US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Date: September 24, 2012 Watershed/Reservoir Sediment Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
The Effect of the Changing Dynamics of the Conowingo Dam on the Chesapeake Bay Mukhtar Ibrahim and Karl Berger, COG staff Water Resources Technical Committee.
Maryland Assateague Coastkeeper Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper Chester Riverkeeper Choptank Riverkeeper Patuxent Riverkeeper Sassafras Riverkeeper Severn.
Conowingo Dam and Lower Susquehanna River Sediment Mt. Airy Water and Sewer Board December 12, 2013 Bruce Michael Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
Water Management Options for Surface Drainage RED RIVER BASIN TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BTSAC) BRIEFING PAPER #3 September, 2014 BTSAC.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Expedited Projects + Innovative Teamwork = Measurable Improvements to the Health of Lake Okeechobee and the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee Estuaries.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Aquatic Plants and the Environment (SWES, ECOL, WFSc 474/574)
EEP Watershed Planning Overview August 12, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Nationally recognized, innovative, non-regulatory program formed in July.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Water in California: Self-induced Scarcity Waterscape International Group.
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
An Analysis of the Pollutant Loads and Hydrological Condition for Water Quality Improvement for the Weihe River For implementing water resources management.
Aquatic Biodiversity Ocean 91% of all water Polar ice caps and glaciers 2.3% Lakes, streams, and rivers 2.8% Rest largely groundwater.
Lower Susquehanna River Dam Sediment and Solutions Conowingo Relicensing; LSRWA; MD County Resistance; Solutions; CAC Involvement Thursday November 29.
Low Flow Analysis & Water Use Plan Science & Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Forum June 10, 2004 Barry Ortman Diversified Technical Services Dawson.
Estuary Productivity & Complexity Evaluating Human Impacts.
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Citizens Advisory Committee November 29, 2012 Anna Compton USACE 1.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
Sediment Issues within Transboundary Basins Presented by Paul Bireta and Fernando Salas April 12, 2012.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Modeling in the USACE US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Bruce Ebersole U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal & Hydraulics.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Baird Claytor Hydroelectric Project Sedimentation Study.
Urban Water Research Todd Rasmussen Associate Professor of Hydrology The University of Georgia, Athens and Pending Director, Urban Water Research Institute.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Prevention and Cure. Contents Introduction to Reservoirs Preventing Siltation Cure Cost Benefit Analysis Conclusion.
1 Lake Ballinger and McAleer Creek Watershed Strategic Action Plan Forum Briefing #2 January 27, 2009.
Sediment Management in Prado Basin and Lower Santa Ana River Greg Woodside, P.G., C.Hg Executive Director of Planning & Natural Resources September 20,
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
17 November 2015 WATER RESOURCES PRACTICE LEADER BLACK & VEATCH WATER PAMELA P. KENEL QUARRY CONVERSION: CRITICAL PLANNING & DESIGN ELEMENTS DRAFT.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
PROJECT PLAN: The Nature Conservancy Corps of Engineers ICPRB Presentation Potomac Watershed Roundtable January 9, 2009.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEDIMENTATION Proposal to become a subgroup under the ACWI September 9, 2003.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
Mekong River Commission Information System/ “WUP-FIN Phase III” Concept The information system development is critical activity for maintaining the MRCS.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Watersheds and Wetlands CHAPTER 1. Lesson 1.5 Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds Human Activities Watershed Quality Health of U.S. Watersheds.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
Beneficial Use of Dredge Materials: Introduction to Dredging and Policy J. Bailey Smith US Army Corps of Engineers April 4, 2011.
The Boardman: A River Reborn Removing Dams for a Free Flowing River.
CALCASEIU RIVER AND PASS DREDGED MATERIAL SEDIMENTATION STUDY.
Lake Erie Dredge Material: Finding a Solution for Ohio Ohio Brownfield Conference 2016 April 6-7, 2016.
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Comprehensive Conservation & Management Plan (CCMP)
Paper by: Bloniarz D. , M. Matteo, T
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Water Resources Q: What water can we use?
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Date: September 24, 2012 Watershed/Reservoir Sediment Management Literature Search Preliminary Findings Anna Compton

BUILDING STRONG ®  Review, analyze, and synthesize literature on managing watershed/reservoir sedimentation.  Findings and lessons learned will be incorporated into refining sediment/nutrient management strategies for LSRWA.  Help us Brainstorm Ideas  Help us Brainstorm Ideas. 2

BUILDING STRONG ®  Reviewed Sediment Task Force Findings  Conducted Database Literature Search ► Findings ► Trends ► Conclusions 3

BUILDING STRONG ® 4

 Met from  Chaired by Susquehanna River Basin Commission  Multi-agency, Multijurisdictional group  Tasks: ► Review of existing studies- Susquehanna sediment transport and storage; ► Make recommendations on management options to address the issues; ► Symposium of experts and policy makers; and ► Recommend areas of study, research, or demonstration 5

BUILDING STRONG ® 1. Human influenced sediment loading is a problem. 2. Loads in early 1900’s were 2-3 times larger (land use, BMP’s, dams). 3. Benefits of dams will be lost once at steady state: Increased loads More scouring 4. Steady State ~ 20 years??? 5. Sediment transport is a natural process that has been aggravated by human activity. Management focus: reduce human impacts. 6

