April 24, 2013.  In 2003 representatives from MASS, MOEC, maaps, MAPT and ASE organized to discuss rising costs in out-of-district special education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

The Individual Health Plan Essential to achieve educational equality for students with health management needs Ensures access to an education for students.
October 19, 2006 Children With Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools 34 CFR §§ Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Payment for Educational Services Provided to DCF-placed Children Connecticut Association of School Business Officials January 7, 2005.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
OF ECSE COMPLIANCE PRESENTATION FOR THE 2014 MO-CASE CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 23, 2014.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
Surrogate Parent Training
Division of Special Education
1 Massachusetts Interagency Restraint and Seclusion Prevention Initiative Approved Public and Private Day Special Education Schools Preliminary Survey.
Recent Changes in Intercity Service Delivery in Minnesota 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Gerry Weiss, State.
TRANSPORTATION IN A FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) EXAMINATION April 9,
Special Education Review Manchester Essex Regional School District School Committee Meeting November 17, 2009.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Chapter 222 of the Acts of 2012 THOMAS J. NUTTALL, ESQ. SULLIVAN, NUTTALL & MACAVOY, P.C PLAIN STREET MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS (781)
Jarrod McCarthy River Valley Regional Commission Mobility Manager.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
A Brief Overview of California’s Early Start Program Early Intervention Services in California Developed by California MAP to Inclusion and Belonging…Making.
Special Education Update Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education MASS Summer Conference 2013.
1 Section 504 Clarkstown Central School District Office of Pupil Services Dr. Carol Gannon, Associate Superintendent Barbara Auriemma, Office.
Sandy Rybaltowski Special Education Policy April 2008 REPORT ON PRESCHOOL EDUCATION.
Noneducational Community-based Support Services Funding Education Service Center Region 11 Fort Worth, Texas.
Budget Proposal MISSION STATEMENT We will support student achievement by developing and sustaining exemplary educational experiences; creating.
Beyond Perkins Addressing the Needs of Students with Special Needs.
Transportation Services Budget February 4, 2010 Josh Davis, Director 1.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
MAA Time Survey Annual Training Madera County Office of Education Local Education Consortium Medi-Cal Administrative Activities Central Valley Services.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
COWETA COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Parentally-placed Private School Children with Disabilities and IDEA April 28 th, 2015.
Exceptional Children Division Special Projects and Data Team Exceptional Children Special Project Funding Programs Presented by Lori Peterson, Special.
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
November 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Special Education.
Best Practices in Parent Center – State Collaboration to Improve Student Achievement Federation for Children with Special Needs and Massachusetts Department.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
Children With Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools 34 CFR §§ Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find Free and Appropriate.
603 CMR (6) Guidance and FAQs on Technical Assistance Advisory SPED
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
1 Indicator 6: Preschool in the LRE Massachusetts Patricia Cameron, 619 Coordinator, Department of Early Education and Care Donna Traynham, Elementary.
E DUCATIONAL C OLLABORATION, C ENTRAL O FFICE C ONSOLIDATION, AND D ISTRICT R EGIONALIZATION Combining school systems for the benefit of all Presentation.
O S E R S Proposed Assistive Technology Act Data Collection June 12, 2006 Jeremy Buzzell Program Specialist Rehabilitation Services Administration Office.
SPECIAL NEEDS TRANSPORTATION ISSUES JULY, 2009 CASE CONFERENCE SPECIAL NEEDS TRANSPORTATION ISSUES JULY, 2009 CASE CONFERENCE Cathy Staggs State Department.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
School District Merger Study Crown Point Central School and Ticonderoga Central School December 4, 2012 Castallo and Silky Education Consultants.
Comparison of Proposals to Restructure Central Office Administration Owen Maurais Executive Director, PREP February 8, 2007.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Title III Application Process Maria Garcia-Morales (717) Title III Program Manager Pennsylvania Department of Education.
1 ANNUAL SPECIAL EDUCATION TRAINING: PARENTS’ RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES October 7, :00 – 7:30 p.m. Swansea Public Schools Administration Building.
Effective Contracting Pupil Transportation Mary Sansaricq New York State Education Department Pupil Transportation Services Room 475 EBA Albany, New York.
Pre-Applicant Training| SC Public Charter School District| Beckie Davis Serving Students with Special Needs.
Construction, Remodeling, Equipment and Vehicle Purchase Approval Jill Bemis MASBO Institute February 23, 2016 “Leading for educational excellence and.
Transportation for special Education
Secondary Transition Shannon McVoy, Bureau of Services for Blind Persons (BSBP) Larry Stemple, Transition Coordinator, Wayne Regional Educational Service.
McKinney-Vento American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Serving Students with Special Needs
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
MASBO – WEST Bi-Monthly Meeting Special Education Transportation
Title I Program Monitoring: Common Findings from FY18
Extended School Year (ESY)
Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find Free and Appropriate Public
Getting students where they need to go
Presentation transcript:

