Region 3 Monitors April 2013 1. What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
Advertisements

Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Notice: An Overview Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS August 4,
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
The Evaluation Process Federal Law – IDEA – All eligible students, ages 3-21, are entitled to a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Independent Educational Evaluations Developed by Contra Costa SELPA As Recommended for LEA Board Policy
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
October 10, The Texas Education Agency has recently clarified and expanded the use of Prior Written Notice (PWN) in Special Education.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
New York State Education Department (NYSED) Prior Written Notice (Notice of Recommendation) This presentation is presented using Power Point with an.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
The SOPM Standard Operating Procedures Manual Highlights.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Transition Assess Interests, Preferences, Strengths and Needs by age 14*** Add Post Secondary Goals and Transition Activities by age 16 At age 16 advise.
Evaluation ARC Chairperson Training KAR 1:300 Section 4 (1) An LEA shall ensure that a full and individual evaluation is conducted for each child.
Planning together for service
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Conducting Re-evaluations Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework Director of Special Education Eligibility, Theresa Nicholls | Fall 2015.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Ottawa Area Intermediate School District March, 2012 Adapted from Allegan Area ESA.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration Developed by Oakland Schools 2007.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University.
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
Notice: An Overview Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS April 29,
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
The New IDEA in Special Education
I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Prior Written Notice of Action & Notice of Conference March 2014 ADE-SEU.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS. STEP 1- THE CHILD IS DETERMINED AS POSSIBLY NEEDING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES There are two primary ways in which.
KATHLEEN M. FLAHERTY PH.D. THE REED PROCESS. JUST A THOUGHT… Getting Paper Trained is hard work.
Process for Enrolling New Special Education Students
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
Implementation Manual Revisions
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
New Enrollment and Transfer Students
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Region 3 Monitors April

What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about a student. 2

What is the purpose of a REED? Initial Evaluation: out of state transfers and Part C to B Transition Reevaluation Other: Consideration of Termination or Change in Eligibility Additions/Modifications to IEP 3

Who Participates in the REED process? The IEP team and other qualified professionals may meet in person, communicate via phone, through written documentation, or other informal ways. There must be a documented team member who can interpret the educational implications of the evaluations. 4

What are the team’s responsibilities? The IEP Team conducts the REED and must first gather and review: Evaluations and recent assessment data Teacher and service provider observations Evaluation and other information from the parents Other pertinent data (i.e. medical information) 5

Examples of information gathered and reviewed at the REED: State and district assessments Universal screening or progress monitoring data Record review Teacher made assessments Classroom assignments Discipline records Developmental assessments 6

Examples of information cont.: Attendance Report cards Medical/health records Developmental assessments Parent input (through meaningful engagement) Outside evaluation obtained by parents Observations by the SSW Other (as appropriate) 7

Is any additional data needed? Based on the review, the educational needs of the child, and input from the student's parents, the team must identify if any additional data is needed to determine the following: 8

Additional data needs cont.: Whether the student has or continues to have a disability The student's present level of academic performance and related developmental needs Whether the student needs or continues to need special education and related services Whether any additions or modifications to special education and related services are needed to meet IEP goals and participate in general education 9

If data is needed: Assessments are recorded along with the title of the person(s) who is/are to conduct the evaluation(s) 10

If no new data is needed: Record rationale for REED team decision on Notice Document Signed Parental Consent is required for initials even if no further assessments are needed (i.e. Part C to Part B, Out-of-state transfer, or Private Evaluation) Parent has the right to request assessment District must either honor the request or provide notice with the rationale for refusal 11

What if parent does not consent? If the parent does not consent for an initial evaluation, the district is under no obligation to pursue the evaluation If the parent refuses consent for a reevaluation, the district “may, but is not required to, pursue the reevaluation” 12

What if the parent does not respond with consent? If consent for a reevaluation cannot be obtained after multiple documented attempts and the parent has failed to respond, the district can proceed with the reevaluation The parent should be informed in writing that if he/she does not respond in so many days, the district will proceed with the evaluation 13

What is the initial REED timeline? Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education (R b) states the “time from receipt of parental consent for an evaluation to the notice of an offer of a free appropriate public education or the determination of ineligibility shall not be more than 30 school days.” 14

