Final Commissioning Plan and Schedule Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Installation Readiness Review 09/27/2004 Outline: - Work to be done during shutdown - Work.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Project Overview & System Integration Ted Liu June 11th, 2004 Fermilab, High Rise, Hornet Nest Pulsar Meeting.
Advertisements

MICE Target Electronics, DAQ and BPS MICE/ISIS Target Meeting 17 th September 2010 P J Smith – University of Sheffield.
Project Control Techniques
The LAr ROD Project and Online Activities Arno Straessner and Alain, Daniel, Annie, Manuel, Imma, Eric, Jean-Pierre,... Journée de réflexion du DPNC Centre.
Introduction Ted Liu, FNAL Feb. 9 th, 2005 L2 Pulsar 2rd IRR Review, ICB-2E, video: 82Pulsar
Summary Ted Liu, FNAL Feb. 9 th, 2005 L2 Pulsar 2rd IRR Review, ICB-2E, video: 82Pulsar
A presentation by Angela Little SULI Program 8/4/04 Pulsar Boards and the Level II Trigger Upgrade at CDF.
GLAST LAT ProjectNovember 18, 2004 I&T Two Tower IRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test One and Two Tower Integration Readiness Review.
The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.
1 Welcome to EQ2430/EQ2435/EQ2440 Project in Wireless Communication Lecture 1 March 20, 2015 Per Zetterberg School of Electrical Engineering.
MICE CM26 March '10Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM25 o DAQ System Upgrade o Luminosity Monitors o Sequels of.
CCSB223/SAD/CHAPTER141 Chapter 14 Implementing and Maintaining the System.
Outline: Current status Active splitter Plan Chris Neu, Daniel Whiteson, Rick Van Berg L2 Upgrade Meeting 11 June 2004 XCES Input Path: Status.
Joint Commissioning (2) Commissioning plan Gene Flanagan Purdue University.
Pulsar System Overview and Commissioning Plan Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Installation Readiness Review 02/08/2005 Outline: - Items from last review - Pulsar.
CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.
Online Update Elliott Wolin JLab 4-Oct Outline Online Data Challenges Networking DAQ JInventory System Farm Manager Counting House, Computers, Databases.
Burkard Reisert June 11 th, 2004 Fermilab, High Rise, Hornet Nest Pulsar Meeting Ted’s overview talk: Pulsar production/testing success !  all hardware.
Plan Design Analyze Develop Test Implement Maintain Systems Development Life Cycle MAT Dirtbikes.
14 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Cluster Finder Report Laura Sartori (INFN Pisa) For the L2Cal Team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn, Pisa, Purdue.
MICE CM25 Nov 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM24 o Trigger o Event Building o Online Software o Front End.
Technical Part Laura Sartori. - System Overview - Hardware Configuration : description of the main tasks - L2 Decision CPU: algorithm timing analysis.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
News Ted & Kirsten June 10, 2005 TDWG. Meet Trigger Reps today? Exotic Trigger Reps: Vadim and Oscar doing great work QCD Trigger Rep: Mary herself EWK.
Intermediate 2 Software Development Process. Software You should already know that any computer system is made up of hardware and software. The term hardware.
Commissioning Experience and Status Burkard Reisert (FNAL) L2 installation readiness review:
Outline: Brief review Splitting of input signals Status of 2A system before and after splitting Status of 2B system after splitting Status of monitoring.
Svtsim status Bill Ashmanskas, CDF simulation meeting, Main authors: Ashmanskas, Belforte, Cerri, Nakaya, Punzi Design goals/features: –main.
17-Aug-00 L.RistoriCDF Trigger Workshop1 SVT: current hardware status CRNowFinal Hit Finders64242 Mergers31616 Sequencers2312 AMboards4624 Hit Buffers21212.
R. Fantechi. TDAQ commissioning Status report on Infrastructure at the experiment PC farm Run control Network …
Status and planning of the CMX Wojtek Fedorko for the MSU group TDAQ Week, CERN April , 2012.
