Risk adjustment and other reporting issues Shalini Santhakumaran NDAU Statistician Imperial College London.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDAU National Neonatal Audit Programme Mike Watkinson.
Advertisements

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health A mixed bag: an enquiry into the care of hospital patients receiving parenteral nutrition Neena Modi Vice.
The impact of managed clinical networks on place of birth and newborn transfers Chris Gale On behalf of the Neonatal Data Analysis Unit and the Medicines.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Non-Clinical Hot Topics in General Practice Professor Azeem Majeed Department of Primary Care & Social Medicine.
NDAU Database Yevgeniy (Eugene) Statnikov NDAU Data Manager.
October 2004 Screening and Surveillance of routine data Adrian Cook.
NDAU/NNAP Collaborators Meeting A National Neonatal Network Neena Modi Professor of Neonatal Medicine Imperial College London Vice President, Science &
Graphical methods for turning data into information Martin Utley Clinical Operational Research Unit (CORU) University College London
Notes  Data are presented as a pair of overlying bars, the outer, wider bar representing the period 1st Oct 2007 to 30th September 2008, and the inner,
NDAU/NNAP Collaborators Meeting Neena Modi Professor of Neonatal Medicine Imperial College London Vice President, Science & Research Royal College of Paediatrics.
Healthcare The London for LondonTrauma System Launch Maralyn Woodford The TRAUMA Audit & Research NETWORK The Trauma Audit & Research Network.
UK Neonatal Collaborative Necrotising Enterocolitis (UKNC-NEC) Study
Necrotising Enterocolitis: Population approaches
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
AM Recitation 2/10/11.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
1/26/09 1 Community Health Assessment in Small Populations: Tools for Working With “Small Numbers” Region 2 Quarterly Meeting January 26, 2009.
Introduction to Control Charts: XmR Chart
Dissemination to support Research & Analysis John Cornish.
Linkage between SSCAS data and mortality data. Patients’ outcome Determined by: Prior health and personal characteristics Severity of illness Effectiveness.
Outcomes surveillance using routinely collected health data Paul Aylin Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College London.
Measuring trauma outcomes & processes of trauma care The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session.
Data Analysis & Interpretation Intermediate Injury Prevention August 23-26, 2011 Billings, MT.
Slide4.11 Learning Objectives Illustrate risk model Determine level of OAA Identify risks Calculate detection risk.
Developments & Issues in the Production of the Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC)
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Crude Rates and Standardisation Standardisation: used widely when making comparisons of rates between population groups and over time (ie. Number of health.
Standardization of Rates. Rates of Disease Are the basic measure of disease occurrence because they most clearly express probability or risk of disease.
Audit of outcomes in HIV BHIVA Audit and Standards Sub-Committee E Ong (chair), J Anderson, D Churchill, M Desai, S Edwards, S Ellis, A Freedman, P Gupta,
LIBRARY SERVICES Evaluating the evidence Paula Funnell Senior Academic Liaison Librarian (Medicine and Dentistry)
Descriptive study design
Lesson 4Page 1 of 27 Lesson 4 Sources of Routinely Collected Data for Surveillance.
Management of coronary heart disease in primary care Professor Azeem Majeed Primary Care Research Unit University College London.
Learning Objectives After this section, you should be able to: The Practice of Statistics, 5 th Edition1 DESCRIBE the shape, center, and spread of the.
Medicines Reconciliation A Whole System Approach Arlene Coulson Principal Clinical Pharmacist, Specialist Services Gordon Thomson Principal Clinical Pharmacist,
Retrospective Chart Reviews: How to Review a Review Adam J. Singer, MD Professor and Vice Chairman for Research Department of Emergency Medicine Stony.
Performance Monitoring Public Health Intelligence training course day 5 Liz Rolfe Knowledge & Intelligence Team (South West)
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Professor Azeem Majeed Department of Primary Care & Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London. “Using.
The ‘Centre Effect’ and Statistical Process Control Alex Hodsman.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups 10.1.
Cervical cancer among Asian subgroups in California, Janet Bates, MD MPH California Cancer Registry NAACCR Annual Meeting Denver, Colorado June.
Quality Indicators Martin Orton – NHS IC & Arun Bhoopal DH Medical Directorate.
Variation in place of death from cancer: studies in South East England Elizabeth Davies, Peter Madden, Victoria Coupland, Karen Linklater, Henrik Møller.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 2 Statistics.
Diabetes Research Network Professor Azeem Majeed Imperial College, London.
Why your baby’s data are important
Instructional Objectives:
Outcomes in AKI, the national audit
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
How many study subjects are required ? (Estimation of Sample size) By Dr.Shaik Shaffi Ahamed Associate Professor Dept. of Family & Community Medicine.
Confidence Intervals and p-values
Why your baby’s data are important
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
chance Learning impeded by two processes: Bias , Chance
Semiannual Report, March 2015
An introduction to Bayesian reasoning Learning from experience:
Public Health Physician, Lecturer Critical Care Medicine,
Why your baby’s data are important
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Investigations using the
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Graphs and Chi Square.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
MODULE 7 Definitions Module 7 page 1.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Presentation transcript:

Risk adjustment and other reporting issues Shalini Santhakumaran NDAU Statistician Imperial College London

Why report outcomes ? Improvements in neonatal care and outcomes Audit Comparison CommissioningAccountability Transparency

Data Issues  Completeness  Accuracy

Data Issues  Completeness  Accuracy  Agreed case definitions

Data Issues  Completeness  Accuracy  Agreed case definitions  Neonatal transfers

Analysis issues  Unadjusted data is useful for some purposes  For others a more detailed analysis is required

Analysis issues  Unadjusted data is useful for some purposes  For others a more detailed analysis is required  3 reasons for variation in outcome:

Analysis issues  Unadjusted data is useful for some purposes  For others a more detailed analysis is required  3 reasons for variation in outcome: 1.Differences in case-mix 2.Random variation 3.Differences in care provided

Analysis issues 1.Differences in case-mix 2.Random variation 3.Differences in care provided  Selection of variables  Use of appropriate statistical models  Cannot completely control for case-mix

Survival Probability Calculator

Analysis issues 1.Differences in case-mix 2.Random variation 3.Differences in care provided  Occurs by chance even if the underlying mortality rate is the same for all providers  Illustrate significance using funnel plots

Funnel plot for adjusted SMR 95% confidence interval limits = “warning” 99.8% confidence interval limits = “alarm” ● = complete networks ○ = incomplete networks

Analysis issues 1.Differences in case-mix 2.Random variation 3.Differences in care provided  Not necessarily due to good/poor performance  ‘Constant risk fallacy’ and other local effects  Cannot tell us whether deaths were preventable  Needs to be linked to process measures

The National Neonatal Database  Individual, not aggregated  Population-based  Detailed clinical record  Electronic  Collaborative access to denominator data

The National Neonatal Database  Individual, not aggregated  Population-based  Detailed clinical record  Electronic  Collaborative access to denominator data …ideal for reporting outcomes

Acknowledgements All neonatal units contributing to the NDAU NDAU Team NDAU Steering Board Jane Abbott (BLISS)Jacquie Kemp Prof. Peter BrocklehurstProf. Azeem Majeed Prof. Kate CosteloeProf. Neena Modi Prof. Liz DraperProf. Andrew Wilkinson Imperial College London Academic Neonatal Medicine Unit