The Oklahoma Mesonet: Creating a Multi-Purpose Network Ronald L. Elliott Biosystems & Agricultural Engineering Dept. Oklahoma State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Collaborative Spaces in Libraries
Advertisements

Ken Crawford, Program Director COOP Modernization and Integrated Surface Observing Systems NWS Office of Science and Technology
How to Work with Government Building & Maintaining Relationships.
Southeast Climate Consortium Extension Program C. W. Fraisse, J. Bellow, N. Breuer, V. Cabrera, J. W. Jones, K. Ingram, and G. Hoogenboom.
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Rate Plan. Value Story When asked, our customers identify the following topics as ways MidAmerican Energy provides value – Emergency Response.
Understanding Oklahoma’s Weather and Climate: The Data, the Tools, and the Technology Jeffrey B. Basara Director of Research Oklahoma Climatological Survey.
The Application of In-Situ Observations to Weather, Water, and Climate Issues Ken Crawford Vice Administrator Korea Meteorological Administration WMO Technical.
The Oklahoma Mesonet: Why We Did It & Lessons Learned (Its Value to the Citizens of Oklahoma) Chris Fiebrich, Manager The Oklahoma Mesonet Oklahoma Climatological.
Feedback Mechanisms From Human Activities: Discoveries Using Data From The Oklahoma Mesonet Ken Crawford, Director Oklahoma Climatological Survey Regents’
PUBLIC LAND DISPOSITON MAPPING SDW & ALTALIS BACKGROUND - DIDS.
SNOW SURVEY, SNOTEL (SNOwpack TELemetry) & SCAN (Soil Climate Analysis Network) Presented at NWS Cold Regions Workshop November , 2004.
Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop Bill Proenza Regional Director National Weather Service Southern Region Tallahassee March 9, 2004.
CAVIAR – Continuum Absorption by Visible and Infrared Radiation and its Atmospheric Relevance How on schedule are we? Keith Shine Department of Meteorology,
Climate Services Provided by the Colorado Climate Center Mark Losleben and Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Atmospheric Science Department Colorado.
Mesonet and Drought Update. What’s new? What’s new? What’s the current drought situation? What’s next?
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
How the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts (WICCI) serves as a model to solve contemporary science and policy issues ILS 372 Carolyn Rumery.
North Carolina Team North Carolina Department of Public Safety Office of State CIO North Carolina Department of Commerce Criminal Justice Information Network.
Overview and Next Steps 8/27/2015.
Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network (AEMN) Established in 1991 Housed on UGA Griffin Campus in Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, College.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HYDROLOGY Overall Goal – from purpose statement: “To improve the availability and reliability of (surface water) information needed for.
Field Project Planning, Operations and Data Services Jim Moore, EOL Field Project Services (FPS) Mike Daniels, EOL Computing, Data and Software (CDS) Facility.
Training Module 3. What You’ll Learn In This Module Conservation Districts’ State and Federal partners Districts’ non-profit partners Other organizations.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) Presentation for the ITS America 2006 Annual Meeting May 9,
Increasing the capacity of higher education in East Africa through the creation of a Consortium of African and United States Educators (CAUSE) in the focus.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.
The use of the Mesonet in Oklahoma agriculture Clint Dotson Precision Ag April 16, 2007.
NCAR Annual Budget Review October 8, 2007 Tim Killeen NCAR Director.
Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers OFCM Workshop Summaries Lt Col Rob Rizza Assistant Federal Coordinator for USAF/USA Affairs.
STATE WATER EFFICIENCY AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM Jenny Lester Moffitt Deputy Secretary.
James H. Butler, Acting Director NOAA Strategic Planning Moving NOAA into the 21 st Century Third GOES-R User Conference May 2004, Boulder, Colorado.
Advancing Cooperative Conservation. 4C’s Team An interagency effort established in early 2003 by Department of the Interior Secretary Gale Norton Advance.
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 CISM Vision:
Mid-Atlantic Mesonet Consortium Founded through the State Climate Offices at: the University of Delaware and Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
COOP Modernization: Building NOAA’S Environmental Real-time Observation Network (NERON) Tim Ross Integrated Surface Observing Systems NWS Office of Science.
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Tim G. Schulte, P.E. Richland County Engineer.
` DIVISION OF NEARSHORE RESEARCH TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-CORPUS CHRISTI Key Features:  Located on oil production platforms 3 and 15 nautical miles from Port.
The IEM-KCCI-NWS Partnership: Working Together to Save Lives and Increase Weather Data Distribution.
1 Review of CPUC Role with the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program on Natural Gas Briefing for California Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications.
1 NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction (NCWCP) June 17, 2005 Briefing for Dr. David A. Sampson Deputy Secretary of Commerce.
Hazardous Weather Forecasts and Warnings Overview: Forecast Division Jack Kain (NSSL) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
FUTURE OF LAND IMAGING U.S. Land Imaging Needs & Long-Term Continuity Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI-IWG) U.S. Group on Earth Observations.
The State Climatologist Program and a National Climate Services Initiative Mark A. Shafer Oklahoma Climatological Survey University of Oklahoma.
COOP Modernization: Building The National Cooperative Mesonet October 2003.
Observation Data Requirements for Surface Transportation Dr. Jim O’Sullivan National Weather Service – Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services NOAA.
Iowa Environmental Mesonet National Weather Association Conference March 22, 2002 Dennis Todey Iowa State University.
Statewide Monitoring of the Mesoscale Environment: A Technical Update on the Oklahoma Mesonet Ken Crawford and Renee McPherson Oklahoma Climatological.
1 State Broadband Data and Development Ohio GIS Conference September 18, 2009 Katrina Flory Ohio Department of Administrative Services Office of Information.
The NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction Project Developing a Partnership to Provide a New High Technology Research Center A Briefing to Governor.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Uncertainty in Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion (ATD) Models Setting the.
INDONESIA NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION Dr. A. Sarwiyana Sastratenaya Director, Center for.
1 SBIR/STTR Overview Wang Yongqiang. 2 Federal SBIR/STTR Program ‣ A +$2Billion funding program set-aside for small businesses seeking to early stage.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
NOAA Climate Program Office Richard D. Rosen Senior Advisor for Climate Research CICS Science Meeting College Park, MD September 9, 2010.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEDIMENTATION Proposal to become a subgroup under the ACWI September 9, 2003.
The Oklahoma Climatological Survey & The Oklahoma Mesonet Mark Shafer Director of Climate Information Oklahoma Climatological Survey February 20, 2004.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
PLANNING FOR A NOAA SCIENCE CENTER June 28, 2000.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
Mike Crimmins Dept. of Soil, Water, & Env. Science & Arizona Cooperative Extension The University of Arizona Mike Crimmins Dept. of Soil, Water, & Env.
Update on the South Dakota Digital Cadastral Initiative
The NWS and Climate Offices
(6-8 November 2018, Beijing, China)
Presentation transcript:

