Comparison of Half- and Full-Day Kindergarten on Kindergarten Achievement Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Student Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparative Study of ELL and Non-ELL Student Performance in National Standardized Achievement Reading Test: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy.
Advertisements

DIBELs Next…. Oh my, What’s Next?
Presented to NHC Human Relations Commission January 26, 2009 John S. Rice & Jessica L. MacDonald Learning to Read at Hillcrest.
WELCOME to DIBELS Night 6:00 – 6:30 Dinner 6:30 – 7:00 Children: Story Teller Parents: DIBELS presentation on 1 st /2 nd grade assessments at Wilcox 7:00.
Using DIBELS to Guide Instruction Or What Is a Trajectory Anyway?
Understanding DIBELS Next
Steve King The mCLASS® System North Carolina April 2013 Steve King
1 Performance of English Language Learners on the 2008 Grades 3-8 ELA Tests David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting.
Growth Model Considerations in Early Literacy Research Yaacov Petscher Florida Center for Reading Research.
1 Data-Based Leadership Cohort B March 2, 2006 (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
RTI Data-based Decisions Marilyn Bechtel Psychologist/Elliott Elementary School Lincoln Public Schools July 30, 2007.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
V v Do Older Parents have More Self-Regulated Children? Kevin G. Harper, Megan M. McClelland, Ph.D. Oregon State University COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND.
Kindergarten Curriculum Night Central Elementary Mrs. Heuring and Miss Nick.
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information Shereen Henry Math Instructional.
Use of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills with English Language Learners Rachel McCarthy, M.S.E. & Mary Beth Tusing, Ph.D. University.
Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model - RTI Name:___________________________ Grade:___________________________ School:__________________________ CONSULTING.
DIBELS Information Night for Kindergarten Parents Monday, September 24, 200 6:30 – 7:30 P.M. Mirage Elementary Media Center Information about what DIBELS.
Research Foundations and EGRA Protocols or Why these measures? Sylvia Linan-Thompson.
Predictive Validity Evidence for DIBELS: Correlation to WASL Reading Scores Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information.
Response to Intervention (RtI) practices in educational settings aim to identify students who are at risk for academic struggles. Typically, RtI tries.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
Wake County Public School System
Many children with speech-language impairment will have difficulty with reading. Even those children who begin kindergarten with adequate early literacy.
1 Welcome! to Leeds Elementary ARI Reading Coach Cynthia Wallace.
Dynamic Measurement Group (DMG) Part 2.
Instruction, Teacher Evaluation and Value-Added Student Learning Minneapolis Public Schools November,
DIBELS Overview Kindergarten. What is DIBELS?? Kindergarten Assessments DIBELS Report What can parents do at home?
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
DIBELS Overview First and Second Grade.
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
Report on Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
MCLASS Reading 3D: Class Summary Reports. Desired Outcomes Understand how to access and analyze Class Summary Reports for whole class and individual students.
Buffalo Early Reading First R eview of Performance Data of Students & Classrooms August 31, 2009.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Student Miscue Analysis Presentation REA 628. Student Information  John* is a 6 year old Caucasian male.  He is grouped in a lower level reading group.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
RTI and District Assessments Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Student Information Anzara Miller RTI Coordinator / Professional Development.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting AERA San Diego, CA - April 13-17, 2009 Denise Huang Examining the Relationship between LA's BEST.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
SEPT. 21, 2015 DIBELS- NEXT REFRESHER. ACCESS mClass Portal mclasshome.com/portal Support: resources and contact Reports mClass Assessment mclasshome.com/assessment.
Interpreting data for program evaluation and planning.
DIBELS Team Training Monday, August 7. Agenda Why DIBELS? Are you DIBELS Savvy? Administering DIBELS Miscues and Markings Scoring Mock Assessments.
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
The State of the School Fall Goals What do we want children to know and be able to do with text in this school? We want our children to know how.
(brief) RTI OVERVIEW & BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT TRAINING: 1 st Grade MEASURING STUDENT PROGRESS IN YOUR PLC Lake Myra Elementary School * July 2009.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
READING 3D TRAINING Lynn Holmes Fall 2015.
Evaluating Outcomes of the English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Program in Secondary Schools: Methodological Advance and Strategy to Incorporate.
Responsiveness of Students With Language Difficulties to Early Intervention in Reading O’Conner, R.E., Bocian, K., Beebe-Frankenberger, M., Linklater,
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.
Winston-Salem / Forsyth County Schools
Addressing Questions with KN, 1st and 2nd Grade Reading
Linking Progress Monitoring with High-Stakes Assessments: Setting Standards-Based Goals in Reading John Hosp & Kristen Missall The University of Iowa Pursuing.
Delaware Statewide DIBELS Results. Statewide K-3 DIBELS Results Fall ,794 Total K-3 Students Tested: 3,794.
DIBELS.
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Data-Based Leadership
K–3 Literacy Assessment Reporting and DIBELS Reporting
CASD K-6 Transition Plan from DIBELS to DIBELS Next
Weaver Elementary School
mClass Training for New Staff
DIBELS Next Overview.
Reading Goals and Reading Growth A Proposal for Cohort A
Kindergarten - Universal Screening Flow Chart (DIBELS or FAST)
Reading Goals and Reading Growth A Proposal for Cohort A
Program Effectiveness in DERF: State-Level Action Plan
Data-based Decisions: You try it
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of Half- and Full-Day Kindergarten on Kindergarten Achievement Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Student Information

