HOMEWORK Donald Snead Department of Educational Leadership Kathleen Burriss Department of Elementary and Special Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Dr Maria Giatsi Clausen
The Relationship Between Participation in High School Athletics and Academic Achievement Nora E. O’Donnell.
Legal and Ethical Issues
Physical Fitness and Wellness for Children
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Why Student Perceptions Matter Rob Ramsdell, Co-founder April 2015.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
AN EVALUATION OF THE EIGHTH GRADE ALGEBRA PROGRAM IN GRAND BLANC COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 8 th Grade Algebra 1A.
Name : Muhammad Iskandar Bin Nordin Student ID : Course : EDU 555 Curriculum and Instruction Prepared for : En. Mohamad Hisyam Ismail Name :
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool “Using the PECAT”
PERCENTAGE AS RELATIONAL SCHEME: PERCENTAGE CALCULATIONS LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A.F. Díaz-Cárdenas, H.A. Díaz-Furlong, A. Díaz-Furlong, M.R. Sankey-García.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Identification and Service Options for Gifted Students.
Text Complexity the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts, Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects 3-5 Learning Community.
Are We making a Difference
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
TEMPLATE DESIGN © The Homework Effect: Does Homework Help or Harm Students? Katherine Field EdD Candidate, Department.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Evaluating a Research Report
Students’ and Faculty’s Perceptions of Assessment at Qassim College of Medicine Abdullah Alghasham - M. Nour-El-Din – Issam Barrimah Acknowledgment: This.
EDU 8603 Day 6. What do the following numbers mean?
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Welcome to Fifth Grade! TONIGHT’S TOPICSTopics for Future Conversations in the Fall Social growth and development in fifth grade Shifts in academic expectations.
West Central Community School District Performance Document: Formative Evaluation Tool By John Johnson ortheast Iowa Charter School Northeast Charter School.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Department of Chemistry Education How to Assess Materials which Enhance the Popularity and Relevance of Science Education.
How Effective Are One-to-One Tutoring programs in Reading for Elementary Students at Risk for Reading Failure? A Meta-Analysis of the Intervention Research.
Criteria for selection of a data collection instrument. 1.Practicality of the instrument: -Concerns its cost and appropriateness for the study population.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
Gayle Thieman, Portland State University Susan Lenski, Portland State University National Council for Social Studies CUFA December 1, 2011.
An Introduction to the Research Process Dr Vicente Chua Reyes, Jr.
A Q u a l i t a t i v e S t u d y : T h e N a r r a t i v e A p p r o a c h The Importance of Literacy For a Cohort of First Year Doctoral Students.
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Andrea C. Privratsky, M.S.E., William Frankenberger, Ph.D. Teacher Attitudes on the use of the Responsive Classroom.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
PARENT NIGHT Working Together To Achieve What’s Best For Your Child.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
Researching Technology in South Dakota Classrooms Dr. Debra Schwietert TIE Presentation April 2010 Research Findings.
LINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Parent Presentation Paul Martin.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
One Piece of the Puzzle “Helping you, help your child complete their puzzle of life.”
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Research and Evaluation
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Compilation of Slides for Data Measures
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Highly Capable Education
Parent Discussion Meeting
Presentation transcript:

HOMEWORK Donald Snead Department of Educational Leadership Kathleen Burriss Department of Elementary and Special Education 1

Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding the Motivation and Effectiveness of Homework 2

Definition of Homework  A historical component of children’s learning and teachers’ instruction  Defined as any task assigned by to complete out- of-school (Cooper, 1989) (Cooper, 1989) 3

Questions about Homework  How assign?  How use grades? 4

Scheduling Homework  Administrator mandate  Parents’ expectations  Family schedules full  Children need help 5

Past Research Inconsistencies  Yes, positive relationship between homework & academic achievement  But inconsistencies exist for children, parents, and teachers (Cooper, Robinson, Patall, 2006) (Cooper, Robinson, Patall, 2006) 6

Contemporary Family Issues  Single family households/two working parents  Additional extracurricular activities  More hours in school  Increases in rates of childhood obesity levels  Increases in media addictions  Increases in restaurant eating 7

The Research Problem  Lack of naturalistic data in literature  Finding the teacher voice 8

Literature Review  No consensus  Administrators (test scores, school policy)  Parents’ expectations  Form of communication/involvement  Improve students’ understanding (Van Voorhis, 2003) (Van Voorhis, 2003) 9

Contradictions in Literature  Cooper, et. al (2006) homework influences academic achievement homework influences academic achievement  Kralovec & Buell (2000) homework/waste of time homework/waste of time quality of professional development/after-school programs quality of professional development/after-school programs 10

Homework is Instructional/Non- Instructional  Instructional Complete school assignmentsComplete school assignments Drill/practiceDrill/practice ReviewReview Test preparationTest preparation  Non-instructional: Community involvementCommunity involvement Political & personal developmentPolitical & personal development CommunicationCommunication 11

Homework as Dilemma  One-size fits all  Differentiate assignments  Parents’ ability to help  Students’ ability to interpret and transfer learning  Appropriate timing 12

Past Homework Literature  A snapshot of what has already been learned  Most studies quantitative  Few qualitative studies from perceptional standpoint  Teacher voice data limited 13

Theoretical Framework  Informational Processing Learning as transferring information Learning as transferring information Cognitive control processes Cognitive control processes Adequate student understanding necessary for transfer Adequate student understanding necessary for transfer (Atkinson & Shiffin, 1968) (Atkinson & Shiffin, 1968) 14

Research Questions  What are the reasons elementary school teachers assign homework?  Are there any differences between early childhood and elementary teachers’ perceptions regarding homework?  How do teachers use homework in the overall evaluation process of their students? 15

Research Questions  To what degree does homework involve the use of technology or specific tools that are not provided by the school?  To what degree does a district implement homework policy when such is mandated by administrators?