Online Software 8-July-98 Commissioning Working Group DØ Workshop S. Fuess Objective: Define for you, the customers of the Online system, the products.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 16 to July 22 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.6pb -1 u Recorded:
L2 Upgrade review 19th June 2007Alison Lister, UC Davis1 XFT Monitoring + Error Rates Alison Lister Robin Erbacher, Rob Forrest, Andrew Ivanov, Aron Soha.
Simple ideas on how to integrate L2CAL and L2XFT ---> food for thoughts Ted May 25th, 2007.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
Tracker Week October CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxon, UK Imperial College, London, UK Brunel University,
Firmware - 1 CMS Upgrade Workshop October SLHC CMS Firmware SLHC CMS Firmware Organization, Validation, and Commissioning M. Schulte, University.
Project Overview Ted Liu Fermilab Sept. 27 th, 2004 L2 Pulsar upgrade IRR Review
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting August 3, 2004.
L2 Status and Plan Matt Worcester, Heather Ray, Monica Tecchio, Myron Campbell, Jane Nachtman, David Saltzberg, Tom Wright, Steve Kuhlmann, Karen Byrum,
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting September 21, 2004.
Trigger Commissioning Workshop, Fermilab Monica Tecchio Aug. 17, 2000 Level 2 Calorimeter and Level 2 Isolation Trigger Status Report Monica Tecchio University.
MICE CM28 Oct 2010Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ o Achievements Since CM27 o DAQ Upgrade o CAM/DAQ integration o Online Software o Trigger.
Online monitor for L2 CAL upgrade Giorgio Cortiana Outline: Hardware Monitoring New Clusters Monitoring
New L2cal hardware and CPU timing Laura Sartori. - System overview - Hardware Configuration: a set of Pulsar boards receives, preprocess and merges the.
Pulsar Status For Peter. L2 decision crate L1L1 TRACKTRACK SVTSVT CLUSTERCLUSTER PHOTONPHOTON MUONMUON Magic Bus α CPU Technical requirement: need a FAST.
DAQ Status & Plans GlueX Collaboration Meeting – Feb 21-23, 2013 Jefferson Lab Bryan Moffit/David Abbott.
L2TS and Plan for Integration Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Pulsar Meeting 06/11/2004.
R. Fantechi. Shutdown work Refurbishment of transceiver power supplies Work almost finished in Orsay Small crisis 20 days ago due to late delivery of.
L2toTS Status and Phase-1 Plan and Pulsar S-LINK Data Format Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab L2 Trigger Upgrade Meeting 03/12/2004.
L2 CAL Status Vadim Rusu For the magnificent L2CAL team.
Pulsar Hardware Status Burkard Reisert (FNAL) March, 14 th 2003.
1 Status of Validation Board, Selection Board and L0DU Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 19 Dec 2006.
1 Run IIb Event Builder upgrade Director’s Review Jan Steve TetherRon RechenmacherMarkus KluteBruce Knuteson MITFNAL/CDMITMIT RonSteve Motivation.
GlueX Collaboration May05 C. Cuevas 1 Topics: Infrastructure Update New Developments EECAD & Modeling Tools Flash ADC VXS – Crates GlueX Electronics Workshop.
News and Related Issues Ted & Kirsten May 27, 2005 TDWG News since last meeting (April 29th) Organization Issues: how to improve communication Future Plans:
Arnd Meyer (RWTH Aachen) Sep 8, 2003Page 1 Integrated Luminosity Total data sample on tape with complete detector > 200pb -1.
Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Scope of the Project Current Status Schedule  Commissioning.
Initial check-out of Pulsar prototypes
CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status
Enrico Gamberini for the GTK WG TDAQ WG Meeting June 01, 2016
Global Inventory of Statistical Standards
Pulsar WG Meeting (C-J Lin)
Online Software Status
ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints
05 | Making the Cloud Transition
L2 CPUs and DAQ Interface: Progress and Timeline
Presentation transcript:

Final Commissioning Plan and Schedule Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Installation Readiness Review 09/27/2004 Outline: - Work to be done during shutdown - Work to do after shutdown - Some thoughts on operational issues

Work to be Done During Shutdown Firmware Developments: -Firmware for most data paths are in good shape. -Cluster board still has low level data corruption either due to upstream data protocol violation and/or Pulsar firmware issue. Top priority item for Vadim and Wojtek. - ShowerMax board also has low level data corruption. Problem not understood. Top priority item now for Chris. - Implement ShowerMax zero-suppression firmware to reduce latency Firmware at simulation stage Critical items:

Active splitter for ShowerMax fibers  need all 48 fibers split PC/Control Node : -Integrate into the current trigger table building framework -Interface with ScalerMon (pre-scale changes) -TL2D building (in processing node) -Infrastructure code for L2 algorithm -Need to start purchasing 2 more PC soon -All above items are software work, should be able to complete during shutdown Misc. Software: - PulsarMon (online monitoring for Consumer Operator) - FER code for TL2D and ScalerMon support Documentations !! To the committee: anything else we’ve missed? Work to be Done During Shutdown Critical items:

Shutdown Work Schedule Integrating into current trigger table building framework (Daniel, Kristian) Finish on Nov 1, tested and debugged by Dec 1 Interface with ScalerMon for prescale changes (Daniel): Finish on Sept 15 TL2D Building in node (Kristian): Complete by Oct 15 L2 algorithm infrastructure code: Complete by Nov 15 PC purchase (Kristian): Start paperwork Oct 15, expected arrival date Dec 1. Debug Cluster firmware (Vadim): fix the problem during the shutdown and spend the the first two weeks of beamtime (parasitic) validating the fix. Debug ShowerMax data corruption (Chris): middle of October Active splitter working for 48 SMXR fibers (Chris): complete by Nov 15 FER code changes for TL2D and ScalerMon (Cheng-Ju, with help from DAQ experts): complete by Nov 15. Testing zero-suppression ShowerMax firmware and merger optimization (Sakari): before shutdown PulsarMon code (Vadim, Wojtek and other subsystem experts): Full blown version running by the middle of November. Clean up cabling in the Pulsar crate (Cheng-Ju with help from JDL): Before shutdown. Documentation (all): continuous updates. Names in parentheses are folks in charge of the work Completion dates are estimated by folks working hard at the task.

Summary of Shutdown Work Schedule We should be able to to meet the timeline for most of the items mentioned before. Firmware related issues  Making Cluster and ShowerMax firmware robust. Since some of the problems are still not fully understood, solving the problem may take longer than expected.  People are working hard at it. Hardware related: ShowerMax active splitter fully working. Crucial for final commissioning

Work to be Done After Shutdown We would like to come out of the shutdown with a full system Some pieces may need a week or two of stand-alone testing first. Initial work  parasitic commissioning of the L2 decision trigger: - Check for data corruption for the various data paths - Compare L2 trigger decision (based on upstream simulation and alpha) - Verify ScalerMon, TL2D, PularMon infrastructure in beam running In the past we have used very little dedicated beam time for Pulsar work. We will need dedicated beamtime (~few hours/week) after the shutdown to fully validate the Pulsar system: - Look for system wide problems with Pulsar driving L2, - Study error handling recovery implementation, - Study timing performance of the Pulsar driven system + optimization, - etc… We will do our best to minimize dedicated beamtime.

Validation criteria: - Two weeks of stable running with Pulsar driving L2 and no trigger decision discrepancy based on upstream simulation, - No significant downtime caused by Pulsar system during the two weeks of trial, - Pulsar system performance (deadtime) meet and exceed alpha system at any L1A rate and luminosity. To the IRR committee: are the above conditions sufficient to meet the technical requirements? Our goal is to achieve the above criteria + any other technical requirements recommended by the IRR committee by March After we have met the technical requirements, we’ll have another review before officially switching over. At this review, we’ll have to settle the MOUs, manpower, and other issues. Work to be Done After Shutdown

Thinking Ahead on Operational Issues Overhead for switching between the Alpha and Pulsar driven system: Switching from Alpha to Pulsar driven trigger should be seamless. All the reconfiguration can be done within minutes. Hardware maintenance support: - Pulsar boards, custom mezzanine cards and transition boards  PREP - Control and processing PCs  UPENN - Input data splitting infrastructure  Chicago, Fermilab, UPENN. Pager carrier rotation: All Pulsar group members have expressed strong commitment to carry out pager responsibility. Similar to the current L2 page, we will maintain Pulsar webpages for CO, shiftcrew, and pager carriers. Some questions from IRR committee members:

Hot spares: at any given time, we plan to maintain a copy of the L2 decision system in the trigger room. However, the system may be used for developmental work. We will also set aside hot spares. Pulsar group will maintain the PulsarMon package. However, we do not intend to assume responsibility for TrigMon, XMON, nor the trigger database. All the above issues (and more) will have to be fully resolved by the next review. Thinking Ahead on Operational Issues Some more questions from IRR committee members:

Summary As Ted mentioned in the beginning, the purpose of this review is to help us get ready for the final commissioning. We believe that we have a well defined plan, but no plan is perfect. We welcome any recommendations (or even criticisms) of our plan. Lastly but not least, the Pulsar group would like to thank the Committee for taking your time to review the Pulsar upgrade project.