What is the reevaluation timeline? At least once every 36 months unless the parent and LEA determine that a full evaluation is not needed When the district suspects that a student is no longer eligible (termination of eligibility) Not more than once a year unless agreed upon by both the parent and district 15

Reevaluation timelines: Michigan law no longer requires that continuing eligibility be determined every 36 months via a formal multi- disciplinary evaluation team meeting However, the REED process may never exceed the 36 month timeline 16

Additionally, re-evaluations may be required: When a district determines an evaluation is needed for: educational or related service needs improved academic achievement and functional performance When requested by: child’s parent, or teacher 17

If the parent requests more than one reevaluation in a year: The LEA may not agree that another evaluation is needed The LEA must provide Notice which includes the rationale for refusing to conduct the evaluation 18

Notice: In order to complete the REED process, all Notice requirements must be provided to the parent in writing when a district: Proposes to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the student or the provision of a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) to the student Refuses to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the student or the provision of a FAPE 19

Extensions to REED timelines: Extensions may be obtained at the time of the REED or any time within the 30 school days prior to the offer of a FAPE The extension must be mutually agreed upon in writing, and measured in school days The extension may never exceed the 36 month reevaluation timeline 20

Frequently Asked Questions About Evaluation Review 21

22 Q: Must the district notify the parent if the REED team determines that no further testing is needed?

23 A: YES. The district must inform the parent about the determination and the reasons for it, and about the parent’s right to request a reevaluation to determine whether the student continues to be a student with a disability.

24 Q: Is a REED required for an initial evaluation?

25 A: NO. The REED is optional by law but it is a suggested best practice as a way to document the planning process of an evaluation. *In regards to this option, please consult with your ISD for policy requirements.

26 Q: What is the exact date that "resets the clock” on a reevaluation?

27 A: A REED date does not determine the evaluation cycle. The prior eligibility determination notice date begins the 36 month evaluation timeline. Subsequent notice of eligibility must occur within 36 months of that date.

28 Q: Must a REED be completed prior to determining that a student is no longer eligible to receive special education and related services?

29 A: YES. A REED is required when a student is exiting from special education programs & services (but continuing in general education). *Remember the rule: evaluate in, evaluate out. However, the need for additional evaluations is determined by the REED team.

30 Q: Must a REED be completed prior to graduation with a diploma or “aging-out?”

31 A: NO. A REED is not required prior to graduation with a regular high school diploma or when a student exceeds the age of eligibility.

32 Q: When considering a change of disability, can the REED determine that an evaluation by a MET is not required?

33 A: NO. To change the disability of a student, an evaluation by a MET is required as defined in Michigan Rules.

34 Q: For a reevaluation of eligibility, is a MET needed if a REED team agrees that “No Additional Data is Needed?”

35 A: NO. A MET form is not needed each time a team is re-determining eligibility. The only requirement is to conduct a REED proceeding a Reevaluation IEP which must occur minimally every 36 months. *Some ISD’s may require that an Eligibility Recommendation still needs to be completed.

36 Q: The team is considering changing the student’s eligibility from ECDD to EI and the parent has not signed the REED, can the team proceed with the IEP team meeting and make the eligibility change?

37 A: YES. If the district attempted to contact the parents several times and documented these attempts, the IEP team meeting could proceed.

38 Q: Is a REED required when speech and language services are discontinued?

39 A: YES. A district must evaluate a student who has been determined eligible as a student with a speech and language impairment in order to determine ineligibility and cease services.

40 A. NO. A district may not need to conduct a full evaluation if the student was receiving services only and not deemed eligible as SLI. A written report should be attached to the IEP identifying the criteria under which the student no longer requires the service and that the goals have been achieved.

41 Q: If during an evaluation, it is determined that additional assessments are needed, is another REED required?

42 A: YES. Another REED is required to obtain consent on the additional evaluation plan.

43 Q: If the district submits a request for an OT or PT evaluation, is a REED required?

44 A: YES. A REED is required for any additional evaluation that will potentially add or modify eligibility for a special education service or program.

If you have additional questions concerning the REED process, please contact your ISD/RESA Monitor or administrator. 45