About the Study  Participants - 90 Volunteer Teachers: 2 nd and 4 th grade teachers (47 and 43 respectively) 2 nd and 4 th grade teachers (47 and 43 respectively)  Instrument: Seven item open- ended questionnaire Seven item open- ended questionnaire Analysis Analysis Compare/Contrast Compare/Contrast 17

Homework Survey  Open-Ended Survey: Why do you give homework? Why do you give homework? If homework is mandated, who requires it? If homework is mandated, who requires it? How much time do you anticipate students spending on homework per week? How much time do you anticipate students spending on homework per week? Do you assign homework that requires technology (internet, word processing, spreadsheets)? Do you assign homework that requires technology (internet, word processing, spreadsheets)? 18

Homework Survey  Open-Ended Survey: How do you assess homework? How do you assess homework? To what degree (percentage) is homework included in the overall grades? To what degree (percentage) is homework included in the overall grades? Additional thoughts on homework. Additional thoughts on homework.

Study Validity  Piloted the survey with a group previous to the onset of the study.  Two researchers and a graduate assistant analyzed the participants’ responses.  Constant comparison process determined each of the three independent coding efforts elicited the same categories for each question. (Le Compte & Preissle, 1993; McMillan, & Wergin, 2006) (Le Compte & Preissle, 1993; McMillan, & Wergin, 2006) 20

Study Validity  Two researchers provided text examples to justify category labels.  Theoretical validity is affirmed through earlier discussions of informational processing and developmentally appropriate practices. (Le Compte & Preissle, 1993; McMillan, & Wergin, 2006) (Le Compte & Preissle, 1993; McMillan, & Wergin, 2006)

Five Layers of Analysis  Constant Comparison Analysis: Layers one, two and three Layers one, two and three Two researchers Two researchers One graduate student One graduate student Fourth layer Fourth layer Two researchers provided text examples to justify category labelsTwo researchers provided text examples to justify category labels Fifth layer Fifth layer Researchers looked for consistent/inconsistency patterns within individual teacher responsesResearchers looked for consistent/inconsistency patterns within individual teacher responses 22

Study Results

Question 1: Why do you give homework?  Several instructional/non-instructional reasons: Practice Practice Reinforcement Reinforcement Review Review Communication Communication Responsibility Responsibility Multiples of the aforementioned categories Multiples of the aforementioned categories 24

Question 2: If homework is mandated who requires it?  Administrators  Parents  District  Other  Not assign  Collapsed “other”, “Multiples”, & “Not assigned”  65 of 90 reported homework as a teacher choice 25

Question 3: How much time do you anticipate students spending on homework per week?  Most teachers reported a range; therefore, a spreadsheet displays the lower and upper limits time required. Example: Teacher A lower limit 1.25 hours to upper Example: Teacher A lower limit 1.25 hours to upper limit 1.67 limit 1.67 Teacher B lower limit 1.33 hours to upper Teacher B lower limit 1.33 hours to upper limit 1.33 limit

Question 4: Do you assign homework that requires technology?  Overwhelmingly teachers reported they do not 27

Question 5: How do you assess homework?  Analysis teased out five sub-categories Teacher— sole grader Teacher— sole grader Student— sole grader Student— sole grader Teacher and student— teacher provide answers while students checked work or teacher just checked/looked over with student Teacher and student— teacher provide answers while students checked work or teacher just checked/looked over with student No graded— teacher did not check homework No graded— teacher did not check homework No Response— teacher did not indicate procedure No Response— teacher did not indicate procedure 28

Question 6: To what degree is homework included in the overall grades?  Analysis teased out six categories Not counted or 0% Not counted or 0% 1% > 10% 1% > 10% 11% > 15% 11% > 15% 16% > 20% 16% > 20% 21% > 25% 21% > 25% Other amounts Other amounts 29

Question 7: Additional thoughts on homework  Most teachers did not respond Subcategories included: Subcategories included: ResponsibilityResponsibility ReinforcementReinforcement StandardStandard ParentsParents PracticePractice Not finished in schoolNot finished in school Relevant readingRelevant reading On homework givenOn homework given 30

Conclusions about Homework  Variety of reasons for assigning homework Confusion Confusion Teacher inconsistency Teacher inconsistency Purpose not well defined Purpose not well defined (Findings concur will Banks, 2007)(Findings concur will Banks, 2007) 31

Conclusions about Homework  Time spent/week  Second graders.33 to 3.5 hours  Fourth graders.05 to 7.0 hours  No second/two fourth grade teachers indicated “no homework.”  Graded Fourth grade teachers who did not grade homework and required more than two hours per week, included the grade considerably more in over all (10%<) Fourth grade teachers who did not grade homework and required more than two hours per week, included the grade considerably more in over all (10%<) Second grade teacher assigning more than two hours per week, did not include in overall grade Second grade teacher assigning more than two hours per week, did not include in overall grade 32

The Data State…  Greatest number of responses indicated skill as reasons for homework. “More is better” “More is better” Differentiated learning may be lost Differentiated learning may be lost Teachers inconsistent with respect to grade, time, & goal Teachers inconsistent with respect to grade, time, & goal 33

Implications of Study  Process & product of homework may be inconsistent  Historical, but not as effective  Differentiation not evidenced  Teachers’ inconsistency undermine process  Homework did not extend learning

HOMEWORK Donald Snead Department of Educational Leadership Kathleen Burriss Department of Elementary and Special Education 35