Overview: I.Introduction/Background A.Kevin Allen B.Noel Shenoi II.Core Basics III.Solutions IV.Additional Literature.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiphase Extraction Techniques
Advertisements

In-Situ Remediation at Silver Lake Region 4 Hazardous Materials Geo/Bridge/Environmental Unit.
Home with an Underground Heating Oil Tank (UST) Solutions for your Leaking Heating Oil Tank.
Treatment of Slaughterhouse Wastewater
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Pay-For-Performance in Oklahoma The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Richard McKay Petroleum Storage Tank Division.
A Partner in Protecting California’s Waters CalClean Inc. High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction & Groundwater Treatment Systems Noel Shenoi Principal Engineer.
AHMET UCANOK JOHN E. ELVIS Pump and Treat of Contaminated Groundwater at the United Chrome Superfund Site Corvallis, Oregon.
1 Prevention and Remediation In Selected Industrial Sectors: Small Sites in Urban Areas Athens, Greece June 3-5, 2006 NATO/CCMS PILOT STUDY.
Plaistow, New Hampshire
Pulse Drying What is it?. Pulse Drying Pulse drying is a relatively new technique for rapidly drying high moisture/medium solids feed streams into a much.
Water Contaminants Soluble Contaminants - dissolve in water Particulates/Colloids - carried by the water column Insoluble Contaminants - very low solubility.
Air Sparging at Fort Greely, Alaska Presented by Aung Syn & James Powell.
Alabaster Corp. Tank Cleaning and Degassing General Process Overview.
1 In Situ Oxidation of PAH Contaminants Associated With Former Manufactured Gas Plants Ron Jensen Southern California Edison 1.
Add Main Topic Here Created by Educational Technology Network
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
1 Oil Fuel Line De-aerators What they are, what they do and how to install.
1 Thermal Remediation Services, Inc. Electrical Resistance Heating for In-Situ Remediation of Soil & Groundwater December 10, 2002 Greg Beyke (770)
“Where Can CalClean Work In ARIZONA?”
Collection Systems for Community Wastewater Systems CAWPCA Spring Meeting April 26, 2013 Dave Prickett, PE.
Using Quantitation to Develop Sustainable Solutions.
Multiphase Extraction for Soil and Groundwater Remediation Nick Swiger Spring 2007.
Clean-up at BP Paulsboro New Jersey (USA) Roxane Fisher and Mark Ferguson.
By: Martin Lee, Jey Hwan Lee, Wilson Leung. Background Former HKIA, replaced in 1998 ▫World’s busiest in 1997 ▫Overcrowded World famous difficult landings.
1 Soil Vapor Extraction Limitations and Enhancements LeeAnn Racz AgE 558 Semester Project April 2001.
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Fate and Transport of Chemicals A Presentation by Terrie Boguski Technical Outreach Services for Communities (TOSC) Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Hazardous.
Activities CTC-415. Activity Consumes Time Usually consumes resources (cure time for concrete) Definable start and finish Assignable – V. important –
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
C. Remediation of groundwater contaminants
Distribution System Control Strategies.  Tank Management/Operations  Flushing  Rerouting Water  Others  optimizing existing booster chlorination.
Genesis Solar Module Brochure ™
Economics of Sustainability When money speaks, nobody cares for the grammar!
Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance Industrial Assistance Section John Burke
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
PIT MANAGEMENT Why? Technical Standards Branch CEA PRESENTATION Revised Feb14 Bruce Blue.
PRESENTATION TO: Washington State Transit Insurance Pool ABOUT: Pollution Legal Liability Insurance (PLL) BY:Brian A. White ALLIANT.
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
1 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION OF A HIGHLY CONTAMINATED BEDROCK SITE - The Oxygen Infusion Phase - J. Morrow D. Side By :
Remediation System Design & Implementation Presented by.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
Military Redevelopment – Kelly AFB to Port of San Antonio Tim Underwood Deloitte Consulting LLP May 2012.
Field-Scale Application of in situ Reductive Dechlorination for High Concentrations of Mixed Solvents in Complicated.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Pesticides Using Shallow Soil Mixing The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
The Contaminated Sites Cleanup Process (18 AAC 75)
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
Aerojet Environmental Update Carmichael Town Hall Meeting March 12, 2008 Michael Girard Aerojet Environmental Site Remediation (916)
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم تلوث المياه الجوفية الناتج عن التسربات من خزانات الوقود المدفونة الخيار بين الوقاية والعلاج.
Stake Holders: Newport –Mesa Unified School District State of California, Orange County Health Care Agency State of California, EPA Costa Mesa Local Community.
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
ESAC Meeting December 1, pm LOS REALES LANDFILL UPDATE Entrance Facility Rodeo Wash Erosion Control Structure Scale House Drainage and other Stormwater.
David J. Berestka, PE Remedial Design Engineer, Tetra Tech EM Inc.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCE DEPT. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (DERM) “THE PERMITTING PROCESS TO DISPOSE OF STORMWATER.
Groundwater Pollution
1 Source Removal- Policy and Practice in the FDEP Robert C. Cowdery, P.E. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section Division of Waste Management Florida Department.
Excavation & Trenching Awareness Plus
Services Capabilities “A Different Approach” Neil Taylor.
Rapid Closure of Lingering Off-Site Plume Remediation Program in Residential Neighborhood using Horizontal Air Sparge and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells Narayanan.
Olusola Ayilara, P.E., P.G. PST-DCRP Section, Remediation Division
Web-based Class Project on Geoenvironmental Remediation
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
WEMCO® Hydrogritter® II Complete Grit Removal Package
Presentation transcript:

