WISM Program Review in ESD 113 Region October 2012 Where are the challenges?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
The IEP Process Georgia Department of Education Division for Special Education Services and Supports 1870 Twin Towers East Atlanta, Georgia Georgia.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Understanding the IEP Process
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Thank you for joining us for Monitoring Progress Toward IEP Goals The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
CONSOLIDATED PROGRAM REVIEW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE I, PART C, MIGRANT EDUCATION PROGRAM MEP STATE CONFERENCE AUGUST 2013.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
October 10, The Texas Education Agency has recently clarified and expanded the use of Prior Written Notice (PWN) in Special Education.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
An Overview of the Law 1 Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice from Federal Compliance to Accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
ASSESSMENT ACCOMMODATIONS How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities Ohio.
PLOP, Goals & Objectives Notes PLOP – Free of grammatical and spelling errors – Statement describing how the student is performing the annual goal currently.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
CIMP & DUE PROCESS POINTERS It’ that time again… Anoka-Hennepin participates in the Continuous Improvement Monitoring Process supported by.
 Indicator 1 – Graduation  Indicator 2 – Dropout Rates  Indicator 3 – Assessment  Indicator 4 – Suspension/Expulsion  Indicator 5 – School Age LRE.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
Chapter 3 Assessment. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 3-2 Highlights of the Law: IDEA-1997 Strengthens the role of parents.
Chapter 3. Assessment Highlights of the Law:IDEA 1997 Strengthens the role of parents Ensures access to the general education curriculum Increases attention.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The New IDEA in Special Education
Board of Education Meeting September 10, Special Education Quality Review - Monitor compliance related to programs and services provided to students.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
 Is unique to Nebraska with its self- assessment process.  Is intended to be a component of your district’s School Improvement Process.  Is an ongoing.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
Amendments to the District ESE Policy and Procedures that outline Virtual education guidelines appear in blue. "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding."
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Jefferson County: ESY Information and Procedures
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
SPECIAL EDUCATION UPDATE Board of Education Presentation
Appleton Area School District
INCLUDE Strategy A plan for accommodating
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
The IEP Process Georgia Department of Education
in Correcting Noncompliance
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student Progress SBIEP Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student.
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

WISM Program Review in ESD 113 Region October 2012 Where are the challenges?

I Data Management – 7/10 Question C – LRE Reporting – Correct inconsistencies between LRE Calculator, minutes per week on IEPs, bell schedules – Correct LRE codes – Study historical identification patterns that reveal identification above 12.7%

II B Time & Effort Tracking 6/10 Submit T & E reports for particular staff members Confirm corrected coding and reporting Review staffing charged to special education

IV A Monitoring Priority Areas – Child Find, 4/10 Expand Child Find notice to include Birth-21 If using WSSDA document, customize it to the district

IV B Monitoring Priority Areas – LRE, 8/10 Include explanation of extent educated with nondisabled Review resources on LRE and strategies for increasing access to the general curriculum Review LRE strategies for preschool

IV D Monitoring Priority Areas – Transition from Part C to B, 5/10 Develop and implement proportional cost allocation model for preschool Ensure timely completion of transition from C to B Clarify roles and responsibilities

IV E Monitoring Priority Areas – Secondary Transition, 6/10 Complete age-appropriate transition assessments Make post-secondary goals measurable in education, training and employment Make sure post-secondary goals are to be completed after secondary Include course of study Include notification of transfer of rights at 18 Invite student to the meeting, keep documentation Invite agency providing services to the meeting

IV F, G Monitoring Priority Areas – Disproportionality 5/10 Review resources related to culturally responsive referral procedures

V IEP (A) Implementation – Sufficient Evaluations, 10/10 Include sufficient evidence to establish or reconfirm disability Include adverse impact of the disability Demonstrate need for specially designed instruction Refer to Evaluation Review Form

V IEP (A) Implementation – Consistency between Evaluation, IEP, Services Ensure students are receiving services in all areas identified

V IEP (B) Procedural – Measurable Annual Goals, Present Levels Academic and Functional Performance, 9/10 Include sufficient evidence of performance level for each area of service Include current data Include appropriate goals – problems with “study skills”, homework Write measurable goals – Include quantifiable baseline and target – Writing, behavior, social skills areas of problems Include explanations of appropriate state assessment, accommodations, appropriate grade level for state assessment

V IEP (B) C Procedural – Frequency, Location, Duration of Services 6/10 Include all areas of service, delete areas that are eliminated Be sure there is consistency between student schedule and areas, amount of service If ESY is TBD, complete it Include details of ESY service Be specific about location/context of service – “General/special ed classroom” not OK

Implications for Other 33 Districts Use this information in internal control activities – Establish a schedule to check IEPs and give feedback to teachers Use this information and information from IEP checks for targeted professional development for teachers and ESAs