Using Fuel Receipts to Determine Routes of Travel Case history in Oklahoma.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IFTA/IRP Audit Workshop Improving your Audit Process IFTA/IRP Opening Conference.
Advertisements

IFTA/IRP Audit Workshop Improving your Audit Process IFTA Closing/IRP Exit Conference.
What Constitutes an Audit? Presenters: Diane Robichaud-Cormier, NB Terry Hing, ON Michele Snow, ON.
REPORT WRITING Michael Buccola (IL) Renée Kyser (AL) Tom Sullivan (IN)
2014 IFTA / IRP AUDIT WORKSHOP Appendix 1 – Return Model for Dual-Fuel Vehicles Assumptions: Miles Fuel - Diesel (gallons) Fuel - LNG (gallons)Total Fuel.
IFTA Non-Receipted Fuel Adjustments Presentation for IFTA ABM August, 2013 Reno, NV.
Essentials of Fund 73 WASBO Accounting Seminar March, 2009 Presented by: Kathy Guralski, School Finance Auditor Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
IFTA, Inc. Clearinghouse 2009 Audit Workshop. Interjurisdictional Audit Reports The Interjurisdictional Audit Report page provides a mechanism for the.
IFTA / IRP Audit Process Mileage Audit
GPS Based Reporting An Industry Perspective By Thomas Rushfeldt.
Arizona Department of Transportation IFTA RECORD KEEPING REQUIRMENTS.
SADC/ICART Finance Rules European Commission (EC) Funding Mark Parnell Natural Resources Institute University of Greenwich.
Kansas SMART (Statewide Management, Accounting, and Reporting Tool) Workflow for General Ledger.
1 Motor Carrier Registration Motor Fuels Tax Division Rev. 08/09.
KC Transportation Inc. v. Dep’t. of Treasury, 2013 Mich. App. LEXIS 1197 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013) By: Sukanya Mukherjee Comptroller of Maryland.
IRP 1005/ IFTA P500 Adequacy of Records. Evaluating Vehicle Movement The source documents must contain the necessary details to trace vehicle movement.
Auditing Distance Michele Deering-Volz Maxime Dubuc Carl Robinson.
Surveying Electronic Systems in the Marketplace – What is the marketplace? – Characteristics of current systems. – How do we audit these systems? – How.
1 Using GPS data for IFTA and IRP. 2 Objective Controls in an IT Environment GPS – How it Works? Applying Knowledge Gained to Future Audits.
Motor Fuels IFTA/Intrastate E-File
Diabetes Educator Sector Leadership Forum 2004 Chapter Finances Presentation Linda Aumell, RD, CDE DES National Treasurer.
Welcome to: Breakout Session #3. Hodgepodge With Dawn Lietz – NV Richard Wagner – KY Audrey Martel - NH.
COMPLETING AN IFTA TAX RETURN
8/8/20151 Audit Planning IFTA / IRP 2009 Annual Audit Workshop Gerald Jackson (WY) Leroy Johnson (SC) Mark Byrne (NE)
1 IFTA / IRP 2010 Annual Audit Workshop Breakout Session # 1 – Part 2 Distance – It’s a Long, Long Road; Auditing That Newfangled GPS. Distance – It’s.
Ballot 371 IRP Audit Rewrite A Change is Coming!.
1  Distance – It’s a Long, Long Road; Dealing With Those Pesky Gaps.  Distance – It’s a Long, Long Road; Dealing With Those Pesky Gaps.  Derrick Rumph.
IFTA/IRP AUDIT WORKSHOP 2010 FUEL TAX EVASION DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES.
Recordkeeping in the 21 st Century Reflections on …Where we've been …How far we've come …Where we are headed in the future Discover the intricacies of.
2007 IFTA BALLOTS & A CONCESUS BOARD INTERPRETATION.
Household Goods Carriers “Household Goods Carrier” means a carrier handling: (a)personal effects and property used or to be used in a dwelling; (b)furniture,
Chapter 7 Quiz will be on next Tuesday Nov 4..  Opening an Account ◦ Let’s say that account number for your Asset accounts are: ◦ Bank 101 ◦ Bookkeeping.
PRESENTATION OF IRP BALLOTS 2008 IFTA / IRP Audit Workshop.
A Generic Model of Motor- Carrier Fuel Optimization Yoshinori Suzuki.
AUDIT REPORTS 12 th Annual IFTA and IRP Audit Workshop San Antonio, TX February 2-4, 2010.
1 Auditor 101 AnnMarie Chamberlain (MA) Gerald Jackson (WY) Thom Rabaglia (WI) Mark Byrne (NE)
To Ping or Not to Ping An exercise working with a large volume of electronic data.
2010 IFTA & IRP AUDIT WORKSHOP TOWN HALL MEETING MODERATORS: JAY STARLING (AL) THOM RABAGLIA (WI) ____________________________________.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
Consumer Taxation Program Branch IFTA Fraud Part 1 - Administrative Focus September 22, 2005.
IFTA ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING DISCUSSION OF IFTA FULL TRACK BALLOTS AND
ACTIVITY IN A NON-REGISTERED JURISDICTION During the audit, you find that an apportioned & IFTA-decaled unit traveled in a jurisdiction that the carrier.
Standards vs. Procedures  Auditing standards differ from auditing procedures. Procedures are acts that the auditor performs during the course of an.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc. IFTA, Inc. Board of Trustees Report.
Presented by Anthony Madsen – Washington Diana Kay – Florida Bob Gattinella – Rhode Island Stacey Hammock - Wyoming Auditor 101_301.
1 IFTA / IRP 2010 Annual Audit Workshop Breakout Session # 1 – Part 3 Distance – It’s a Long, Long Road; Records ! What Records ? Distance – It’s a Long,
International Fuel Tax Agreement An Overview. What is IFTA? Fuel Tax Collection Agreement between the 48 contiguous states. Non- IFTA = Yukon Territory,
RUNNING ON EMPTY. Presented By Dave Nicholson - OK Audrey Martel - NH Terry Hing - ON.
August 12-13San Antonio, Texas 2015 Annual Business Meeting IFTA AUDIT COMMITTEE 2015 Annual IFTA Business Meeting Audit Committee Report Presented by.
Raising Fuel cost. We will discuss…..  Problem size and implications  What carriers can and are doing  Fuel optimizer – exercise  Fuel contract –
Preparing for an Audit Roy De Lauder CPPM, CF NOVA Chapter General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems.
 (i) has two Axles and a gross Vehicle weight or registered gross Vehicle weight in excess of 26,000 pounds (11, kilograms), or  (ii) has three.
Chapter 8: Investigating Concealment © 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
The Audit Toolkit - Empowering Employers To Take Control© The audit toolkit was developed to help employers focus on the key points of preparing for an.
ABC Trucking Case Study Applying an audit plan from the source documentation.
IFTA BALLOT #3 Overview of changes. Overview of Changes The new Language in Ballot #3 introduces 5 new requirements and defines “should” as a conditional.
Audit Plan ELECTRONIC. PLANNING Auditor Independence Training and Proficiency Professional Care Audit program Working Paper Documentation.
IFTA BALLOT #3 Overview of changes. Overview of Changes The new Language in Ballot #3 introduces 5 new requirements and defines “should” as a conditional.
IRP/IFTA Adequacy of Records IRP International Registration Plan IFTA - P530 IFTA Procedures Manual.
ELD Mandate What You Need To Know
Auditor 101 AnnMarie Chamberlain (MA) Gerald Jackson (WY)
Record keeping from an auditor; and industry perspective - GPS.
By: Trina Kluever Pauli (WI) Ghyslaine Lepage (QC) Krystal Miller (NH)
Alternative Fuels Where are they?.
ACCOUNTING EQUATION.
Auditing with GPS and on-board recording devices
Auditor 101 AnnMarie Chamberlain (MA) Gerald Jackson (WY)
IFTA EXEMPTION DATABASE
Joint Audit Subcommittee Overview
GPS - Standardization / ELD / Audit Issues
Presentation transcript:

