry Dwyer Qantas Professor of Travel and Tourism Economics School of Marketing University of New South.
Economic Valuation of Coastal Resources in Latin America and the Caribbean Lee G. Anderson George R. Parsons University of Delaware.
Lecture 9 Life and other anomalies. Life and other non-mon. benefits In RIA we need to monetize benefits; but benefits in case of externalities come in.
Valuation methods II Revealed preference methods (RP) Elina Lampi
Well-being and the water environment: An econometric investigation 13 th March 2015 Steve Arnold Environment Agency
Chris Curington Hedonic pricing.
A Quick Intro to Non-Market Valuation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Return to Home Page GEOG 370 May 5,
10. Valuing Impacts from Observed Behavior: Indirect Methods
Class 3: Housing Concepts, Household Bids
Class 3: Housing Concepts, Household Bids
Presentation transcript:

Revealed-preference methods Outline Hedonic pricing method Travel cost method Davao study

Readings Lesser et al., pp. 276-281, 296-304 Choe, Whittington, Lauria

Hedonic pricing method Measures how the characteristics of a marketed asset, including environmental attributes, affect its price Typically applied to housing: “hedonic property method” Earliest application: Ridker (1967) Has also been applied to agricultural land Can also be applied to wages: “hedonic wage method” Job selection might reflect regional amenities or occupational health risks

Common observations Houses near airports tend to sell for lower prices So do houses downwind from oil refineries and slaughterhouses Houses with panoramic views tend to sell for higher prices Hence, although there are no markets for noise, smell, or view, such environmental characteristics can affect house prices

Hedonic property method: basic idea Housing is made up of several characteristics, including environmental quality, that determine its value The price of a house is the sum of the products of the implicit prices of those characteristics times the amounts of the characteristics in the house Statistical methods can be used to decompose house price into these implicit prices, as long as the characteristics vary within the sample of houses

Revealed preference method Synonym: “indirect” method Analyze “behavioral trail” left by individuals’ actual decisions, not what individuals say they would do (“stated preferences”) under hypothetical conditions Implications: cannot use revealed preference methods to value new goods, or changes outside range of current conditions

Surrogate markets Housing market is not really a market for houses, but rather a surrogate market for the characteristics of houses Similarly, demand for parks is not really demand for parks per se, but rather demand for different environmental services provided by parks (travel cost method)

Types of values that hedonic property method can estimate Use values Among non-use values, perhaps option values, but not others (e.g., existence)

Typical applications Ambient environmental quality: air, water, noise, odor pollution Proximity to noxious sites: dumps, incinerators, airports Natural hazards: floods, earthquakes, landslides, radon Proximity to desirable amenities: beaches, parks, vistas, cultural sites

Hedonic price function Relationship between price and attributes: PH = 0 + 1A1 + 2A2 +  PH = price of house A1 = airport noise A2 = size of house  = error term 0, 1, 2 = coefficients Econometric methods (multivariate regression) can be used to estimate the coefficients

For the linear function PH = 0 + 1A1 + 2A2 + , the implicit price for amenity A1 is just the coefficient 1: PH/A1 = 1

Example: Housing and air pollution in U.S.

Travel cost method: basic idea The “price” of using a recreation site is not only the entry fee, but also the monetary and time costs of traveling to it

Travel cost method: basic idea The “price” of using a recreation site is not only the entry fee, but also the monetary and time costs of traveling to it Visitors who live at different distances from the site thus face different implicit prices

Travel cost method: basic idea The “price” of using a recreation site is not only the entry fee, but also the monetary and time costs of traveling to it Visitors who live at different distances from the site thus face different implicit prices We can estimate a demand curve for the site by relating the number of visits to the total travel cost

Entry fee vs. Implicit price Parks often have no entry fee, or fee hasn’t varied over time or across users Cannot estimate a demand curve if there’s no price variation Analyze demand as a function of implicit price: total cost of visiting park, not just entry fee

History of TCM One of oldest and most frequently used valuation methods Concept is due to Harold Hotelling, in response to request from National Park Service in the late 1940s Operationalized by Marion Clawson in the 1950s Refined by Jack Knetsch in the 1960s

Recreational applications National parks and other protected areas Sporting sites (hunting, fishing) Archaeological sites Cultural sites (museums)

Other applications Collection of fuelwood Collection of water In principle, can be applied to any good whose consumption involves travel-related costs

Related terminology Revealed preference method: TCM is a prime example of this category of valuation methods, which infer WTP or WTA from observed (not hypothetical) behavior