April 24, 2013

 In 2003 representatives from MASS, MOEC, maaps, MAPT and ASE organized to discuss rising costs in out-of-district special education transportation  Preliminary study showed significant cost savings by consolidating routes  Funding provided from the Legislature to fund a three-year pilot program effective July 1, 2006

 Proposed model- collaborative would serve as a hub for coordinating transportation to private schools located in their geographic area  Year two of the study showed potential cost savings could be realized through inter- collaborative networks  The legislature continued funding in FY2009 to further support the development of networks

 In FY2010 the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education provided funding to support, enhance and create additional networks  The following networks demonstrated significant savings: Metro-BostonNortheast Metro-WestBlackstone Valley Southeast

 Continued DESE support of the State Special Education Taskforce  DESE funded project to provide districts with the October 1 DESE SIMS data  Provide ridership data for programs receiving students from 15+ school districts

Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents Massachusetts Organization of Educational Collaboratives Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials Massachusetts Association of School Committees Massachusetts Association of Special Education Administrators Massachusetts Association of Approved Private Schools Massachusetts Association for Pupil Transportation

Fiscal YearNumber of StudentsNumber of Private/Collaborative Programs , , , ,414395

 A website was developed in FY2012 to show the October 1 DESE Data and ridership data for identified programs  Districts can see if sharing with another district or if potential to share exists

IEP Placement Website Identify Neighboring Districts Contact District Establish Route PROCESS

 Facilitate IEP meeting  Arrange for transportation services  Ensure transitions to outside placement are smooth and effective  Work closely with parents  Ensure compliance with all State and Federal mandates

 Quality of service provided by vendor or school district  Parent satisfaction  Dependable and reliable service  Expediency in establishing transportation services  Cost savings

 Parents may not want child riding with students from other districts  Length of ride  Frequent changes to routes  Special conditions for monitors and/or wheelchairs  Cost

 Recognize parents concerns  Their child riding with children from other districts  Length of time on the vehicle  Share benefits of ride sharing  Inclusive setting allows for greater socialization  Least restrictive environment

 One hour ride limit can be waived by the team  IEP Transportation Services ◦ Check “NO” if student does not require any modifications (a smaller vehicle does not constitute special transportation) ◦ Check “YES” if student requires any modifications, wheelchair, adaptive bus, lift or ramp, monitor

Narrative Description of School District Proposal Transportation is being provided the student attending the out of district placement. In the meeting the parents understood and agreed that the commute may be longer than one hour due to distance, traffic, weather and other circumstances beyond the control of the transportation company.

 Significant savings can be realized when several districts share vehicle costs  Vehicle cost divided by the number of districts on the vehicle  Average route cost=$215 per day ◦ District would pay that as solo run or share with other districts

 Significant cost savings can result if districts share routes Cost Savings Example District Current per Day Cost* Cost Avoidance** Annual Savings180 Days Boxford PS$71.60 $ $25, Newburyport PS $71.60 $ $25, Topsfield PS$71.60 $ $25, Combined Cost Avoidance (Savings): $77, *Hypothetical figure based on Northeast Network rate. **Based on average cost per day statewide.

 District must provide transportation provider with clear written information  In-service Training Program  Periodic Inspection of Equipment

 Provides another resource when setting up transportation services  Can expedite placement  Cost savings to your district  Helpful documents and presentations

 Work with collaborative or transportation network  Work closely with transportation person  Timing is important for smooth start  Provide pertinent information to transportation providers

 Formal Collaboratives providing this service ◦ Operate their own vehicles ◦ Contract with vendor(s)  Regional networks  Informal arrangements made between towns/districts  District owned and operated transportation

October 1 Data

Ridership Data

Colleen Cavanaugh Office Cell Jay Sullivan Office