UNDERSTANDING THE SC CAST LOGIC MODELS CAST Academy, Nov. 4, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Watauga County is ranked in the top 18 Counties in North Carolina for Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Crashes.
Advertisements

Local Evaluator Meeting June 19, 2012 University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.
Assessing Intervening Variables (i.e., R&P Factors and Underlying conditions) Presented by….. Bob Flewelling Jan 31, 2008.
1 Hillsborough County Alcohol and Drug Indicator Profile M. Scott Young, Ph.D. Kathleen Moore, Ph.D. Department of Mental Health Law and Policy Louis de.
SAMHSA’s Strategic Plan
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Comprehensive Assessment: A Data Driven Decision Making Process.
Aligning Outcomes with Population Needs
A Call to Action: Changing the Culture of Drinking at U.S. Colleges Recommendations for Colleges and Universities.
Injury Research in Highway Safety Thomas Songer, PhD University of Pittsburgh Injury Epidemiology EPIDEM 2670.
How To Use Science in Practice Selecting, Implementing, and Evaluating Environmental and Population-Based Prevention Strategies How To Use Science in Practice.
Community Based Projects to Prevent Underage Drinking Community Based Projects to Prevent Underage Drinking Kathryn Stewart MADD National Board Safety.
A Tool to Monitor Local Level SPF SIG Activities
Strategic Planning Training New Mexico Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant February 22, 2006 Paula Feathers Southwest Center for Applied.
Picking Interventions and Strategies, Part I: Problem Analysis/Mapping South Side Families and Babies Community Team Meeting, January 21, 2014.
Creating Observation Forms for Collecting Data An evaluation webinar hosted by the Tobacco Control Evaluation Center Presenter: Robin Kipke, Evaluation.
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
Koreen Johannessen, MSW Peggy Glider, Ph.D Andrew J. Maghielse, BFA
NEW MEMBER ORIENTATION. Vision: A caring community united for a safer Carolina Mission: To create a campus-community environment that promotes healthy.
FRIDAY NIGHT LIVE Target Responsibility for Alcohol Connected Emergencies MAKING TRACE HAPPEN IN OUR COMMUNITY.
2007 NHTSA ASSESSMENT WHAT IT CAN DO FOR YOU!. What is NHTSA? What is NHTSA? National Highway Transportation Safety Administration National Highway Transportation.
Dorcas Sithole Mental Health Department Ministry of Health & Child Welfare 1.
Implementation Opening Activity Implementation Considerations Implementation Activity.
CAST Evaluation Team Webinar March 10,  Different organizations & fields use different terminology  SC Prevention System has agreed-upon definitions.
Opioid Misuse Prevention Program “OMPP” Strategic Planning Workshop
ROANOKE COUNTY PREVENTION COUNCIL Fostering the healthy development of youth and over time the community. Empowering Families. Encouraging Youth.
Must include a least one for each box below. Can add additional factors. These problems… School Performance Youth Delinquency Mental Health [Add Yours.
George Firican ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.
Must include a least one for each box below. Can add additional factors. These problems… School Performance Youth Delinquency Mental Health [Add Yours.
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Capacity Training New Mexico Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant January 25, 2006 Michelle Fry & Paula Feathers Southwest Center for Applied.
Harold D. Holder, Ph.D. Prevention Research Center Berkeley, California Selecting, Implementing, and Evaluating Environmental and Population-Based Prevention.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Maine Learning Community: Selecting Strategies February 21, 2007
School Performance (% of courses passed) Youth Delinquency (HYS perception of Risk) Mental Health ( HYS depression) School Performance (% of courses passed)
Washington State Department of Social & Health Services One Department Vision Mission Core set of Values - Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery Prevention.
Overview June,  Sub-recipients grant applications will go to ADAMHS/ADAS Boards only.  ADAMHS/ADAS Boards will be expected to identify a primary.
PRI Logic Model The following slides demonstrate various displays of the PRI logic model for your reference and use in local presentations. If you need.
Potential Alcohol Strategies March 20, 2008 Sheila Nesbitt.
Road safety: What works? Margie Peden Coordinator, Unintentional Injury Prevention Department of Injuries and Violence Prevention World Health Organization.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Module Safety Management Roles and Responsibilities Describe the institutional roles and responsibilities within which safety is managed by federal/state/local.
Nebraska Collegiate Consortium To Reduce High-Risk Drinking Environmental Scanning NCC Skill Building Workshop April 11, 2006.
Healthiest Wisconsin 2010: A Partnership Plan to Improve the Health of the Public A Report of the State Health Plan Committee October 12, 2007.
Presentation to the Illinois State University April 20, 2006 Dr. Ronald Henson, Ph.D. Ignition Interlock Devices: Should they be Mandated for DUI Offenders?
Origin and Process of Utah Guidelines Anna Fondario, MPH Utah Department of Health Violence and Injury Prevention Program.
What are coalitions? A coalition is a formal arrangement for cooperation and collaboration between groups or sectors of the community, in which each group.
Putting Logic Models to Use Jere Thomas, LCSW, CPSII.
SAMHSA’s Strategic Prevention Framework. Community Prevention Systems Bring the power of individual citizens and institutions together Bring the power.
Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.
Celebrating Our Progress – Confronting Our Challenges Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Center for Enforcing Underage Drinking Laws.
March 31, 2011 Long-Term Individual & Community Consequences (not an accountability measure) Consumption (Long-term outcomes) Strategies (State required)
Evidence-Based Prevention of Underage Drinking: An Overview Scott Caldwell Presentation to the Dane Co. Coalition to Reduce Alcohol Abuse March 31, 2009.
An Analysis of the Quality of Wisconsin’s Community Health Improvement Plans and Processes 2011 Wisconsin Health Improvement and Research Partnerships.
Improving Mine Safety and Health through Substance Abuse Prevention and Education Keeping America’s Mines Alcohol and Drug Free.
Building a Comprehensive Approach Part 2: Using Complementary Strategies Erica Schmitz MESAP: Maine’s Environmental Substance Abuse Prevention Center Medical.
NZIPS 2008/2009 Alcohol Community Safety Forum South Island.
Robert Pollack October 26, FHWA Safety Data Initiatives.
Maine Learning Community: Day 2 Selecting Strategies and Implementation March 26, 2007 Maine Office of Substance Abuse (OSA) Northeast Center for Application.
Barnstable County Regional Substance Abuse Council Updated October 2015 Barnstable County Department of Human Services |
Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.
March 2016 Advancing Drugged Driving Data at the State Level: Synthesis of Barriers and Expert Panel Recommendations.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
2014 Town Hall Meetings To Prevent Underage Drinking ● Social Media Town Hall Meeting
STRATEGIC PLANNING January 12-13, Where are we in the planning process? Needs assessment data collection and prioritization - Consequence - Consumption.
Being “Active” with Safety How Can Administrators Change the Culture of Vehicle Purchasing? Presenter: Mark Francis (British Columbia) AAMVA Region IV.
Prosser CIA Coalition Logic Model
Community Prevention II Design and Implementation of Strategies
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Vision/Goals/Objectives
Presentation transcript:

UNDERSTANDING THE SC CAST LOGIC MODELS CAST Academy, Nov. 4, 2010

South Carolina Community Action for a Safer Tomorrow (CAST) Environmental Logic Model: DUI Traffic Crashes Consumption Pattern Risk Factors & Underlying Conditions Environmental Strategies Social norms accepting and/or encouraging use Insufficient enforcement of laws Easy social access Low or discount pricing Over-service to intoxicated patrons Insufficient laws and policies DUI traffic crashes High-visibility best practice enforcement operations Adjudication systems enhancement Merchant education Restrictions on alcohol price/promotion Social event monitoring & enforcement Community mobilization for policy change Consequence Limited transportation options Increase transportation options The SC rate of 12.1 alcohol- related vehicle deaths per 100,000 people is almost twice the national rate Almost half of SC fatal motor vehicle accidents involve alcohol Drinking to the point of impairment Lack of identification of problem behaviors Improved screening & referral systems Community media advocacy Last updated 8/6/10

South Carolina Community Action for a Safer Tomorrow (CAST) Environmental Logic Model: Underage Drinking Consumption Pattern Risk Factors & Underlying Conditions Environmental Strategies Social norms accepting and/or encouraging use Insufficient enforcement of laws Easy social access Inappropriate promotion of use Low or discount pricing Insufficient enforcement of school policies Easy retail access Lack of identification of early problem behaviors Underage Drinking Social event monitoring & enforcement High-visibility best practice enforcement operations Adjudication systems enhancement Merchant education Alcohol advertising restrictions Increase product price Model school policies w/ enforcement Improved screening & referral systems Insufficient laws and policies Community mobilization for policy change 35% of SC high school students drink 18% of SC high school students drank 5 or more drinks on one occasion in the past two week 1 in 10 SC high school students drove after drinking in the past month Community media advocacy Last updated 8/6/10

Where did these logic models come from?  Reviewed models from other states  Took what we liked  Changed a great deal  Staff brainstorm of any and all environmental factors that influence UD or DUI  Reviewed by:  Evaluation team  SEOW  WEB  Governor’s Council  Key partners (e.g., Office of Highway Safety)

Are they “perfect”?  Probably not  And they are not final either  We welcome your feedback

Most Importantly...  These 2 “1-page” diagrams are NOT the whole model  You must have the Contributing Local Factors (CLFs) to have the full logic model  The one-pager is like a pretty cover page  Found on “A Guide for Measuring Risk Factors and Local Conditions in Your Community”  The Risk Factors & Underlying Conditions boxes on the one-pagers are like buckets, but it’s what is inside (CLFs) that matters

Why focus on CLFs?  Risk factor headings can (and do) mean a lot of different things  Risk factors can’t be assessed as a whole (Step 1)  Different CLFs suggest different strategies (Step 3)  Different CLFs need to be tracked differently (Step 5)

Assessing CLFs  In the “guide,” we’ve tried to help match methods to CLFs  Sample tools we’ve developed are based on that approach  BUT you should do your own thinking on this  Are there better ways for you to measure some CLFs?  Do the sample tools get at all the relevant CLFs?  Are we covering every relevant CLF with some collection method?  Make this process your own; make it work for you

More on the Logic Models  Note that all environmental strategies go through “Community media advocacy”  Your county logic model will not look like the state model  Will have fewer boxes b/c not every risk factor will be a priority for your county and you won’t implement every strategy  May leave you room to include your priority CLFs on the “one pager”

More on the Logic Models  We used arrows on only the most direct connections  There may be plausible connections with no arrows  We’ve broken down the environmental strategy boxes like we broke down risk factors into CLFs  Not as important right now  Start to examine those options on 1/26 and beyond

More on the Logic Models  Not every risk factor is created equal  We brainstormed all relevant environmental risk factors  Some do not match up with an evidence-based strategy (e.g., limited transportation options)  Worry about that later  For now, just assess  Importance, ability to change will be factored into prioritization