Related terminology Revealed preference method: TCM is a prime example of this category of valuation methods, which infer WTP or WTA from observed (not hypothetical) behavior Surrogate market method: demand for transportation services is surrogate for demand for environmental amenities at destination

Types of travel cost models Zonal: average data on visitors; a given site Individual: data on individual visitors; a given site Multi-site (ditto): data on individual visitors; a set of sites Hedonic: average or individual data on visitors; characteristics of a given site

Features that are common across TCM models Typically implemented using cross-sectional data Econometric-based Two-stage procedure to obtain estimates of consumer surplus

Davao study: individual TCM Asked each household (i) annual number of visits it made to Times Beach before and after health advisory (Vi0, Vi*)

Calculated prices of visits to Times Beach (pi) and substitute sites (sij) as sum of: Roundtrip travel costs E.g., bus fare Costs of roundtrip travel time Assumed cost per hour equaled half of hourly wage rate There’s no entry fee If there were, it should be included, too

Pooled data across households and estimated demand functions (“trip generating functions”) that relate annual number of visits to pi, sij, household income (yi), and other socioeconomic characteristics (hi): Vi0 = b00 + b10pi + b20sij + b30yi + b40hi + i Vi* = b0* + b1*pi + b2*sij + b3*yi + b4*hi + i What do we expect the signs of the coefficients to be?

For each household, calculated difference in consumer surplus between the two demand functions This can be interpreted as the household’s WTP for restoring Times Beach Do we interpret it as compensating variation, equivalent variation, or something else?

Calculating consumer surplus For each household, plug in actual values for sij, yi, and hi and rewrite demand functions as Vi = ci + b1pi where ci = b0 + b2sij + b3yi + b4hi

Calculating consumer surplus For each household, plug in actual values for sij, yi, and hi and rewrite demand functions as Vi = ci + b1pi where ci = b0 + b2sij + b3yi + b4hi Solve for pi: pi = –ci/b1 – Vi/b1 Can interpret intercept, –ci/b1 , as choke price: price that causes number of visits to drop to zero: Vi = 0

Calculating consumer surplus For each household, plug in actual values for sij, yi, and hi and rewrite demand functions as Vi = ci + b1pi where ci = b0 + b2sij + b3yi + b4hi Solve for pi: pi = –ci/b1 – Vi/b1 Can interpret intercept, –ci/b1 , as choke price: price that causes number of visits to drop to zero: Vi = 0 Calculate consumer surplus by applying the formula, MCS = ½(–ci/b1 – pi)Vi

WTP: TCM vs. CVM TCM: 36 pesos/month

WTP: TCM vs. CVM TCM: 36 pesos/month CVM (Scenario 1, mean for households that used beach before advisory): 37 pesos/month

WTP: TCM vs. CVM TCM: 36 pesos/month CVM (Scenario 1, mean for households that used beach before advisory): 37 pesos/month Looks good, but: CVM yields WTP for well-defined reference utility level ; TCM yields Marshallian WTP CVM measures use and non-use values; TCM measures only use values CVM measures WTP for cleaning up river and sea; TCM measures WTP just for Times Beach

Time costs Time has an opportunity cost (OC), both while traveling and while on site Time-related costs are often the largest portion of total travel costs

OC of time and the wage rate Does OC of time equal the pre-tax wage rate?

OC of time and the wage rate Does OC of time equal the pre-tax wage rate? No: taxes drive a wedge between OC of time and gross compensation How about post-tax wage?

OC of time and the wage rate Does OC of time equal the pre-tax wage rate? No: taxes drive a wedge between OC of time and gross compensation How about post-tax wage? Overstates OC of time if work involves nonpecuniary costs (stress) Is time fungible between work and travel?

OC of time and the wage rate Does OC of time equal the pre-tax wage rate? No: taxes drive a wedge between OC of time and gross compensation How about post-tax wage? Overstates OC of time if work involves nonpecuniary costs (stress) Is time fungible between work and travel? Can work while traveling (laptops), or might not be able to work if not traveling (institutional constraints)

OC of time and the wage rate Does OC of time equal the pre-tax wage rate? No: taxes drive a wedge between OC of time and gross compensation How about post-tax wage? Overstates OC of time if work involves nonpecuniary costs (stress) Is time fungible between work and travel? Can work while traveling (laptops), or might not be able to work if not traveling (institutional constraints) People might enjoy travel itself Usual assumption: OC of time equals 25-50% of pre-tax wage