About this Study The purpose of these analyses is to examine the effect of All Day kindergarten on the achievement of Shoreline kindergarten students. This requires two conditions: A longitudinal analysis of the same students over period of time A continuous measure of achievement to provide a consistent yardstick for measuring growth throughout the year In Shoreline, the only districtwide measure of kindergarten student achievement is the DIBELS literacy measures, and the most recent longitudinal data is from last school year, This study therefore compares the achievement of Half Day and All Day kindergarten students on the DIBELS measures. Results are presented in two ways: Gains in mean performance across benchmark windows Regression analyses of DIBELS outcome measures on predictor measures of All Day kindergarten participation, demographic variables (lunch, gender, English speaking), and interactions between All Day K and the demographic variables

DIBELS Kindergarten Literacy Measures

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Initial Sound Fluency Winter benchmark score Means Both Half Day and All Day students gained. All Day students gained at a slightly faster rate than Half Day students.

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Letter Naming Fluency Fall benchmark score Winter benchmark score Spring benchmark score

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Winter benchmark score Spring benchmark score

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Nonsense Word Fluency Winter benchmark score Spring benchmark score

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Initial Sound Fluency What predicts the winter ISF score? Presented here is regression of winter ISF on fall ISF and other predictor variables including All Day K. The purpose is to gather evidence of the net impact of All Day K on literacy achievement controlling for other demographic variables which also influence student achievement. The only significant predictors are the Fall ISF score and gender. Students score an average of.72 points higher on the Winter Assessment, and boys, on average, score 4.4 points lower than girls on the winter ISF measure, accounting for All Day K, family income status, and language of origin. All Day K students do not score significantly different than Half Day students.

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Letter Naming Fluency A regression of Spring Letter Naming Fluency scores on the fall and winter scores, All Day K, demographics, and their interactions. The only significant predictors are the winter LNF score and the interaction between All Day K and Non-English. The results suggest that Non-English speakers who were in All Day K scored, on average, 6.8 points higher on the Spring LNF measure than all other students.

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Letter Naming Fluency

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Regression of Spring PSF score on Winter PSF, All Day K, demographics, and interaction terms. The only significant predictor is Winter PSF score. Participation in All Day K, or membership in any particular demographic group, does not significantly improve prediction of the Spring PSF score over the mean.

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Nonsense Word Fluency Regression of Spring NWF score on Winter NWF, All Day K, demographics, and interaction terms. The interaction between All Day K and lunch service is significant, suggesting that low income students in All Day K scored, on average, 10 points lower than all other students.

Effect of All-Day Kindergarten on Literacy DIBELS – Nonsense Word Fluency