The Oklahoma Mesonet: Creating a Multi-Purpose Network Ronald L. Elliott Biosystems & Agricultural Engineering Dept. Oklahoma State University

Topics To Be Addressed What is the Oklahoma Mesonet? How did the Oklahoma Mesonet come to be?

What is the Oklahoma Mesonet? A multi-purpose, statewide, environmental monitoring network A unique information infrastructure emphasizing value-added applications An active partnership between Oklahoma State University and the University of Oklahoma A successful model for inter-agency cooperation A valuable resource that is meeting important state needs A state-of-the-art network that is recognized nationally and internationally

The Physical Network

Remote Stations (data collection) 115 Mesonet stations –at least one in each of Oklahoma’s 77 counties –average station spacing = approx. 30 km 42 USDA-ARS Micronet stations (reduced set of sensors) –research watershed near Chickasha –average station spacing = approx. 5 km

Self-reliant, 2-way communications Solar powered Data storage capacity: from ~5 to nearly 30 days Self-Contained Sites

Variables Measured at All Mesonet Stations Air temperature (1.5 m) Relative humidity (1.5 m) Rainfall Atmospheric pressure Solar radiation Wind speed & direction (10 m) Soil temperature under bare soil and sod (10 cm)

Supplemental Measurements (~100 of the 115 stations) Air 9 m Wind 2 m Sod soil 5 and 30 cm Bare soil 5 cm Soil 2 to 4 depths (58 stations have all 4 soil moisture depths)

“OASIS” Measurements Research emphasis (surface energy balance) 90 “standard” sites 10 “super” sites

Equipment Deployed and Maintained More than 3000 sensors More than 1800 dataloggers/ radios/power systems/etc.

Maintenance Activities in 2001 Conducted 430 standardized “routine” site visits Acquired 4800 digital site photos Calibrated 1475 instruments in the laboratory Resolved 950 instrument “trouble tickets”

Communications Network (data transmission) Line-of-sight radio to/from OLETS Oklahoma Law Enforcement Telecommunications System –reliable –high bandwidth –two-way communications OLETS to/from Mesonet computers

Central Computers (data processing & sharing) Data ingest and “hole filling” software –1.15 million observations per day –99.8% archiving efficiency in 2001 Extensive data quality assurance routines More than 150 unique web-based products ~63,000 files per day ~1,500 web accounts ~33 million web hits in 2001

Oklahoma Climatological Survey Mesonet’s operational home State agency based on the OU campus in Norman Legislative mandate to acquire, process, and disseminate climate and weather information for use by the state's citizens

Topics To Be Addressed What is the Oklahoma Mesonet? How did the Oklahoma Mesonet come to be?