BUILDING STRONG ® 6. Sediment transport - aggravated by catastrophic storm events. 7. Reducing loads to local streams, rivers and lakes has value. 8. Decreasing loads over time will restore water quality and habitats 9. Need more knowledge of sediment and effectiveness of management options to support a comprehensive management strategy. 7

BUILDING STRONG ® Upland Management ► Agriculture Uplands ► Urban Uplands ► Transportation Systems ► Forestry ► Mining Uplands Reclaim/reforest abandoned mine land 8

BUILDING STRONG ® Riverine Management ► Stream Restoration & Stabilization ► Sediment Trapping Structures (Impoundments/dams) ► Sediment Transport Assessments (Monitoring and Modeling) ► Stream Bank/Channel Stability Assessments (Monitoring and Modeling) ► Riparian Buffers ► Natural & Reconstructed Wetlands 9

BUILDING STRONG ® Reservoir Management ► Sediment Bypassing: Would result in a base load condition that exceeds the current base load into the Bay. Counter to the currently accepted goal of reducing sediment input to the Bay. ► Sediment Fixing: Would not mitigate scouring or change the amount of sediment passing through the system or add capacity. ► Modified Dam operations: Unclear if this would accomplish anything in the interest of sediment control other than as a form of bypassing. ► Dredging: Supports study to maintain/increase trapping capacity. 10

BUILDING STRONG ® 11

BUILDING STRONG ®  Google Scholar  The Wall Street Journal  ProQuest  Academic Search Premier (EBSCO)  ScienceDirect  GreenFile (EBSCO)  EnvironetBASE  Agricola  GEOBASE 12

BUILDING STRONG ®  100+ articles (National and International) were reviewed  A sub-set were determined to be most relevant to sediment management and were summarized: ► Studies/Modeling ► Technology ► Alternative Analysis ► Recommendations ► Implemented Actions 13

BUILDING STRONG ®  Reservoir sedimentation (declining storage) is a worldwide problem.  Trends like climate change and population growth are exacerbating problem.  Comprehensive, long-term sediment management is needed EVERYWHERE.  New dams, have sediment management built in. 14

BUILDING STRONG ® 15

BUILDING STRONG ® ► Goals - What is driving the need for sediment management drives the solution: Losing purpose/function of the dam (economics)? Restoring natural sediment flow (environmental)? ► It’s all about the sediment - Where they are coming from? Where they are depositing? Sediment size and chemical characterization? Contaminants; land-use history? Erodability rate Location and magnitude of sediment deposition downstream? Value of sediments behind the dam? Precipitation patterns: when is sediment transported? 16

BUILDING STRONG ® ► Effectiveness - How effective is strategy at improving sedimentation? ► Economic - Capital costs for strategy? Future operation and maintenance requirements? ► Optimization/Adaptive Management - Modeling before implementation Monitor effects after implementation Adjust activities to optimize effectiveness Continuously improve system performance 17

BUILDING STRONG ® ► Environmental - Permitting requirements? Impacts? ► Schedule - How much time is required for solution to be implemented? Long-term problems often need long-term solutions. Implementation sequence: long and short-term implementation? ► Integrated sediment system management- Multi-faceted problem requires multi-faceted solution; most have combinations. ► Benefits - Costs incurred worthwhile? 18

BUILDING STRONG ® Dredging (i.e. increasing or recovering volume) ► Operations and Maintenance ► Contamination ► Dredging can be reduced by using BMP’s and finding the critical sediment producing watersheds from upstream. ► Tactical Dredging ► Beneficial re-use Soil amendments (agriculture, mining etc.) Habitat development/beach nourishment Commercial (bricks, geotextile container fill groins, landfill capping, tiles, glass, cement blocks ► Dredging is very expensive normally is a last resort; often creates new social and environmental problems 19

BUILDING STRONG ® By-passing - Routing sediments around or through storage  The technology to by-pass and transport sediments has been developed  Long Distance Conveyance hydraulic transport of through pipelines (>10 miles)  Hydrosuction sediment removal ► Dredging equipment with hydrostatic head over a dam to create suction at the upstream end. ► Difference between water levels upstream and downstream of dam to remove sediment through a floating or submerged pipeline. ► Hydrosuction dredging, deposited sediment dredged and transported downstream or to a treatment basin. ► Hydrosuction bypassing, incoming sediment is transported without deposition past the dam to the downstream receiving stream. 20

BUILDING STRONG ® By-passing Continued ► Pipeline diameter selection, and head size ► Environmental Impacts Increased turbidity levels downstream? Changes in water chemistry? Impacts of sediment-removal upstream? Regulatory agencies contacted early ► Upper limit of sediment concentration defined Ecological aspects Operational aspects ► Out-flowing sediment concentration regularly monitored and controlled. 21

BUILDING STRONG ® 1.Evaluate strategies to manage sediment and associated nutrient delivery to the Chesapeake Bay.  Strategies will incorporate input from Maryland, New York, and Pennsylvania Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Watershed Implementation Plans.  Strategies will incorporate evaluations of sediment storage capacity at the three hydroelectric dams on the Lower Susquehanna River.  Strategies will evaluate types of sediment delivered and associated effects on the Chesapeake Bay. 2.Evaluate strategies to manage sediment and associated nutrients available for transport during high flow storm events to reduce impacts to the Chesapeake Bay. 3.Determine the effects to the Chesapeake Bay due to the loss of sediment and nutrient storage behind the hydroelectric dams on the Lower Susquehanna River. 22