Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives California Digital Library Scholarly Publishing at University of California ———— An.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Future of Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Institutional Repositories Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Advertisements

1 Scholarly Publishing Initiatives in ARL Libraries: a Penn State Perspective Nancy L. Eaton, Dean University Libraries and Scholarly Communications The.
EScholarship: Publishing the work of UC Catherine Mitchell Director, eScholarship Publishing Services California Digital Library University of California.
Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.
Faculty Copyright Management: University of California Strategies Presented to AAU/ARL/CNI/NASULGC/SPARC forum on Improving Access to Publicly Funded Research.
The Library as Publisher: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J How can a Repository Contribute to University Success? APSR - The Successful Repository June 29,
Institutional repositories and libraries : being visible Nor Edzan Che Nasir Library University of Malaya.
California Digital Library eScholarship Repository ASIST DASER Summit November 2003 Suzanne Samuel California Digital Library.
Publishing through UC’s eScholarship Insert Name/Title date The following slides are based on the work of the UCLA Library Scholarly Communications Steering.
Brown’s Digital Repository An overview of services.
IT Governance and Management
The Successful Repository: Welcome and Context Keith Webster University Librarian & Director of Learning Services.
Collect/connect The future of library collections and collection management Libraries Australia Adelaide, 27 October 2011 Caroline Brazier, Director of.
Case Studies in New Models of Collaboration: CANADA’S UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Carole Moore Chief Librarian, University of Toronto Chief Librarian, University.
California Digital Library eScholarship Update Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly Communication University.
Bielefeld Conference 2006: Academic Library and Information Services: New Paradigms for the Digital Age Hans Geleijnse Director of Library and IT Services.
Building Publishing Services in the Academic Library Brian Rosenblum University of Kansas Colorado Academic Library Summit Denver, Colorado June 1, 2007.
Scholarly Communication: Responses at the University of California A “Systemwide” Overview This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs.
9/13/2006 UCLA Library--Scholarly Communication Steering Committee Update What’s going on with SC in UC(LA)? A set of white papers widely discussed by.
ELPUB 2006 Bansko, 14 June 2006 E-publishing Infrastructure for Firenze University Press Patrizia Cotoneschi University of Florence E-publishing Infrastructure.
Challenges & New Opportunities Laurel Haycock, U Libraries February 2007 Author’s Rights:
IT: dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s Michael Yonezawa Reference/Electronic Resources Librarian UC Riverside Libraries UCCSC 2004 August 3, 2004.
California Digital Library eScholarship Repository Int’l Conference on Digital Institutional Repositories 9-10 December 2004, Hong Kong Catherine H.Candee.
LAUC Assembly May 20, 2013 University of California Libraries Systemwide Advisory Structure Redesign.
African Librarianship and the Academic Enterprise Prepared By: Kay Raseroka Director: Library Services University of Botswana.
Elizabeth Newbold and Samantha Tillett GL8 New Orleans, December 2006
Publishing Solutions for Contemporary Scholars: The Library as Innovator and Partner Sarah E. Thomas University Librarian Cornell University Ithaca, NY.
E-journal Publishing Strategies at Pitt Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.
Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Mark Thorley, Natural Environment Research Council Research Outputs: Their Access & Preservation A perspective.
Shared Print Planning and Organization at the University of California Libraries Emily Stambaugh, Shared Print Manager CRL PAN meeting, January 24, 2014.
Free e-journal publishing services Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.
Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The "Toddler Years" for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories Greg Tananbaum President The.
Libraries as Partners in Research: the UC Curation Center’s Tools and Services UC3 Team University of California Curation Center California Digital Library.
Libraries and the Communication of Scholarship: Changing Times, Changing Roles David Ruddy.
University Libraries Library Systems Office. Life on MARS Mason Archival Repository Service Dorothea Salo Digital Repository Services Librarian Library.
UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco October 2004 Scholarly Communication – Impact on Libraries.
UC3 Standards and Best Practices for Datasets and Other Supplemental Journal Article Materials UC3 Stephen Abrams Patricia Cruse John Kunze.
The Department of Energy’s Public Access Solution Giving Voice to Energy and Science R&D Results Jeffrey Salmon Deputy Director for Resource Management.
AIAA’s Publications Business Publications New Initiatives Subcommittee Wednesday, 9 January 2008 Rodger Williams.
California Digital Library Stewardship of Scholarly and Cultural Assets at the University of California Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic.
What is happening 'Free Access' 3. The Position of SPARC Raf Dekeyser.
JSTOR Current Scholarship Program: Current Issues and e-Books Ken DiFiore, MLS Associate Director Outreach & Participation Services JSTOR | Portico.
California Digital Library eScholarship Publishing Services CDL Users Council Meeting, May 9, 2008 Catherine Mitchell Acting Director, Publishing Group.
Seminar on Scholarly Communication and the UC Community University of California Office of Systemwide Library Planning Fall 2003.
University of California Libraries Digital library building blocks: Empowering libraries in an increasingly competitive online information space Daniel.
UC’s Library Statistics What is UC keeping? (And why?) LAUC-B Conference: Making it Count: Opportunities and Challenges for Library Assessment Joanne Miller.
The Library as Publisher at the University of Pittsburgh Rush G. Miller Hillman University Librarian and Director, ULS University Library System University.
Creating Change in Scholarly Communications Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC September 21, 2009 TCAL, Austin, TX.
Amy Jackson UNM Technology Days July 22,  An institutional repository (IR) is a web-based database of scholarly material which is institutionally.
Capture the Movement: Banner 7.0 and Beyond Susan LaCour, Senior Vice President, Solutions Development California Community Colleges Banner Group.
A Publisher’s Perspective on Academic Publishing in the Digital Era Dr Frances Pinter
South Africa in the global knowledge arena: implications for academic libraries Andrew M. KANIKI Executive Director: Knowledge Management and Strategy.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
Institutional Repositories: the DSpace Experience Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J HOW RESEARCHERS FIND INFORMATION IN THE NEW DIGITAL AGE Gaynor Austen Director, Library Services.
California Digital Library Managing and Federating e-Print Repositories: UC’s eScholarship Initiatives CNI Fall Task Force Meeting December 1999 John Ober.
DAEDALUS - An ePrints Case Study William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Library/Press/University Collaborations The Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia.
California Digital Library eScholarship: a UC Publishing Initiative Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly.
Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Future Directions for Scholarly Publishing at the University of California Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of.
BUILDING AN INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY – CHALLENGES FOR UNIVERSITY OF SWAZILAND (UNISWA) Dr. Zipho Ngcobo.
DUO - the institutional repository for the University of Oslo Arne Jakobsson University of Oslo Library Library of Medicine and Health Sciences.
The R EPOSITORY AS P UBLISHER OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN A DUAL ROLE BEN HOCKENBERRY SYSTEMS LIBRARIAN | ST. JOHN FISHER COLLEGE.
Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.
Publishing from the Library: New Roles for Libraries in Scholarly Communications David Ruddy Cornell University Library September, 2004.
The New Now: Institutional Repositories and Academia Institutional Repository USM April 17, 2015 Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian.
Visibility Matters Dave Stout, Sales Director Open Access Week Wayne State University October, 2011.
Presentation transcript:

Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives California Digital Library Scholarly Publishing at University of California ———— An Update for User’s Council

Overview ► Change afoot/impact on UC/steps taken ► Why we went in this direction ► Successes ► Challenges ► Predictions on evolution of market ► Advice to information providers

Brief History of CDL Publishing ► Economics and technology intersected in the mid-1990s to provide the perfect crisis/opportunity ► CDL opened 1999; eScholarship Program launched 2000 ► eScholarship Repository launched 2003; today 200 UC depts. contributing more than 16,000 papers, books, articles, etc; 5.2 million full-text downloads ► eScholarship Editions: 2,000 XML Scholarly monographs from University of California Press ► CDL-UC Press partnership extends to monographic series, digital critical editions, interactive Web based publications

eScholarship Services ► Provide low-cost alternative publishing services for the UC community ► Support widespread distribution of the materials that result from research & teaching ► Foster new models of scholarly publishing through the development and application of advanced technologies

Dark and Stormy Night ► Economics of scholarly publishing have become increasingly troublesome for both nonprofit producers and consumers; libraries continue to buy shrinking percentage of output ► New technologies offer possibilities for innovative and more cost-effective publishing ► Pressures and opportunities create new challenges for UC services in support of research & teaching ► Experiments with new forms of publication have extended as far as existing organizational structures (UC Press and CDL) and budgets will allow

Guiding Principles ► To remain competitive the university must provide a research infrastructure for its faculty that will ensure productivity and stimulate innovation in all aspects of the research, teaching and learning cycle ► Publishing must be conceived more broadly than the production of an archival record; it is an integral part of the research enterprise ► Publishing must embrace a suite of production and dissemination activities, some of which will be revenue generating ► Publishing must enable faculty to create and distribute works via the most appropriate means

Early research confirming what we already knew ► An enormous amount of publishing activity, both system-wide and campus-based ► Much of it is informal, e.g. working papers, much of it is digital, and much of it hard to find ► Surprising amount of formal publishing activity on campuses, in ORUs and UCOP departments ► Faculty make a distinction between in-process scholarly communication and formal, archival publication (ref to Harley, King) ► There is still considerable resistance to the use of alternative formats for “archival publication” because of tenure concerns ► Growing percentage of UC faculty are desperate for university support for creating, validating, publishing, recognizing their new scholarly communication activities

UC Strategy ► Align UC publishing services with the academic enterprise of the University of California ► Broaden the role of the university press beyond gatekeeper for a select few; reclaim and extend the original role of the university press ► Coordinate planning across the UC system, find intersections in IT planning, digital stewardship, research data support, publishing and preservation ► Develop publishing services to be interoperable with services for research and supplementary data

UC Publishing ► Extend repository-based services to support the implementation of UC policy on faculty copyright ► Formalize a collaboratory structure for UC Press and CDL’s eScholarship Office to focus efforts in strategic publishing initiatives ► Provide a more robust journal publication service: offer a menu of choices for editorial assistance, production quality, print and access options ► Implement cost-recovery mechanisms; secure open access options ► Seek efficiencies across traditional publishing modalities, e.g., books and journals; invest savings in R&D for emerging publishing modalities

UC Publishing Services ► Traditional Scholarly Publishing Services  Scholarly monographs  Peer-reviewed journals ► Dissemination & Repository Services  Working papers, technical reports, etc.  Electronic Theses & Dissertations  Postprint Repository ► New Publishing Models  Distributed Editorial Boards  Digital Critical Editions  Interactive map-based publications in soc sciences & humanities  Science reference/collaboration with museums

Some Implications of University- Based Publishing ► Increasing amount of content disseminated within the university = Multiple copies of many works ► Imperfect methods for resolving appropriate copy ► Google, et al, not reliable for access to deep Web, for precision searching, for appropriate copy ID ► Opportunity for commercial A&I services to provide integrated access across gated and open access content, “improve” on Google, rather than compete for content

Thank you!