Overview: I.Introduction/Background A.Kevin Allen B.Noel Shenoi II.Core Basics III.Solutions IV.Additional Literature

Core Basics Trustworthy Knowledgeable ReliableValue Solutions

High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction & Groundwater Treatment Systems Saving the Environment One Drop At A Time

CalClean has a working relationship with numerous consultants and contractors throughout the US to assist with the assessment, cleanup, and case closure of your site(s). We manage the remediation project from beginning to end. No lengthy reports to review and submit to the Agency. We handle that burden for you and provide short executive summaries. CalClean is interested in Performance Based Contract (PBC) projects anywhere in the US. With truck mounted extraction systems and water treatment systems located in numerous areas throughout the US, we can mobilize anywhere. We handle your money like it is our own. There are no hidden mark-ups. We get your location to closure much faster. Your Remediation One Stop Shop

Service Equipment

Report Card THIRTEEN (13) YEARS OVER 300 CASE CLOSURES & 60 SITES IN 5 STATES NOW IN FINAL CLOSURE MONITORING

Advantages  Most Cost Effective (Lowest $ / lb. Hydrocarbon Removed)  No Capital Or Maintenance Cost Outlays  Can Mobilize Quickly  No Shutdown Of Operations Do To Installation Of Trenching  Low Noise For 24-Hour Operations In Neighborhoods  Occupies Less Space At Station  High Capacity Equipment (SCFM and GPM)  Various Permitting Already Obtained  100% Guaranteed Up Time  Quality Technical Expertise And Supervision  Mobile Fleet Of Truck And Trailer Mounted Extraction Systems  Faster Clean-up = Quicker Release Of Long Term Liability

Enhanced Remediation Techniques  Use Air Sparging to enhance HVDPE  Use HVDPE to remove diesel free product  Clean up contaminated vadose only sites quickly with high vacuum systems  New well box and underground piping design for HVDPE operations  Use periodic extractions (w/interruptible pricing) to address interim rebound  Can extract from depths of >270 feet

Examples of HVDPE w/Air Sparging Concentration Location w/o Air Spargingw/Air Sparging Gardena600 ppmv10,000 ppmv Diamond Tire500 ppmv11,000 ppmv Glen Avon200 ppmv 6,000 ppmv

