PUTTING THE ‘I’ IN IEP RCDSB Collaborative Teacher Mini Inquiry.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Elementary. The District Heard Your Concerns In teachers requested that the following three documents be merged into one. Instructional Focus.

Advertisements

Instructional Learning Cycle

Growing Success Overview

Team Teaching Section 7: Monitoring Teacher. The Monitoring Teacher model One teacher assumes the responsibility for instructing the entire class. The.

The Individual Education Plan (IEP) What is an IEP?  a summary of the student’s strengths, interests, and needs, and of the expectations for a student’s.

Tracey McConachie- Pinelands RTLB. ‘AT RISK’ REGISTER It is difficult for schools and their SENCO to have one system of setting goals for students with.

Region 3 Assessment Binder Cheryl Bashutski Sun West School Division Mike Walter Regina Public Schools.

Planning with a Focus on Student Understanding St. Amant High School 1.

Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)

National Science Standards  Teachers of science plan an inquiry-based science program for their students.

Ontario Comprehension Assessment (OCA)

ORIGINAL SMART GOAL FORM Smart Goal Setting Form Name: School: Shared: Primary Evaluator (Name/Title): A minimum of one student learning goal and one professional.

Kyrene Professional Growth Plan

 Review Objectives  It’s the Law  What works? Wagon Wheel Activity  It’s all about Customer Service  Guidelines for Successful Parental Involvement:

Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007

Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.

Communication and Sharing Practices for Co-teachers Cheri Modesitt.

STRATEGIC PLANNING Board of Health Update January 16, 2014.

Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.

LITERACY PROFESSIONAL LEARNING RESOURCE Primary Schools Program Session 4: Professional Learning.

Elementary Liaison Meeting January, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas CFN 204.

Effective Questioning: Gap Closing Grade 9 Student Success Summer Program 2011 Mathematics 7-12.

Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.

1 Welcome to Module 4 Planning the Mathematics Program/ Instructional Approaches.

OVERVIEW PRESENTATION

The FERA Instructional Strategy Guiding Questions What is the FERA instructional strategy? How does the cycle connect to other disciplines? What routines.

School Planning Councils Collaborative Inquiry to Improve Student Achievement with Bruce Wellman Webcast February 16, 2005 Host: BC Ministry of Education.

Take One! January 28, How Do I Become A “Good” Teacher?

2. Planning for Teaching and Learning Long Term (Course) Planning.

The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.

The School Effectiveness Framework

WestEd.org Framing the Curriculum: Families, Interactions, Environments, and Materials PITC Partners for Quality Advanced Training 2014.

Individual Education Plans.

Principles of High-Quality Professional Development Dean Richards January 15, 2009.

Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.

April 6,  Refine our understanding of ELA  Engage with student exemplars and rubrics and designing constructive feedback  Plan – put knowledge.

1 Math CAMPPP 2011 Perspectives ??? Proportional Reasoning Breakout # 3.

1 Math CAMPPP 2011 Pursuing Broader Perspectives Algebraic Thinking Breakout # 3.

Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.

Teaching Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities: Research-Based Practices Second Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.

Using Action Research To Empower North Carolina Educators A Race to the Top Initiative NC Department of Public Instruction Educator Effectiveness Division.

Laws in brief Introduction n The information I will be sharing with you came from the text book: n Including Students with Special Needs: A practical.

The Individual Education Plan (IEP)

Math 6-8: The Standards in Practice: A Common Core Lesson

ORIGINAL SMART GOAL FORM

Embedded Formative Assessment Book Study

School Self-Evaluation

Critical Reading Charting the Text.

Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner

Analyzing Student Work

Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years

Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation

Overview of the Intent of the Iowa Core Curriculum

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

Professional Learning

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

The Nuts and Bolts of National Board Certification

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

MAIN MENU 1. Introduction 2. Unit Info 3. Unit Overview 4. Subtasks

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

ETBI Annual Conference for Principals and Deputy Principals

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics

Presentation transcript:

PUTTING THE ‘I’ IN IEP RCDSB Collaborative Teacher Mini Inquiry

INQUIRY QUESTION How can we create better Individual Education Plans to increase student success?

BRIEF BACKGROUND The IEP Standards document was released in 2000 and the IEP Guide was released in 2004

In 2006 the Ministry conducted a provincial review of IEPs for every Board

In 2012 RCDSB participated in another provincial IEP review

The Putting the ‘I’ in IEP Collaborative Teacher Mini Inquiry is a next step to help support schools with IEP development and implementation

The mini inquiry provides educators with an opportunity to refine their own knowledge base and deepen their understanding of quality Individual Education Plans and their impact on student learning

MODERATING THE IEPS - Divide into groups of about 3 - Each group needs a Putting the ‘I’ in IEP duotang and IEP (provided in the package) - Each group also needs chart paper and a marker Putting the I in IEP

MODERATING THE IEPS The duotang includes: - What is an IEP - Tricky Bits of the IEP - Moderation Look Fors sheet - RCDSB IEP Exemplars Putting the I in IEP

MODERATING THE IEPS Whole Group: - Review/moderate the Assessment section on pg 1 of the IEP using the ‘Moderation Look Fors’ sheet, the ‘Tricky Bits’ and the ‘Exemplars’ sections of the duotang - Is it a level 1, 2, 3 or 4? - Why? - Surprises or questions?

MODERATING THE IEPS Have each group moderate the following sections of the program pages in the IEP: -Current Level of Achievement -Annual Goal -Learning Expectations -Teaching Strategies -Assessment Methods -Each group reviews the sections listed and records on chart paper: -whether it is level 1, 2, 3, 4 -their reasons -any surprises or questions that arose from their discussion

MODERATING THE IEPS - Each group shares their results with the whole group - Any burning questions that are left can be ed to the special education department for clarification

CONSOLIDATION - Each participant should take a few minutes to fill in the Putting the ‘I’ in IEP Reflection Sheet included in the Mini Inquiry package