Wrap-Up and Potential Future Actions Mary J. Bartholomew, Mathematical Statistician Center for Veterinary Medicine Center for Veterinary Medicine at the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Striving for Integrity in the Research Process Zina OLeary.
Advertisements

Precaution WTO Symposium, 6-7 July 2001 Current issues facing the World Trading System Session:Food Safety and SPS D. TAEYMANS, Director Scientific & Regulatory.
Track 2 Summary Metrics in Validation One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL.
The Economic Benefits of Economic Peer Review Richard A. Williams, Ph.D. Director, Division of Market Studies Office of Scientific Analysis and Support.
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research.
Dealing with Uncertainty – Peanut Butter Case Study Jenny Scott FDA CFSAN Office of Food Safety.
Validity of Quantitative Research Conclusions. Internal Validity External Validity Issues of Cause and Effect Issues of Generalizability Validity of Quantitative.
CHAPTER 1 Practical Business Research. A working definition: Any systematic attempt at collecting and interpreting data and evidence in order to inform.
Aaron J. Scott Research Associate October 13 th, 2009.
CFSAN’s Peer Review for Risk Assessments Robert L. Buchanan, Sherri Dennis, and Marianne Miliotis.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues Marian Ford Erin Gonzales November 2, 2010.
Reading the Dental Literature
Lessons Learned in Initiating and Conducting Risk Assessments within a Risk Analysis Framework: A FDA/CFSAN Approach Robert Buchanan DHHS Food and Drug.
Data Utility : Improvements by Targeting Study Design and Sampling Plans Peg Coleman Senior Microbiologist Syracuse Research Corporation.
Contractor Assurance Discussion Forrestal Building Washington, D.C. December 14, 2011.
O'Leary, Z. (2004) The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London: Sage Chapter Five1 Indicators of Good Research How do I know that what I have done will.
Erik P. Mettler, M.P.A., M.P.H. Associate Commissioner for Food and Veterinary Medicine September 29, 2014.
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Unit Assessment: Advanced Higher Investigative Biology.
Validity Lecture Overview Overview of the concept Different types of validity Threats to validity and strategies for handling them Examples of validity.
A Review ISO 9001:2015 Draft What’s Important to Know Now
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
The Vocabulary of Research. What is Credibility? A researcher’s ability to demonstrate that the study is accurate based on the way the study was conducted.
Food Advisory Committee Meeting December 16 and 17, 2014 Questions to the Committee Suzanne C. Fitzpatrick, PhD, DABT Senior Advisory for Toxicology Center.
CORDEX Scope, or What is CORDEX?  Provide a set of regional climate scenarios (including uncertainties) covering the period , for the majority.
FSIS’s Needs for Peer Review of Risk Assessments Carol Maczka, Ph.D. Senior Scientist for Risk Assessment FSIS/USDA September 30, 2003 Presented at JIFSAN/SRA/RAC.
Appendix E – Checklist for Review of Performance Audits Presented by: Ashton Coleman Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General August 16, 2012.
1 Research Methodology Model. 2 Hypothesis a prediction of what is the case (fact) based on theory Conclusions Observation (s): Phenomena; Problem (Tree)
Judith Wheeler, OCN Eastern Region Quality Reviewer Direct Claims Status Or, what do we need to see when undertaking a monitoring visit?
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem.
Results The final report was presented to NICE and published by NICE and WHO. See
Major Components of FDA’s Action Plan for Acrylamide Richard Canady, PhD DABT US Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
Aircraft Predictability Summary Definition of predictability –Hard to nail down, but it starts with UQ –Processes and requirements define predictability.
Evidence Based Practice RCS /9/05. Definitions  Rosenthal and Donald (1996) defined evidence-based medicine as a process of turning clinical problems.
Guidelines for Critically Reading the Medical Literature John L. Clayton, MPH.
Systematic Review: Interpreting Results and Identifying Gaps October 17, 2012.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Data I.
The Role of the RAC in the Peer Review of CVM’s Risk Assessments Barry Hooberman, Ph.D., MPH Center for Veterinary Medicine Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation.
Review of the Implementation of the White Paper on Corrections in South Africa, 2005.
How do you know your product “works”? And what does it mean for a product to “work”?
Considerations for Developing Alternative Health Risk Assessment Approaches for Addressing Multiple Chemicals, Exposures and Effects External Review Draft.
VALIDITY What is validity? What are the types of validity? How do you assess validity? How do you improve validity?
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
or items of information; these will be numbers in context
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Building a Common Vocabulary
Developing Accountable Care in Greater Nottingham
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
Overview of Project Management
Research Quality and Reproducibility
Maintaining quality data throughout the life of a project
Unit 1 Lesson 2 Scientific Investigations
Safety Case Components and Documentation
CLINICAL RESEARCH: An Introduction
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues
Reliability & Validity.
Unit 1 Lesson 2 Scientific Investigations
Project Title Subtitle: make sure you specify it is a research project
A Research Companion to Principles and Standards
Critical Appraisal วิจารณญาณ
The Scientific Method (Experimental Design)
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
Internal Assessment.
Overview of Project Management
Presentation transcript:

Wrap-Up and Potential Future Actions Mary J. Bartholomew, Mathematical Statistician Center for Veterinary Medicine Center for Veterinary Medicine at the Symposium on Data Collection and Utilization in Risk Assessments and Management Decisions September 14, 2004

Presenters Bob Buchanan - CFSAN Bob Buchanan - CFSAN v Peg Coleman – Syracuse Research v Martin Cole – IIT v John Luchansky – USDA/ARS/ERRC v Yuhuan Chen, Jenny Scott – National Food Processors Association v Richard Whiting – CFSAN v Perry Chumley – US Army VCS

u In a transition phase u More data being collected specifically to fill gaps in risk assessments u More potential data collectors thinking about how to collect data that will be useful in risk assessment Data Collection

Simultaneously RAC and others strive to define characteristics of good and useful data u OMB – Information Quality Act u Do these definitions apply to data collected and used in RAs? v Quality: utility, objectivity, and integrity v Utility: reproducibility and transparency

Review of Characteristics for Utility for Risk Assessment and Management Decisions u Relevancy – v Dick Whiting: How pertinent is this data to this particular assessment? v Yuhuan Chen, Jenny Scott: For the risk management decision? u Representativeness – v Peg Coleman: Accounting for confounders and in the population of interest

Review of Characteristics for Utility for Risk Assessment and Management Decisions u Robustness – Consistent performance for multiple investigators u Generalizability or external validity – predictions consistent with other data u Internal validity – soundness of conclusions

Review of Characteristics for Utility for Risk Assessment and Management Decisions u Defensibility – use consistent with other scientific evidence u Accounting for data quality, variability, and uncertainty

Potential Future Actions  Continue to hone the list of characteristics and the definitions for each one  Tie in with data quality definitions  Develop a written document  Risk assessors and managers  Peer reviewers

All This in the Context of a Project with Well-defined Goals and a Well-defined Scope