End of Presentation Remaining slides for information purposes only

Extraction Process HIGH VACUUM VAPOR EXTRACTION PLUME IN VADOSE ZONE PLUME IN SATURATED ZONE DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION TANK

Flow Diagram

Vapor and Groundwater Extraction * TIMING FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY ( Longer Events usually increase Cone of Depression and expose more saturated zone for vapor extraction) Cone of Depression 8hr.* 24hr.* 5 days* 20 days* 1 month*

Systems Comparison CalClean HVDPE Standard S.V.E. Pump & Treat Truck-Mounted Mobile Systems High Capacity 450 CFM Systems Can Extract 5-50 GPM Water Can Extract & Destroy up to 130 pounds of Hydrocarbons per hour Can Extract up to 29” Hg (394” H 2 O) i.e.. Large Radius of Influence, Less Extraction Wells Required for Site Extract Vapor & Groundwater Can Lower Groundwater Table to Address Vadose, Capillary Fringe & Saturated Zones Fixed Based Systems (Few Mobile Systems) Typical System is 250 CFM But Cannot Extract Water Typical System can Destroy up to 40 pounds per hour of hydrocarbons Typically Extracts up to 10” Hg (136” H2O) i.e.. Smaller Radius of Influence, More Wells Required, Greater Costs Extract Vapor Only Cannot Extract Groundwater Fixed Based Systems (Few Mobile Systems) Typical System is 2-20 GPM But Cannot Extract Vapors Cannot Destroy Hydrocarbon Vapors. Not Applicable For Vapors Extract Groundwater Only Can Only Remove Groundwater, No Vapor

Comparisons ($$) System Manned At All Times To Adjust Stinger Depths to Maximize Recovery No Capital Cost Outlay Closures Can Be attained Earlier (possibly in less than 1 year) No Trenching Needed No Shutdown Of Station No Long Time Commitment Needed For Use At A Site No Cost Of Decommissioning No Weekly O&M Cost(s) Faster Closures = Quicker Release of Liability System Unmanned, Cannot Adjust Depths in Extraction Wells High Capital Cost Closures Typically Take 3 to 10 Years Trenching Required Shutdown Station for Weeks - Loss of earnings Long Term Commitment is Needed High Cost Of Decommissioning And Loss Of Value Of System Highly Weekly O&M Cost(s) Slower Closures = Long Time Liability CalClean HVDPE Standard S.V.E.Pump & Treat System Unmanned, Cannot Adjust Depths In Extraction Wells High Capital Cost Closures Typically Take 5 to 30 Years Trenching Required Shutdown Station for Weeks - Loss of earnings Long Term Commitment is Needed High Cost Of Decommissioning And Loss Of Value Of System High Weekly O&M Cost(s) Slower Closures = Long Term Liability

Comparisons (misc.) Can Mobilize to a Site Within Hours of a Call. Can Attack Source Immediately Can Startup At A Site Quickly Can pull offsite when concentrations Drop Off To Allow For Rebound Can Adjust Number of Days of Operation To Maximize Recovery Constant Onsite Monitoring of Influent Vapor Concentrations Occupies Space At Station Only During Onsite Operation Low Noise Operation (Great For Residential Areas) Typically Takes 9-15 Months To Install System - Allows Plume Size To Increase Takes Many Months Before Startup Cannot Pull Offsite since fixed Cannot Adjust Days of operation No Onsite Monitoring of Influent Vapor Concentrations Occupies Full-Time Space On Small Station Property High Noise Systems (Complaints From Neighbors) CalClean HVDPEStandard S.V.E.Pump & Treat Typically Takes 6-15 Months to Install System - Allows Plume Size to Increase Takes Many Months Before Startup Cannot Pull Offsite since fixed Cannot Adjust Days of operation Not Applicable Occupies Full-Time Space On Small Station Property. Low Noise