Using Fuel Receipts to Determine Routes of Travel Case history in Oklahoma

Oklahoma Case History Recently an audit was conducted by Oklahoma under both IRP (2003 and 2004) and IFTA (2 nd quarter – 4 th quarter 2004). Beginning and Ending Odometers were not maintained. (Odometer readings were made available from vehicle service records after protesting.) Routes of travel were not maintained. The company operated about 25 company owned and 25 owner operated vehicles. Company owned vehicles were equipped with GPS devices. Owner Operator equipment were not so equipped. (Longitude/Latitude points were not provided during the original audit)

Oklahoma Case (cont.) For purposes of audit, three company owned vehicles and three owner operator vehicles were selected for sampling. Fuel was audited and verified. Fuel was accepted and no adjustments made. A distance tool was used to determine that minimum distance was reported. When reviewing the sample results, there were several jurisdictions were no distance had been reported but fuel had been purchased. The majority of these occurrences were in the western jurisdictions. One such route was from Kansas to Nevada, near Reno. ( This happened quite often, so we’re not so sure that Reno wasn’t the destination.)

Oklahoma Case (cont.) Without routing information, what did the auditor do? Since no routing information had been provided (Longitude/latitude points were not made available during the original audit.), the auditor used what was available to him to determine the routes, Fuel Receipts.

Oklahoma Case (cont.) After adjusting the routes for fuel stops, audit findings were issued. For both IRP and IFTA, the records were deemed inadequate for audit. *IFTA – Results were issued with a reduced MPG *IRP – Results were issued with credits denied.

Oklahoma Case cont. As a result of the findings, the Company protested the results. More information was provided. *Longitude/Latitude points *Odometer readings from vehicle service records. *We also verified that the GPS was not in service until after June This affected the IRP findings as far as credit denial.

Oklahoma Case (cont.) What did Oklahoma do next?

Oklahoma Case (cont.) First the company was required to self audit all vehicles for the 4 th quarter They were to use Longitude/Latitude points were available. (company equipment) Use all stops, including fuel stops, when Long/lat were not available. (owner/operators)

Oklahoma Case (cont) What did Oklahoma do?

Oklahoma Case (cont.) After receiving the self audit data, we: *reviewed the previous sample units; *compared the audit sample to the self- audit data; *used a distance tool to run the long/lat points and compared the resulting distances.

Oklahoma Case (cont.) What did we find?

Oklahoma Case (cont.) The company did not use the long/lat points for company owned equipment, none the less, the company self audited distances and the distances using fuel stops closely resembled the distances obtained from the long/lat points. Some of the difference was attributed to routing through the nearest post office.

Oklahoma Case (cont.) What does this mean?

Oklahoma Case (cont) This means that fuel receipts can be used to help determine routes of travel. Which, in this case, we were able to confirm for units that had the GPS system.

Oklahoma Case Summary In this case, we were able to determine routes of travel based on fuel stops. Because the GPS system was only available on the company owned equipment and was not in use until after June 2003, records for the revised findings were still deemed inadequate. Beginning and ending odometer readings were not maintained. The company was able to provide odometer readings from vehicle service records which we were able to use to validate that the reported MPG was higher than the MPG determined through audit.

Oklahoma Case Questions/Discussions?