The Mesonet’s Timeline 1980’s Pre-funding phase Design-and-build phase 1994-present Operational phase

Early to Mid 1980’s Stillwater (OSU) –Established ad-hoc committee on Agro- Meteorological Systems –Sought to improve weather data availability for agricultural applications Norman (NWS, OU, NSSL) –Tulsa flood of 1984 stimulated thinking –Proposed concept of a statewide mesonetwork

1987 Proponents in Stillwater and Norman became aware of each other’s interests Informal, cooperative, working team was quickly established

August 1988 Open meeting in Norman to present the Oklahoma Mesonetwork concept Preliminary proposal discussed Many organizations represented Very positive feedback

1988 – 1990 Refined the proposal Approached the Governor’s office Eventually were awarded $2 million in oil overcharge funds (via the Oklahoma Dept. of Commerce)

The Mesonet’s Timeline 1980’s Pre-funding phase Design-and-build phase 1994-present Operational phase

The Steering Committee 6 individuals with varied backgrounds Shared governance (OU & OSU) Empowered by university administration Meetings as needed Consensus decisions Prepared agendas, minutes, reports Shared vision and close working relationships

Current SC Members Ken Crawford (meteorologist) Ron Elliott (agricultural engineer) Howard Johnson (climatologist) Steve Stadler (geographer) Dave Stensrud (meteorologist) Al Sutherland (horticulturalist)

Previous SC Members Gerrit Cuperus (entomologist) Chuck Doswell (meteorologist) Jim Duthie (plant pathologist) Mike Eilts (meteorologist)

The Mesonet Manager Oversees day-to-day activities Technical & managerial responsibilities Reports to SC & OCS leadership

Mesonet Managers (listed chronologically) Fred Brock Tim Hughes Scott Richardson Chris Fiebrich

The Planning Subcommittees Helped ensure that good decisions were made Encouraged a sense of ownership in the system Were mission oriented Had a reasonably short life Interacted with related subcommittees Made recommendations to the steering committee

Subcommittee Themes Site Standards Site Selection Out-Year Funding Station Maintenance Quality Assurance Data Management Products/Dissemination Parameter Selection Sensor Specification User Fees/Data Sharing

Stakeholder Representation on Subcommittees Oklahoma State University University of Oklahoma U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Geological Survey USDA Agricultural Research Service USDA Soil Conservation Service National Severe Storms Laboratory National Weather Service Forecast Office NEXRAD Operational Support Facility Oklahoma Water Resources Board Stillwater Emergency Operations Center Private-sector meteorology

Retrospective Observations on Subcommittees All provided valuable input to the Steering Committee Subcommittee work led to enhanced awareness and buy-in by stakeholders Some topics were front-burner issues early on (site standards, site selection, etc.) Other topics tended to receive more focus at a later date (out-year funding, user fees, etc.)

Three Planning Forums April – June, 1991 Stillwater, Norman, Oklahoma City “an opportunity to learn of current plans for the Oklahoma Mesonet and to contribute towards its final design”

Some Technical Milestones March 1991 –Began data communications testing December 1991 –Installed first towers at field sites April 1992 –Established sensor calibration lab December 1992 –Received first FCC radio licenses July 1993 –Installed last of the original 108 stations

Some Programmatic Milestones September 1991 –OSU hired agricultural meteorologist (J. D. Carlson) June 1992 –NSF funded OCS’s EARTHSTORM educational outreach program August 1992 –Micronet cooperative agreement signed with USDA-ARS October 1993 –Installed first public display cabinet

In 3 short years, the Mesonet team had …. Hired staff with a variety of expertise Found and leased (at no cost) 108 field sites Decided on the variables to be measured Performed in-house system integration Selected, purchased & installed sensors Developed & tested a data communications system Instituted maintenance & preliminary quality assurance procedures Developed value-added products and means of dissemination Stayed within budget!

The Mesonet’s Timeline 1980’s Pre-funding phase Design-and-build phase 1994-present Operational phase

Over the last 8 years ….. Evolution and maturation of procedures related to: –Site & equipment maintenance –Sensor calibration –Data ingest & processing –Data quality assurance –Software development –Serving the end user

Over the last 8 years …. Considerable effort has been expended in securing and solidifying operational funding.

Primary Funding Sources (for network operation) The Noble Foundation ( ) State agencies ( ) OU and OSU (1994-present) Federal partnerships (1994-present) Grants and contracts (1994-present) Legislature/Regents (1996-present) User fees (1996-present)

The vision of a multi-purpose network has been realized …. –Weather forecasting –Emergency management –Agriculture –Education –Research –Water resources –Energy management –Law enforcement & public safety –Transportation –Recreation –Etc.

The Oklahoma Mesonet is now: A proven resource On a firm financial footing Viewed as a model Poised for even greater service

For the Mesonet team, it’s been a long, challenging, exciting, and extremely rewarding journey.