October 14, 2011.  BUT you still need to participate in IEP meetings in a well-documented, meaningful manner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Legal Mistakes Districts Make
Advertisements

REM Shelby County Schools School Year. Current Federal/State Law No Child Left Behind (NCLB) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Reauthorization of.
Notification to Participate in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
10 Things to Expect Regarding Your Child’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting.
Excusal of IEP Members Clarification. Federal News Excusal Of IEP team members –If a required member of the IEP team will not be in attendance, the district.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
1 The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
Discipline Under the IDEA Tulsa Public Schools Special Education and Student Services Presenter: Cheryl Henry August, 2011.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
The IEP Process Georgia Department of Education Division for Special Education Services and Supports 1870 Twin Towers East Atlanta, Georgia Georgia.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Roadmap for Your Transition IEP:
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
October 10, The Texas Education Agency has recently clarified and expanded the use of Prior Written Notice (PWN) in Special Education.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
New York State Education Department (NYSED) Prior Written Notice (Notice of Recommendation) This presentation is presented using Power Point with an.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
The SOPM Standard Operating Procedures Manual Highlights.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
Writing Compliant ETRs State Approved Training Module
Prior Written Notice (PWN) Training Rock Hill Schools Exceptional Student Education 2009.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
CIMP & DUE PROCESS POINTERS It’ that time again… Anoka-Hennepin participates in the Continuous Improvement Monitoring Process supported by.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network (TASN) Overview and Preparation for.
CHAPTER 16 Regulations Covering the Education of Gifted Students August 25,2009.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
Ottawa Area Intermediate School District March, 2012 Adapted from Allegan Area ESA.
Individualized Education Program (IEP) Ms. Boldt.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
Educational Benefit Review (ED Benefit). Educational Benefit Purpose To determine if the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) was reasonably.
EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
SAGE Coffee October 7, 2014 UNDERSTANDING THE ARD PROCESS FOR PARENTS AND CAREGIVERS.
The New IDEA in Special Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Notice of Procedural Safeguards for Parents of Students with Disabilities Parents of exceptional students are entitled to information about their rights.
Special Education Webex Conference February 5 & 6, 2007.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
Implementing IDEA 2004: 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Law and Regulations CSE/CPSE Meeting Membership Individualized Education Programs Continuum.
Section 504 Pasco County Procedures. Beginning of the Year 504 Procedures Make sure that every student with an existing 504 Plan has their own 504 folder.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS. STEP 1- THE CHILD IS DETERMINED AS POSSIBLY NEEDING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES There are two primary ways in which.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
KATHLEEN M. FLAHERTY PH.D. THE REED PROCESS. JUST A THOUGHT… Getting Paper Trained is hard work.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PARENT REQUESTS
IEP PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATIONS
Compliance Monitoring
The IEP Process Georgia Department of Education
12/9/2018 Notice: An Overview The MDE released documentation and a new requirement last year for districts to utilized Notices to “finalize” IEPs rather.
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
Meetings of the IEP Team
How to navigate Special Education
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

October 14, 2011

 BUT you still need to participate in IEP meetings in a well-documented, meaningful manner.

 When the parent and LEA agree that the attendance is not necessary because the member’s area of service isn’t being modified or discussed  Major change: The member’s absence needs to be documented on Member Excusal form  Include reason for absence  Minor change to service area that is not yours: No need to complete the Member Excusal form

 Here are your answers:  /lib/ /Making_Changes_to_the _IEP.pdf /lib/ /Making_Changes_to_the _IEP.pdf

If the parent and LEA consent to the excusal The member MUST submit, in writing, to the parent and team, input into the development of the IEP prior to the meeting.

 Use the Davis School District IEP Team Member Not Attending form  Best practice is to involve all relevant members of the IEP team whenever possible. Use the form SPARINGLY. When used, a copy needs to be sent to your supervisor at the district.  What does the form look like? What does the form look like?

 The parent has the right to consent or refuse consent for an IEP team member excusal.  It is not appropriate to request this consent at the scheduled meeting time.  Consent must be sought prior to the scheduled meeting time..  It is recommended that consent is obtained and written input is provided no less than 2 days prior to the meeting.

 The LEA designee  This team member is responsible for knowledge about the availability of resources of the LEA.  If a trained LEA designee cannot attend, the meeting must be re-scheduled for a time when an LEA is available.

 In limited cases, a TRAINED school counselor may act as an LEA Designee.

 Requirements for General Ed. Teacher attendance are listed on page 3 of the PIE “IEP Team Member Excusal” document  There are very limited circumstances in which a general education teacher is not required at an eligibility/IEP meeting.

 Excusal of more that 1 IEP team member is not recommended because it could deny parents their right to meaningfully participate in the IEP process.  If more than 1 team member cannot attend, the meeting should be re-scheduled.

 The team needs to identify a meeting date and time that all members of the team can be present.  Meetings need to include all members whenever possible.

 Date of submission of written statement of input into the development of the IEP.  This MUST be at least two days before the meeting  The input the excused member has to offer to the IEP.  The location the input is documented on the DRAFT IEP.  Goal area, service labels, times and freq., classroom and/or test modifications or accommodations

 A copy of the DRAFT IEP labeled DRAFT with the areas of documentation highlighted along with this explanation.  Attach all of the above documentation to the Member not Attending form and place in the student’s file with the IEP.

 Provide evidence of the student’s present level of functioning and academic performance.  Progress reports or an evaluation summary can support ending services.  Be sure to update progress reports to show achievement  Provide contact information to the parent

 Excusal of a team member is not intended to be a time saver.  Involvement in the IEP team meeting is often less time consuming than the excusal process.